Thursday, August 22, 2024
4977-4980: International Public Notice: Writ of Error and Notice of Liability from Lincoln County Watch
By Anna Von Reitz
As
we have adequately explained to the world in two earlier International
Public Notices sent to all the appropriate Principals and Agents, the
British Territorial United States. and its personnel known as U.S.
Citizens, do not represent us in any substantive capacities related to
our physical and material assets apart from serving as: (1) our Trustees
on the High Seas and Navigable Inland Waterways when we actually put to
sea; (2) those responsible for the Territorial duties outlined under
the Northwest Ordinance; (3) those designated to regulate the interstate
manufacture, sale, and transportation of alcohol, tobacco, and
firearms.
It follows that they do not represent us as the Receivers or Beneficiaries of the UNITED STATES bankruptcy, either.
As
usual, they went behind our backs, misrepresented themselves as our
"representatives" in these matters, did not provide notice of the
bankruptcy or otherwise "fully inform" their employers, and continued to
operate as rogue entities.
Everyone
in receipt of this International Public Notice has cause to know that
we are Americans and are State Nationals --- not U.S. Citizens --- and
that our Government is in Session.
Everyone
in receipt of this Writ of Error and Notice of Liability has cause to
know that their proposed settlement of the UNITED STATES bankruptcy in
their own favor is a constructive fraud attempting to defraud the actual
Parties of Interest and the Lawful Inheritors/Beneficiaries of both (1)
the British Territorial "Persons" --- corporate franchises of the
United States of America, Inc., created under the False Registration
scheme that misidentifies American babies as U.S. Citizens, and, (2)
subsequently, the "US PERSONS" that were derived from the purported
Estates of these British Territorial "Persons" who never actually
existed.
What begins as fraud, ends as fraud.
The Perpetrators have again outsmarted themselves.
They
thought that by secretly seizing upon American babies and changing
their political status to that of British Territorial "U.S. Citizens"
and by later listing our names as "lost at sea, presumed dead" ----and
having these fictional entities declared legally dead, they could
separate us from our lawful and legal interest in our own names and
assets, and prevent us from claiming back our "reversionary trust
interest" and dissolving these fictitious British Territorial "Persons"
named after us.
But we've done so, just the same.
They
also colluded with the Holy Roman Empire service providers to establish
third party Municipal franchises in our NAMES, which purportedly held
the Estates of these fictional British Territorial U.S. Citizens---
which would, in theory, allow them to claim all the assets held in these
federal municipal ESTATE trusts, if any such British Territorial U.S.
Citizen ever existed, or was ever "lost at sea".
But having failed the First Cause, they have also failed the Second Cause.
There
never was any actual British Territorial U.S. Citizen named Anna Maria
Riezinger, and my Mother lived long enough to record her Testimony in
the form of an Unrebutted Affidavit that stands on the Public Records of
Jackson County, Wisconsin, repudiating any claim or supposition that I
was ever a US Person or U.S. Citizen, either one.
Like
millions of other Americans, I have been the victim of a complex
clandestine identity theft scheme resulting in human trafficking on
paper --- both known crimes.
Both
fictional entities, the civilly dead U.S. Citizen named after Anna
Maria Riezinger, and the federal municipal trust, ANNA MARIA RIEZINGER
purportedly containing "her" assets, have to be dissolved as if they
never were.
I
am owed back all right, title, interest, and substance attached to my
Good Name and national sovereignty, including any and all beneficial
interest in the federal Cestui Que Vie Trust established under my name,
and likewise, any and all right, title, interest, and substance thought
to be vested in any prior fictional British Territorial Person, a U.S.
Citizen "franchise" merely named after me.
As I am alive and have proven that I am both alive and am the adult woman, Anna Maria Riezinger, who was born on June 6th 1956,
in Neillsville, Wisconsin, and have a Medical Doctor's Affidavit to
prove it, there can be no contest over any aspect of my claim. My
Mother's Witness seeming to agree that I was ever a U.S. Citizen is
firmly rebutted and the similar Witness of Dr. Robert Krohn is also
contraindicated by the signed Testimony/Affidavit of Dr. Ilona Farr. A
similar roster of evidences applies to my husband, James Clinton
Belcher.
So there you have it, two lies do not make a single truth.
Two
fictional identities attached to a single baby in an attempt to latch
onto her and her lawful estate, remain two big fat fraudulent
self-interested lies that have been handed back to the Perpetrators
responsible for the existence of these fictional foreign "persons" named
after me, together with a claim against their Usufructuary Duty to hold
me and my estate harmless from any charge or ill-effect resulting from
the existence of either one of these foreign franchise corporations.
The
entire enchilada is owed back to me, unharmed, made good, and intact
---- and in my proper ownership, too, under my proper sovereignty.
I
was the "presumed donor" at the head of the line, first in time, that
was misrepresented as a British Territorial U.S. Citizen franchise, dba
"Anna Maria Riezinger, Inc."
This
British Territorial franchise corporation was named after me and
created while I was a baby in my cradle. The citizenship contract
allowing this was totally undisclosed to my Mother and unconscionable to
me, and so, was invalid from the start.
When
this fictional British Territorial "Person" named after me was declared
bankrupt and civilly dead, I was already the inheritor and
beneficiary of the municipal Cestui Que Vie ESTATE trust identified as
ANNA MARIA RIEZINGER that resulted from "her" death, as well as my
purportedly "waived" estate as a Wisconsinite.
I
didn't voluntarily waive my birthright as a Wisconsinite and neither
did my Mother on my behalf. We did not create an infant decedent estate
for the benefit of the Queen. We did not knowingly or voluntarily
participate in any of this and we claimed back my reversionary trust
interest(s) via Unrebutted Affidavit that has been standing on the
Public Record for over twenty years.
Any
Pretense or self-interested Presumption notwithstanding, I am the Naked
Owner of my estate(s) and nobody and nothing comes between me and the
Living God.
And the same is true of 320 million other Americans.
Our
States of the Union have always been Third Parties with respect to the
combatants in the so-called American Civil War, which was in fact an
illegal and immoral Mercenary Conflict staged by States-of-States
business organizations that were service providers and subcontractors of
States.
There
isn't an excuse in this world or the next, for any Pretense that "I"
fought on either side of this purported "war" or that any combatant
therein has any material interest in my Estate/ESTATE, is owed any war
reparations, or is my custodian.
The
persons making these absurd claims are my Employees and I have not
given them any authorization to represent me in these matters.
The
Officers of the Joint Chiefs and the Officers of the International
Courts and the Bank for International Settlements and all other
responsible Parties in receipt of this communication are fully liable
and informed and must take immediate action to correct this situation on
my behalf and on behalf of 320 million other Americans who have been
attacked and defrauded by these British Bunko Artists.
Issued by:
Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary
The United States of America
In care of: Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652
August 22nd 2024
----------------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
A Note to American Catholics
By Anna Von Reitz
It has been -- wrongly -- alleged that I "hate" Catholics. This is not true.
I
have cause to know the core values that sincere Catholics hold dear,
and however I differ in doctrine, I can respect and appreciate the many
contributions that the Roman Catholic Church has made to the progress of
civilization and the cause of "organized compassion".
Knowing
the good and even great side of the Church does not overall persuade me
to approve of the terrible things that have been done in the name of
its secular administration --- things like the Inquisition.
Perhaps
I am naïve, but I believe that a large proportion of modern Catholics
would disapprove of the Inquisition and its methods and stand with me in
opposition to the use of cruel and unusual punishments to enforce what
are, in the end, religious beliefs and doctrines.
Similarly,
I believe that a large percentage of modern Catholics would not approve
of the issuance of Baptismal Certificates as Clearinghouse Certificates
representing warehouse receipts for "souls" being trafficked as
commercial commodities.
For
that matter, I can't imagine many modern Catholics approving of the
sale of Indulgences, which are basically, a license to sin.
Throughout
its history, the Church's secular administration has acquired a tainted
reputation for graft, deceit, and abuses ranging from breach of trust
to racketeering to human trafficking and worse.
This is, most likely, the result of entrusting the Church's financial affairs to Sephardic Jews who are Talmudic Levites.
Though
these individuals are very accomplished in their craft and competent to
deliver profit, they view their customers with the same contempt they
hold for all Christians, and appear to take pleasure in investments and
business practices that embarrass and defame the Church.
So
what is the Talmud and what is a Talmudic Levite and why should doing
business with these Jews be any different than doing business with
generations of Jewish traders and bankers ever since the Roman Empire?
The
Talmud is a collection of rabbinical teachings and analysis of the
actual scripture, the Torah; it began being collected during the Middle
Ages and serves as a Commentary --- a written discussion about the
meaning and the practice of the Laws presented in the Torah, that is,
the first five books of the Bible.
Unfortunately,
the Talmud gives vent to the personal feelings and prejudices of the
rabbis who wrote this commentary, and encourages not only Jewish
elitism, but an active and cruel contempt for what the Talmud calls "the
Goyim" -- the Gentile people of the Earth, including Catholics.
"Talmudic
Levites" -- a name they gave themselves -- use the Talmud apart from
the Torah, as a source of law, and not just an interpretation of the
Laws of God and Moses contained in the actual scripture. Thus you have
rabbis who teach the Torah, those who teach the Talmud, and those who
teach both.
This
is how we have the Law of the Land, known as The Ten Commandments, and
the Law of the Sea, known as the Noahide Laws, all "interpreted" by the
writers and practitioners of the Talmud.
Catholics
need to examine the situation and ask themselves and their priests ---
is it wise to leave our assets under the management of Jews who
earnestly believe that we are lower than cattle in the realm of
creation?
That it is fair for them to murder us, in extremely nasty ways, simply because we are Christians?
You
should be asking yourselves, what would such men do with our Church's
money? Money that is supposed to spread the Gospel and comfort the sick
and the poor?
Would
you be surprised to learn that it is instead being invested in glitzy
new high-rise office buildings, luxury condominiums, and Disney movies
preaching normalization of transgenderism and homosexuality?
What
can you expect? These men have contempt for you and everything you
stand for. They believe that God gave them the right to do anything
they want to do to you --- rape, pillage, and plunder, disgrace,
disserve, cheat, lie, murder, enslave --- whatever it takes to slake
their lusts and fill their plates.
Not all Jews believe these evil things, but Talmudic Levites do.
They
think they are the Chosen Ones, the only ones with any rights, the only
ones to be served, the Lords and Masters of all they survey, to nurture
or to destroy as they see fit. They have no respect or care for anyone
outside their group of True Believers, and you can now see the results
of that whole mindset playing out in Gaza.
The
so-called Palestinians, who were labeled as such by the constantly
meddling British, won the jackpot. They had clear and easy access to
the Eastern Mediterranean Oil Basin right off their coastline in Gaza.
So
the Talmudic Levites contrived a False Flag and paid the Hamas
Mercenaries to stage an "incursion" into Gaza. They even laid down
their own border defense perimeter to expedite this incursion, which was
their own excuse to attack the Palestinians living in Gaza.
They
are cold-bloodedly murdering these people in Gaza to steal oil that
would otherwise belong to "Palestinians" --- but which will now belong
to the State of Israel, Inc., the latest franchise corporation of the
USA, Incorporated. While they are bombing and excavating Gaza and its
people into oblivion, they are building the oil refineries and pipeline
infrastructure to extract and ship the oil --- and all while playing the
victim of Palestinian aggression.
These
same people moved the "New York Stock Exchange" to Tel Aviv, where they
endlessly manipulate world commodity and stock markets.
Do
you, as Christians, as Catholics, want to be affiliated -- through your
Church investments -- with this filth and violence and elitism and
corruption? Do you want your money backing this?
We
want a completely different, honest, peaceful world. So we are "voting"
with our feet and lifting our voices, and no longer paying attention to
the authorities who have misled us. We've created our own banking
system, issued our own asset-backed currency, and are developing our own
network of people worldwide who want peace and decency --- and want to
invest in that, instead.
I
learned a long time ago that I can't change anyone else, and that
includes changing the way they think, what they spend their money on,
and what they believe. I also learned that I can't fix evil.
So I don't try. And I don't waste my time or energy on hate.
I
will simply invite you to look at who you've got investing your money
and what they are investing in. I will invite you to join our new
banking network, if you want a better world.
If not, you can see what you've got.
----------------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
International Public Notice: The Great "Mischief"
By Anna Von Reitz
This
may come as news to many, but there has always been a "British
Territorial United States". This is clearly indicated in the
Definitive Treaty of Paris (1783) concerning that entity and its
doing-business-as-name, "the United States of America" (Incorporated) as
opposed to "The United States of America" -- our unincorporated
Federation of States.
These
very similar names, separated only by the Definite Article, which is
included as part of the name of the Federation and excluded as part of
the name of the British sound-alike entity, have proven to be a fertile
bed for confusion and fraud.
Likewise, the British have, by omitting to mention that they are talking about the British Territorial United
States and simply referring to their operation as "the United States",
have succeeded in confusing their operations with the Federal Republic
that existed from 1787 to 1861, and also with the Municipal United
States, and ultimately with our country, The United States.
Despite
their continuing efforts to impersonate us, and to bring False Claims
against our assets and interests, they have been fully discovered and
exposed for what they are and what they are attempting to do.
The
Treaties of Paris series represents Treaties at Sea and in the
Territorial domain, while the Treaties of Versailles are Treaties on
Land and in the International domain.
Thus,
from the very start, the remaining interests of the British in The
United States after The War of Independence, are identified as: (1)
Territorial; (2) Corporate; and (3) Strictly limited.
The
Vatican Chancery Court, the International Court of Justice, and even
the British High Court, to say nothing of the United States Supreme
Court and Supreme Court of the United States, as well as many foreign
governments, know or have cause to know, that what we are saying is true
and verifiable and has been standing on the international public
records for many decades.
It's not a matter of opinion or conjecture.
Early
on, we contracted with the British Government via The Constitution of
the United States of America, to receive specific "essential government
services" --- specifically the protection of our merchant shipping on
the High Seas and Navigable Inland Waterways by the British Navy, an
arrangement that made the British Monarch our Trustee in those
domains.
That
is the total extent of their relationship to our government, aside from
their role providing the services associated with The Northwest
Ordinance, and regulation of interstate manufacture, sale or
transportation of alcohol, tobacco, and firearms.
The
locus of this "British Territorial United States" is within the United
States Territories and Possessions and the District of Columbia, where
they established their District of Columbia Municipal Corporation in
1790.
This
is, indeed, very old news --- yet it hasn't been taught to American
schoolchildren in over a hundred years; neither average Americans nor
the rest of the world can be blamed for not knowing these facts, for the
British have done everything possible to blur the lines and impersonate
us.
We
still regularly encounter people who, based on the existence of the
British Territorial United States, believe that America is still a
British Colony.
We
bring this forward and to the attention of the Public, so that people
have a grasp of the facts and the confusions that result from using
similar names for disparate things.
The
United States of America is the name of our unincorporated Federation
of States, while the United States of America (Incorporated) is the name
of a British Territorial Municipal Corporation.
The
British never like it when we require them to say, "Incorporated", and
to distinguish the difference between their "United States of America"
and ours.
They
like it even less when we require them to stipulate that they are
talking about the British Territorial United States --- not our Federal
Republic, not the Municipal United States, and not our country, The
United States, when they refer to, "the United States".
Nonetheless,
they are a foreign government under contract to serve the States of the
Union and our Federation of States and are not the "same as" the
Federation of States and do not occupy the same jurisdiction nor do they
have the same powers as the Federation of States.
Likewise,
while we acknowledge the existence of the "British Territorial United
States" and have not mistreated them or their people, they are a foreign
government, and a separate nation which operates under foreign law, and
exist in a separate "strictly limited" Territorial jurisdiction.
With
this situation clearly focused in your minds, turn your attention back
slightly more than a century to the very early 1900s (1900-1904) and a
series of British Territorial U.S. Supreme Court cases known
collectively as the Insular Tariff Cases.
A
Tariff is a form of tax. The word "Insular" refers to the "Insular
States" --- the Territories and Possessions of this country.
These
cases, including Downes v Bidwell, and most famously, Hooven and
Allison v Evatt, lay the groundwork and provide the permissions
necessary to set up a separate taxation system within the Territories
and Possessions, the so-called "Insular States" and to levy foreign
taxes on U.S. Citizens --- including British Territorial corporation
franchises --- according to different standards than the standards
required for Americans which are stipulated in The Constitution of the
United States of America.
This
reveals another motive that the British have had to misrepresent us as
part of their citizenry --- they claim the right to "enfranchise" their
U.S. Citizens and create corporate franchises named after their U.S.
Citizens, which they can then tax and abuse as they please, without
regard for the restraints of The Constitution of the United States of
America.
British
Territorial U.S. Citizens are not protected by the limitations imposed
by the Federal Constitutions, so promoting the False Registration of
American babies allowed these criminals to evade their contractual
obligations owed to those same babies.
The Insular
Tariff Cases allowed for the arrival of the "Federal Reserve Act" which
was supposed to only apply to the British Territorial United States and
U.S. Citizens ----not Americans, as discussed yesterday in our International Public Notice: The Dutch, the IRS, and Us.
At
the time of the Insular Tariff cases, Justice Harlan issued his dissent
and voiced his fears that these cases would be used for nefarious
purposes and "mischief".
Indeed,
it has, as the Brits have continued to omit such necessary words as
"Incorporated" and "British Territorial" from their communications about
their version of "United States of America" and their version of
"United States" --- so as to confuse everyone but the actual Americans,
and induce the delusion that "they are us"---when they are definitively
not.
They
continued to serve this deliberate and venal deceit by secretly
registering American babies as British Territorial U.S. Citizens.
They
are now engaged in making False Claims in Commerce and trying to attach
importance to their Agent's actions in 2010, in which these same
British Territorial U.S. Citizens issued a "Declaration of Sovereign
Intent" and notably failed to send a copy to the actual American
Government, which raised its hand in 1998, and let the rest of the world
---including Her Majesty--- know that we are still here and still
minding our own business.
This
was done a full twelve years before these British Bunko Artists issued
their "Declaration of Sovereign Intent" and it was followed up in 2015
by a formal re-issuance of our Sovereign Letters Patent in cooperation
with the American Indian Nations.
To
drive the point home and to provide Notice, we published our letters
to Queen Elizabeth II, giving Her Majesty our mailing address in
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania --- in case she lost her address book. We
also notified the United Nations of our Federation of States' continuing
presence and our Member's much-prior claim to the American States of
the Union and all land assets of this country.
As
a result, the British entity calling itself "The Republic of the United
States of America" has no valid "claim on abandonment" and the people
promoting this entity have no standing.
British
Territorial U.S. Citizens cannot "restore" anything American "for" us
and have no granted authority to act for us in any capacity related to
our land and soil jurisdictions. They commit treason against us and
against our country by making any such claims for themselves.
It
should be obvious that they are and have always been duplicitous,
dishonorable, conniving, self-interested promoters of confusion and that
the present circumstance is just more proof that what Shakespeare
called "perfidious Albion" is just as perfidious as ever.
This
is the Great Mischief that Chief Justice Harlan foresaw, that the
British Territorial United States Government would, under the pretense
of governing itself, attempt to govern us --- and by venal guile
accomplish what they could never accomplish by force of arms.
All
such Pretenses and the source and motivation for these Pretenses have
now been cut to the bone before the Perpetrators and the members of the
High Courts of the world.
These
people, including Donald Trump, are not acting as Americans while they
are adopting British Territorial U.S. Citizenship.
Our
claim to our American States, our land and our soil, remains, as we
ourselves remain, internationally declared, recorded, and published
nationals and citizens of our States of the Union, still operating our
lawful American Government and in international venues, still operating
our Federation of States doing business as The United States of
America.
That
should be all that needs to be said or explained in refutation of the
claims of The Republic of the United States of America, and in exposure
of its foreign nature and criminal objectives, which are acts and claims
made in insurrection and treason against our actual American Government
to which they all owe good faith and service.
Including Donald Trump. And Joe Biden.
Issued by:
Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary
The United States of America
In care of: Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652
August 22nd 2024
----------------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
Thoughts on Administration
By Anna Von Reitz
The
Federation of States is sometimes (not often) called upon to conduct
investigations related to the operations of State Assemblies, and at
this stage of things, the actions of Coordinators who are supposed to be
acting as go-betweens, bringing forward questions that the Assemblies
have and bringing back answers to expedite the process and ensure that
everyone is working from a common template that will yield good
results.
The
customary Assembly template requires that four functions, which we
refer to as "pillars", are organized in each Assembly and that the
functions and services performed by those "pillars" are present, working
correctly, and serving everyone as they should.
These four pillars include the General Assembly, the International Business Assembly, the Militia, and the State Courts.
This
is a lot of work for people to wrap their heads around and organize
themselves to accomplish, even when the proportion of the task is kept
in measure and relative to the numbers of the people in each Assembly.
The
Coordinators are not experts in any one of these functions when they
start and are American State Nationals like everyone else, yet, by
virtue of being identified as a "leader" of some sort they inherit the
burden of many assumptions carried over from the Corporate Government.
Sometimes
even they get confused and fall back into the old indoctrination and
start abusing "power" and taking actions which are neither appropriate
nor fair.
Americans have lost sight of the American Way and must find it again.
Similar
to mistaking Coordinators for CEOs, there has been a tendency to think
that every disagreement ends in litigation in a "court" of some kind and
that rules of Due Process apply to business relationships which are
really as simple as hiring and firing and not subject to this sort of
legalistic process.
When
the Federation has to spend the time and money to investigate
wrong-doing at the hands of a Coordinator, we don't do it for fun or on a
whim. We do it to protect the interests and rights of the members of
the Assembly and to honor our responsibility as the Summoning
Authority.
Recently,
more than two dozen members of The Michigan Assembly contacted us with
serious allegations of wrong-doing and denial of their basic rights:
free speech being censored, cronyism, denial of the basic right to
participate in their own government, profiling of members, arbitrary use
of time-outs and false accusations of disorderly behavior. Other
similar complaints have been made in other States.
It seems that we become what we hate.
Simple
coffee klatches have been mischaracterized as "public meetings", and
public meetings have been mischaracterized as private meetings. A
miasma of ignorance, partisan politics, and self-service ---- and fear,
of one kind or another, hangs over all these similar ugly
circumstances.
When
I was growing up I had the opportunity to see, first hand, that those
who seek offices are seldom those who should be in office. Too often,
they seek office because they are afraid or because they are
self-interested, and neither one of these motivations can result in good
performance.
Other
times, people accept offices when they shouldn't --- when they really
don't have the time or the interest or the skills or lack some other
basic "piece" of personal stability --- but they resolve to try their
best anyway.
I
have sympathy for these folks and am grateful for their efforts, but
again, when you are pinch-hitting with half a deck, and are distracted
by other issues, it's hard to do the job and do it right. It also
becomes far more stressful than it should be.
Under
stress, then, people often say and do things in desperation that they
shouldn't. They lose patience. They "pop" off and adopt a "my way or
the highway" attitude toward people who are their equals and lose sight
of the communal nature of the American Government.
It
may be a cry for "Help!" but when that cry is expressed as a Mute
Button or an arbitrary "Time Out" or in extreme cases, telling people
that they can "never" be a member of their own State Assembly and have a
voice in the public government in this country --- the rest of us must
be forgiven for taking offense.
The
perfect candidate for any position in any State Assembly is a stable
middle-aged person who is not currently at odds with the corporate
government and not fond of politics or gossip -- someone with life
experience and skills related to the job.
We
don't always have the largesse of perfect candidates, but we can try
our best to get good people and get them into the right jobs.
Personal
stress, and trying to do jobs that require more patience, or different
skills, are the three top reasons that Assembly Officers and
Coordinators fail.
We
don't blame them for failing or not fitting or just getting it wrong,
but when a Coordinator is denying the basic rights of Assembly Members
to speak, to participate, to disagree, to ask questions --- and do all
the other things necessary to reach consensus, we first try to correct
the erring behavior; if they continue in this behavior, we investigate;
and if they still persist in acting in an autocratic fashion and
disrespect the equal rights of other members, we fire them.
From our perspective, there is a well-defined job to be done and we either get it done or we don't.
Part
of the Coordinator's job is to uphold and teach and model the
principles of the American Government. Some of those principles are
clearly stated, as in the Bill of Rights, and others are built into the
structure of our government.
From
time to time, and for whatever reasons, a Coordinator may not know the
Basics of what I call the "American Way", or, when under stress, may
fall back on the autocratic indoctrination we have all suffered at the
hands of the corporate government.
They may abuse powers that they don't actually have, and deny others the same rights that they cherish for themselves.
The
Federation doesn't choose Coordinators. We work with those who
volunteer from each State. We do, however, have the power to remove
Coordinators who unreasonably trespass on the equal rights of others, or
otherwise fail to perform the work required.
We
don't do this lightly or without misgivings, and we do not do it with
any pleasure or arrogance; we do it after thorough investigation, and we
do it only when it is absolutely necessary.
We
don't divulge the identities of our investigators, which would
ham-string their efforts --- and they are not the "accusers" --- all and
any accusations of wrong-doing arise in the Assemblies themselves.
To
the extent possible, we wish for each State to build Coordinator Teams,
and encourage Assemblies to develop multiple Coordinators who can share
the work.
Simply
having more than one or two Coordinators helps break the indoctrination
of centralized "power"--- and helps prevent the politicking and
bottle-necking that can otherwise stifle the growth of an Assembly and
the joy of self-governance.
----------------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
No comments:
Post a Comment