Thursday, December 25, 2025
5687-5688: International Public Notice: We're Not Bankrupt. from Lincoln County Watch
By Anna Von Reitz
Let
us correct the understanding and the record. The UK, US, and Canada
are NOT "bankrupt countries". The only thing that could be bankrupted
were incorporated entities.
Actual
countries and their sovereign governments are not eligible for
bankruptcy protection and enjoy "sovereign" or "state" immunity
instead.
This
is an important distinction that should be lost on nobody concerned.
Bankruptcy does not apply to countries, which are unincorporated and
sovereign entities. It applies to businesses that are created by the public via indentures, enrollments, charters, registrations, etc.
It
is important to note which "public" is the "public" responsible for the
bankruptcy debts--- in the case of the 1930 bankruptcy declared among
the G5 in May of 1930 at the Geneva Conventions, the public was the
Municipal "citizens of the United States" residing in our country, not
the General Public of Americans.
The
entities in receivership to the Vatican were corporations created by
the Roman Curia. These corporations were subsequently bankrupted and
their franchises, including their "Municipal slaves" were returned to
the Vatican by Franklin Delano Roosevelt as indicated in his First
Inaugural Speech. It has nothing to do with these "countries" at all. The
bankruptcies apply only to the incorporated entities that have
functioned as government services vendors operating in this country and
their foreign "citizenry" operating as franchisees and shareholders of
the incorporated service vendor corporations.
The
problem has been that millions of Americans have been "assumed" ---
wrongly --- to be Municipal "citizens of the United States", which is
first predicated on them being misidentified as British Subjects. Only
British Subjects were supposed to be caught up in this miasma and
asset-stripped to pay for it. It was simply very "convenient" for the
perpetrators to misidentify Americans to pay the debts of the miscreant
service vendors --- and as a result, we have been "mischarged" a vast
amount of money that we don't in fact owe.
The
estates of "missing" British Subjects, Merchant Mariners all acting as
Warrant Officers engaged as "Taxpayers" have been charged for the debts
of the USA, Inc. and its British Crown affiliates and those foreign
"public trusts" have been named after millions of Americans without the
knowledge or consent of those Americans.
Likewise,
the ESTATES of unknown "citizens of the United States" have also been
created and named after these vacuous British public trusts and
non-existent British Territorial Merchant Mariners that are themselves
named after Americans.
We,
the actual Americans, have been impersonated and suffered aggravated
identity theft ever since May of 1865, and for reasons that should be
self-evident, this entire system of things is at an end.
This
same constructive fraud scheme of simply "assuming" that Americans born
in the States of the Union are instead foreign citizens merely
"residing" in this country, and sharing out the cost of the Territorial
and Municipal bankruptcies to them, has been repeated over and over
again, as the criminals responsible got away with it once and were
encouraged to pull the same fraud scheme again, and again, and again---
most egregiously in the 1940's with the Buck Act and Selective Service
Act, in 1951-53 with the "Powers of Appointment Act" which is in fact
illegal and unratified and unauthorized and three times overruled by
high appellate courts, and in 1997-1999 which resulted in the debacle of
2000-2001. Each of these bankruptcies were pre-planned, deliberate,
fraudulent, and entered in Bad Faith.
Each
time we objected and each time we were ignored. We've finally gained
enough traction and succeeded in describing the mechanism of the fraud
to enough other people and nations, so that the Money Mill has gone
silent and for the first time in recent history, the victims on diverse
continents have taken effective action to expose this pernicious public
bankruptcy fraud and the underlying organized personage and barratry
scheme misusing the concept of public trusts in support of it.
So
let us make no mistake. Any "National Debts" owed by any "National
Trusts" in 1930 or at any time since, are foreign and are not the
responsibility of Americans, American States, or the American
Government. Our country is not and never has been "bankrupt" despite
these common, fraudulent, and self-interested bankruptcies of foreign
government service providers. And all the attendant misunderstandings
that accrue.
Thank
you, very much, for correcting your entire assumption and understanding
of the "public bankruptcies" and putting them in proper perspective.
Just
because the company providing me with garbage disposal service goes
bankrupt, it does not imply that I am bankrupt --- nor does their
bankruptcy pose any necessary "emergency" for me; I can still haul my
own garbage, thank you, and I can still hire other vendors to do it for
me, too.
With this new grasp of what has been going on here --- proceed to correct everyone else.
The
United States is not bankrupt. The United States of America is not
bankrupt. A British Territorial Services Vendor doing business as "the
United States of America, LLC" is trying to act as Successor to
contract after another British Territorial Vendor, "the United States of
America --- Incorporated" went bankrupt. A Roman Municipal services
vendor doing business as the UNITED STATES (INC.) went bankrupt together
with all its franchises.
None
of this has anything to do with America or with Americans in general
and to the extent that these service vendors and employees of these
service vendors attempt to confuse themselves with the native and
natural American State National population, so as to create fraudulent
and illegal claims upon the assets and resources of average Americans,
they must be flatly rebuffed and denied any satisfaction.
The
Service Contracts require "good faith service" --- and pawning off
one's own corporate debts on one's employers, is not good faith of any
kind. This is Bad Faith -- a knowing self-service and constructive fraud
and in this case, it has been coupled with (1) unlawful political
conversion of the victims; (2) organized personage schemes; (3)
organized barratry schemes; (4) systemic, organized, and aggravated
identity theft, (5) exacerbated by bankruptcy fraud and (6) Bad Faith by
colluding bankruptcy Trustees.
We
have exposed the Fraud of two centuries-worth of war-mongering madness
and no more misrepresentation claiming that our country or any other
country "is bankrupt" is allowed; we have also demonstrated that no
"National Debts" exist in any country where legal tender laws have been
enforced, and no payment of interest on any such bogus "National Debt"
is owed, either. This is simple, gross Breach of Trust and violation of
venerable Service Contracts, specifically, The Constitution of the
United States and The Constitution of the United States of America.
These
issues have already been given ten years of Due Process and brought to
trial and the results have been published and entered on the Public
Record since April of 2014. It is now almost a year beyond any known
statute of limitations, and people are still stumbling around thinking
that entire countries are bankrupt, and still trying to extract "tax"
payments and illegally seizing upon private property assets to pay these
bogus "debts" that the impersonated victims don't owe and have never
owed.
Enough
bool sheet is enough bool sheet. The crime and the fraud have been
discovered, discussed, given full public due process. The issues have
been tried in an international court of record and the judgement has
been released and published.
Get
on with the discipline of the actual criminals -- the members of the
Bar Associations that profited themselves using a "legal system" in
place of the "lawful system" owed, the members of the Committee of 300
who chose to play a game of "Pretend" that has cost millions of lives
and untold billions in property losses instead of shouldering their own
responsibilities, and the Roman Curia, which was supposed to act in good
faith, and provide oversight for its creations, and didn't do so.
So,
please do not at this late date make the mistake of saying or thinking
that just because corporations calling themselves "Great Britain" or
"the UK" or "the United States" or some form of "the United States of
America" --- Incorporated, are bankrupt, that this has anything to do
with America or the American people, ditto the British people or anyone
else who has been defrauded, denigrated, and deliberately
mischaracterized by government services vendors seeking to escape their
own indebtedness by means of fraud.
Issued by:
Anna Maria Riezinger -- Fiduciary
The United States of America
In care of: Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652
Christmas Day 2025
------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
International Public Notice: Concerning Misapplication of Law
By Anna Von Reitz
The fact is that we are not constrained by Third Party contracts at birth or at any other time.
The problem is that we don't have a name and the Given Name is not ours unless we accept it.
If
we accept it, we must accept it conditionally in commerce, because we
do not want to be held responsible for the spending of any foreign
state.
If we don't accept it, we run the risk of being disregarded as a donor-beneficiary.
So there, neatly summed up, is the crux.
And here is the answer: no living man engages in commerce, therefore, no code, rule, or law merchant applies to the living man.
Commerce by definition is business carried out between two or more corporations.
The
presumptions of the Federal Subcontractors and their state-of-state
franchises are thus unjustifiable absent impersonation, a condition that
must be fully disclosed and freely and knowingly agreed to; in
addition, in the particular case of the Americans, no government entity
has regulatory authority over commerce taking place within the borders
of a State of the Union.
The only Federal "regulatory authority" over commerce ever granted is summed up by the interstate commerce clause present
in all three federal constitutions. So even actual commercial business
taking place within the borders of a single state is unregulated.
The
entire scheme seeking to impersonate living people appears to be an
effort to bring them under the regulatory authority granted by the
interstate commerce clause -- a gross and fanciful overreach of any
intended granted authority.
Are you a corporation or choosing freely and voluntarily and knowingly to operate as one, when you buy a cup of coffee?
No.
Is the person selling you that cup of coffee actually a corporation or knowingly acting as one? No.
No,
and consider this --- none of the elements of lawful contract exist in
any of the scenarios, systems, or suppositions that people are
attempting to apply to any of this, so that tells you again, that
contract law and commercial law are both foreign to living people and
have been misapplied.
People cannot engage in contracts because people are not immortal; people can only make agreements in good faith.
Contract
requires the ability to perform in life or death, hence the necessity
to create and use corporations "representing" living flesh in order to
subject living flesh to the system of contract law.
We are all bound as was the prophet, Jeremiah, and cannot control and tell from day to day which foot will go before the other.
Unlike God, we can't promise (as in "promissory note") to do something tomorrow, much less thirty years from now.
This
tells you explicitly, and you have "cause to know" that contracts like
mortgages, are not in the province of living flesh and cannot be applied
to living men.
The
Universal Postal Union operates according to code, not law. It applies
only to those employed by the Postal Union and to a very limited extent
to those who freely choose to use the postal service.
As
that word, "service" implies, it is convenience offered for sale like
any other service and Postal Union "law" cannot be supposed to apply
beyond the reasonable and customary limits
All the wrangling over Erie Railroad v Tompkins is nonsense, too.
The
court in this case had the temerity to state something that is
commonplace and directly observable to any schoolboy --- of course, the
Federal Government has no Common Law and could not have any Common Law.
It never did and still doesn't and the fact that the court observed
this fact has no bearing on the price of tea in China.
The
Common Law ---unless you euphemistically "stretch" the meaning of the
term to include such things as Martial Law--- is the law of living men,
and none of the Federal entities can have any such law, because all
Federal entities operate exclusively in international or global
jurisdictions. All such entities and the personnel serving them have to
operate as persons, not people, as a result.
The
province of the Common Law was and is reserved to the lawful State
Government, which in this country is reserved to the State Assemblies.
The
fact that our lawful government vested in the State Assemblies was not
in Session meant that the people of this country lost access to the
Common Law, which then prompted the courts to embark on this long and
sordid business of impersonating everyone and subjecting them via this
pretense to the law of corporations and contracts.
As
Milligan Ex Parte provides (2 USC 71) when the people's courts survive
and the Common Law becomes available again, the impersonation ruse must
cease and the business of men must be separated from the business of
corporations. As all fifty State Assemblies are now in General
Assembly, that return to Common Law has been achieved, if only as Courts
of Record in some cases.
The
problem has been forcing the existing commercial courts to recognize
the limitations of their own presumptions. They garnered too much power
over both living flesh and private property via these False
Presumptions, and they don't want to give it up.
So
there it is, a matter of rogue courts failing to recognize their
limitations and lack of actual authority. We, living people, are not
willingly, knowingly, and voluntarily impersonating ourselves, accepting
impersonation by any other power, or participating in commerce
---interstate or otherwise.
Now
that our State Assemblies are in operation, we again have access to our
own customary Common Law, and both the District Courts and their
State-of-State franchise courts need to be dissolved and/or strictly
limited to addressing actual corporations, absent any supposition that
living people are represented by public trusts operated in their names
without their knowledge or consent.
Is that plain and clear enough for everyone to grasp?
If
not, I can belabor the points individually or collectively until hell
freezes over, and the facts will still remain as they are.
The
current system was imposed as an "emergency" matter absent any actual
granted "emergency powers" and has continued to operate without any
lawful granted authority ever since May of 1865; the longevity of the
deception in no way clothes it with any rectitude or excuse for
continuance.
The
pertinent Maxims of Law are: "Let him who will be deceived, be
deceived." -- which applies only until fraud and overreach is
discovered, as it now has been; "When what is true comes, fiction of law
disappears." --- which has now happened; and "Possession by pirates
does not change ownership."
This misapplication of law is what we are dealing with, not any fine points of who is holding the hot potato or why.
Living
people are living people and they are not subject to the laws of
contracts or corporations -- they are not and never have been; and the
creation of public trusts operated "in their names" without their
knowledge and consent and then used as a device to unnaturally subject
living people to the laws of contracts and corporations is nothing but
fraud and aggravated identity theft and has resulted in vast crimes of
illegal confiscation, unlawful taxation, personage and barratry.
Every
attorney in America deserves to be arrested, charged, and thrown in
jail for their willing participation in this farce against justice.
And
now, brothers, can we have a big, "Amen!" and an end to the underlying
evil and untrue legal presumptions that have been the cause of so much
injustice and suffering? No public trusts named after living
Americans exist. No action undertaken by any court based on the false
presumption that such public trusts --- or shall we be more blunt? ---
any such "public salvage interest" exists, is valid.
All Americans who have been incarcerated for non-violent crimes and statutory infractions must be released.
All
Americans who have been presumed to be "taxpayers" must be released
from foreign tax obligations of all kinds, including mortgages.
All
the homes and lands illegally confiscated from Americans based on the
foregoing false legal presumptions and suppositions must be returned to
the living and the living people must be made whole to the extent
possible.
All
Americans born or naturalized in this country must be presumed to be
Americans, not British Subjects, not employees or dependents of the Holy
Roman Empire.
Is
that all clear and concise enough for everyone? Can we stop trying to
"reframe" the situation we find ourselves in, and stop making vain
appeals to other forms of law that don't fit the foot any better?
Postal law? Really?
That's
all nonsense, and it arises as people desperately try to find some
acceptable basis to move onward without, however, facing the actual
truth -- that a legal system has been operating unlawfully and in gross
breach of trust for over 150 years, right under our noses, and those
operating this legal system have committed gross crimes of personage and
barratry against the interests of the American People whom they are
contractually bound to serve "in good faith".
That's
the actual and factual truth, and like it or not, correction must be
taken and restitution paid, and the sooner the better.
Prolonging
injustice and criminality once discovered and failing to take prompt
action against it becomes a crime in itself, and those who delay justice
in this matter may themselves be considered accomplices to these crimes
against humanity if they don't move off the dime.
Waffling
around and acting as poltroons stabbing at legalistic smoke rings and
"interpretations" and arguing about what form of law applies, when it is
perfectly obvious that no "federal" law applies to the living people,
and therefore, no federal franchise "state of state" law applies, either
--- is the height of evasion, stupidity or delusion.
The
Common Law of the nation-states applies to the people, and no other
form of law seeking to redefine living people as incorporated entities
or foreign "persons" can ever be valid. What begins with a false
premise, ends as a false premise, no matter how one embroiders it.
A pig wearing lipstick is still a pig.
As
our courts of record are all standing and our trial courts are forming
rapidly, the Common Law of the living people is invoked and accessible
and operational again.
As
everyone reading this knows, I have fought long and hard to bring this
misapplication of law and the illegal and unlawful functioning of the
courts to the attention of all concerned. The facts have been fully and
exhaustively established and full Due Process has been applied; the only
remaining obstacle to understanding and proper corrective action is the
sheer lunacy that prompted the inception of this legal system in the
first place.
People
find it hard to imagine that grown men endowed with logic conspired to
pretend that living people are corporations, in order to subject living
people to the law of corporations and contracts.
It
reeks of little children pretending that Johnny is a goat and Mindy is a
pig; you can play games of Pretend all you like, and still never change
a man into a corporation.
This
fanciful pretension, however, unlawfully converting the identity of
living men into that of public trusts, is precisely what our
predecessors indulged in, and what the courts are still doing now; it
was inexcusable and fraudulent then, and is just as inexcusable and
fraudulent now.
Let
us graciously, with humility, and alacrity--- put an end to this
practice, and an end to the court system(s) dependent on this outrageous
and obviously False Presumption. This puts an end to all "district"
courts operating outside the District of Columbia. Immediately.
Permanently.
The
only work remaining for these courts and their officers residing within
the States of the Union is their obligation to self-correct and
exonerate all the cases that they put in place under these described
False Pretenses, and provide restitution to all the people they have
harmed. Any business they may have administering the needs of
legitimate corporations formed in the District of Columbia may be
pursued within the borders of the District of Columbia.
Nobody
here is operating as a corporation; nobody here is represented by any
public trust. We don't belong to the British Monarch or the Pope and
are in possession of our own sovereignty guaranteed by international
treaty and venerable commercial service contracts.
So
-- everyone take your cajones in hand and do what is right. Admit the
wrong. Correct it. Respect the Common Law that all living men are heir
to. Stop the senseless attempts at evasion and excuses and
reinterpretations. You've been operating court systems like rigged
gambling casinos, you've been caught at it, and that is all there is to
it. Nothing more "special" than that.
Your
own law demands that you be keel hauled and/or gibbeted for what you've
done; we don't care about that. It isn't our law. We're not obligated
to enforce it on you.
Perhaps
it's time that you all just stopped acting like evil children and
stopped pretending about anything at all --- time to come home to the
actual factual world, dear old Kansas, where everything may be black and
white, but is nonetheless not subject to interpretation or judicial
discretion.
And
one other point: my decision and agreement to operate as a person-- an
officer-- of the Federation of States does not make me a "federal"
person. The Federation of States existed prior to any and all Federal
Vendors and is a separate unincorporated corporate entity, a lawful
instrumentality of the States of the Union. I don't work for or under
the direction of any federal vendors of services.
The
reason that the "Federal" Government is called the "Federal" Government
is because it is obligated to work for the Federation of States. All
Federal Subcontractors receive their delegated powers from and through
the Federation of States and when the contracts of federal service
providers are defaulted upon, those same delegated powers return to the
Federation of States.
Thus,
I am working for the employer of the federal service vendors as an
officer operating in international jurisdiction, to bring correction and
direction to their operations. I am an American working for the
American Government.
As long as people insist on playing children's games for real, I crack the whip.
Issued by:
Anna Maria Riezinger -- Fiduciary
The United States of America
In care of: Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652
December 23rd 2025
------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
No comments:
Post a Comment