Wednesday, March 6, 2019
1648-1652: The Continuing Debacle and The Remnant from Lincoln County Watch
By Anna Von Reitz
The Continuing Debacle and The Remnant
We wish to express our Extreme Displeasure:
The US Municipal "Congress" is out of control. They may be out of their minds, too.
They can't be allowed to abuse bankruptcy and just continue merrily on. You know this.
No doubt Cardinal Parolin and the others know this, too---whether or not
they want to admit it. The entire world is watching and knows the
score, knows what was done, by whom, to whom.
The Subcontractors are even worse, if possible. All these bogus
"Federal" Agencies are nothing but a huge expense and a nuisance. They
create trouble out of thin air just to give themselves something to
do--- and then ignore all the work that they are supposed to be doing.
The FBI, DOJ, BATF, FEMA, IRS, CIA, et alia --- they are all rampaging
around on our shores causing trouble, mis-addressing Lawful Persons,
staging all sorts of stupid military "operations", trying to confuse
everyone with deceitful use of language, getting ready to stage a "civil
war" on our shores, the entire point of which is to kill us, their
Employers.
The Holy Roman Empire needs to stand down and assist the Lawful
Government of this country. What should have happened in 1865 needs to
happen now.
The Apocalypse has happened and is ongoing.
The Great Tribulation has been paid.
The Remnant has returned.
Do the right thing.
Anna Maria
Dear Mr. Trump, On This Day
By Anna Von Reitz
Dear Mr. Trump,
On this 6th day of March in the year
2019, we wish to convey our sympathy and support against the outrageous
and unauthorized actions of the Municipal United States Congress. Feel
free to exercise your options.
We realize that you are not
responsible for their Bad Behavior and we are forwarding our Displeasure
to those who are responsible for THEM.
We would like to see a directive go
out to the United States Military to properly inform all members that
just because they signed up to act as "United States Citizens" as a
condition of receiving a paycheck, the rest of us are under no such
obligation and must be left alone, not addressed, not spied on, not
harassed, coerced, or made subject to any racketeering or unjust demand
at all --- ever, with regard to our choice of political status or the
exercise of our rights and guarantees, including our exemptions.
We have a nasty DOD-UN CORP-FBI and
other assorted Municipal Alphabet Soup group being run out of Michigan
calling itself the "Michigan General Jural Assembly" but in fact they
are misrepresenting themselves as a lawful State Jural Assembly and are
apparently aiming to set up a Municipal Corporation merely named after
the actual State---instead.
A "Bait and Switch" Operation.
We deduce this from the fact that
their leadership all claims "United States Citizenship" or "Citizenship
of the United States" and they continue to promote the idea that such
"Citizens" have Constitutional rights and guarantees and tell people
that they can retain such citizenship obligations at the same time that
they are purportedly acting as one of our State Jural Assemblies.
Our States do not now nor have they ever allowed Dual Citizenship.
We protest against all of these
continuing "similar names deceits" and against all of these various
foreign corporate enterprises seeking to impersonate our actual States
while being guests upon our shores.
We ask for your assistance in
properly informing these groups and individuals --- some of whom may be
well-meaning patriots who are simply confused, some of whom are no doubt
acting as Undeclared Foreign Agents.
Among all the other Disinformation
that supporters of this group are spreading is the idea that the "FBI"
has approached me and asked me questions and otherwise bullied me. This
is not true, nor should it be. As a Subcontractor of a Subcontractor,
the FBI has no authority to address me and neither does the IRS or any
other Municipal Agency.
We wish for your Administration to
make it completely clear that none of these contractors are to
investigate, meddle with, contact, address, coerce, lie to, attempt to
interfere with, co-opt, misdirect, or harm any American who is claiming
their lawful birthright political status as an American State National
or American State Citizen of any of the now-fifty States.
We wish for all Military Contractors to be fully advised.
We are the lawful Civilian Government of this country and we are fed up with the "Service".
Any service organization wishing to
get a contract or keep one needs to stop playing games and do their
actual jobs--- jobs which do not include running co-option schemes
and psychological warfare operations on the People of this country.
We request and require the full and
explicit compliance of all military personnel, including subcontractors,
to cease and desist all operations aimed at destabilizing, thwarting,
impersonating, co-opting, misinforming, threatening, bullying, or
otherwise interfering with our State Assemblies or mis-addressing our
Lawful Persons.
We also request and require that
they cease and desist all operations seeking to establish commercial
corporations "in our names" or the names of our States. This is an
unwelcome, unnecessary, fraudulent usurpation against the actual States
and People of this country.
We are quite competent and capable
of issuing our own charters and will do so -- an eventuality which is
not the business of any Territorial or Municipal Citizen, nor any
Federal Agent, Agency, Subcontractor, or Department.
Thank you for your service and patience in the midst of such injustice.
----------------------------
See this article and over 1600 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.
Ours v. Theirs
By Anna Von Reitz
Even today, among sincere patriots, there are many misunderstandings.
I had one such man who has devoted
his life to restoring the lawful government owed to the people of this
country describe the Federal Constitutions as our "Founding Documents".
They aren't our Founding Documents. They weren't even anticipated when our Founding Documents were forged.
The Federal Constitutions establish
the Federal Government and our States are Parties to those agreements,
but no, folks, the Federal Constitutions --- all three of them --- were
lucky to be included as Organic Law in this country.
The Constitutions govern national
trusts and commercial services contracts. They stipulate which
organizations are supposed to provide which services. They establish the
form and structure of the Federal, Territorial, and Municipal
Governments as they pertain to us. They limit the Federal Government.
They provide guarantees to our States and to us. And that's about it.
As things stand, the trusts have
been held in contempt by the British Monarch and the Pope, and the
services have been totally ramrodded. The Hired Help has been running
the roost, writing up contracts for themselves, charging whatever they
wanted against our credit under conditions of fraud and under color of
law.
And who are the Hired Help? The "United States Citizens" and "Citizens of the United States".
These are two groups of foreign
operatives on our shores, one British (United States Citizens) and one
Papist (Citizens of the United States). Their political status is
created and defined under Article 1, Section 2 and Article I, Section 3.
They are our employees and we are their employers. Never forget it again.
The Constitutions are their "Founding Documents"---- not ours.
We have every reason and right to
form up our actual State Assemblies and hold the Queen and the Pope feet
first to the fire for Gross Breach of Trust and for Fraud and many
other crimes against the living people of this country.
We, the People, who are the actual
population of the geographically defined States, can enforce the
Constitutions and we need to do so without any further debate.
In view of the way we have been
dis-served by the Queen and the Popes, we have every right to refuse
them any further assumption of contract. Mr. Trump has a 30 day quid
pro quo and that's all anyone has at this point.
They want us to respect the
Constitutions and pay the bills, but they don't want to live in accord
with and respect the Constitutions --- nor do they show the least little bit of concern for their actual employers.
They, the Hired Help, want to lord
it over us and pretend that we are employees, just like they are
employees---- except that we are considered "volunteers" who don't get
paid for our services: slaves and indentured servants.
The tail has been wagging the dog so
long that they, the tail, have forgotten that there is a dog, and
tragically enough, there are even many Americans who have been asleep
and thought so, too.
Well, here's a big ray of sunshine
up their skirts. We are back. In force. On the land and soil of the
American States. We know who we are. We know who they are. And the
whole world knows what they owe us.
----------------------------
See this article and over 1600 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.
Points of View, Terms of Art, and Where Pedal Meets Metal
By Anna Von Reitz
I already explained how all Federal
Code, Titles, Acts, etc., are written from the Federal Perspective ---
from their Point of View, not ours.
That's how we become described as "non-resident aliens" in their IRS Code.
This is also how "United States
Citizens" and "Citizens of the United States" can be described by them
as "Domestic Terrorists" --- because such Legal Persons are "domestic"
with respect to the Federal Government.
These same Legal Persons are foreign
with respect to us. We have to call them "Foreign Terrorists" when US
Citizens engage in activities meant to
scare, intimidate, or coerce us.
In the same way, from their
perspective, it's okay to call a "State of State" a "STATE". They
aren't really lying, though they are promoting confusion. From their
point of view, a "State of State" is a "State" --- but not from ours.
We have already encountered this
particular confusion when we discussed the "Confederate States" --- both
North and South --- which were in fact Federal States of States, and
not "States" in the sense that we think of a "State" at all.
To avoid the facts and avoid giving
the power of our government back to the civilians it belongs to, the
British-controlled military government that has ruled here since 1863,
is promoting just that kind of confusion again.
We figured out that a "state of
state" is not a State, so now they are trying to confuse us by claiming
that a "STATE" is the same as a "State" --- but it's not.
Anything that appears in all capital
letters, for example, "MICHIGAN", is announcing to the world that it is
in fact a corporation--- and a particular kind of corporation, too: a
Municipal Government Corporation, operated by the Holy See and the Holy
Roman Empire.
Our physically defined States of the Union are not corporations of any kind.
Our physically defined States of the Union are unincorporated entities.
Our States are actual, factual, located-in-space.
Confederate "States" meaning Federal
States, are not, and neither are any Territorial or Municipal
"States". All such "States" are "inchoate"--- non-physical, legal
fictions. They are "States of States" being called "States" within the
Federal Government system.
So to avoid all this confusion, just cut to the chase: are you talking about incorporated entities or unincorporated entities?
I am talking about unincorporated States.
When I talk about "States of the
Union" I am not talking about the "Federal Union" of States of States
that fought in the Civil War.
I am talking about the actual
unincorporated States that belong to The United States and which are
members of The United States of America --- an unincorporated Federation
of States.
So that's how you cut through all the baloney: is it incorporated?
If so, it is not a "State" for our purposes.
The Federales can call their States
of States an "Onion" for all I care. The bottom line is -- they are
talking about incorporated entities, and I am not.
If we are talking about an unincorporated State called "Wisconsin", that's my Home State, where I was born.
If we are talking about an
incorporated "State" called "Wisconsin", in the current context, that's a
foreign British-controlled commercial corporation.
If we are talking about an incorporated "STATE" called "MICHIGAN", that's a foreign Papist-controlled commercial corporation.
The fail-safe, fool-proof question is: incorporated or unincorporated?
Now, I am of the opinion that once
we get our States Assembled, we have grievances to settle against the
British Monarch and the Pope. They have been promoting a "similar names
deceit" and constructive fraud by promoting this confusion between the
actual and factual States and their commercial corporation franchises.
We are owed a "lawful conversion" of all our purloined assets, including respect for our copyrights and Good Names.
Meantime, we keep our noses to the
grindstone and our wits about us. Their "States" are not our "States"
and the difference is: our States are not incorporated entities.
----------------------------
See this article and over 1600 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.
Dear Bobby, ….
By Anna Von Reitz
Bobby, I don't know who you are, but I feel
that you deserve some honest answers. So I am going to give you what
you aren't getting elsewhere.
I
just re-published answers I already gave to Jeff Dougherty, who persists
in trying to hide his identity behind the nickname "Sun Tzu"---
speaking of "obfuscating": he has pretended that I didn't answer his
questions, when they are published on my blog and now as a whole
separate article as of this morning: "A Repeat of Answers Already
Given".
Let's go over the latest
screed of venomous misrepresentation and ignorance point by point. I
will reduce the size of his typeface because he is very verbose and
wordy and leave my replies in large blue type so you can distinguish
them easily.
Dear Bobby,
Thank you for posting on the forums at National-Assembly.net
I discovered your post on the forum and I am responding to you and it.
I agree with some of what you said, Anna Von Reitz is in
fact the individual who's writings first WOKE ME UP to the situation at
hand. I began working with the Michigan Jural Assembly members as soon
as Anna DECLARED, "Michigan Jural Assembly did everything right!" - Those were her exact words.
Yes, Bobby, they even fooled me -- for a
time. They had the trees right enough, but not the forest. It turns
out that they are bent on trying to assemble a "State of State" and not
an actual land jurisdiction State at all. The process of assembling is
the same, but the inputs and the end results are very different. In
their case, they wind up with a foreign commercial corporation
franchise. In our case, we wind up with a functioning State of the
Union.
So I worked with members of the MGJA(Michigan Grand Jural
Assembly) to discover what it meant to "Peaceably assemble, to redress
grievances, and to self represent," the MGJA members helped me
understand all of these things. The MGJA members informed me that I did
not have to "repudiate my U.S. citizenship," as it would bring great
hardship upon my life. MGJA members did however tell me that if I chose
to do so (repudiate citizenship) that I WAS WITHIN MY RIGHT to do so.
Anna's actual answer: I never told anyone to
"renounce" or "repudiate" --- you have to "rebut" presumptions by
producing superior evidence and you need to "expatriate" from any
"presumed" political status as a "US Citizen". These are different
actions and they have different results. I have had to repeatedly
rescue people who "renounced" their US Citizenship and got stuck in
foreign countries, but none of that was on my advice.
However, the MGJA members then put me in touch with other
Michigan Grand Jural Members who HAD REPUDIATED THEIR U.S. CITIZENSHIP
and the information I learned from them WAS OF GREAT IMPORTANCE.
Just as Anna Von Reitz has advised, [No--
I never advised anyone to do any of this. It is contrary to what I
actually teach on my website. I teach people how to "expatriate"-- not
"repudiate" and I have never in my life told anyone to return their BC's
or anything else. No such action is necessary--- but changing your
political status back to being an American State Citizen or American
State National, is.]
…. in rder to repudiate your citizenship, you send them back
your Social Security Card, you send them back all other U.S. government
provided identification too (driver's license). Then the MGJA members
informed me of what happens when you get pulled over without a driver's
license, how the intentionally low IQ hired law enforcement officers do
not give a rats butt about any papers you have on you to prove that you
have the right to drive without a driver's license. The very presenting
of "Documents" to the officer, has in many times alerted that officer
that you are a threat, a domestic terrorist known as a sovereign
citizen, and anyone paying attention knows that the government has
declared sovereign citizens as "Domestic Terrorists."
In order to be a "Domestic Terrorist" you
have to be "domestic" with respect to the Federal Government. Neither I
nor anyone I teach is "domestic" with respect to the Federal
Government. Hello? US Citizens are "domestic" with respect to the
Federal Government. American State Citizens are not. Hello, Houston?
Hello?
I have NEVER told anyone to do anything like
this. Ever. Bobby, are you listening? He is telling you that I said
things I never said, and that other people acting upon "my" advice were
harmed. What I in fact teach is published on my website and not open to
interpretation. I have never once told anyone to "renounce" their US
Citizenship. I have taught people how to properly "expatriate" from it
and told them why.
There isn't even a tiny bit of truth in
anything being told to you, except for the fact that people who try to
exit the system the wrong way suffer. Pretending that I suggested any
of this is the worst kind of BIG LIE.
The Michigan Grand Jury members I spoke with who had repudiated
their U.S. citizenship informed me that upon the law enforcement officer
realizing that they had just traffic stopped a "Domestic Terrorist,"
the MGJA member was then cuffed and stuffed.
Upon refusing to sign the corporation, "United States Inc,"
paperwork at the local jail, the MGJA members sat in jail for 60 days,
which is as long as the U.S. corporation can legally hold someone for
driving without a license. Please bare in mind that these were 60 days
in jail for FIRST OFFENSE.
This is because despite all their "protest" and "rebellion" and "insurrection" against the "State of State" corporations, they
hadn't changed their actual political status,
so they were still held to Statutory Law and still considered bound by
private contract to that law. Uh-duh.
So, I present you the following evidence.
1) Is a U.S. Citizen protected by the Bill of Rights?
Answer: YES
Anna's actual answer--- No, they are not, and never have been. At best, they are "granted" Equal Civil Rights.
2) Does the First Amendment to the Bill of Rights guarantee the
right to, "Peaceably Assemble, to Redress Grievances, and to Self
Represent?"
Answer: YES, IT DOES
Anna's actual answer: It gives the right to
assemble to Americans, but not to British and Holy Roman Empire
"Citizens"---- that is, US Citizens. US Citizens can be arrested for
"assembling".
3) Yet Anna says that in order to EXERCISE that right, you need to repudiate your U.S. Citizenship!
Answer: THAT IS FALSE INFORMATION
Anna's actual answer: what I am telling you
has been true since the foundations of this country. As of 1787. And
it has never changed. The people trying to lead you are blind as bats
and will get you in real trouble, just like the Colorado Nine, who
didn't listen to me, either.
FINDINGS:
A) Why would Anna Von Reitz knowingly provide false statements?
Anna's answer: I didn't. It's you that is
not being honest. I am telling you the God's Honest and Verifiable
Truth. You just aren't accepting it.
B) Anna originally used the title of Judge in her name.
Answer: The Alaska Government HAS NO RECORD of any variations
of Anna Von Reitz, aka Anna Reitzinger, aka Anna Von Reitzinger EVER
BEING A JUDGE in the State of Alaska.
Anna's actual answer: who ever said I was
acting as a Justice or a Judge for any "State of State"??? Can you see
the difference between these two things: "State" and "State of State"?
State equals actual State of the Union, geographically defined, physical, actual
State of State equals corporate franchise of a foreign commercial corporation, legal fiction, inchoate, not physical or actual.
Learn the difference so you know what you are talking about before you even open your mouth.
C) Anna originally stated that she was a COMMON LAW JUDGE.
Answer:
In order to be a Common Law Judge, Anna Von Reitz would of been
required to submit her name for candidacy in a local election in her
county of the State of Alaska and she would have been required to get 60
signatures to get her name on the ballot, and then if there was no
incumbent, she would have obtained the seat of "JUSTICE OF THE PEACE."
Anna's actual reply: I
did "stand for election" --- unopposed as it happened, because nobody
else stepped forward into the gap left when our one remaining Justice
died of old age. As for any "60 signatures" that applies to "States of
States" not States. Our States are now so de-populated thanks to idiots
that it would be hard to find sixty knowledgeable jurors in a State the
size of Alaska, but thankfully, our States don't require that.
All
the things you are "assuming" to apply-- don't. That's because you are
operating in a "State of State" framework and mindset instead of being
aware of the actual State.
Again,
I never said I was representing any "State of State" organization at
all. I am occupying the land jurisdiction of a State. Two different
things. I have never said otherwise.
This
is all people trying to confuse oranges with apples, and apparently on
purpose because I have been VERY clear about this from the very
beginning.
She did not run for election, nor did she obtain the seat.
That is why when the FBI visited her, they asked her the following questions:
1) What Oath did you swear to become a Common Law Judge?
2) What is the significance of the 1783 Treat of Peace?
Upon the FBI leaving, she IMMEDIATELY removed her title as "Judge."
Anna's
actual reply: The FBI has never "visited" me, never addressed me at
all, so it would be hard for them to ask me any questions and also hard
for me to make any replies! Ha! The FBI doesn't want to talk to me, and
in fact, they are well-aware that it would be inappropriate for them
address me.
This is just pure fabricated lies.
And I am still a "Judge" if I act as a Postal District Judge and I am still a "Justice" if I act for a land jurisdiction court.
Learn the verbiage. It matters.
She
however did not inform 9 of her students in Colorado to do the same.
They were all days later arrested, some of whom are still in jail.
Anna's actual reply: I fought with the leader of the Colorado Nine,
Bruce Doucette, for three months prior to the action that led to their
arrest, trying to make them see sense and own truth, just like I am
doing here. They wouldn't listen to the logic or the facts, so I
finally drew a line in the sand and published notice officially ending
my association with them. It appears as Article 485 on my website www.annavonreitz.com for
anyone who wants to know what I actually told them at the time and why I
shook the dust off my feet. I believe the title is "An End to My
Association with Bruce Doucette and Michael R. Hamilton".
Hamilton was a Federal Insurance Agent. I am fairly sure he was sent into the group to mislead the members.
Anyway, that Article was published well-before the Colorado Nine took
their ignorance and rode off into history. What they did was not on my
advice. So count that as ANOTHER BIG LIE being promoted by "Sun Tzu"
--using a fake name.
Now I present the final evidence:
An Interview Anna Von Reitz gave:
The above interview given by Anna Von Reitz exposes the true nature of this PSY-OP.
Anna says"You have to go through all this process and all of
this development of a public paper trail in order to reestablish who you
are."
Answer: FALSE
Anna's actual answer: Yes, you do have to do
this, just as I have always taught, and there is no getting around
it. They have created "evidence" in the form of Birth Certificates and
similar documents that show you have a private contract with their
commercial corporations. Until and unless you create "Superior
Evidence" rebutting their claims, you are subject to them, to their
"State of State" franchises, and all their private law. What I said in
the interview was correct and still is and I stand by it. If it were
not true, I would be in jail and if I were not validly a land
jurisdiction Justice, I would be arrested for impersonating a judge.
These people (Sun Tzu, Destry, MGJA, et alia) are either ignorant or
deliberately misleading you.
Anna is attempting to make it difficult for you to represent yourself,
she is trying to make you think that it is difficult to exercise your
GOD given rights, when all you have to do is pull out your BILL of
RIGHTS, dust it off, and read the FIRST AMENDMENT.
Anna's actual answer--- this would be true,
if you had any rights guaranteed by the Constitutions, but as a "US
Citizen" you have no such rights or guarantees.
Anna says you have to repudiate your U.S. Citizenship.
Answer: FALSE
Anna's actual answer--- see the discussion above about "repudiation" vs. "expatriation".
"United States Citizens" and "Citizens of the
United States" were defined by the Constitutions. They are not and
never were parties to the Constitutions and do not have constitutional
guarantees. This is why when you appear in a US District Court the
Judge will tell you (as a US Citizen) that the "Constitution doesn't
apply here and I will hold you in contempt if you mention it again".
Some patriots are too stupid to get it and won't learn no matter how
many times their noses get rubbed in it.
Anna is very effectively performing several tasks:
1) Obviate
Anna is "Obviating" threats, to "Remove threats who would pose a
challenge to Corporate United States Inc's RECKLESS OPERATIONS and
ENDLESS felony OVER BILLING, there is trillions of dollars more to steal
coupled with vast underground resources to steal from the people, vast
resources of public lands to SELL, which is a theft against the people
as the public lands were constitutionally granted to the people forever,
and could not be withheld, sold, or multiple use permit denied.
Anna's actual answer: the only "PERSONS"
intent on stealing anything are the foreigners among us, specifically,
"US CITIZENS" working for foreign commercial corporations, and as I just
published (again) this week, the rotters are intent on trying to set up
franchise corporations merely calling themselves "State" ---- as in
"MICHIGAN". I published the addresses of the Registered Agents websites
to prove to you that this is exactly what the Michigan General Jural
Assembly is knowingly or unknowingly promoting --- a commercial
corporation calling itself a "STATE"---- not the actual State at all.
Be aware and be smart about this. There is a lot at stake.
Anna Von Reitz is protecting the ability to continue THE THEFT via THE
GREAT FRAUD, as people rotting in jail cells for driving without a
driver's license can hardly be capable of challenging the corporation,
"United States Inc," let alone living under a bridge, with no job,
because they have no Social Security card, so no one will hire them, and
even if they did find work, they have no bank account, and cannot get
one, as I said, a person living under a bridge does not pose a threat to
the corporation United States.
Anna's actual answer--- look at the above
"discussion"---they are trying to make you fearful, and make you bow
down to every little demand of their corporations--- and on the other
hand, they are trying to convince that you have "rights" as a "US
Citizen" that you demonstrably don't have while in that political
status, and all the terrible things they describe "living under a
bridge" etc. have only happened to who? People stupidly clinging to "US
Citizenship"--- and not bothering to reclaim their birthright standing
as American State Nationals or American State Citizens! Ask yourself
---if you had any "rights" as a US Citizen, much less constitutionally
guaranteed rights, why are the US District Judges telling you right from
the bench that you have no constitutional guarantees and that the
constitution doesn't even enter in to their court??? Wake up!
2) Obfuscate
Anna is making the necessary path "Unintelligible, unclear, or obscured."
define Obfuscate:
Anna is "Obfuscating," making the path forward unclear and full of; doubt, worry, and concern, for personal well being.
Anna's actual answer: there is nothing
"unclear" about what I am saying or what I am teaching. It is very
simple. You have been kidnapped into a foreign jurisdiction of the law,
where you have no rights and no constitutional guarantees and no
property rights, either. You have been purposefully misidentified as a
"US Citizen" --- a political status that is foreign to you. You have the
option of reclaiming your birthright political status, but you must
create a public claim to it by declaring your permanent homestead and
domicile on the land and soil of your home State of the Union. There are
three
simple documents that need to be recorded to do that. You also need to
be able to prove that you are the "John
Michael Doe" whose actual birthday appears on the Birth Certificate they
issued "in your Name" by providing two Witnesses who can connect you to
the living baby born that day and time and place. There is nothing too
difficult about this, except explaining it to knotheads and fools who
cling to their chains and refuse to admit that they have been used and
duped.
Anyone with reason knows that they are putting themselves in harms way when they "Repudiate their U.S. Citizenship."
Anna's actual answer: no, you get into
trouble when you allow people to misrepresent you as anything but an
American State Citizen. It's just the opposite of what these people are
selling you. And as many of you have directly experienced--- all these
bad things happen to who? Those who are clinging to "US Citizenship" as
if it were a great thing. Why would you want the same political status
as someone from Puerto Rico? That's what "United States Citizenship"
means! Or, alternately, why would you want to subject yourself to the
Holy Roman Empire? Most of you aren't even Catholic! That's what
"Citizen of the United States" means. Wake up! Wake up! Wake up!
Anna "Obfuscates" when she makes up a WHOLE BUNCH OF THINGS that you
NEED TO DO, in order to exercise these God given rights, when all you
really had to do was DUST OFF YOUR BILL of RIGHTS.
Anna's actual answer: as any US District
Court Judge or Attorney will tell you, US Citizens have no
"constitutional rights or guarantees" --- and never have had. Ask
yourself, how anyone whose political status was created by the
Constitutions, could at the same time be party to the Constitutions?
They can't. The plain fact is that no kind of "US Citizen" -- neither
Territorial nor Municipal -- has ever had any part of the
Constitutions. They are subject to the Constitutions, not those
protected by them.
3) Injure
define Injure:
Anna is attempting to "Injure" any fully motivated person who would move against the United States Inc corporation.
Anna's actual reply: I don't belong to nor do
I suggest that anyone else belong to any commercial corporation or have
anything to do with any commercial corporation nor do I advocate that
any average person offer to do battle with any commercial corporation.
"People" exist in a totally different realm of the law and different
jurisdiction than "Persons" and all the injuries that people are
suffering are a result of being misidentified as "persons". The
"injury" occurs when we leave these corporations and stand as living
people again. You must all understand that a "US citizen" of any
stripe, literally belongs to either the British Crown Corp (United
States Citizens) or to the Pope (Municipal Status). Is that where you
want to be? Then, cling to your chains and make no objection to being
called a "US Citizen".
It's your choice, after all.
It is difficult for injured prey to mount an efficient, intelligent, and
calculated attack against a seemingly all powerful corporation, "United
States Inc."
4) Deter
Anna is "Deterring" anyone from joining up with other Grand Jury
Assembly Members whether it be the Michigan Grand Jury Assembly or any
others.
Anna's actual answer--- I am leading people
to actually accomplish what they want and need to accomplish, which is
the restoration of their lawful government and the assembly of their
actual State --- not a commercial franchise calling itself a "STATE".
The leaders of MGJA either don't know their
butts from tin cups when it comes to assembling an actual State with
actual People, or they are deliberately seeking to create another
commercial corporation franchise.
How can anyone imagine that "US Citizens" ---
like people from Puerto Rico can come here and populate our States
"for us" and restore our government? No, what they would be doing is
creating their own government to rule over ours. And we have no reason
to support that, do we?
Anna is sewing devision between Patriots who are looking for a solution.
Anna's actual answer: I already presented the
solution to all this a long time ago, and it stands ready to implement
for everyone with the brains to do it.
And THE ANSWER is that our Founding American Forefathers knew that this
day would come! They knew the enemy; in the Vatican, the enemy in
England, and any other Royal Power that would seek to weaken or destroy
the greatest threat to continued world domination would eventually come
to steal America from We The People. Thus the Founding American
Forefathers ensured that any Constitution coming after the First
Constitution, would have to contain all of the original constitution.
Although the Bill of Rights is the greatest weapon against the forces of
Evil that our Founding Fathers & the Framers gave us to destroy the
enemy even in the midst of the DARKEST LONG NIGHT. The weapon, the
SILVER BULLET, has been discovered.
Anna's actual answer: US Citizens have no
"Bill of Rights". If you doubt that, just continue to call yourself a
"US Citizen" and neglect to reclaim your birthright political status and
drive over the speed limit.
Our Founding Fathers would roll over in their
graves if they knew that we have become so stupid that we can't even
read the Constitutions they gave us and understand what they mean.
They would be utterly appalled to know that
any American allowed themselves to be conscripted and mislabeled a "US
Citizen" of any kind.
All you need to do is follow "The Handbook" as provided by the Michigan
Jural Assembly. The Patriots operating the National Assembly and the
Michigan Jural Assembly, many of them are former special forces Patriots
who served long and hard to protect the people of this nation, and once
they discovered the plot and how far the rabbit hole of death and
suffering was dug, they set out to correct the wrongs and liberate We
The People from the Evil of a foreign power that had overtaken us.
Anna's actual answer -- the Evil has already
overtaken us. Any "Special Forces" are part of the problem and not the
answer. We have been the victims of a foreign British-controlled
Territorial United States Military operating on our shores (and
worldwide) in the same capacity as the British Raj in India. This has
been a problem of military ignorance, corruption, and usurpation against
the Civilian Government since 1863.
Go back and read the very first "Executive Order" issued by Abraham Lincoln in 1863.
Then submit a letter to the Congressional
Research Service or any of the Congressional Delegations and ask if the
Reconstruction Acts have been repealed.
They will answer that only a few specific
parts of the Reconstruction legislation have been repealed and the vast
bulk of it remains in full force and effect.
So now you can see that our own dear military
is up to its neck and is at least partly responsible for the problem in
the first place---- and when they interfere like this and misrepresent
the facts and try to make other people adopt "US Citizenship" akin to
their own in ignorance or in guile, they are part of the problem, not
the solution.
The "Evil" has already arrived.
It's called being a "presumed citizen of the
United States". And if you don't want to be owned by the Queen or the
Pope, it's high time you all woke up and smelled the java. I repeat---
"US Citizens" have no constitutional rights and no guarantees. The best
they have are "Equal Civil Rights" provided at whim or not, by the
members of the Municipal United States Congress acting under Article 1,
Section 8, Clause 17.
All other Handbooks, like the one Anna stole and is selling on Amazon,
will put you living under a bridge, in jail for 60 days at a time,
without a bank account, without the ability to leave the country and
gain RE-ENTRY.
However Bobby, I suspect you are also working for the Cabal. Because if
you were listening on that National Assembly call when we were
discussing Anna Von Reitz, you would have heard the testimony that both I
and Others gave, revealing both Anna Von Reitz, and Soaring Spirit as
being Crime Syndicate operatives to Obviate, Obfuscate, Deter, and
Injure
Anna's actual reply: Have nothing more to do
with the Michigan General Assembly or their mistakes. Pay no attention
to their fear-mongering and their wrong assertions about "US
Citizenship". All the bad things are happening to "US Citizens" --- not
American State Nationals, not American State Citizens. The proof is in
the pudding.
Please note the egregious and apparently deliberate lies they are spreading?
I "stole" the MGJA "Handbook" by writing a better one, article by article? And publishing it on my website as I wrote it?
Show me where I ever advised anyone to
"renounce" their "US Citizenship"? I have told everyone to "expatriate"
from it, which is a different thing entirely.
Show me where I ever said I was a "State of
State" Judge? I am not confused about who I am, what my political
status is, or anything else. Why would I be working as a Hired Jurist
for a Commercial Corporation?
Even their lies are ignorant.
Shake the dust from your weary feet, Bobby.
I never ever wanted to be responsible for
organizing the States on top of everything else that sits on my plate,
but here we are, facing up to that.
The American States Assembly will be
organizing actual geographically defined States of the Union. Those who
are interested in restoring their lawful government and living their
lives as Lawful People, are invited to assist in this great endeavor.
It should be understood that: (1) the actual States are unincorporated
entities; (2) the actual States have physical borders; (3) the actual
States are populated by People who are protected by the Constitutions;
(4) the People are all either American State Nationals (who have no
obligation to serve the government) or American State Citizens (who
agree to serve as Jurors or in other capacities as needed).
The States have nothing to do with any State
of States, nor do they have anything to do with any commercial
corporation calling itself a "State" or a "STATE".
Finally, Bobby, I want you to notice who they
quote-- people who weren't even at the interview that I gave the
Southern Poverty Law Center, people who sought to misrepresent what I
was saying and what I have been saying for years.
So who are they "representing"? And what?
----------------------------
See this article and over 1600 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.
No comments:
Post a Comment