The
Open Conspiracy
When I speak of Fabianism, or of any particular Fabians,
actual or virtual like Kurt Lewin,
once head of Britain's Psychological Warfare Bureau, or R.D. Laing, once
staff psychologist at the
Tavistock Institute, I have no interest in mounting a polemic against this particular conceit of the
comfortable
intelligentsia. Fabian strategy and tactics have been openly announced and discussed
with clarity for nearly a century, whether identified as Fabian or not. Nothing illegal about it. I do think it a
tragedy, however, that government
school children are left in the dark about the existence of influential
groups with complex social agendas
aimed at their lives.
I've neglected to
tell you so far about the role stress plays in Fabian evolutionary theory. Just as Hegel taught that history moves
faster toward its conclusion by way of warfare, so evolutionary socialists were taught by Hegel to see struggle
as the precipitant of evolutionary
improvement for the species, a necessary purifier eliminating the weak
from the breeding sweepstakes.
Society evolves slowly toward "social efficiency" all by itself; society under stress, however, evolves
much faster! Thus the deliberate creation of crisis is an important tool of evolutionary socialists. Does that
help you understand the government
school drama a little better, or the well-publicized doomsday scenarios of environmentalists?
The London School of Economics is a
Fabian creation. Mick Jagger spent time there; so did John F. Kennedy. Once elitist, the Economist, now a
worldwide pop-intellectual
publication, is Fabian, as is The New Statesman and Ruskin Labor College
of Oxford. The legendary Royal
Institute of International Affairs and the Tavistock Institute for Human Relations, premier mind- bending
institutions of the world, are Fabian. Theodor Adorno, an important if barely visible avatar of the
therapeutic state, and a one-time
eminence at Tavistock, traveled the Fabian road as well.
You needn't carry a
card or even have heard the name Fabian to follow the wolf-in- sheep's-clothing flag. Fabianism is
mainly a value-system with progressive objectives. Its social club aspect isn't for
coalminers, farmers, or steam-fitters. We've all been exposed to many details of the Fabian program
without realizing it. In the United States, some organizations heavily influenced by Fabianism are the Ford
Foundation, the Russell Sage
Foundation, the Stanford Research Institute, the Carnegie Endowments,
the Aspen Institute, the Wharton
School, and RAND. And this short list is illustrative, not complete. Tavistock underwrites or has intimate
relations with thirty research institutions in the United States, all which at one time or another have taken a
player's hand in the shaping of
American schooling.
Once again, you need
to remember we aren't conspiracy hunting but tracking an idea, like microchipping an eel to see what
holes it swims into in case we want to catch it later on. H.G. Wells, best known of all early Fabians, once wrote
of the Fabian project:
The political world
of the Open Conspiracy must weaken, efface, incorporate and supersede existing governments.... The
character of the Open Conspiracy will then be plainly displayed. It will be a world religion. This large,
loose assimilatory mass of groups
and societies will definitely and obviously attempt to swallow up the
entire population of the world and
become a new human community.... The immediate task before all people, a planned World State, is appearing at a
thousand points of light [but]...
generations of propaganda and education may have to precede it. (emphasis
added)
Zbigniew Brzezinski wrote his famous
signature book "Between Two Ages: America's Role in the Technetronic Era" in 1970, a piece reeking
with Fabianisms: dislike of direct
popular power, relentless advocacy of the right and duty of evolutionarily
advanced nations to administer
less developed parts of the world, revulsion at populist demands for "selfish self-government"
(homeschooling would be a prime example), and stress on collectivism. Brzezinski said in the
book:
It will soon be possible to assert
almost continuous control over every citizen and to maintain up-to-date files containing even the most personal
details about health and personal
behavior of every citizen, in addition to the more customary data. These files will be subject to instantaneous
retrieval by the authorities. Power will gravitate into the hands of those who control information.
In his essay,
Brzezinski called common people, "an increasingly purposeless mass."
And, of course, if the army of
children collected in mass schooling is really "purposeless," what argument says it should exist at
all?
l3
The government-created crisis, masquerading as an unexpected external
provocation, is elementary Hegelian strategy. If you want to take Texas and California from Mexico, first
shoot a few Americans while the press disinforms the nation that Mexican
depredations against our nationals
have to be stopped; if you want Cuba as a satrapy, blow up an American
battleship and pin it on the Cubans. By this strategy, a nation which has decided to suspend its
democratic traditions with a period of martial law (under which permanent
social reordering would occur)
might arrange a series of "terrorist" attacks upon itself
which would justify the transformation as a defense of general public
safety.
l4 In
the "world peace" phenomenon so necessary to establish a unitary
world order lies a real danger, according to evolutionists, of species deterioration caused by inadvertent
preservation of inferior genes which would otherwise be killed or starved.
Hence the urgency of insulating
superior breeding stock from pollution through various strategies of
social segregation. Among these, forced classification through schooling has been by far the most important. An Everlasting Faith
No comments:
Post a Comment