THE UNITED KINGDUMB’S PLAN TO DIM THE SUN
I don't know what they're putting into the water supply in the United Kingdumb (with thanks to member K.B. for that epithet), but I suspect that whatever it is, it may be manufactured in Nuttyfornia, because the results appear to be that the country's entire political and leadership class is, to paraphrase the saying, bat-guano crazy, just like that in Nuttyfornia. According to this article shared by W.G., scientismists in the United Kingdumb have taken a page out of Baal Gates' and other American technocrats' book to dim the sun, and are now apparently ready to begin actual experiments in how to dim that pesky yellow ball up there from raining all that radiation down here:
Experiments to dim the Sun will be approved within weeks
Now, if you're like me, you enjoy reading articles like this for the sheer insanity and hubris that they inevitably contain, and if there is any group on the planet that is both insane and possessed of bat-guano crazy hubris, it is the technocrats of "climate change". Get this:
Experiments to dim sunlight to fight global warming will be given the green light by the Government within weeks.
Outdoor field trials which could include injecting aerosols into the atmosphere, or brightening clouds to reflect sunshine, are being considered by scientists as a way to prevent runaway climate change.
And that's just the opening two paragraphs. Notice that injecting aerosols into the atmosphere is being touted as a forthcoming experimental means of "dimming" the sun, when a glance upward at the skies in the last few years would convince anyone of intelligence - which ipso facto excludes the scientismists - that the aerosolization has been under way for some time. And I like others strongly suspect this campaign has been designed with a multitude of objectives in veiw, which includes (but is not limited to) (1) the introduction of materials into the general population that said population otherwise would not allow if given a choice, such materials possibly including experimental aerosolized "quackcines", (2) attempts to introduce aerosolized heavy metals to increase the conductivity of the atmosphere for "star wars" type black projects, (3) the same possibly to increase the magnetic capacity and resonance of the planet, and so on and so on, &c. &c.
What always gets me about such articles though is that last phrase in the last sentence above: "such and such methods are being considered by scientists (sic) as a way to prevent runaway climate change."
Oh really? It seems to me that one thing that might actually start or hasten "runaway climate change" is precisely things like tinkering with the reflectivity of high altitude clouds. And cooling the planet? What if doing so sets or starts a chain of events leading to turning the planet into a frozen ball of ice?
But wait, there's more. Consider this whopper doozie plopped down in the middle of the article:
“One of the missing pieces in this debate was physical data from the real world. Models can only tell us so much.
“Everything we do is going to be safe by design. We’re absolutely committed to responsible research, including responsible outdoor research.
“We have strong requirements around the length of time experiments can run for and their reversibility and we won’t be funding the release of any toxic substances to the environment.”
Oh I feel just all warm and reassured! Admitting that one of the "missing pieces in this debate," which is presumably the "climate change" debate, is "physical data from the real world," meaning, they don't have real physical data from the real world about the effects of their experiments, we are then assured that, in the absence of such data, that "everything" they will do is "going to be safe by design" and that any such experiments and their bad results will have "strong requirements" for their "reversibility" and - oh by the way - nothing toxic will be introduced into the environment. If you believe that, then I have some unused quackcines for sale, cheap.
Then we finally come to the admission:
Geoengineering projects which seek to artificially alter the climate have proven controversial, with critics arguing they could bring damaging knock-on effects, as well as being an unhelpful distraction from lowering emissions.
No! Really!?!? "Knock on effects?" You mean, you might start a process that can't be reversed, and bring about that which you claim to be against?
Then we're "informed" about those nasty carbon dioxide levels (never mentioning, of course, that carbon dioxide is what plants breathe, exhaling their "waste gas" (oxygen, which is what we and other animals breathe)):
However, scientists are increasingly concerned that carbon dioxide levels are not falling fast enough and that further action may be needed to prevent catastrophic warming.
And it's because of those nasty greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide, that we'd better do this:
One major area of research is sunlight reflection methods, which includes stratospheric aerosol injection whereby tiny particles are released into the stratosphere to reflect sunlight.
Now, wait a minute: if you're concerned about greenhouse gases creating a condition where heat from the sun's light will be trapped in the atmosphere and driving up the temperature of the Earth until it turns into an unbearable inferno like Venus, which is surrounded by lots of high altitude dense reflective clouds, then won't making Earth's clouds reflective contribute to the greenhouse gas effect, rather than mitigating or eliminating it? Pardon me for asking, Mr. Scientismist, but I'm just an enfant terrible and a hack from South Dakota, and don't know any better, except this is what they taught me way back when in all those general science course in elementary and junior high school. When, and why, did "the Science" change? Did Fauci promulgate an encyclical?
Now, if that isn't enough, that reflectivity then goes on to become a two-way mirror of high altitude cirrus clouds, which have to be made reflective to reflect all that heat off into space:
Other ideas for geoengineering include seeding cirrus clouds to allow more heat to escape into space. Currently, the wispy high-altitude clouds act as a blanket, trapping in heat.
So, please tell me how seeding those clouds will enable them to become two-way mirrors: reflecting incoming light from the Sun, and bleeding off excess heat that is not being reflected back to earth. Pardon me, Mr. Scientismist, but I'm sensing a contradiction here. But I'd like to know how you're going to polarize cirrus clouds to reflect light coming from one direction, and allow it through in another.
But it's all, I suspect, in aid of the last sentence of the article, which I strongly suspect discloses the real agenda, which has nothing to do with climate change:
As well as outdoor experiments, Aria will also be funding new modelling studies, indoor tests, climate monitoring and gauging public attitudes to geoengineering.
That, I suspect, is the real goal: we're going to do it because we can, and because doing so enhances our power. And, oh, let's not forget, that all those emissions of yesterday which were causing global warming, are now causing global cooling:
Dr Sebastian Eastham, a senior lecturer in sustainable aviation at Imperial College London, said: “Every time you fly, sulphur, which is naturally present in jet fuel, is emitted into the lower most stratosphere causing a small cooling effect.
“Similarly, aircraft contrails cause accidental cirrus cloud modification but in this case accidentally causing, rather than preventing or thinning, cirrus clouds.
“This points to the fact that it’s theoretically possible (to cool the planet) with current day technology but there are many practical questions that would need to be answered before they could be done at scale.”
Experts are hopeful that if experiments prove a success, they could be scaled up and implemented within 10 years.
Really, guys, c'mon. If you're that concerned about getting the planet to cool down, you need to get to the heart of the issue: that big ball of hot yellow plasma up there that we call the Sun. You need to figure out a way to tinker with its output and control it precisely. If you're going to be bat-guano crazy and advocate insane projects, then, as they say, go for the gold and quit playing around. That will prove to the whole world that you really are the United Kingdumb, and that the sun never sets on the union jack.
See you on the flip side...
(If you enjoyed today's blog, then please share with a friend.)
No comments:
Post a Comment