“Muslims behind the 9/11 Attacks.” The Official Story on the Murder of Osama Bin Laden
"Judicial Watch" Played Into The Government’s Hands. Americans Are Blinded By Agendas
Disinformation
succeeds because so many people and interest groups across the
political spectrum find that it serves their agendas as well as the
agenda of the government. Consider for example the explanation of 9/11
that blamed Muslim terrorists for the attack. This served the interests
of the neoconservatives, the private armaments companies, the US
military, the private security companies, government security agencies
such as the CIA, the left-wing, the right-wing, the Israel Lobby, and
the print and TV media.
The
official explanation gave the neoconservatives the “new Pearl Harbor”
that they needed for their program of invasions of Middle Eastern
countries. The private armaments companies could look forward to
decades of high profits. Wars always bring the military rapid promotions
and higher retirement benefits. Private manufacturers of security
equipment and spyware enjoy a rising demand for their products and have
grown fat from the products sold to the TSA and NSA. Homeland Security
has vastly expanded the federal workforce and administrative positions.
The left-wing has proof of “blowback” caused by US interference in the
internal affairs of other countries. The right-wing has proof that
America has enemies against whom defense at all costs is necessary. The
Israel Lobby has the US to overthrow the regimes in the way of Israel’s
territorial expansion. The media has the story of the century with which
to boost ratings and curry the favor of government.
These
are formidable interests arrayed against the mere obvious truth,
obvious, that is, to any educated person. The 2,100 Architects and
Engineers for 9/11 Truth have no vested interest in any explanation of
9/11. Indeed, they are harmed by disproving, as
they have done, the government’s explanation. None of them will ever
again get a government contract, and many of their former clients have
turned their backs on “those damn anti-Americans who don’t believe their
own government!” Cass Sunstein, a Chicago and Harvard law professor
who sold out his integrity, if any, to the Obama regime by accepting an
appointment and arguing that the federal government should infiltrate
the 9/11 truth movement with agents and set-up truth-tellers so that
they could be discredited, possibly even prodding them into actions for
which they could be arrested.
In
other words, the government’s story cannot stand the light cast by the
facts and independent experts, and the government’s false story must be
protected by shutting down the truth-telling experts. The government,
Sunstein argued, needs to either gain control over these experts or to
shut them down.
Just
as many different collections of interest groups and people have stakes
in the Obama regime’s story of the killing of Osama bin Laden by US
Navy SEALS in Abbottabad, Pakistan. This story and its selling by an
enthusiastic media guaranteed Obama’s reelection. It served the emotions
of super patriots desperate for revenge who wear their gullibility on
their sleeves. It served the myth of CIA and NSA prowess. It served the
reputation of the killing power of US Special Forces teams. It proved
that America won even though it lost the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
All the trillions of dollars spent were worth it. We got revenge on the
guy who did 9/11.
No
one remembered that the US government, unable to find bin Laden for 10
years, had settled on a different “9/11 mastermind,” Khalid Sheikh
Mohammed, and had him water-boarded 183 times until he confessed to
being responsible for 9/11.
If
Khalid Sheikh Mohammed “was responsible for the 9/11 operation from A
to Z,” why were SEALS sent, illegally, into Pakistan to murder bin
Laden? As the FBI says, there is no evidence that bin Laden is
responsible for 9/11. That is why bin Laden was not wanted on that
charge by the FBI, as the FBI publicly stated.
How was bin Laden, who was known in 2001 to be suffering from
terminal illnesses, including renal failure, and whose death was widely
reported in 2001 still alive ten years later to be murdered by SEALs?
What
sense does it make that the greatest terrorist leader of our time only
had two unarmed women to protect him. What sense does it make that the
US would murder the terrorist mastermind with all the plots in his head
instead of capturing and questioning him? How can anyone be so gullible
as to believe such a nonsense tale as told to them by Obama and the
presstitute media? Is America really a nation of utter fools?
Like the 9/11 story, the story
of bin Laden’s murder is losing credibility with the US population.
Pakistani National TV shot Obama’s story down with an eyewitness
interview that reported that not one single person, dead body, or any
piece of evidence left Abbottadad, because the only helicopter that
landed blew up when it attempted to leave and there were no survivors.
No other helicopters landed. So there was no dead bin Laden to be
buried at sea (there are no known witnesses to the alleged burial) and
no photographs of a dead bin Laden.
Yet
the nonexistent photos of a dead bin Laden have now emerged in
controversy. Allegedly, the US government had photos of bin Laden’s
corpse after he was blown away by trigger-happy SEALs who didn’t have
enough sense to keep the “mastermind” alive for questioning. The tough
macho SEALs were so threatened by two unarmed women that they just
opened fire.
Judicial
Watch has been trying to pry the (nonexistent) photos of a dead bin
Laden from the government’s hands. For “national security reasons” the
US government does not want anyone to see evidence that supports its
far-fetched tale of bin Laden’s murder. The photographic evidence of a
successful raid are off limits. They are like the alleged videos of the
airliner hitting the Pentagon that we are not permitted to see for
“national security reasons.”
In other words, the photos and videos do not exist and never did. No
government, not even the American one, would be so totally stupid as to
withhold the evidence for its claims.
The
government, seeing its unbelievable stories lose believability at home
and abroad used Judicial Watch’s lawsuit to boost the credibility of
its story. Judicial Watch filed a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit for
the photos that the Obama regime alleged to have of the murdered bin
Laden but refused to release. Obviously, the government has no such
photos and never had any such photos. But the government does not need
evidence when it can rely on the gullibility of the American people.
As
the government had no photos to release, the US government decided to
use the opportunity presented by Judicial Watch to bolster its story
that photos of bin Laden murdered and dead were once in its possession.
The government released to Judicial Watch a document under the Freedom
of Information Act that is an order from Special Operations Commander
Admiral William McRaven to “destroy immediately” the photos of the dead
bin Laden.
Judicial Watch took the bait.
Instead of realizing that there was no reason whatsoever for the
government to destroy the only evidence that might support its claim to
have murdered bin Laden, Judicial Watch focused on the illegality of
destroying the evidence.
Judicial
Watch says that “Federal law contains broad prohibitions against the
‘concealment, removal, or mutilation generally’ of government records.” http://www.globalresearch.ca/top-pentagon-leader-ordered-destruction-of-bin-laden-death-photos/5368389
Judicial
Watch played into the government’s hands. Judicial Watch president Tom
Fitton was maneuvered by the government into defining the scandal as the
destruction of evidence, “revealing both contempt for the rule of law
and the American people’s right to know.” To the contrary, the real
scandal is the massive lie that bin Laden was killed by a SEAL raid and
the acceptance of this lie by the American people and Judicial Watch.
By
damning the government for destroying evidence, Judicial Watch has
given credibility to the government’s claim that SEALs murdered Osama
bin Laden.
The
SEAL team credited with bin Laden’s murder was quickly eliminated when
the team was loaded onto a 1960s vintage helicopter in Afghanistan.
Apparently the team members were asking one another, “Were you on that
mission that killed bin Laden?”
Of course, no one was, and this information was too dangerous for the Obama regime.About the author:
Paul Craig Roberts, former Assistant Secretary of the US Treasury and Associate Editor of the Wall Street Journal, has held numerous university appointments. He is a frequent contributor to Global Research.Related content:
Disclaimer: The contents of this article are of sole
responsibility of the author(s). The Centre for Research on
Globalization will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect
statement in this article. The Center of Research on Globalization
grants permission to cross-post original Global Research articles on
community internet sites as long as the text & title are not
modified. The source and the author's copyright must be displayed. For
publication of Global Research articles in print or other forms
including commercial internet sites, contact: publications@globalresearch.ca
www.globalresearch.ca contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of "fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than "fair use" you must request permission from the copyright owner.
For media inquiries: publications@globalresearch.ca
www.globalresearch.ca contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of "fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than "fair use" you must request permission from the copyright owner.
For media inquiries: publications@globalresearch.ca
Copyright © Dr. Paul Craig Roberts, paulcraigroberts.org, 2014
No comments:
Post a Comment