On the difference between vaccination and exposure to lethal nerve agents such as sarin gas.

Katherine Watt

Apr 1

READ IN APP

Sasha Latypova’s synopsis from MAHA bravely fights Big Soda post:

The absolute risk of poisoning by direct injections into the blood stream of proteins, metals, chemicals, aborted fetal cells, animal cells and other components of “safe vaccines”, will be ALWAYS far greater than the risk of consuming/being exposed to some agent externally.

Reader comment:

Is this supposed to be a profound statement?
There’s an equally absolute risk of poisoning if you're directly and externally exposed to nerve agents such as Sarin gas. There's a far greater risk that the Sarin gas will immediately kill you.

My reply:

To the extent there are still people in the world who believe vaccination is a medical treatment intended to prevent disease and death, yes, pointing out that vaccination is a poisoning act intended to cause disease and death is a profound statement.

You are correct that exposure to sarin gas, at sufficient concentration, for sufficient duration, in a sufficiently enclosed space, will immediately kill targets.

But no one in government, science, medicine or media promotes intentional exposure to sarin gas in an enclosed chamber as a medical procedure intended for the benefit of the person being gassed to death or as a civic duty.

Thousands of people in government, science, medicine and media promote vaccination as a medical procedure intended for the benefit of the person being poisoned by injection and as a civic duty. They are all lying.