Fluoride Information

Fluoride is a poison. Fluoride was poison yesterday. Fluoride is poison today. Fluoride will be poison tomorrow. When in doubt, get it out.


An American Affidavit

Monday, March 25, 2019

1696-1699: My Nightstand from Lincoln County Watch




Sunday, March 24, 2019

1696-1699: My Nightstand from Lincoln County Watch


By Anna Von Reitz

My Nightstand is large, indeed, capacious for a nightstand.  It has room to hold a lamp, a clock radio/CD player, water decanter, and lots of books.  There is room for the Bible to have its own space with no other books below or on top of it, and room for a stack of ever-changing books of other kinds.  

I try to keep a variety of books in that Big Stack.  There are currently books about mathematics and medicine, law and journalism, Christian commentary, botany, mineralogy, early American History, and British History on my nightstand.  They vary in difficulty from weighty and dense, jargon-filled tomes to light popular reading that keeps me connected.  

Thank God I learned to read and to write and --miracle of miracles, considering my eye-hand coordination-- also learned to type. 

There is always some new wonder or insight to discuss and share, some reason to be lost in contemplation.  The whole glory of creation opens up, even in a jail cell, even in the loneliest and most remote place, if you have the companionship of a book.  Late at night you will find me reading my share of the Bible and then trying to find a few extra minutes to address the Big Stack.  

Life being life and things being what they are, some books stay in the Big Stack for months as I gradually macerate them a few pages at a time.  Other books are there and gone like a spark from a bonfire.  I devour "light reading" like a box of bon-bons--- and mostly with the same kind of pleasure. 

A friend recently sent me a copy of Howard Storm's book, My Descent into Death.  I recommend it.  As I was hurtling through it I had to stop several times as the words on the page so perfectly and succinctly described my own experience of "Near Death" and the awareness I was given.  

Coming so very near to death changes your life in ways you don't even begin to imagine at the time it happens.  It opens doors and insights that were hidden before.  It expands your capacity to feel and to love and to be connected.  Isn't it strange that death can be a portal to new life and purpose?  And yet, it is.  It was for Howard Storm.  It was for me, too.  And like him, I feel compelled to say something, to raise my hand and share the experience. 

Just on the other side of the veil separating the living from the dead, the Truth is fully known.  There's never any reason to lie or keep secrets, because every tiny detail, every motivation, every circumstance is fully known.  And not just about your life, about every life.  It's all recorded on eternal Memorex.  

If I can share nothing else and convey nothing else to people about that blessed intimacy with God and the Angels that we are all invited to share, regardless of our sins and regardless of our religions, let it be that there are no secrets.  There are no lies.  

So you have no reason to be anything but upright in your lives.  You are free to be absolutely honest about all things, at all times, and it makes no sense to live your life any other way.  

And if I am gifted to share any other insight with all of you, let it be that every effort you make to be good and to love the Earth and to love other people increases the joy of all creation.  Love is never wasted.  

Every time you choose good over evil, every time you make the thankless effort, every time that you sacrifice to help someone, every time you let your love extend outward -- it matters.  So let those moments and gestures and efforts increase and let those sacrifices be made with faith and heart, to please Our Father in Heaven, to bless those struggling along with us, and to make our Choice for the future certain. 

----------------------------

See this article and over 1600 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.

The Truth About "Southern Poverty Law Center"


By Anna Von Reitz

No doubt some of you remember the Hit Pieces issued by SPLC trying to mislabel me (yes, me of all people) a "sovereign citizen" --- to which I replied that the man writing the article never interviewed me (was lying outright) and that the Southern Poverty Law Center isn't "Southern", isn't concerned about "Poverty" and as far as I can determine isn't a "Law Center" either. 

But I digress.  Recent exposure of the slimy organization reveals that it has a budget of half a billion dollars --- more than a small country.  That in itself should raise eyebrows. If the "mission" is to help solve the southern poverty problem, imagine what half a billion invested in jobs and scholarships and actual help for poor people in Alabama could do?  

But there is more....  Turns out that the King Pins in SPLC lost $60 million in court for telling more lies and slandering and libeling other people besides me.  

This was a sore point with the Board of Directors for some reason, given that they have made it their business to slander and misrepresent others for decades in an effort to whip up fears of Jim Crow and increase donations. 

Here's a quote lifted from the ZeroHedge report from a former SPLC staffer: 

"“Outside of work," recalls Bob Moser of his days working for the organization [Southern Poverty Law Center], "we spent a lot of time drinking and dishing in Montgomery bars and restaurants about … the hyperbolic fund-raising appeals, and the fact that, though the center claimed to be effective in fighting extremism, ‘hate’ always continued to be on the rise, more dangerous than ever, with each year’s report on hate groups. ‘The S.P.L.C.—making hate pay,’ we’d say."  

Just sayin'.  If promoting baseless fear propaganda is part of your stock-and-trade  ---- presenting innocent people and organizations as threats, racists, and "haters" so as to plump up your own coffers to half a billion dollars --- you should expect to get sued and be prepared to take it in the teeth. 

So the Board fired their long-time fearless leader and co-founder, Morris Dees, just as the organization faced up to allegations of internal sexual misconduct.  Now his successors and lieutenants are fleeing the proverbial kitchen, too.  


Who knows?  Maybe SPLC will finally get some new leadership and upgrade their behavior and ethical standards to something above snake belly?  Quoting the Washington Examiner article cited by ZeroHedge: 

The only thing worse than a snarling partisan activist is a slimy conman who merely pretends to be one. -Washington Examiner 

----------------------------

See this article and over 1600 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.

Who to Trust?


By Anna Von Reitz

I often get asked who among the various sources should be trusted as reliable --- and the answer is that none of us get it 100% right a 100% of the time. Including me.
Nor are we all "perfect" in all venues and respects, because everyone that I mention has their specialties and tends to work in some particular jurisdiction of the law or arena of historical inquiry. Some are focused on private relief and others are more focused on general relief/restoration of a proper lawful government and still others are focused on some particular historical research period.
So when I make a recommendation like this it is with a built in caveat emptor, in that you have to know or learn where the pieces of the puzzle fit and define what your own needs are.
In terms of people/sources who reliably make the Good Faith Effort besides my own team and who dig up good nuggets of Truth with the consistency of Truffle Pigs, I would include [in no particular order]:
Rod Class -- PAGs and Administrative Law
Kelby Smith of HISAdvocates -- Private Living
Jean Keating -- Maritime and Admiralty Law
Mark Emery -- Private Living
Kurt Kallenbach - Paramount Claims of Life, History, DNA
Romley Stewart - History, DOG LATIN, Fraud Investigation
Neo - Statutory Law and Practical Quick Fixes
Peter of England - Private Banking, Current Events
SEDM - Federal Bureaucracy, Private Living, Forms
Boris - Private Living
Jordan Maxwell - History, Birth Certificates
Robert David Steele - Natural Law
Field McConnell - Military, Administrative History
Neil Warren - Lawful Banking (England)
Richard Cornforth -- Statutory Law, Legal History
John Trowbridge - History, Statutory Law, Constitution
Mary Croft - Government, History, Attitude Adjustment
Brent Winters - History of Law, Constitutions, Common Law
Freedom School - IRS, History, Statutory Law
Isaac Witham - Early American History, Treaties
Michael Kearns - Early American History, Treaties
SPLSPro -- British Equity Law
Emily Windsor - Cragg - British History, British Law, Monarchy.
Republic of Texas - IRS and Tax Court, Land Patents
No doubt I am forgetting very worthy groups and people at this moment and will think of them with a big "ouch!" as they (or their fans) call me to task. Please don't think that just because someone's name doesn't appear on The List that it is any strike against them per se. This is just an Off-the-Top-of-My-Head list of some of the many people and organizations who are contemporaries providing insights via websites, videos, teleconferences, or publications and who have consistently provided solid information in these subject areas.

----------------------------

See this article and over 1600 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.
  

An Apology to Robert


By Anna Von Reitz

Most of the time I am patient and explain things as well as I can and as often as necessary, but once in a while, I lose my temper --- just get worn down and pop off at someone who hits me at the wrong moment with something that has been a cause of irritation for days or months or even years.  This recently happened with Robert and I would like to apologize.  

He wrote to me about the issue of  "Affidavits of Truth".   He assumed that I was using Certificates to replace Affidavits and referenced an article of mine where I explained that living people who are acting in their unincorporated Lawful Person capacity can't make Affidavits ----- only corporations (like franchises) or officers of corporations can make Affidavits.  The rest of us must label our presentations as "Testimony in the Form of an Affidavit".  

This is part of the Court Rules and part of the reason that our Testimony doesn't get heard in Court.  Another reason is that too many people file their paperwork with the Court Clerk and don't file it with the Prosecutor directly and with the District Attorney.  

They aren't obliged to accept your Testimony, read it, react to it or respond to it until and unless you label it properly for what it is and present it to them.  Directly. 

There is a difference between an "Affidavit" and "Testimony in the Form of an Affidavit", just as there is a difference between a "State of State" and an actual "State".  

I get worn out trying to teach people who don't read things closely enough to notice these differences for themselves, and I can get really frustrated with those who still don't notice these things AFTER I have pointed them out. 

If a man asserts that he is operating exclusively as a Lawful Person and is owed exemption and exoneration, but then turns around and submits an "Affidavit" instead of a "Testimony in the Form of an Affidavit" he has presented conflicting information.   

He is claiming to act in one capacity and then, by submitting an "Affidavit of Truth" instead of "Testimony in the Form of an Affidavit" is demonstrating that he is in fact operating in a completely different capacity.   It's like a Colonel in the Army showing up in full dress uniform and claiming that he's a civilian.

If we are going to deal competently with the many issues facing this country, we must all learn to read things much more closely, with more attention to what the words actually say and how things are labeled and named.  

So, I am sorry for losing my temper, Robert.  It was just the straw that broke the camel's back after months of trying to draw people's attention to similar facts:

A State is not a State of State. 
A State of State is not a STATE OF STATE.
An Affidavit is not Testimony in the Form of an Affidavit.
A United States Citizen is not a Citizen of the United States. 
An American State National is not a US Citizen. 
The United State [Unincorporated] is not the United States, Inc. 
The United States of America [Unincorporated] is not the USA, Inc. 
Indictments are not Presentments.  
A Republican State is not a Republic, etc., etc., etc... 

As confusing as the rats have made this, I actually have great sympathy with people who are threading their way through the maze and who care enough to do so.  I'm sorry, Robert.  Please forgive me for being Grandma Grump.

----------------------------

See this article and over 1600 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.

No comments:

Post a Comment