A novel analysis of the Pfizer trial:vaccine effectiveness was nowhere near 95%Analysis by epidemiologist Professor Eyal Shahar shows that the COVID vaccines reduced the risk of symptoms, not infection. The impact on infections was likely small and possibly zero.Executive summaryProfessor Eyal Shahar used statistics to prove, using Pfizer’s own data, that the COVID vaccines were nowhere near 95% effective against infection. A novel analysis of the Pfizer trial: vaccine effectiveness was nowhere near 95%Very innovative approach and totally legit. Basically, if the vaccine reduces symptoms, not infections, the Pfizer will not detect it. AI summary here. It’s pretty detailed, so not for the casual reader But it’s quite an innovative approach. Pfizer claimed ~95% “vaccine efficacy” based on symptomatic, PCR-confirmed cases in vaccinated versus placebo groups. But that number assumes:
Those assumptions are now very well known to be false. He introduces two empirically supported premises:
Armed with these, he explores what happens when we combine:
SummaryHe’s likely right about 2 things:
For further confirmation, see this article showing essentially the same thing that the benefit was a mirage. You're currently a free subscriber to Steve Kirsch's newsletter. For the full experience, upgrade your subscription. |

No comments:
Post a Comment