Fluoride Information

Fluoride is a poison. Fluoride was poison yesterday. Fluoride is poison today. Fluoride will be poison tomorrow. When in doubt, get it out.

An American Affidavit

Saturday, January 26, 2013

Uncivilized by Edmund Vance Cooke

                           Edmund Vance Cooke

An ancient ape once upon a time,
Disliked exceedingly to climb,
And so he picked himself out a tree
And said, ”Now this belongs to me.
I have a hunch that monks are mutts
And I can make them gather nuts
And bring the bulk of them to me,
By claiming title to this tree.”

He took a green leaf and reed
And wrote himself a title deed,
Proclaiming pompously and slow:
“All monkeys by these presents know”.
Next morning when the monkeys came
To gather nuts, he made his claim:
“All monkeys climbing on this tree
Must bring their gathered nuts to me,
Cracking the same on equal shares;
The meats are mine, the shells are theirs.”

“But by what right?” they cried, amazed,
Thinking the ape was surely crazed
By this”, he answered: “if you’ll read
You’ll find it is a title deed,
Made in precise and formal shape
And sworn before a fellow ape,
Exactly on the legal plan
Used by that wondrous creature, man,
In London, Tokyo, New York,
Glengarry, Kalamazoo and Cork.

Unless my deed is recognized,
It proves you quite uncivilized.”
“But”, said one monkey, “You will agree
It was not you who made this tree.”
“Nor”, said the ape, serene and bland,
“Does any owner make his land,
Yet all of its hereditaments
Are his and figure in the rents.”

The puzzled monkeys sat about
They could not make the question out.
Plainly, by precedent and law,
The ape’s procedure showed no flaw;
And yet, no matter what he said:
The stomach still denied the head.

Up spoke one sprightly monkey then:
“Monkeys are monkeys, men are men;
The ape should try his legal capers
On men who say respect his papers.
We don’t know deeds; we do know nuts,
And spite of ‘ifs’ and ‘ands’ and ‘buts’
We know who gathers and unmeats ‘em,
By monkey practice also eats ‘em.
So tell the ape and all his flunkies
No man tricks can be played on monkeys”
Thus, apes still climb to get their food.
Since monkeys’ minds are crass and crude
And monkeys, all so ill-advised,
Still eat their nuts, uncivilized. 

Sunday, January 20, 2013

The USS Liberty and The Caiaphas Complex (Loss of Liberty)

      The USS Liberty and The Caiaphas Complex
                           (Loss of Liberty)

     On June 8th 1967 the unarmed United States Navy ship the USS Liberty was attacked in international waters off the coast of the Sinai Peninsula in the Mediterranean Sea near the Gaza Strip by allegedly the nation of Israel.  This attack carried out by the United State’s “friend and ally” Israel has been an open sore for those brave sailors who survived the attack and were aboard the USS Liberty that day. 
     It is this author’s opinion that the evil behind those attacks that led to the death of 34 sailors and the wounding of 172 more were directed by what writer Michael Collin Piper has called “The Caiaphas Complex”.  The term Caiaphas is defined by Webster’s Encyclopedia Unabridged Dictionary as a high priest of the Jews who presided over the assembly that condemned Jesus to death. Matt 26.  For the sake of clarity and modernization The Caiaphas Complex term will be replaced by a more familiar term World Zionism (please see earlier Templeton Times or Pauly’s Templeton Watch blog on World Zionism for definition).
     The attack on the USS Liberty appeared to be a planned attack to get the United States of America involved with expanding territory in the Mideast by Israel and World Zionist forces.   Israel appears to be controlled by the same forces that control America, that being World Zionism and The International Bankers.  The following link will bring a tear to your eyes as we watch the cold calculating attack on our servicemen aboard the USS Liberty on June 8 1967.
     According to Ambassador James Akin in the film USS Liberty Cover Up-Full Documentary-The Loss Of Liberty from the link above quoting from author George Ball, the attack on the USS Liberty represented the “awakening of Israel,” that “awakening” meant that Israel could do whatever they wanted to the United States and get away with it. 
     Events of 9/11 come to mind to verify Ambassadors Akins words “awakening of Israel” (please see blogs 9/11 Oil and The Brute Squad part I and II on Templeton Times or Pauly’s Templeton Watch) concerning doing whatever alleged abuses Israel and World Zionism wish to inflict on whoever stands in the way of  the larger agenda of World Zionism.      
     What many people do not understand about world events and who control these events is that the United States may have gone into bankruptcy due to debt owed the International Bankers from WWI and the adoption in 1913 of Article XVI of our Constitution (Federal Reserve Act).  
     In this bloggers opinion and that of Representative James Traficant of Ohio The Emergency Banking Act of March 9 1933 as declared by President Roosevelt on June 5 1933 placed the United States into the hands of the Creditors  (World Zionism).  Representative James Traficant reads the account of the Bankruptcy of the United States into the Congressional Record on March 17 1993 in the link below.
     The debtor (United States) is beholden to the creditor (World Zionism and International Bankers).
    It is the opinion of this blogger that Israel was being directed by a much larger force (World Zionism) when Israel was directed to attack the USS Liberty and possibly start a much larger war in the Mideast for those regions resources.
     For those who would call this blog anti-Semitic it appears to this blogger that the word Semitic has morphed into a meaning that has come to be synonymous with bully, bullies on a world scale.  
     A most startling recognition of what might have happened that day on June 8 1967 is mentioned in the link below, Documentary of USS Liberty: Dead In the Water.   
     It appears from this video that nuclear- armed jets were heading to Cairo to create a mushroom cloud to terrorize everyone in the Mideast and possibly start WWIII with the spoils of war possibly going to Israel and of course World Zionism.
     Operation Cyanide mentioned in the above film appeared to be the name of a joint US and Israeli operation that placed the United States in the planning phases and possibly operational phases of Israeli’s Six Day War held in June of 1967.
     If the United States was covertly helping Israel take over the Middle East via the Six Day War it would have been an easy matter for Israel and World Zionist factions to blackmail US politicians in regards to matters concerning the USS Liberty.  
     It would appear that those valiant men aboard the USS Liberty on June 8 1967 by their actions may have prevented an all out war in the Mideast that may have led to the loss of life of so many more than those 34 US Servicemen who died that day (there would have been thousands lost in the nuclear strike in Cairo alone that day on June 8 1967).   
     Learning who was really behind the attack on June 8 1967 to The USS Liberty and the death of 34 Navy men and the injury of 172 more is the duty of all true Americans.  
     Those who may have been behind events on that day of betrayal in June of 1967 are most likely very much with us today.
     The debtor is beholden to the creditor.          


Sunday, January 6, 2013

Holocaust Revisionism

                      Holocaust Revisionism

     In a recent article in Jewish Telegraph Agency (JTA) it was announced that the Jewish Holocaust would be taught in Australia School Systems.
     Many believe that The Nation of Israel was strengthened politically and financially by the events of the Holocaust with many Jews moving to Israel due to World War II and the policy of The Final Solution.   The shame of what the world did to the alleged six million Jews acted as a catalyst for Israeli funding by not only Germany and the United States but also by World Banking Interests and others caught up in the shame the Holocaust story brought the world.  
     Growing up reading Exodus by Leon Uris and The Diary of Anne Frank in English classes taught here in our hometown, brought a feeling of remorse.  How could people do this to other people?  Hollywood and television documentaries did nothing but add to this loathing of self, but then came 9/11/01, Ground Zero and Court Case 02-2424C. 
     Case 02-2424C was a case heard at the Worcester Superior Court in early 2005 concerning contractual obligations where the facts seemed to have little to do with the outcome of the case.  As a public official it was new to me to see such apparent distortions of law and a total disregard for the truth.
     With 9/11 the mainstream media and public opinion did not seem to match the actual event.  There seemed to be much information ignored and distorted in the events of 9/11(similar to case 02-2424C) especially when it came to the possible involvement of Mossad and the CIA and other intelligence agencies  (see 9/11,Oil and The Brute Squad on Templeton Times blog) on that fateful day.

     The question for many became, if omission and deception are part of the formula for 9/11 and case 02-2424C does this also hold true for events concerning the Holocaust?   
     These Historical Revisionist believe that something quite different occurred in Germany concerning the Holocaust and here is some of their story.
     The literature on the subject of the Holocaust is vast.  The books that will be used as references for this blog involving Holocaust Revisionism include The Holocaust Hoax Exposed by Victor Thorn, The Hoax of the Twentieth Century by Arthur R. Butz and Dissecting the Holocaust by Germar Rudolf as Editor. 
     Paul Rassinier a former political prisoner at Buchenwald (from 1943-1945) and geographer first began writing on the Holocaust in 1948.  After several books questioning the gas chambers Mr. Rassinier reached a definitive conclusion on the tale of extermination of the Jews: “a historic lie: the most tragic and the most macabre imposture of all time”.   Rassinier’s works were not translated into English until Harry Elmer Barnes published The Drama of the European Jews in 1975. 
     Mr. Thorn an Author and reporter for The American Free Press’s book The Holocaust Hoax Exposed is a quick read and interesting.  This link gives an idea of what Mr. Thorn’s work is all about but is not exhaustive. There are three parts to this link totaling about fifteen minutes in all. 
     Here is part II.
     Here is part III.
     Mr. Butz is an Electrical Engineering teacher at Northwestern University in Chicago, his book The Hoax of the Twentieth Century is an excellent read and represents one of the base works concerning Historical Revisionism and The Holocaust.  The link below gives an idea of his topic that includes the gas chambers at Auschwitz.
     Here is part II
    Links total about thirty minutes.
    Germar Rudolf an accomplished Chemist edits a compilation of material about the Holocaust that is very informative.  Mr. Rudolf’s book Dissecting the Holocaust The Growing Critique of “Truth” and “Memory” is packed with alleged facts and figures from seventeen different authors who compile twenty- two articles in just under six hundred pages of fine print.  The reader will be impressed by the amount of information that has been gathered by the Historical Revisionists.  Here is Mr. Rudolf.
     There are approximately fifteen Countries that have laws to jail people who speak out about Historical Revisionism and the Holocaust; we are not on that list currently.  David Irving a famous English author and historian has been jailed for his work involving the Holocaust.  Here is what Mr. Irving’s historical research has uncovered concerning the Holocaust.
     One of the most hated Historical Revisionists on the mainstream media’s radar would have to be David Duke.  Here is Mr. Duke being interviewed by Wolf Blitzer on CNN.
     Here are some of Mr. Duke’s thoughts on the Holocaust.
     The topic of the Holocaust should be taught in our school systems as it has much to teach us.  Let all the alleged facts be placed on the learning table and especially the historical events that led us to the Holocaust story and those historical events that followed.
     Noam Chomsky noted Jewish author has written “The holocaust was the most extreme atrocity in the human history, and we lose our humanity if we are even willing to enter the arena of debate with those who seek to deny or underplay Nazi crimes… by accepting the presumption or legitimacy of debate on certain issues, one has already lost one’s humanity.”  Alternately another great man said “and the truth will set you free.”  Can we have it both ways with the Holocaust Story? 



Tuesday, January 1, 2013

Paul Craig Roberts Guess Author

Donate Newsletter


Paul Craig Roberts

Institute for Political Economy

Agenda Prevails Over Truth

In the Western world truth no longer has any meaning. In its place stands agenda.
Agenda is all important, because it is the way Washington achieves hegemony over the world and the American people. 9/11 was the “new Pearl Harbor” that the neoconservatives declared to be necessary for their planned wars against Muslim countries. For the neoconservatives to go forward with their agenda, it was necessary for Americans to be connected to the agenda.
President George W. Bush’s first Treasury Secretary, Paul O’Neil, said that prior to 9/11 the first cabinet meeting was about the need to invade Iraq.
9/11 was initially blamed on Afghanistan, and the blame was later shifted to Iraq. Washington’s mobilization against Afghanistan was in place prior to 9/11. The George W. Bush regime’s invasion of Afghanistan (Operation Enduring Freedom) occurred on October 7, 2001, less than a month after 9/11. Every military person knows that it is not possible to have mobilization for invading a country half way around the world ready in three weeks.
The Orwellian “PATRIOT Act” is another example of planning prior to the event. This vast police state measure could not possibly have been written in the short time between 9/11 and its introduction in Congress. The bill was already written, sitting on the shelf waiting its opportunity. Why? Who wrote it? Why has there been no media investigation of the advanced preparation of this police state legislation?
Evidence that responses to an event were planned prior to what the government said was a surprise event does suggest that the event was engineered to drive an agenda that was already on the books.
Many on the left-wing are immune to evidence that is contrary to the official 9/11 story, because for them 9/11 is refreshing blow-back from the oppressed. That the oppressed struck back is more important to the left-wing than the facts.
The right-wing can’t let go of the fantasy either. America in all its purity and wonderfulness was attacked because evil Muslims cannot stand our goodness. “They hate us for our freedom and democracy.” The right-wing vision of a great and good America wronged is essential to the right-wing’s sustaining ideology, an ideology that is prepared to commit violence in order to prove its righteousness.
Implausible stories can be useful to other agendas and thus be sustained by their use in other arguments. For example, the Obama regime’s story of the killing of Osama bin Laden is central to Charles Pierson’s story in the November 16-30, 2012, CounterPunch in which Pierson writes about the growing strains on the US-Pakistan alliance. Pierson writes that bin Laden resided next to Pakistan’s largest military academy and that bin Laden “did go next door every Wednesday to use the pool. If the Pakistani government was unaware of bin Laden’s presence this would mark an intelligence failure of heroic proportions.”
Is it plausible that Osama bin Laden, a hunted man (actually a man dead for a decade), visited the Pakistani army, a bought-and-paid-for entity used by Washington to launch attacks on Pakistan’s semi-autonomous tribal areas, to go swimming every Wednesday?
Or is this a fairy tale made possible by ignoring the live interviews of the neighbors of the alleged “bin Laden compound.” According to Pakistanis who knew the person living in “bin Laden’s compound,” the person Americans were told was bin Laden was a long-time friend who imported foreign delicacies. An eye witness to the “assault” on “bin Laden’s compound” reported that when the helicopter lifted off it exploded and there were no survivors. If there were no survivors, there was no sea burial of bin Laden. http://www.globalresearch.ca/pakistan-tv-report-contradicts-us-claim-of-bin-laden-s-death/25915
How is it that the US media can produce a story as fact that is contradicted by the news on the ground? Is the answer that the bin Laden assassination story served an agenda by providing evidence that we were winning?
Consider the Sandy Hook school shooting. This shooting serves as an excuse for “progressives” to express their hatred of guns and the NRA and to advance their gun control agenda. Few if any of those hyperventilating over the tragedy know any of the parents of the murdered children. They have shown no similar response to the US government’s murder of countless thousands of Muslim children. The Clinton regime alone killed 500,000 Iraqi children with illegal sanctions, and Clinton’s immoral secretary of state, a feminist hero, said that she thought the sanctions were worth the cost of one half million dead Iraqi children.
Suddenly, 20 US children become of massive importance to “progressives.” Why? Because the deaths foster their agenda–gun control in the US.
When I hear people talk about “gun violence,” I wonder what has happened to language. A gun is an inanimate object. An inanimate object cannot cause violence. Humans cause violence. The relevant question is: why do humans cause violence? This obvious question seldom gets asked. Instead, inanimate objects are blamed for the actions of humans.
In one of its reports on the Sandy Hook shooting, Time noted that such events “inevitably reopen debates about gun control, or more tenuously lead people to complain about American culture itself. Yet on the very same day, a 36-year-old Chinese man attacked 22 children with a knife at a primary school in China, suggesting that there is a critical factor with mass homicides that gets far less attention.” That factor, “the core of these events,” is mental health and “our failure to address it as a society.” http://ideas.time.com/2012/12/15/sandy-hook-shooting-why-did-lanza-target-a-school/?iid=obnetwork

That factor remains unaddressed, because the agenda-driven media is determined to use the Sandy Hook shootings as a means of achieving gun control. One wonders if there is a “knife control” agenda in China. What follows is not an argument that the report of the Sandy Hook shootings is a hoax. What follows is an argument that suspicions are created when agenda takes precedence over reporting and discrepancies in reports are left unresolved.
Agenda-driven news is the reason that apparent inconsistencies in the Sandy Hook story were not investigated or explained. According to some reports, the medical examiner said the children were shot with a rifle, but other reports say the accused was found dead inside the school with two pistols and that a rifle was found outside in the car. The police capture a man in the woods who says “I didn’t do it.” How would a person in the woods know what has just happened? Who was the man? Was he investigated and released? Will we ever know? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ovspEgeMXb4
Some reports say the school was locked and admission is via security camera and being buzzed in. Why would a heavily armed person be buzzed in? Other reports say he shot his way in. Why wouldn’t such a commotion have alerted the school?
Another puzzle is the video of a father whose child has supposedly been shot to pieces. Prior to the interview he is caught on camera laughing and joking, and then, like an actor, he pulls his face and voice into a presentation of grief for the interview. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=urrRcgB581w and http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oMINqFGNr-w
The spokesman for the Connecticut State Police is anxious to control the story, warns social media against posting information contrary to official information, but provides little information, refusing to answer most questions. The usual “ongoing investigation” is invoked, but Lanza has already been declared to be the killer and the number of dead reported. About the only hard information that emerges is that the police are investigating where every component of the weapons was manufactured. The relevance to the shooting of where the components of the weapons were manufactured is not explained. http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/people-spreading-misinformation-sandy-hook-massacre-face-charges-police-article-1.1221554
The medical examiner’s press conference is weird. He is incoherent, unsure of what he is supposed to say, hasn’t answers to questions he should have, and defers to police.
Perhaps the best way to avoid fueling suspicion is for public officials not to hold press conferences until they are prepared to answer the relevant questions.
And where are the bodies? Like the alleged murder of Osama bin Laden by a SEAL, the crucial evidence is not provided. Paul Vance, the Connecticut State Police spokesman, said that the “victims’ bodies were removed from the school overnight” and that detectives “were able to positively identify all of the victims and make some formal notification to all of the families of the victims.” http://www.kens5.com/news/Sandy-Hook-victims-identified-bodies-removed-from-school-overnight-183647091.html?ref=next
Allegedly, no parent wanted to see the body of their dead child, but how do you know it is your child if you do not see the body? It is a strange kind of closure when it is provided to parents by impersonal detectives. Has anyone seen a body other than a state medical examiner and a few detectives? Where are the media’s films of body bags being carried out of the school? Why would Obama’s gun control agenda forego the propaganda of a procession of body bags being carried out of a school?
Perhaps the sensitivity issue prevailed, but with all the suspicion that already exists about the government and its claims, why fuel the suspicion by withholding visual evidence of the tragedy?
There are reports that when emergency medical help arrived at the school, the medical personnel were denied access to the children on the grounds that there were no survivors and the scene was too gruesome. Yet, there is a conflicting story that one six-year old girl had the presence of mind to play dead and walked out of her classroom unscathed. If the story is true, how do we know that other survivors did not bleed to death from wounds because the emergency medical personnel were denied access? Did police exercise more control over the scene than was warranted? http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/regions/americas/united-states/121216/sandy-hook-shooting-girl-6-was-sole-survivor-her
It doesn’t seem to matter that questions are not answered and discrepancies are not resolved. http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-sandy-hook-school-massacre-unanswered-questions-and-missing-information/5316776 The story is useful to the gun control agenda. Progressives, in order to achieve their agenda, are willing adjuncts of the police state. The facts of the shooting are less important than the use of the incident to achieve their agenda.
Probably there are answers to the questions. Moreover, the news reports that are the basis for questions could be incorrect. But why aren’t the answers provided and confusions cleared up? Instead, people who ask obvious questions are dismissed as “insensitive to the tragedy” or as “conspiracy kooks.” This in itself deepens suspicion.
The Colorado movie theater shooting has its own unresolved discrepancies. One eyewitness claimed that there were two shooters. Apparently, the suspect was captured sitting in a car in the theater parking lot, which seems strange. There are claims that the accused, a graduate student in neuroscience, was involved with the Defense Advance Research Projects Agency in mind control research and that he doesn’t remember doing the shooting.
Do we actually know? Apparently not. Wouldn’t it be preferable to investigate these claims rather than to leave them as unanswered sources of suspicion? The loose ends of the Colorado movie shooting contribute to the suspicions caused by news reports of the Sandy Hook shootings.
A shooting incident occurs. The government puts out a story. Agendas form and take the place of the story. Unresolved issues disappear in heated dispute over agendas. Gun control advocates blame guns, and Second Amendment defenders blame other factors.
When the media permit agenda to take precedence over news, people lose confidence in the media and distrust spreads deeper into society. If the media and the government are opposed to conspiracy theories, they should not foster the theories by mishandling the news.
Neither the right-wing nor the left-wing has an interest in getting to the bottom of things. The right-wing is aligned with the police state in order to make us safe from “terrorism”– Muslim terrorism, not the terrorism of the unaccountable police state.
The American left is so feeble that it essentially doesn’t exist. Its issues are gun control, homosexual marriage, abortion, and taxing “the rich.” Such misfocus cannot slow the onrushing militarized police state. American liberals have such an abiding faith in government that they are incapable of believing that beloved government would be culpable in crimes–unless, of course, it was Ronald Reagan’s government.
As tyranny envelops the land, the main goal of the left-wing is to disarm the population.
The American left is the enabler of the police state, and the American right is its progenitor.
Americans began their descent into deception and tyranny in the final years of the 20th century with the Clinton regime’s aggression against Serbia and murderous sanctions on Iraq. These war crimes were portrayed by the US media and foreign policy community as great achievements of Western democracy and humanitarianism.
In the first decade of the 21st century Americans lost their constitutional protections and had their pocketbooks opened to indefinite wars. The latest report is that Washington is sending US troops into 35 African countries. http://rt.com/usa/news/us-deploying-troops-order-749/print/
Worse is to come.

Print This Article
About Dr. Paul Craig Roberts Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy and associate editor of the Wall Street Journal. He was columnist for Business Week, Scripps Howard News Service, and Creators Syndicate. He has had many university appointments. His internet columns have attracted a worldwide following.

Depleted Uranium (Beyond Treason)

             Depleted Uranium (Beyond Treason)

Templeton residents who have sons and or daughters enlisted in the military may be surprised to learn of the many unexpected dangers that come with military enlistment. These dangers do not end when the enlistment is over. One of those dangers and one that is well documented by our American Government are the hazards associated with depleted uranium.

This blog will take a closer look at what some have come to call “Beyond Treason” and the military industrial governmental banking complex’s (MIGBC) lack of concern for “we the people” when it comes to profits and the bottom line and the use of Depleted Uranium (DU).   
Depleted uranium is a by-product of MIGBC that has been weaponized. Uranium has three major isotopes with U234 and U235 being more useful in bomb making than depleted uranium (U238) that has now been added to ordinance rounds for its armor piercing abilities. The following video by William Lewis is very informative on the subject of DU and its health effects but is somewhat disturbing in nature (graphic images of infants with birth defects are highly disturbing).

The experiences of our servicemen and women that are shown in the 1:28 long video are most likely not going to be shown on any major television screen in the near future.  It would appear that if anything is going to be done about Depleted Uranium (Beyond Treason) we will need to inform ourselves and those around us about the problems associated with the mindset that allows our young men and women to be used as guinea pigs… by our government and the military industrial governmental banking complex. (MIGBC)

The website Beyond Treason .com may help returning veterans get a handle on the complex health issues facing themselves and their families and a place for all to become more informed on the subject of DU   

Our servicemen and women get to leave the countries where the DU has been spent but the environmental impacts this radioactive substance creates last an eternity for those countries involved. DU affects the lives of our servicemen and servicewomen as well.

The birth defects caused by the use of Depleted Uranium in the Mideast are shameful and now account for close to fifteen percent of live births as shown in the video above. When a baby is born in Iraq, Iraqi parents no longer ask if it is a boy or a girl, they ask if it is “normal”.   

Riegle Report – 1994 Report by Senator Riegle

Executive Order 13139 – signed by President Clinton September 30, 1999

Sec. 3. Informed Consent Requirements and Waiver Provisions.
(b) In accordance with 10 U.S.C. 1107(f), the President may waive the informed consent requirement for the administration of an investigational drug to a member of the Armed Forces in connection with the member’s participation in a particular military operation, upon a written determination by the President that obtaining consent:
(1) is not feasible;
 (2) is contrary to the best interests of the member; or
(3) is not in the interests of national security.

Make a New Year’s resolution to learn more about MIGBC and it use of Depleted Uranium.