The biggest chemical cover up in history. PFAS has polluted the entire global water system. Now, potentially dangerous forever chemicals are being found in the entire US population. Go to https://groundnews.com/Ve to get all sides of every story. Subscribe to save 40% off the unlimited Vantage Plan through our link. If you’re looking for a molecular modelling kit, try Snatoms, a kit I invented where the atoms snap together magnetically - https://ve42.co/SnatomsV ▀▀▀ 0:00 Killed by Fridges 5:27 Teflon and The Manhattan Project 7:59 Teflon is Tricky 11:37 The Teflon Revolution 13:27 Earl Tennant's Farm 17:34 Inside DuPont 20:28 Fluoride In Drinking Water 25:00 It's bigger than that 29:23 What is PFAS? 35:56 How much PFAS is in Derek’s blood? 37:56 How forever chemicals get into your blood 46:18 Removing PFAS from drinking water 49:30 Can you lower your PFAS levels? ▀▀▀ A huge thank you to Rob Bilott for his time and expertise. Check out his fantastic book: Bilott, R. (2019). Exposure. Simon and Schuster - https://ve42.co/7R Rob's story also inspired the 2019 film: Dark Waters. Thank you to Doctor Mike for giving us a medical perspective on PFAS! Check him out at
Saturday, May 31, 2025
104. Global Associations Of Technique: The Underground History of American Education by John Taylor Gatto from archive.org
104. Global Associations Of Technique: The Underground History of American Education by John Taylor Gatto from archive.org
Global Associations Of Technique
In 1700 it took nineteen farmers to feed one nonfarmer, a guarantee that people who minded other people's business would only be an accent note in general society. One hundred years later England had driven its yeoman farmers almost out of existence, converting a few into an agricultural proletariat to take advantage of machine-age farming practices only sensible in large holdings. By 1900, one farmer could feed nineteen, releasing eighteen men and women for disposal otherwise. Schools during this period, however, remained trapped in the way things used to be, unable to deliver on their inherent potential as massifiers.
Between 1830 and 1840, the decade in which the Boston School Committee came into existence, a fantastic transformation built out of steam and coal became visible. When the decade began, the surface aspect of the nation was consistent with the familiar life of colonial times, the same relationships, the same values. By its end, modern American history begins. Chicago, a frontier fort in 1832, was by 1838 a flourishing city with eight daily steamboat connections to Buffalo, the Paris of Lake Erie.
But something to rival steam-driven transport in importance appeared at almost the same time: cheap steel. The embryonic steel industry which had come into existence in the eighteenth century revolutionized itself in the nineteenth when the secret of producing steel cheaply was revealed. Formerly steel had been bought dearly in small quantities by smelting iron ore with coke, converting the resulting iron pigs into wrought iron by puddling. This was followed by rolling and then by processing fine wrought iron through a further step called cementation. Steel made this way could only be used for high-grade articles like watch springs, knives, tools, and shoe buckles.
REPORTAGE Book Launch
BUY THE BOOK: reportagebook.com On May 10, 2025, James Corbett appeared at The Deck in Osaka for the worldwide gala launch of his new book, REPORTAGE: Essays on the New World Order. At the launch, he read from the book, took questions from the audience, and signed limited edition hardcover copies of the book. This is the footage of that event. |
Ch. 8 The Greatest Fraud Fluoridation: Errors and Omissions in Experimental Trials - 2d ADDITIONAL OBSERVATIONS ON THE EVANSTON, GRAND RAPIDS AND NEWBURGH
Ch. 8 The Greatest Fraud Fluoridation: Errors and Omissions in Experimental Trials - 2d ADDITIONAL OBSERVATIONS ON THE EVANSTON, GRAND RAPIDS AND NEWBURGH TRIALS 1. Gross numerical errors in statements of the number of children examined. The Evanston Trial by Dr. Philip R.N. Sutton from fluoridationfacts.com
Errors and Omissions in Experimental Trials - 2d
ADDITIONAL OBSERVATIONS ON THE EVANSTON, GRAND RAPIDS AND NEWBURGH TRIALS
1. Gross numerical errors in statements of the number of children examined.
The Evanston Trial
These comments on the Evanston trial were published in 1980 in the present author's book Fluoridation Scientific Criticisms and Fluoride Dangers. It was stated:
"Additional Errors in the Evanston Trial Data.
In January, 1967, which was the twentieth anniversary of the commencement of the Evanston Trial, an entire special issue of the Journal of the American Dental Association was devoted to a report on that study (Blayney and Hill, 1967). In this, the original tables, complete with their gross numerical errors, were reproduced, despite the fact that these [errors] had been pointed out eight years earlier (Sutton, 1959) and some of them had been acknowledged by the authors (Sutton, 1960). In addition, several faulty tables were published for the first time.
The tables [in this issue of the J. Amer. Dent. Ass.] then showed three different statements regarding the number of children aged 6-8 years who were examined in Evanston during the 1946 examination:
(i) 1991 children - see Tables 10,
11,30,40 and 47.
(ii) 1985 children - see Tables 7,8,16,18,21 and 32.
(iii) 1754 children - see Tables 24 and 25.
There were also no fewer than six different statements in that article of the number of children aged 12-14 years examined in Evanston in 1946:
(i) 1703 children - see
Tables 15 and 32.
(ii) 1702 children - see Table 47.
(iii) 1701 children - see Tables 11,30,41,44 and 45.
(iv) 1697 children - see Tables 7,9,12,13,17,19,22 and 31.
(v) 1556 children - see Table
26.
(vi) 1146 children - see Table 46.
Between the sum of the two highest statements of the number of children examined in Evanston in 1946, and the sum of the two lowest statements of children examined in the same year in the same study in the same city, there is a difference of 794 children (1991 + 1703 - 1754 - 1146 = 794).
The number of children stated to have been examined in Evanston is even more divergent in the original papers than in this special article. Blayney and Tucker (1948) and Hill et al. (1950) both gave a figure of 4375 children, compared with the number of 3310 in Hill et al. (1957b), a difference of 1065 children.
Does Your Ice Cream Resist Melting? It May Contain an Ingredient That’s Harming Your Health
Toxic Exposures
Does Your Ice Cream Resist Melting? It May Contain an Ingredient That’s Harming Your Health
Studies have found that emulsifiers — chemicals used to control the consistency of thousands of supermarket products — can alter the mix of bacteria in the gut, known as the microbiome or microbiota, damage the lining of the gastrointestinal tract and trigger inflammation, potentially contributing to problems elsewhere in the body.
Listen to this article
By David Hilzenrath
It’s a marvel of food technology: ice cream that resists melting.
In a video explaining the science behind it, a seller of food chemicals shows scoops of ice cream holding their shape under hot lights. The super ingredient? Polysorbate 80.
Polysorbate 80 is an emulsifier, a chemical used to control the consistency of thousands of supermarket products. Other widely used emulsifiers or stabilizers include carboxymethyl cellulose, carrageenan and maltodextrin.
Recently, such ingredients have been showing up in scientific studies for another reason: Researchers say they may cause a variety of health problems.
Studies have found that emulsifiers can alter the mix of bacteria in the gut, known as the microbiome or microbiota; damage the lining of the gastrointestinal tract; and trigger inflammation, potentially contributing to problems elsewhere in the body.
Emulsifiers and stabilizers are among the most common ingredients in ultraprocessed foods, a prime target of the “Make America Healthy Again” campaign by U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
They are on the department’s radar: Their potentially harmful effects were flagged in a document HHS recently produced to support Kennedy’s drive to eliminate petroleum-based food dyes.
But they illustrate the complexity of the war on food additives.
They show how, when it comes to food science, regulators are chronically playing catch-up. In the meantime, for many ingredients, regulators and consumers alike are left in a gray zone between suspicion and proof of harm in humans.
Emulsifiers’ assault on the microbiome could help explain inflammatory bowel diseases such as Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis, metabolic disorders and even cancer, the studies suggest.
“There is a lot of data showing that those compounds are really detrimental for the microbiota and that we should stop using them,” said Benoit Chassaing, a research director at the French National Institute of Health and Medical Research and a co-author of several related studies.
Yet much larger and more ambitious clinical trials in humans are needed, Chassaing added.
6-Month-Old Died After Receiving 6 Routine Vaccines at Wellness Visit
Toxic Exposures
6-Month-Old Died After Receiving 6 Routine Vaccines at Wellness Visit
Blessings Myrical Jean Simmons received six routine vaccines at roughly 3 p.m., on Jan. 13, at a six-month wellness visit. The next morning, her parents found the baby dead in her bassinet. The autopsy listed Sudden Infant Death Syndrome, or SIDS, as the infant’s cause of death.
Listen to this article
Less than 14 hours after 6-month-old Blessings Myrical Jean Simmons was given six vaccines during a six-month wellness visit, she died. The baby received the vaccines at roughly 3 p.m. on Jan. 13 at a clinic in Louisiana, according to the baby’s mother, Brishe McKinley.
At roughly 8:30 a.m. the next morning, the parents found Blessings dead in her bassinet. “We miss her so much,” McKinley told The Defender.
When asked what she most wanted to tell the public, McKinley said, “Don’t let you, your loved one, or your children become a statistic of Pharma.”
McKinley and her partner, Elijah Simmons, shared the story of their daughter Blessings’ death in an interview with CHD.TV Program Director Polly Tommey.
McKinley told Tommey, “We just want justice for her, and we want to bring awareness.”
Blessings was in ‘perfect health’ when she went in for routine visit
The day Blessings went to the pediatrician’s office for her six-month visit, she was in “perfect health,” McKinley said. It was five days before she turned 6 months old.
“She was cooing, babbling. She was her normal self,” McKinley said.
According to Blessings’ vaccination record, shared with CHD.TV, she was given six vaccines recommended for 6-month-olds on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) immunization schedule.
They included a second dose of DTaP (diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis), inactivated poliovirus, Hib (short for Haemophilus influenzae type b), rotavirus and pneumococcal, and a third dose of hepatitis B or Hep B.
She received two shots in each leg. The other two vaccines were given orally, McKinley said. “I thought that we were doing what we needed to do to keep her healthy and safe.”
After receiving the vaccines, Blessings was “cranky” and “crying more than what she normally would,” McKinley said. “We assumed that it was because she was in pain from the injection sites.”
Her parents gave her Tylenol, as the pediatrician had recommended. “We just tried to soothe her,” McKinley said. “Her dad rocked her to sleep.”
Roughly an hour later, the parents went to bed.
Congress Will Vote to Strip States of Their Power to Regulate Artificial Intelligence—for the Next 10 Years
Congress Will Vote to Strip States of Their Power to Regulate Artificial Intelligence—for the Next 10 YearsAs Trump's $500B ‘Stargate’ AI grid is underway, Regeneron acquires 23andMe—handing Big Pharma, Big Tech, and Big Government unchecked access to your weaponizable DNA.
Buried deep in Congress’s 1,116-page “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” is a provision so sweeping, so dystopian, and so underreported that it’s hard to believe it was passed at all. Section 43201 of the bill, blandly titled the “Artificial Intelligence and Information Technology Modernization Initiative,” doesn’t just fund the federal government’s full-scale AI expansion—it removes every state’s right to regulate artificial intelligence for the next decade. Let that sink in: For the next ten years, no state in America—not even your state—will be allowed to create its own safeguards, protections, or liability standards for how AI is developed or deployed.
This is not a theoretical threat. It’s a federal ban on local AI regulation—handing the reins to the very bureaucrats and corporate tech giants already embedding AI into military systems, healthcare, financial markets, education, and law enforcement. This section of the bill is a preemptive strike against state sovereignty. It neuters legislatures and governors from protecting their own citizens—just as powerful corporations and federal agencies rush to install AI systems into every layer of society. It’s not just overreach. It’s a federal power grab dressed as “modernization.” And President Trump is now marching on Capitol Hill to personally demand the bill’s passage—pushing the very legislation that would shield his $500 billion Stargate AI surveillance grid from any state-level resistance (more on this below). The bill—developed by the House Budget Committee, which passed the legislation yesterday—still needs to be voted on in the House and Senate before it hits Trump’s desk, so if you want your senators and representatives to vote no on it, you can contact them here and tell them why. The House is expected to vote on the One Big Beautiful Bill by the end of this week.
Follow Jon Fleetwood: Instagram @realjonfleetwood / Twitter @JonMFleetwood For advertising and sponsorship opportunities reaching 220,000+ viewers per month, send Jon a message by clicking below. Legal Immunity for the Machines—and Their MakersThe bill doesn’t just block states from writing new AI laws. It also forbids states from enforcing existing protections that touch on:
In plain terms: If the feds don’t regulate it, no one can. Big Tech and government agencies now have a green light to roll out unchecked AI systems nationwide—with zero legal accountability at the state level. Why Would This Be in a Budget Bill?Why include this in a “budget reconciliation” bill about taxes, border walls, and SNAP benefits? The answer is likely twofold:
From biometric surveillance bans to AI-policing moratoriums, states have started pushing back. This bill apparently ends that resistance. The Implications Are ChillingThis isn’t about streamlining federal IT. It’s about silencing the last level of local resistance before the AI apparatus is fully operational. States can’t regulate it. Citizens can’t sue for it. And no one—not even your elected state representatives—can step in to stop it. Welcome to the federal AI regime, where the machines make decisions, and you don’t get a vote. Meanwhile, Trump’s ‘Stargate’ Project Is Building a $500 Billion AI Surveillance Superstructure—and Big Pharma Just Bought Your DNAThis quiet removal of states’ rights is happening against the backdrop of the largest AI-government-corporate alliance in U.S. history. In January, President Donald Trump announced a joint venture with OpenAI, Oracle, and SoftBank to invest $500 billion into an AI mega-infrastructure project codenamed “Stargate.” The system is designed to integrate AI across every sector of American life—including defense, healthcare, and biomedical research. During the announcement, Oracle founder Larry Ellison boasted about using AI to scan electronic health records to develop next-gen mRNA drugs that can target a person’s genome. That same month, the FDA finalized a rule allowing Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) to waive informed consent for “minimal risk” studies—meaning your genetic data, blood samples, and private medical records can be collected and used without your knowledge or permission. And now, Regeneron just acquired bankrupt genomics firm 23andMe for $256 million in a bankruptcy deal that will give the pharmaceutical giant direct access to the genetic data of millions of Americans. The deal was quietly announced yesterday. Let’s be clear: This is the same 23andMe that suffered a massive data breach in 2023, exposing genetic information tied to names, ancestry, and health predispositions. Now, that data is in the hands of a pharmaceutical company that already works hand-in-glove with federal health authorities—and is free to merge it with AI drug development platforms like Stargate. The pieces are falling into place:
And now, with Section 43201 of the new bill, no state has the authority to step in and protect your rights. Not from AI. Not from biotech. Not from the merger of surveillance, pharma, and military-industrial data. While Congress just voted to ban states from regulating AI, the White House is running classified evaluations on how AI can accelerate the development of chemical and biological weapons—and the Department of Homeland Security is openly warning that AI-driven DNA modification could soon be used to target specific groups of Americans. Follow Jon Fleetwood: Instagram @realjonfleetwood / Twitter @JonMFleetwood For advertising and sponsorship opportunities reaching 220,000+ viewers per month, send Jon a message by clicking below.
|
