Global Research
The Japanese Government Hides the Truth: Fukushima Radiations are Killing Children, TEPCO Employees
Katsutaka Idogawa, former mayor of Futaba, a town near the disabled Fukushima nuclear plant, is warning his country that radiation contamination is affecting Japan’s greatest treasure – its children.
Asked about government plans to relocate the people of Fatuba to the city of Iwaki, inside the Fukushima prefecture, Idogawa criticized the move as a “violation of human rights.”
Compared with Chernobyl, radiation levels around Fukushima “are four times higher,” he told RT’s Sophie Shevardnadze, adding that “it’s too early for people to come back to Fukushima prefecture.”
“It is by no means safe, no matter what the government says.”
Idogawa alleges that the government has started programs to return people to their towns despite the danger of radiation.
“Fukushima Prefecture has launched
the Come Home campaign. In many cases, evacuees are forced to return.
[the former mayor produced a map of Fukushima Prefecture that showed
that air contamination decreased a little, but soil contamination
remains the same.]“
Screenshot from RT video
According to Idogawa there are about two million people residing in the prefecture who are reporting “all sorts of medical issues,” but the government insists these conditions are unrelated to the Fukushima accident. Idogawa wants their denial in writing.
“I demanded that the authorities substantiate their claim in writing but they ignored my request.”
Once again, Idogawa alludes to the nuclear tragedy that hit Ukraine on April 26, 1986, pleading that the Japanese people “never forget Chernobyl.” Yet few people seem to be heeding the former government official’s warning.
“They believe what the government
says, while in reality radiation is still there. This is killing
children. They die of heart conditions, asthma, leukemia, thyroiditis…
Lots of kids are extremely exhausted after school; others are simply
unable to attend PE classes. But the authorities still hide the truth
from us, and I don’t know why. Don’t they have children of their own? It
hurts so much to know they can’t protect our children.
“They say Fukushima Prefecture is
safe, and that’s why nobody’s working to evacuate children, move them
elsewhere. We’re not even allowed to discuss this.”
The former mayor found it ironic that when discussing the Tokyo
Olympics, scheduled for 2020, Prime Minister Abe frequently mentions the
Japanese word, “omotenashi,” which literally means that you should “treat people with an open heart.”In Idogawa’s opinion, the same treatment does not apply equally to the people most intimately connected with Fukushima: the workers involved in the cleanup operations.
“Their equipment was getting worse;
preparation was getting worse. So people had to think about their safety
first. That’s why those who understood the real danger of radiation
began to quit. Now we have unprofessional people working there.
Reuters / Chris Meyers
They don’t really understand what they’re doing. That’s the kind of people who use the wrong pump, who make mistakes like that.
“I’m really ashamed for my country, but I have to speak the truth for the sake of keeping our planet clean in the future.
Idogawa then made some parallels with one of the most tragic events
in the history of Japan: the use of atomic bombs on the industrial
cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki by the United States at the end of
World War II.
“The authorities lied to everyone
(about the effects of the atomic bombings)…They hid the truth. That’s
the situation we are living in. It’s not just Fukushima. Japan has some
dark history. This is a sort of a sacrifice to the past.”
When pressed on the details of a United Nations report that says
there have been no radiation-related deaths or acute diseases observed
among the workers and general public, Idogawa dismisses it as“completely false,” before providing some of his own experiences at the height of the crisis.
“When I was mayor, I knew many people
who died from heart attacks, and then there were many people in
Fukushima who died suddenly, even among young people. It’s a real shame
that the authorities hide the truth from the whole world, from the UN.
We need to admit that actually many people are dying. We are not allowed
to say that but TEPCO employees also are dying. But they keep mum about
it.”
When asked to provide solid figures on the actual number of people who died under such circumstances, Idogawa refrained, saying “it’s not just one or two people. We’re talking about ten to twenty people who died this way.”Asked about other options that Japan has for providing energy sources to its 126 million people, he responded that despite having many rivers, the government neglects to promote hydro energy.
Why? Because it’s not “profitable for big companies!”
Idogawa goes on to provide a blueprint for fulfilling Japan’s energy needs that sounds surprisingly simple.
“We can provide electricity for a large number of people even with limited investment, without taxes. Just use gravity, and we may have so much energy that there’ll be no need for nuclear plants anymore.”
Premonitions of disaster
Even before the massive failure at the Fukushima nuclear power plant on March 11, 2011, the day northeastern Japan was hit by an earthquake-triggered tsunami that caused the meltdown of three of the plant’s six nuclear reactors, Idogawa knew the facility was dangerous.
“I asked them about potential accidents at a nuclear power plant, pretending I didn’t know anything about it, and it turned out they were unable to answer many of my questions,” he said. “Frankly, that’s when it first crossed my mind that their management didn’t have a contingency plan. It was then that I realized the facility could be dangerous.”
The former mayor, who happened to be in a nearby town on the day the tsunami struck, recalled driving back to Futaba upon news of the earthquake. Only later did he discover how close he came to losing his life in the approaching tsunami.
“I managed to get there before the bigger tsunami came. It was only later that I realized that I escaped the water… I got lucky. The tsunami came after I drove off that road and up the mountains.”
Members
of the media and Tokyo Electric Power Co. (TEPCO) employees wearing
protective suits and masks walk toward the No. 1 reactor building at the
tsunami-crippled TEPCO’s Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant in
Fukushima prefecture March 10, 2014.(Reuters / Toru Hanai)
Questions regarding the nuclear power plant dominated his thoughts on the 30-minute drive home. “I
just kept thinking, ‘If it’s that strong, what will happen to the power
plant? What if the reactor is damaged? What if the water leaks? What
will the city do? What am I to do as mayor?’”Once in his office, Idogawa looked out the window and was confronted by what he described as “a terrifying sight.”
“Usually you couldn’t see the sea from there, but that time I could see it just 300-500m away,” he said.
It was at that point that the mayor realized that the nuclear power plant had probably suffered some sort of damage. After spending the night watching news reports on television, the only source of information since even mobile phones were not working, Idogawa announced an emergency evacuation early the next morning. Not all of the residents, however, heard the emergency broadcast.
“Later, I learned that not all Futaba
residents heard my announcement. I feel guilty about that…I found out
that the Fukushima prefecture hadn’t given me all the information in a
timely fashion. And now the government isn’t taking any steps to ensure
people’s safety from radiation, and isn’t monitoring the implementation
of evacuation procedures.”
Beyond nuclear energyKatsutaka Idogawa believes a transformation to a cleaner, safer form of energy source for Japan would require a willingness to change the country’s laws.
“There are many laws in Japan,
perhaps too many. There are laws about rivers and the ways they’re used.
We could change laws regarding agricultural water use and start using
rivers to produce electricity. Changing just this law alone will allow
us to produce a lot of energy.”
All of this could be accomplished “without contaminating our planet.”However, such bold proposals do not “appeal to big companies, because you don’t need big investments, you don’t need to build big power plants. It’s not that profitable for investors, for capitalists.”
But for the former mayor of a devastated Japanese town, lost to nuclear radiation, Idogawa senses a sea change forming in public opinion.
The Japanese people are beginning to “realize that we need to avert nuclear disasters, so 60-70 percent of the population is in favor of using natural energy.”
“It took us a long time, but one day we’ll follow the example of Europe, of Germany.”
Related content:
Disclaimer: The contents of this article are of sole
responsibility of the author(s). The Centre for Research on
Globalization will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect
statement in this article. The Center of Research on Globalization
grants permission to cross-post original Global Research articles on
community internet sites as long as the text & title are not
modified. The source and the author's copyright must be displayed. For
publication of Global Research articles in print or other forms
including commercial internet sites, contact: publications@globalresearch.ca
www.globalresearch.ca contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of "fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than "fair use" you must request permission from the copyright owner.
For media inquiries: publications@globalresearch.ca
www.globalresearch.ca contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of "fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than "fair use" you must request permission from the copyright owner.
For media inquiries: publications@globalresearch.ca
No comments:
Post a Comment