The Covid Inquiry Theatre Show

In some rare but welcome news, the British economy was given a boost in the last few days, as popcorn sales have skyrocketed across the nation.

By: Gareth Icke

•

25th November 2025

•ickonic.com•

5 minute read

That can only mean one thing, the much awaited Covid enquiry theatre show was in town, and the crowd weren’t to be disappointed. 

Lessons must be learned from the intentional societal closure, livelihood destruction and mass pharmaceutical needling of the masses, but what would those lessons be?

Ohh, you could cut the atmosphere with a PCR test. 

I mean, it’s all very exciting and all that, and I do love me a theatrical production. I was once a drama student, after all. 

But there is this little part of me that feels somewhat uncomfortable with the establishment marking their own homework. 

I get the impression that letting someone grade their own project, would be, lets say, leaving the result open to manipulation?

But then if that were the case, you would expect the UK Government to give itself an A+ wouldn’t you? 

“We have conducted an inquiry and concluded that faced with an unprecedented threat, our Government and its institution’s actions were exemplary. Well done all… hip hip hooray… case closed, pay rises and book deals all round, let’s all go to Nandos”.

I’m not sure that kind of blatant whitewash would whitewash with the masses, especially those that lost loved ones, and had their lives irreparably damaged in one form or another. 

So you have to give them something. 

You have to admit some errors and some ‘could have done betters’ to satisfy the public. 

Maybe even throw them the heads of some low level political fruit, to really make it look like whilst you have indeed marked your own school book, you’ve done it with honesty and integrity. 

Because no-one does honesty and integrity quite like the parasite class. 

But why just leave it at that? Why not flip the tables in your favour?

See, if you had whitewashed the inquiry, and said everything was great, then at best, if you did manage to get the masses to accept that whitewashed result, then you’d be leaving yourself open and free to implement similar lockdown measures in the future. 

You would have set a precedent for the manufactured pandemics of tomorrow, and that’s cool I guess. It’s certainly better than your inquiry finding that lockdowns and mandates were an absolute disaster, and did so much more harm than good, even if you believe the official ‘Covid’ narrative, which of course I don’t. 

Because if they had admitted what their draconian impositions did, then they would be taking them off the table for further down the road. 

When the next manufactured crisis, whether it be a pandemic, mass terrorism, war with Russia, climate catastrophe, civil unrest or whatever, comes along, and you attempt to impose a lockdown, you’d be pointed straight back to the results of your own inquiry. 

“Remember you did this before, and you found it was an absolute catastrophe!”

Ah, yes. That would make for quite the awkward conversation, wouldn’t it? 

So you don’t do that, and you don’t even give yourself an A+, as tempting as that maybe, because you know that you have an opportunity to make the situation work in your favour, and not only lay the groundwork for similar lockdowns in the future, but instead, you say you should have locked down harder, and locked down faster, and if you had you’d have saved twenty three thousand lives. This builds the foundations on which you can stack the justification for even harsher, more draconian life destroying lockdowns in the future. 

Great idea, and do you know the really really great part? 

You’ll love this. 

You don’t even need to provide any evidence whatsoever for any of your findings, because you can simply use a computer model to give you the answers you want to project as fact. 

And do you know what the really really really great part is, and you will absolutely love this? 

Honestly. 

You can get the same team from University College London, that released the beyond absurd and serially debunked Covid computer models from back in 2020, to also provide rge computer models you can use in your ‘inquiry’. You know, the ones that terrified the population into complying with lockdowns in the first place?

The computer models that told us if we didn’t do as we were told by Gollum and his mate, then we were all going to kill each other. 

The models that were developed by Professor Neil Ferguson, and clearly petrified him so much that he repeatedly broke lockdown rules to have an affair with his climate change pushing bit on the side. 

Isn’t is amazing that with the level of gaslighting going on right now, that some people can still manage to keep themselves in the dark?

The Covid inquiry was never going to be a real inquiry. It has been nothing more than a perception manipulation operation, that ignored real life testimony and evidence and instead relied on farcical computer models that gave them the finding they wanted the models to find. 

Because that’s the thing about computer models. If you put bullshit in, you are guaranteed to get bullshit out.

And once you have the bullshit you so desperately want, you can always rely on the mainstream media bobbleheads and well groomed lapdogs to spray that bullshit all over the masses. 

Just don’t tell them that it’s bullshit that’s raining down on them. 

Tell them it’s global ‘manure-ing’