Global Research
THE 9/11 READER. The September 11, 2001 Terror Attacks
Note to Readers: Remember to bookmark this page for future reference.
Please Forward the GR I-Book far and wide. Post it on Facebook.
Please Forward the GR I-Book far and wide. Post it on Facebook.
[scroll down for I-BOOK Table of Contents]
*
GLOBAL RESEARCH ONLINE
INTERACTIVE READER SERIES
GR I-BOOK No. 7
GR I-BOOK No. 7
THE 9/11 READER
The September 11, 2001 Terror Attacks
9/11 Truth: Revealing the Lies, Commemorating the 9/11 Tragedy
Michel Chossudovsky (Editor)
August 2012
The 911/ Reader is part of Global Research’s Online Interactive I-Book Reader, which brings
together, in the form of chapters, a collection of Global Research
feature articles, including debate and analysis, on a broad theme or
subject matter. To consult our Online Interactive I-Book Reader Series, click here.
INTRODUCTION
The tragic events of
September 11, 2001 constitute a fundamental landmark in American
history. a decisive watershed, a breaking point. Millions of people have
been misled regarding the causes and consequences of 9/11.
September 11 2001 opens up an era of crisis, upheaval and militarization of American society.
A far-reaching overhaul of US military doctrine was launched in the wake of 9/11.
Endless wars of aggression under the humanitarian cloak of “counter-terrorism” were set in motion.
9/11 was also a
stepping stone towards the relentless repeal of civil liberties, the
militarization of law enforcement and the inauguration of “Police State
USA”.
September 11, 2001
marks the onslaught of the “Global War on Terrorism” (GWOT), used as a
pretext and a justification by the US and its NATO allies to carry out a
“war without borders”, a global war of conquest.
At eleven o’clock, on the morning of
September 11, the Bush administration had already announced that Al
Qaeda was responsible for the attacks on the World Trade Center (WTC)
and the Pentagon. This assertion was made prior to the conduct of an
indepth police investigation.
CIA Director George Tenet stated
that same morning that Osama bin Laden had the capacity to plan
“multiple attacks with little or no warning.”
Secretary of State Colin Powell
called the attacks “an act of war” and President Bush confirmed in an
evening televised address to the Nation that he would “make no
distinction between the terrorists who committed these acts and those
who harbor them”.
Former CIA Director James Woolsey,
without mentioning Afghanistan, pointed his finger at “state
sponsorship,” implying the complicity of one or more foreign
governments. In the words of former National Security Adviser, Lawrence
Eagleburger, “I think we will show when we get attacked like this, we
are terrible in our strength and in our retribution.”
That same evening at 9:30 pm, a “War
Cabinet” was formed integrated by a select number of top intelligence
and military advisors. And at 11:00 pm, at the end of that historic
meeting at the White House, the “War on Terrorism” was officially
launched.
The tragic events of 9/11 provided
the required justification to wage war on Afghanistan on “humanitarian
grounds”, with the full support of World public opinion and the
endorsement of the “international community”. Several prominent
“progressive” intellectuals made a case for “retaliation against
terrorism”, on moral and ethical grounds. The “just cause” military
doctrine (jus ad bellum) was accepted and upheld at face value as a
legitimate response to 9/11.
In the wake of 9/11, the antiwar
movement was completely isolated. The trade unions and civil society
organizations had swallowed the media lies and government propaganda.
They had accepted a war of retribution against Afghanistan, an
impoverished country in Central Asia of 30 million people.
The myth of the “outside enemy” and
the threat of “Islamic terrorists” was the cornerstone of the Bush
administration’s military doctrine, used as a pretext to invade
Afghanistan and Iraq, not to mention the repeal of civil liberties and
constitutional government in America.
Amply documented but rarely
mentioned by the mainstream media, Al Qaeda is a creation of the CIA
going back to the Soviet- Afghan war. This was a known fact,
corroborated by numerous sources including official documents of the US
Congress, which the mainstream media chose to either dismiss or ignore.
The intelligence community had time and again acknowledged that they had
indeed supported Osama bin Laden, but that in the wake of the Cold War:
“he turned against us”.
The 9/11 Commission Report has
largely upheld the “outside enemy” mythology, heralding Al Qaeda as the
“mastermind” organization behind the 9/11 attacks.
The official 9/11 narrative has not
only distorted the causes underling the collapse of the World Trade
Center buildings, it has also erased the historical record of US covert
support to international terrorism, while creating the illusion that
America and “Western Civilization” are threatened.
Without an “outside enemy”, there
could be no “war on terrorism”. The entire national security agenda
would collapse “like a deck of cards”. The war criminals in high office
would have no leg to stand on.
After 9/11, the campaign of media
disinformation served not only to drown the truth but also to kill much
of the historical evidence on how this illusive Al Qaeda “outside enemy”
had been fabricated and transformed into “Enemy Number One”.
Click to view video
Special GRTV Feature Production
- by James Corbett – 2011-09-08
***
The 911 Reader is composed
of a carefully selected collection of key articles published by Global
Research in the course of the last eleven years.
9/11 was an important
landmark for Global Research. Our website was launched on September 9,
2001, two days prior to 9/11. Our coverage of 9/11 was initiated on
September 12, 2001.
Within this collection of
more than 60 chapters, we have included several important reports from
our archives, published by Global Research in the immediate aftermath of
the attacks. These articles provide a focus on issues pertaining to the
9/11 Timeline, foreknowledge of the 9/11 attacks, the attack on the
Pentagon, the issue of insider trading on Wall Street in the days
preceding 9/11 pointing to foreknowledge of the attacks.
What prevails is a complex
web of lies and fabrications, pertaining to various dimensions of the
9/11 tragedy. The falsehoods contained in the official 9/11 narrative
are manifold, extending from the affirmation that Osama bin Laden was
the mastermind, to the assertion by the National Institute of Standards
and Technology (NIST) that the WTC buildings collapsed due to the
impacts of fire. (see Part III).
Where was Osama bin Laden on September 11, 2001?
Is there any proof to the
effect that Osama bin Laden, the bogeyman, coordinated the 9/11 attacks
as claimed in the official 9/11 narrative?
According to CBS news (Dan Rather, January 28, 2002), “Enemy
Number One” was admitted to the urology ward of a Pakistani military
hospital in Rawalpindi on September 10, 2001, courtesy of America’s
indefectible ally Pakistan. He could have been arrested at short notice
which would have “saved us a lot of trouble”, but then we would not have
had an Osama Legend, which has fed the news chain as well as
presidential speeches in the course of the last eleven years.
DAN RATHER. As the United states and its allies in the war on terrorism press the hunt for Osama bin Laden, CBS News has exclusive information tonight about where bin Laden was and what he was doing in the last hours before his followers struck the United States September 11.
This is the result of hard-nosed investigative reporting by a team of CBS news journalists, and by one of the best foreign correspondents in the business, CBS`s Barry Petersen. Here is his report.
(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE) BARRY PETERSEN, CBS CORRESPONDENT (voice-over): Everyone remembers what happened on September 11. Here`s the story of what may have happened the night before. It is a tale as twisted as the hunt for Osama bin Laden.
CBS News has been told that the night before the September 11 terrorist attack, Osama bin Laden was in Pakistan. He was getting medical treatment with the support of the very military that days later pledged its backing for the U.S. war on terror in Afghanistan. (transcript of CBS report, see http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CBS203A.html , see also http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/01/28/eveningnews/main325887.shtml
CBS News footage of the Rawalpindi, Pakistan, hospital where bin Laden was allegedly treated the day before 9/11. [Source: CBS News]
CBS News footage of the Rawalpindi, Pakistan, hospital where bin Laden was allegedly treated the day before 9/11. [Source: CBS News]
The foregoing CBS report which is of utmost relevance indicates two obvious facts:
1. Osama bin Laden could not reasonably have coordinated the 9/11 attacks from his hospital bed;2. The hospital was under the jurisdiction of the Pakistani Armed Forces, which has close links to the Pentagon. Osama bin Laden’s whereabouts were known to both the Pakistani and US military.
U.S. military and
intelligence advisers based in Rawalpindi. were working closely with
their Pakistani counterparts. Again, no attempt was made to arrest
America’s best known fugitive. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld
claimed, at the time, that the whereabouts of Osama bin Laden were
unknown. According to Rumsfeld: “Its like looking for a needle in a
stack of hay”.
October 7, 2001: Waging America’s 9/11 War of Retribution against Afghanistan
The immediate response of
the US and its allies to the 9/11 attacks was to the declare a war of
retribution against Afghanistan on the grounds that the Taliban
government was protecting “terror mastermind” Osama bin Laden. By
allegedly harboring bin Laden, the Taliban were complicit, according to
both the US administration and NATO, for having waged an act of war
against the United States.
Parroting official
statements, the Western media mantra on September 12, 2001 had already
approved the launching of “punitive actions” directed against civilian
targets in Afghanistan. In the words of William Saffire writing in the
New York Times: “When we reasonably determine our attackers’ bases and
camps, we must pulverize them — minimizing but accepting the risk of
collateral damage” — and act overtly or covertly to destabilize terror’s
national hosts”.
This decision was taken by
the Bush-Cheney war cabinet in the evening of September 11, 2001. It was
based on the presumption, “confirmed” by the head of the CIA that Al
Qaeda was behind the attacks.
On the following morning,
September 12, 2001, NATO’s Atlantic Council meeting in Brussels,
endorsed the Bush administration’s declaration of war on Afghanistan,
invoking Article 5 of the Washington Treaty.
An act of war by a foreign
nation (Afghanistan) against a member of the Atlantic Alliance (the USA)
is an act of war against all members under NATO’s doctrine of
collective security. Under any stretch of the imagination, the attack on
the World Trade Center and Pentagon cannot be categorized as an act of
war by a foreign country. But nobody seemed to have raised this issue.
Meanwhile, on two occasions
in the course of September 2001, the Afghan government –through
diplomatic channels– offered to hand over Osama Bin laden to US Justice.
These overtures were turned down by president Bush, on the grounds that
America “does not negotiate with terrorists”.
The war on Afghanistan was launched 26 days later on the morning of October 7, 2001. The timing of this war begs the question: how long does it take to plan and implement a major theater war several thousand miles away. Military
analysts will confirm that a major theater war takes months and months,
up to a year or more of advanced preparations. The war on Afghanistan
was already in the advanced planning stages prior to September 11, 2001,
which begs the question of foreknowledge of the 9/11 attacks.
The repeal of civil
liberties in America was launched in parallel with the bombing and
invasion of Afghanistan, almost immediately following 9/11 with the
adoption of the PATRIOT legislation and the setting up of a Homeland
Security apparatus, under the pretext of protecting Americans. This
post-911 legal and institutional framework had been carefully crafted
prior to the 9/11 attacks.
Al Qaeda is a US Intelligence Asset
Important to the
understanding of 9/11, US intelligence is the unspoken architect of
“Islamic terrorism” going back to the heyday of the Soviet-Afghan war.
Bin Laden was 22 years old
and was trained in a CIA sponsored guerrilla training camp. Education in
Afghanistan in the years preceding the Soviet-Afghan war was largely
secular. With religious textbooks produced in Nebraska, the number of
CIA sponsored religious schools (madrasahs) increased from 2,500 in 1980
to over 39,000.
“Advertisements, paid for from CIA funds, were placed in newspapers and newsletters around the world offering inducements and motivations to join the [Islamic] Jihad.” (Pervez Hoodbhoy, Peace Research, 1 May 2005)”The United States spent millions of dollars to supply Afghan schoolchildren with textbooks filled with violent images and militant Islamic teachings….The primers, which were filled with talk of jihad and featured drawings of guns, bullets, soldiers and mines, have served since then as the Afghan school system’s core curriculum. Even the Taliban used the American-produced books,..”, (Washington Post, 23 March 2002)
Under the Reagan
administration, US foreign policy evolved towards the unconditional
support and endorsement of the Islamic “freedom fighters”. This
endorsement has not in any way been modified.
In a twisted irony,
throughout the post 911 era, US intelligence in liaison with Britain’s
MI6, an Israel’s Mossad, continues to provide covert support to the
radical Islamist organization allegedly responsible for the 9/11
attacks. Al Qaeda and its various affiliated groups including the Libya
Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG) and factions within the Free Syria Army
(FSA) are directly supported by the US and NATO.
In a bitter irony, the US
and its allies claim to be waging a “war on terrorism” against the
alleged architects of 9/11, while also using Al Qaeda operatives as
their foot-soldiers.
Front row, from left: Major Gen. Hamid Gul, director general of Pakistan’s
Inter-Services Intelligence Directorate (ISI), Director of Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)
Willian Webster; Deputy Director for Operations Clair George; an ISI colonel; and senior CIA official,
Milt Bearden at a Mujahideen training camp in North-West Frontier Province of Pakistan in 1987.
(source RAWA)
Ronald Reagan meets Afghan Mujahideen Commanders at the White House in 1985 (Reagan Archives)
VIDEO (30 Sec.)
The Collapse of the World Trade Center Buildings
Based on the findings of
Richard Gage of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, the collapse of
the World Trade Center buildings was not caused by fire resulting from
the crash of the planes:
In more than 100 steel-framed, high-rise fires (most of them very hot, very large and very long-lasting), not one has collapsed, ever. So it behooves all of us, as your own former chief of NIST’s Fire Science Division, Dr. James Quintiere, said, “to look at real alternatives that might have been the cause of these collapses.”
Let’s start with temperatures – 1,340° F. temperatures, recorded in thermal images of the surface of the World Trade Center rubble pile a week after 9/11 by NASA’s AVIRIS equipment on USGS overflights. Such temperatures cannot be achieved by oxygen-starved hydrocarbon fires. Such fires burn at only 600 to 800° F. Remember, there was no fire on the top of the pile. The source of this incredible heat was therefore below the surface of the rubble, where it must have been far hotter than 1,340 degrees.
Mark Loizeaux, president of Controlled Demolition, Inc., who was hired for the Building 7 cleanup, said that “molten steel was found at 7 WTC.” Leslie Robertson, World Trade Center structural engineer, stated that on October 5, “21 days after the attacks, the fires were still burning and molten steel was still running.” Fire department personnel, recorded on video, reported seeing “molten steel running down the channel rails… like you’re in a foundry – like lava from a volcano.” Joe O’Toole, a Bronx firefighter, saw a crane lifting a steel beam vertically from deep within a pile. He said “it was dripping from the molten steel.” Bart Voorsanger, an architect hired to save “relics from the rubble,” stated about the multi-ton “meteorite” that it was a “fused element of molten steel and concrete.”
Steel melts at about 2,850 degrees Fahrenheit, about twice the temperature of the World Trade Center Tower 1 and 2 fires as estimated by NIST. So what melted the steel?
Appendix C of FEMA’s BPAT Report documents steel samples showing rapid oxidation, sulfidation, and intergranular melting. A liquid eutectic mixture, including sulfur from an unknown source, caused intense corrosion of the steel, gaping holes in wide flange beams, and the thinning of half-inch-thick flanges to almost razor-sharpness in the World Trade Center 7 steel. The New York Times called this “the deepest mystery uncovered in the investigation.”
NIST left all of this crucial forensic evidence out of its report. Why? Because it didn’t fit in with the official conspiracy theory.
Last year, physicist Steven Jones, two other physicists, and a geologist analyzed the slag at the ends of the beams and in the samples of the previously molten metal. They found iron, aluminum, sulfur, manganese and fluorine – the chemical evidence of thermate, a high-tech incendiary cutting charge used by the military to cut through steel like a hot knife through butter. The by-product of the thermate reaction is molten iron! There’s no other possible source for all the molten iron that was found. One of thermate’s key ingredients is sulfur, which can form the liquid eutectic that FEMA found and lower the melting point of steel.
In addition, World Trade Center 7′s catastrophic structural failure showed every characteristic of explosive, controlled demolition. … The destruction began suddenly at the base of the building. Several first responders reported explosions occurring about a second before the collapse. There was the symmetrical, near-free-fall speed of collapse, through the path of greatest resistance – with 40,000 tons of steel designed to resist this load – straight down into its own footprint. This requires that all the columns have to fail within a fraction of a second of each other – perimeter columns as well as core columns. There was also the appearance of mistimed explosions (squibs?) at the upper seven floors on the network video recordings of the collapse. And we have expert testimony from a European demolitions expert, Danny Jowenko, who said “This is controlled demolition… a team of experts did this… This is professional work, without any doubt.”
Fire cannot produce these effects. Fire produces large, gradual deformations and asymmetrical collapses. Thermate can produce all of these effects used in conjunction with linear shaped charges. If the thermate is formed into ultra-fine particles, as has been accomplished at Los Alamos National Laboratory, it is called super-thermate, and is very explosive.(Richard Gage, January 2008)
The following AE911Truth Video provides irrefutable evidence that the WTC center towers were brought down through controlled demolition.
According to David Ray
Griffin: “The official theory of the collapse, therefore, is essentially
a fire theory, so it cannot be emphasized too much that fire has never
caused large steel-frame buildings to collapse—never, whether before
9/11, or after 9/11, or anywhere in the world on 9/11 except allegedly
New York City—never.” (See David Ray Griffin).
According to Architects and
Engineers for 9/11 Truth, based on solid scientific analysis and
evidence, the collapse of the WTC towers was engineered through
controlled demolition. While AE11Truth does not speculate on who might
be behind the conspiracy to bring down the WTC buildings, they
nonetheless suggest that the carrying out such an operation would
require a carefully planned course of action with prior access to the
buildings as well as an advanced level of expertise in the use of
explosives, etc.
The Collapse of WTC Building Seven
The most grotesque lie
pertains to the BBC and CNN announcement in the afternoon of September
11, that WTC Building Seven (The Solomon Building) had collapsed. The
BBC report went live at 5.00pm, 21 minutes before the actual occurrence
of the collapse, indelibly pointing to foreknowledge of the collapse of
WTC 7. CNN anchor Aaron Brown announced that the building “has either
collapsed or is collapsing” about an hour before the event. (See WTC7.net the hidden story of Building 7: Foreknowledge of WTC 7′s Collapse)
 |
| CNN anchor Aaron Brown seems to struggle to make sense of what he is seeing one minute after announcing that WTC Building 7, whose erect facade is clearly visible in his view towards the Trade Center, has or is collapsing. |
The 911 Reader presents
factual information and analysis which points to cover-up and complicity
at the highest levels of the US government.
This body of articles by
prominent authors, scholars, architects, engineers, largely refutes the
official narrative of the 9/11 Commission Report, which is reviewed in
Part IV. It dispels the notion that America was attacked on September
11, 2001 on the orders of Osama bin Laden.
This is a central issue
because US military doctrine since 9/11 has been predicated on
“defending the American Homeland” against Islamic terrorists as well as
waging pre-emptive wars against Al Qaeda and its various “state
sponsors”. Afghanistan was bombed and invaded as part of the “war on
terrorism”. In March 2003, Iraq was also invaded.
War Propaganda
Fiction prevails over
reality. For propaganda to be effective, public opinion must firmly
endorse the official 9/11 narrative to the effect that Al Qaeda was
behind the attacks. A well organized structure of media disinformation
(Part XI) is required to reach this objective. Perpetuating the 9/11
Legend also requires defying as well smearing the 9/11 Truth Movement.
Throughout the post 9/11 era, a panoply
of Al Qaeda related events and circumstances is presented to public
opinion on a daily basis. These include terrorist threats, warnings and
attacks, police investigations, insurgencies and counter-insurgencies,
country-level regime change, social conflict, sectarian violence,
racism, religious divisions, Islamic thought, Western values, etc.
In turn, 9/11, Al Qaeda – War on
Terrorism rhetoric permeates political discourse at all levels of
government, including bipartisan debate on Capitol Hill, in committees
of the House and the Senate, at the British House of Commons, and, lest
we forget, at the United Nations Security Council.
September 11 and Al Qaeda concepts,
repeated ad nauseam have potentially traumatic impacts on the human mind
and the ability of normal human beings to analyze and comprehend the
“real outside World” of war, politics and the economic crisis.
What is at stake is human consciousness and comprehension based on concepts and facts.
With September 11 there are no
verifiable “facts” and “concepts”, because 9/11 as well as Al Qaeda have
evolved into a media mythology, a legend, an invented ideological
construct, used as an unsubtle tool of media disinformation and war
propaganda.
Al Qaeda constitutes a stylized, fake
and almost folkloric abstraction of terrorism, which permeates the inner
consciousness of millions of people around the World.
Reference to Al Qaeda has become a dogma, a belief, which most people espouse unconditionally.
Is this political indoctrination? Is it brain-washing? If so what is the underlying objective?
People’s capacity to independently
analyse World events, as well as address causal relationships pertaining
to politics and society, is significantly impaired. That is the
objective!
The routine use of 9/11 and Al Qaeda to
generate blanket explanations of complex political events is meant to
create confusion. It prevents people from thinking.
All of these complex Al Qaeda related
occurrences are explained –by politicians, the corporate media,
Hollywood and the Washington think tanks under a single blanket “bad
guys” heading, in which Al Qaeda is casually and repeatedly pinpointed
as “the cause” of numerous terror events around the World.
The Alleged Role of Iraq in the 9/11 Attacks
9/11 mythology has been a
mainstay of war propaganda. In the course of 2002, leading up to the
invasion of Iraq in March 2003, “Osama bin Laden” and “Weapons of Mass
Destruction” statements circulated profusely in the news chain. While
Washington’s official position was that Saddam Hussein was not behind
the 9/11 attacks, insinuations abounded both in presidential speeches as
well as in the Western media. According to Bush, in an October 2002
press conference:
The threat comes from Iraq. It arises directly from the Iraqi regime’s own actions — its history of aggression, and its drive toward an arsenal of terror. .,.. We also must never forget the most vivid events of recent history. On September the 11th, 2001, America felt its vulnerability — even to threats that gather on the other side of the earth. We resolved then, and we are resolved today, to confront every threat, from any source [Iraq], that could bring sudden terror and suffering to America. President Bush Outlines Iraqi Threat, October 7, 2002)
Barely two weeks before the invasion of
Iraq, September 11, 2001 was mentioned abundantly by president Bush. In
the weeks leading up to the March invasion, 45 percent of Americans
believed Saddam Hussein was “personally involved” in the Sept. 11, 2001
attacks. (See . The impact of Bush linking 9/11 and Iraq / The Christian Science Monitor – CSMonitor.com, March 14, 2003)
Meanwhile, a new terrorist mastermind had emerged: Abu Musab Al-Zarqawi.
In Colin Powell’s historic address to
the United Nations Security Council, in February 2003, detailed
“documentation” on a sinister relationship between Saddam Hussein and
Abu Musab Al-Zarqawi was presented, focussing on his ability to produce
deadly chemical, biological and radiological weapons, with the full
support and endorsement of the secular Baathist regime. The implication
of Colin’s Powell’s assertions, which were totally fabricated, was that
Saddam Hussein and an Al Qaeda affiliated organization had joined hands
in the production of WMD in Northern Iraq and that the Hussein
government was a “state sponsor” of terrorism.
The main thrust of the disinformation
campaign continued in the wake of the March 2003 US-led invasion of
Iraq. It consisted in presenting the Iraqi resistance movement as
“terrorists”. The image of “terrorists opposed to democracy” fighting US
“peacekeepers” appeared on television screens and news tabloids across
the globe.
Iran: Alleged State Sponsor of 9/11
In the wake of the Iraq invasion, the same alleged “state sponsorship” of terrorism accusations emerged in relation to Iran.
In December 2011, the Islamic Republic
of Iran was condemned by a Manhattan court, for its alleged role in
supporting Al Qaeda in the 9/11 attacks.
The investigation into Tehran’s alleged
role was launched in 2004, pursuant to a recommendation of the 9/11
Commission “regarding an apparent link between Iran, Hezbollah, and the
9/11 hijackers”. The 91/11 Commission’s recommendation was that the this
“apparent link” required “further investigation by the U.S.
government.” (9/11 Commission Report , p. 241). (See Iran 911 Case ).
In the December 2011 court judgment (Havlish v. Iran) “U.S.
District Judge George B. Daniels ruled that Iran and Hezbollah
materially and directly supported al Qaeda in the September 11, 2001
attacks and are legally responsible for damages to hundreds of family
members of 9/11 victims who are plaintiffs in the case”.
According to the plaintiffs attorneys
“Iran, Hezbollah, and al Qaeda formed a terror alliance in the early
1990s. Citing their national security and intelligence experts, the
attorneys explained “how the pragmatic terror leaders overcame the
Sunni-Shi’a divide in order to confront the U.S. (the “Great Satan”) and
Israel (the “Lesser Satan”)”. Iran and Hezbollah allegedly provided
“training to members of al Qaeda in, among other things, the use of
explosives to destroy large buildings.” (See Iran 911 Case ).
This judicial procedure is nothing more than another vicious weapon in the fabricated “War on Terror” to be used against another Muslim country, with a view to destabilizing Iran as well as justifying ongoing military threats. It also says a lot more about the people behind the lawsuit than about the accused. The expert witnesses who testified against Iran are very active in warmongering neocon circles. They belong to a web of architects of the 21st century Middle-Eastern wars, ranging from high profile propagandists to intelligence and military officers, including former U.S. officials.But what makes this case absurd is that in September 2011, a few months before the judgment, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who has questioned the official 9/11 narrative, was accused by Al-Qaeda leaders of “spreading conspiracy theories about the 9/11 attacks”. The semi-official media outlet of Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, insisted that al-Qaeda “had been behind the attacks and criticised the Iranian president for discrediting the terrorist group.” (See Julie Levesque, Iran Accused of being behind 9/11 Attacks. U.S. Court Judgment, December 2011 (Havlish v. Iran), Global Research, May 11, 2012)
Al Qaeda: US-NATO Foot-soldiers
Ironically, while
Washington accuses Iran and Afghanistan of supporting terrorism, the
historical record and evidence indelibly point to the “state
sponsorship” of Al Qaeda by the CIA, MI6 and their counterparts in
Pakistan, Qatar and Saudi Arabia.
Al Qaeda death squads have been recruited to wage America’s humanitarian wars throughout the Middle East and North Africa.
In Syria Al Qaeda units
were recruited by NATO and the Turkish High command: “Also discussed in
Brussels and Ankara, our sources report, is a campaign to enlist
thousands of Muslim volunteers in Middle East countries and the Muslim
world to fight alongside the Syrian rebels.” (http://www.debka.com/article/21255/ Debkafile, August 31, 2011).
In Libya, jihadists from
Afghanistan trained by the CIA were dispatched to fight with the
“pro-democracy” rebels under the helm of “former” Libya Islamic Fighting
Group (LIFG) Commander Abdel Hakim Belhadj:
Western policy makers admit that NATO’s operations in Libya have played the primary role in emboldening Al Qaeda’s AQIM faction (Al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb). The Fortune 500-funded Brookings Institution’s Bruce Riedel in his article, “The New Al Qaeda Menace,” admits that AQIM is now heavily armed thanks to NATO’s intervention in Libya, and that AQIM’s base in Mali, North Africa, serves as a staging ground for terrorist activities across the region. http://www.globalresearch.ca/al-qaeda-and-natos-pan-arab-terrorist-blitzkrieg/
Table of Contents of the 9/11 Reader
In Part I,
the 911 Reader provides a review of what happened on the morning of
9/11, at the White House, on Capitol Hill, the Pentagon, at Strategic
Command Headquarters (USSTRATCOM), What was the response of the US Air
Force in the immediate wake of the attacks? Part II focusses on “What Happened on the Planes” as described in the 9/11 Commission Report.
Part III sheds
light on what caused the collapse of the World Trade Center buildings.
It also challenges the official narrative with regard to the attack on
the Pentagon.
Part IV reviews and refutes the findings of the 9/11 Commission Report.
Part V focusses on the issue of foreknowledge by Western intelligence agencies. Part VI examines
the issue of how foreknowledge of the attacks was used as an instrument
of insider trading on airline stocks in the days preceding September
11, 2001. The bonanza financial gains resulting from insurance claims to
the leaseholders of the WTC buildings is also examined.
Part VII focusses
on the history and central role of Al Qaeda as a US intelligence asset.
Since the Soviet-Afghan war, US intelligence has supported the
formation of various jihadist organizations. An understanding of this
history is crucial in refuting the official 9/11 narrative which claims
that Al Qaeda, was behind the attacks.
Part VIII
centers on the life and death of 9/11 “Terror Mastermind” Osama bin
Laden, who was recruited by the CIA in the heyday of the Soviet Afghan
war. This section also includes an analysis of the mysterious death of
Osama bin Laden, allegedly executed by US Navy Seals in a suburb of
Islamabad in May 2011.
Part IX focusses on “False Flags” and the Pentagon’s “Second 9/11″. Part X examines the issue of “Deep Events” with contributions by renowned scholars Peter Dale Scott and Daniele Ganser.
Part XI examines
the structure of 9/11 propaganda which consists in “creating” as well
“perpetuating” a “9/11 Legend”. How is this achieved? Incessantly, on a
daily basis, Al Qaeda, the alleged 9/11 Mastermind is referred to by
the Western media, government officials, members of the US Congress,
Wall Street analysts, etc. as an underlying cause of numerous World
events.
Part XII focusses on the practice of 9/11 Justice directed against the alleged culprits of the 9/11 attacks.
The legitimacy of 9/11
propaganda requires fabricating “convincing evidence” and “proof” that
those who are accused actually carried out the attacks. Sentencing of
Muslims detained in Guantanamo is part of war propaganda. It depicts
innocent men who are accused of the 9/11 attacks, based on confessions
acquired through systematic torture throughout their detention.
Part XIII
focusses on 9/11 Truth. The objective of 9/11 Truth is to ultimately
dismantle the propaganda apparatus which is manipulating the human
mindset. The 9/11 Reader concludes with a retrospective view of 9/11 ten
years later.
PART I
Timeline: What Happened on the Morning of September 11, 2001
| Nothing Urgent: The Curious Lack of Military Action on the Morning of September. 11, 2001 |
- by George Szamuely – 2012-08-12
| Political Deception: The Missing Link behind 9-11 |
- by Michel Chossudovsky – 2002-06-20
On the morning of September 11, Pakistan’s Chief Spy General
Mahmoud Ahmad, the alleged “money-man” behind the 9-11 hijackers, was at
a breakfast meeting on Capitol Hill hosted by Senator Bob Graham and
Rep. Porter Goss, the chairmen of the Senate and House Intelligence
committees.
| 9/11 Contradictions: Bush in the Classroom |
- by Dr. David Ray Griffin – 2008-04-04
| 9/11 Contradictions: When Did Cheney Enter the Underground Bunker? |
- by David Ray Griffin – 2008-04-24
| VIDEO: Pilots For 9/11 Truth: Intercepted |
Don’t miss this important documentary, now on GRTV
- 2012-05-16
PART II
What Happened on the Planes
| “United 93″: What Happened on the Planes? |
- by Michel Chossudovsky – 2006-05-01
| Phone Calls from the 9/11 Airliners |
Response to Questions Evoked by My Fifth Estate Interview
- by Prof David Ray Griffin – 2010-01-12
Given the cell phone technology available in 2001, cell phone calls
from airliners at altitudes of more than a few thousand feet, were
virtually impossible
| Ted Olson’s Report of Phone Calls from Barbara Olson on 9/11: Three Official Denials |
- by David Ray Griffin – 2008-04-01
Ted Olson’s report was very important. It provided apparent “evidence” that American 77 had struck the Pentagon.
PART III
What Caused the Collapse of
The WTC Buildings and the Pentagon?
| The Destruction of the World Trade Center: Why the Official Account Cannot Be True |
- by Dr. David Ray Griffin – 2006-01-29
The official theory about the Twin Towers says that they collapsed
because of the combined effect of the impact of the airplanes and the
resulting fires
|
- by Richard Gage, Gregg Roberts – 2010-10-13
| VIDEO: Controlled Demolitions Caused the Collapse of the World Trade Center (WTC) buildings on September 11, 2001 |
- by Richard Gage – 2009-09-20
| VIDEO: 9/11: The Myth and The Reality |
Now on GRTV
- by Prof. David Ray Griffin – 2011-08-30
| Undisputed Facts Point to the Controlled Demolition of WTC 7 |
- by Richard Gage – 2008-03-28
| VIDEO: 9/11 Explosive Evidence: Experts Speak Out |
See the trailer for this ground-breaking film on GRTV
- 2011-08-03
| 9/11: “Honest Mistake” or BBC Foreknowledge of Collapse of WTC 7? Jane Standley Breaks Her Silence |
- by James Higham – 2011-08-18
| The Collapse of WTC Building Seven. |
Interview. Comment by Elizabeth Woodworth
- by David Ray Griffin – 2009-10-17
| Building What? How SCADs Can Be Hidden in Plain Sight: The 9/11 “Official Story” and the Collapse of WTC Building Seven |
- by Prof David Ray Griffin – 2010-05-30
Besides omitting and otherwise falsifying evidence, NIST also
committed the type of scientific fraud called fabrication, which means
simply “making up results.”
| VIDEO; Firefighters’ Analysis of the 9/11 Attacks Refutes the Official Report |
- by Erik Lawyer – 2012-08-27
| VIDEO: Pentagon Admits More 9/11 Remains Dumped in Landfill |
- by James Corbett – 2012-03-01
The Pentagon revealed that some of the unidentifiable remains from
victims at the Pentagon and Shanksville sites on September 11, 2001 were
disposed of in a landfill.
| 9/11: The Attack on the Pentagon on September 11, 2001 |
The Official Version Amounts to an Enormous Lie
- by Thierry Meyssan – 2012-08-16
PART IV
Lies and Fabrications: The 9/11 Commission Report
|
- by David Ray Griffin – 2005-03-24
|
- by Dr. David Ray Griffin – 2005-09-08
| September 11, 2001: 21 Reasons to Question the Official Story about 9/11 |
- by David Ray Griffin – 2008-09-11
|
Military officials made false statements to Congress and to the 911 Commission
- by Michel Chossudovsky – 2006-08-02
|
Flights 11, 175, 77, and 93
- by Prof. David Ray Griffin – 2005-12-13
| September 11, 2001: 21 Reasons to uestion the Official Story about 9/11 |
- by David Ray Griffin – 2008-09-11
| 9/11 and the War on Terror: Polls Show What People Think 10 Years Later |
- by Washington’s Blog – 2011-09-10
PART V
Foreknowledge of 9/11
| VIDEO: The SECRET SERVICE ON 9/11: What did the Government Know? |
Learn more on this week’s GRTV Feature Interview
- by Kevin Ryan, James Corbett – 2012-04-10
| 9/11 Foreknowledge and “Intelligence Failures”: “Revealing the Lies” on 9/11 Perpetuates the “Big Lie” |
- by Prof. Michel Chossudovsky – 2011-09-14
“Foreknowledge” and “Failure to act” upholds the notion that the
terrorist attacks (“act of war”) “waged by Muslims against America” are
real, when all the facts and findings point towards coverup and
complicity at the highest levels of the US government.
| Foreknowledge of 9/11 by Western Intelligence Agencies |
- by Michael C. Ruppert – 2012-08-21
PART VI
Insider Trading and the 9/11 Financial Bonanza
| 9/11 Attacks: Criminal Foreknowledge and Insider Trading lead directly to the CIA’s Highest Ranks |
CIA Executive Director “Buzzy” Krongard managed Firm that handled “Put” Options on UAL
- by Michael C. Ruppert – 2012-08-13
| The 9/11 Attacks on the World Trade Center (WTC): Unspoken Financial Bonanza |
- by Prof Michel Chossudovsky – 2012-04-27
| SEPTEMBER 11, 2001: Insider Trading 9/11 … the Facts Laid Bare |
- by Lars Schall – 2012-03-20
| Osama Bin Laden and The 911 Illusion: The 9/11 Short-Selling Financial Scam |
- by Dean Henderson – 2011-05-09
PART VII
9/11 and the “Global War on Terrorism” (GWOT)
| Political Deception: The Missing Link behind 9-11 |
- by Michel Chossudovsky – 2002-06-20
On the morning of September 11, Pakistan’s Chief Spy General
Mahmoud Ahmad, the alleged “money-man” behind the 9-11 hijackers, was at
a breakfast meeting on Capitol Hill hosted by Senator Bob Graham and
Rep. Porter Goss, the chairmen of the Senate and House Intelligence
committees.
| 9/11 ANALYSIS: From Ronald Reagan and the Soviet-Afghan War to George W Bush and September 11, 2001 |
- by Michel Chossudovsky – 2010-09-09
Osama bin Laden was recruited by the CIA in 1979. The US spent
millions of dollars to supply Afghan schoolchildren with textbooks
filled with violent images and militant Islamic teachings.
| The Central Role of Al Qaeda in Bush’s National Security Doctrine |
“Revealing the Lies” on 9/11 Perpetuates the “Big Lie”
- by Michel Chossudovsky – 2007-07-12
NATO’s Doctrine of Collective Security
- by Michel Chossudovsky – 2009-12-21
- by Michel Chossudovsky – 2010-08-30
What is now unfolding is a generalized process of demonization of an entire population group
| Osamagate |
- by Michel Chossudovsky – 2001-10-09
The main justification for waging this war has been totally
fabricated. The American people have been deliberately and consciously
misled by their government into supporting a major military adventure
which affects our collective future.
| The “Demonization” of Muslims and the Battle for Oil |
- by Michel Chossudovsky – 2007-01-04
Muslim countries possess three quarters of the World’s oil
reserves. In contrast, the United States of America has barely 2 percent
of total oil reserves.
| Was America Attacked by Muslims on 9/11? |
- by David Ray Griffin – 2008-09-10
Much of US foreign policy since 9/11 has been based on the assumption that America was attacked by Muslims on 9/11.
| New Documents Detail America’s Strategic Response to 9/11 |
Rumsfeld’s War Aim: “Significantly Change the World’s Political Map”
- by National Security Archive – 2011-09-12
PART VIII
The Alleged 9/11 Mastermind:
The Life and Death of Osama bin Laden
|
- by Michel Chossudovsky – 2001-09-12
| VIDEO: The Last Word on Osama Bin Laden |
- by James Corbett – 2011-05-24
| Osama bin Laden: A Creation of the CIA |
- by Michel Chossudovsky – 2011-05-03
| Interview with Osama bin Laden. Denies his Involvement in 9/11 |
Full text of Pakistani paper’s Sept 01 “exclusive” interview
- 2011-05-09
| Where was Osama on September 11, 2001? |
- by Michel Chossudovsky – 2008-09-11
On September 10. 2001, Osama was in a Pakistan military hospital in Rawalpindi, courtesy of America’s indefectible ally Pakistan
| Osama bin Laden, among the FBI’s “Ten Most Wanted Fugitives”: Why was he never indicted for his alleged role in 9/11? |
- by Michel Chossudovsky – 2006-09-17
| Osama bin Laden: Already Dead… Evidence that Bin Laden has been Dead for Several Years |
- by Prof. David Ray Griffin – 2011-05-02
| The Mysterious Death of Osama bin Laden: Creating Evidence Where There Is None |
- by Dr. Paul Craig Roberts – 2011-08-04
| The Assassination of Osama bin Laden: Glaring Anomalies in the Official Narrative |
Osama was Left Handed…
- by Felicity Arbuthnot – 2011-05-11
| The Assassination of Osama Bin Laden |
- by Fidel Castro Ruz – 2011-05-07
|
||||||||
- by Larry Chin – 2011-05-05
PART IX
”False Flags”: The Pentagon’s Second 9/11
| The Pentagon’s “Second 911″ |
“Another [9/11] attack could create both a justification and an opportunity to retaliate against some known targets”
- by Michel Chossudovsky – 2006-08-10
The presumption of this military document, is that a Second 911
attack “which is lacking today” would usefully create both a
“justification and an opportunity” to wage war on “some known targets
| Crying Wolf: Terror Alerts based on Fabricated Intelligence |
- by Michel Chossudovsky – 2006-08-20
This is not the first time that brash and unsubstantiated
statements have been made regarding an impending terror attack, which
have proven to be based on “faulty intelligence”.
PART X
“Deep Events” and State Violence
| The Doomsday Project and Deep Events: JFK, Watergate, Iran-Contra, and 9/11 |
- by Prof. Peter Dale Scott – 2011-11-22
The Doomsday Project is the Pentagon’s name for the emergency
planning “to keep the White House and Pentagon running during and after a
nuclear war or some other major crisis.”
| JFK and 9/11 |
Insights Gained from Studying Both
- by Dr. Peter Dale Scott – 2006-12-20
In both 9/11 and the JFK assassination, the US government and the
media immediately established a guilty party. Eventually, in both cases a
commission was set up to validate the official narrative.
| Able Danger adds twist to 9/11 |
9/11 Ringleader connected to secret Pentagon operation
- by Dr. Daniele Ganser – 2005-08-27
Atta was connected to a secret operation of the Pentagon’s Special
Operations Command (SOCOM) in the US. A top secret Pentagon project
code-named Able Danger identified Atta and 3 other 9/11 hijackers as
members of an al-Qaida cell more than a year before the attacks.
| 9/11, Deep State Violence and the Hope of Internet Politics |
- by Prof. Peter Dale Scott – 2008-06-11
The unthinkable – that elements inside the state would conspire
with criminals to kill innocent civilians – has become thinkable…
| Al Qaeda: The Database. |
- by Pierre-Henri Bunel – 2011-05-12
PART XI
Propaganda: Creating and Perpetuating the 9/11 Legend
| September 11, 2001: The Propaganda Preparation for 9/11: Creating the Osama bin Laden “Legend” |
- by Chaim Kupferberg – 2011-09-11
| THE 9/11 MYTH: State Propaganda, Historical Revisionism, and the Perpetuation of the 9/11 Myth |
- by Prof. James F. Tracy – 2012-05-06
| Al Qaeda and Human Consciousness: Al Qaeda, Al Qaeda…. An Incessant and Repetitive Public Discourse |
- by Prof. Michel Chossudovsky – 2012-03-24
| 9/11 Truth, Inner Consciousness and the “Public Mind” |
- by James F. Tracy – 2012-03-18
PART XII
Post 9/11 “Justice”
| IRAN ACCUSED OF BEING BEHIND 9/11 ATTACKS. |
U.S. Court Judgment, December 2011 (Havlish v. Iran)
- by Julie L̩vesque Р2012-05-11
U.S. Court Judgment, December 2011 (Havlish v. Iran)
| “American Justice”: The Targeted Assassination of Osama Bin Laden |
Extrajudicial executions are unlawful
- by Prof. Marjorie Cohn – 2011-05-10
| ALLEGED “MASTERMIND” OF 9/11 ON TRIAL IN GUANTANAMO: Military Tribunals proceed Despite Evidence of Torture |
- by Tom Carter – 2012-05-30
|
Self-confessed 9/11 “mastermind” falsely confessed to crimes he didn’t commit
- by Washington’s Blog – 2012-07-15
| 911 MILITARY TRIAL: Pentagon Clears Way for Military Trial of Five charged in 9/11 Attacks |
- by Bill Van Auken – 2012-04-06
| Khalid Sheikh Mohammed’s trial will convict us all |
- by Paul Craig Roberts – 2009-11-25
PART XIII
9/11 Truth
Revealing the Lies, Commemorating the 9/11 Tragedy
| VIDEO: Commemorating the 10th Anniversary of 9/11 |
- by Prof. Michel Chossudovsky – 2011-09-01
| VIDEO: AFTER 9/11: TEN YEARS OF WAR |
Special GRTV Feature Production
- by James Corbett – 2011-09-08
* * *
Read about 9/11 in Michel Chossudovsky’s international best-seller America’s “War on Terrorism”
According
to Chossudovsky, the “war on terrorism” is a complete fabrication
based on the illusion that one man, Osama bin Laden, outwitted the $40
billion-a-year American intelligence apparatus. The “war on terrorism”
is a war of conquest. Globalisation is the final march to the “New World
Order”, dominated by Wall Street and the U.S. military-industrial
complex.
Order Directly from Global Research
America’s “War on Terrorism” by Michel Chossudovsky Buy Now!
About the author:
Michel Chossudovsky is an award-winning author, Professor of Economics (emeritus) at the University of Ottawa, Founder and Director of the Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG), Montreal and Editor of the globalresearch.ca website. He is the author of The Globalization of Poverty and The New World Order (2003) and America’s “War on Terrorism”(2005). His most recent book is entitled Towards a World War III Scenario: The Dangers of Nuclear War (2011). He is also a contributor to the Encyclopaedia Britannica. His writings have been published in more than twenty languages. He can be reached at crgeditor@yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Michel Chossudovsky est directeur du Centre de recherche sur la mondialisation et professeur émérite de sciences économiques à l’Université d’Ottawa. Il est l’auteur de "Guerre et mondialisation, La vérité derrière le 11 septembre", "La Mondialisation de la pauvreté et nouvel ordre mondial" (best-seller international publié en plus de 10 langues). Contact : crgeditor@yahoo.comRelated content:
-
September 2001: Women of Afghanistan Speak out on the 9/11 AttacksGlobal Research Editor’s NoteFor the next month until September 11, 2012, we will posting on a daily basis important articles from our early archives pertaining to the tragic events of 9/11. The following text originally published on Global Research on September…
-
9/11 ANALYSIS: Where was Osama bin Laden on September 11, 2001.An earlier version of this article was published four years ago on the 9th of September 2006, in the context of the 2006 commemoration of the tragic event of September 2001. Osama bin Laden’s whereabout on September 10, 2001 were confirmed by a…
Disclaimer: The contents of this article are of sole
responsibility of the author(s). The Centre for Research on
Globalization will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect
statement in this article. The Center of Research on Globalization
grants permission to cross-post original Global Research articles on
community internet sites as long as the text & title are not
modified. The source and the author's copyright must be displayed. For
publication of Global Research articles in print or other forms
including commercial internet sites, contact: publications@globalresearch.ca
www.globalresearch.ca contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of "fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than "fair use" you must request permission from the copyright owner.
For media inquiries: publications@globalresearch.ca
www.globalresearch.ca contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of "fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than "fair use" you must request permission from the copyright owner.
For media inquiries: publications@globalresearch.ca
Copyright © Prof Michel Chossudovsky, Global Research, 2014
No comments:
Post a Comment