5177: International Public Notice: Citizenship v Nationality from Lincoln County Watch
By Anna Von Reitz
There are only four(4) possible "citizenships" in The United States.
The
first form of citizenship predating all the others, is State
Citizenship. A State Citizen owes his or her allegiance uniquely to the
State where they live --- California, Wisconsin, etc. This is an
peculiarly American Citizenship, entirely voluntary, and engaged in by
adults knowing and being accountable for their actions.
The
second form of citizenship is United States Citizenship, a form of
citizenship created by the First Naturalization Act, which allows
Americans to go through a lengthy and voluntary process allowing them to
demonstrate their good character and other attributes allowing them to
work for the original American Federal Subcontractor, the Federal
Republic, established under The Constitution for the united States of
America ( Federal Constitution, 1787).
States
of America refers to the doing-business-as name of the Second
Confederacy which failed in 1861. The First Confederacy between the
soil and land jurisdiction States known as the Union States (soil) and
the States of the Union (land) survived intact as a "perpetual Union"
under the Laws of Nature; the Second Confederacy between the States of
the Union (land and sea) and the States of America (air) failed because business organizations created by men cannot guarantee a "perpetual union" via any means of contract.
That is, they attempted to guarantee a contract that they could not
possibly guarantee, and in the end, the contract failed in April of
1861. When it did, both the Second Confederacy and the Federal Republic
failed; the United States Citizens lost their political status as a
result and this form of citizenship has been vacated ever since.
The
third form of citizenship is known as U.S. Citizenship and it refers to
the citizenship status of British Territorials living in United States
Territories and Possessions, such as Puerto Rico and the Mariana
Islands; these people are British Territorial Subjects. Puerto Rico
remains a British Commonwealth nation to this day. They are foreign with
respect to the "free, sovereign and independent states" of the Union
States and the States of the Union, but they work for us under The
Constitution of the United States of America (Territorial Constitution,
1789).
The
fourth form of citizenship known as "citizenship of the United States"
attaches to the Holy Roman Empire's Municipal Government employees who
staff the Federal Civil Service working under The Constitution of the
United States (Municipal Constitution, 1790). This is the form of
citizenship referenced by the infamous (and still unratified) Fourteenth
Amendment to The Constitution of the United States of America
(Territorial Constitution) and also arbitrarily "conferred upon" freed
Negroes who were still being denied political status by some of the
Southern States after the Civil "War" Conflict. This is again a foreign citizenship unique to the District of Columbia.
The Federal Civil Service and its "citizens of the United States" sided with the Southern States in the Civil War Conflict;
afterward, the British Territorial U.S. Congress was looking for a way
to collect war reparations from them. Adding the freed plantation
slaves to the ranks of the "citizens of the United States" gave them
more targets to attach as chattels backing their own public debts, so
"citizens of the United States" are chattels and debtors by definition
under the Fourteenth Amendment, even though the States of the Union
never ratified the Fourteenth Amendment or any subsequent amendment.
That
is, the Fourteenth Amendment to the Territorial Constitution stands as a
unilateral and substantively unenforceable contract amendment made by
employees without the agreement of their employers; it exists only upon
the legal presumption that the States of the Union have not formally
disagreed, and so it is thought to be accepted by acquiescence, when our
States of the Union have never been properly addressed concerning this
issue and no ratification process demonstrating due diligence has ever
been pursued by our Territorial Employees.
This
unilateral action adopting the Fourteenth Amendment to The Constitution
of the United States of America without formal ratification by the
States of the Union, created a citizenry of slaves "owned" by the
British Territorial United States as chattel property and as you will
read in the (still unratified) Fourteenth Amendment, they were defined
first as criminals, and because they were criminals, as slaves.
The
effect was to abolish slavery with one hand (Thirteenth Amendment) and
institutionalize public sector slavery with the other hand (Fourteenth
Amendment). Thus, the issue of slavery was never resolved; private
slave ownership was outlawed, but public slave ownership was allowed and
institutionalized to the detriment of all concerned.
These are the four --- and only four --- forms of citizenship that have existed in this country since the War of Independence
With
respect to your referenced case, the issue is entirely: (1) when did
this issue arise, and what kinds of "United States" citizenship were
available at the time? and (2) which of the potentially three (3) forms
of "United States" citizenship are being referenced with respect to the
intended renunciation?
As
you will see by closely reading the document that you presented to us
for evaluation concerning an issue that arose in the 1980s, what was
actually being considered was United States nationality, not United States citizenship --- which are two entirely different things:
So,
now that we have recognized the fact that "citizenship" in this case is
a Red Herring, let's deal with nationality and properly reframe the
issue of any stare decisis, which is not about "US citizenship" but
instead about American nationality, which precludes any form of US
citizenship absent formal proof of its voluntary and conscious and fully
disclosed adoption and continuance.
Americans
born in one of the States of the Union take their nationality from
their State and are known by the demonym of that State of the Union ---
they are Californians, New Yorkers, Texans, Wisconsinites, Minnesotans,
Virginians and so on. That is our actual nationality as a
member, by birth, of a nation-state. Unlike people born in virtually
any other country on Earth, Americans are not presumed to inherit
citizenship obligations at birth and in fact cannot undertake
citizenship obligations even if they wish to volunteer, until they reach
the age of majority, which for them is still 21 years of age.
British
Territorial U.S. Citizens are born as British Subjects and as such
inherit citizenship obligations to the British Government at birth and
are considered to be British Territorial Nationals --- Puerto Ricans,
Mariana Islanders, etc.
Municipal
"citizens of the United States" likewise are born as Roman Municipal
citizens and inherit those obligations to their foreign government at
birth; their nationality, to the extent that it exists, is dependent on
the existence of the "independent, international city state of
Washington, DC". They can be called "Washingtonians" but that would
cause confusion with the people born in Washington, the State. A quick
check of the official Government Printing Office list of demonyms shows
that this precise confusion does exist and that both populations,
those born in Washington the State and those born in Washington the
City, are calling themselves "Washingtonians".
A better answer has been suggested: "District Columbians", but this has not been adopted.
So, now you know that nationality derives from where you are born, whereas citizenship refers to owing service and duty to the government of that place.
In
America, you can be born in a State of the Union, say, Wisconsin, and
owe no duty to serve the government of Wisconsin. The government of
Wisconsin instead owes a duty of service to the people born in or living
in Wisconsin, the Wisconsinites.
If
you are born in Puerto Rico, you are a Puerto Rican national by birth
--- that's your nationality, and you inherit the citizenship obligations
of a British Territorial Subject.
If
you are born in Washington, DC., you are a "Washingtonian" (until
further notice), and you inherit the citizenship obligations of a Holy
Roman Empire city-state.
There
are some saving loopholes to all this. If you are born in a British
Territory or other foreign country or political status (e.g. born in
Washington, DC, because your parents were working there), and one or
more of your parents was born in a State of the Union, you can claim
their birthplace as your own and adopt their nation-state nationality.
If,
for reasons of insanity and fraud, a foreign nation such as the British
Territorial Commonwealth nation of Puerto Rico tries to "confer" its
citizenship obligations on you, you are also free to expatriate from
that presumed foreign political status or any other "conferred" foreign
political status (such as "citizen of the United States") under the
Expatriation Act.
Bottom-line
-- Americans are not "US Nationals" of any stripe and are not heir to
any kind of United States citizenship by birth, either.
We belong to our States of the Union (land) and our nation-states (soil), as free, sovereign, and independent people.
All
our Territorial and Municipal employees are both contractually and
honor-bound to make sure it stays that way; any usurpation against our
nation-states or attempts to unlawfully convert our natural political
status, is an international crime known as unlawful political
conversion, which is a capital crime under both the Geneva and Hague
Conventions.
Any
"misunderstanding" on this point needs to be cleared away. We have
herein fully demonstrated our awareness and mastery of these identity
issues, have claimed our nationality, and have asserted our natural
freedom from any inherited or unconscionable contractual citizenship
obligations to any foreign government, Territorial or Municipal.
So
any stare decisis established by any international court or commission
must firmly establish and respect these obligations on the part of the
United States Subcontractors and hold us harmless from foreign
citizenship obligations that our foreign employees have attempted to
confer on us.
The
intention to refuse claims of United States citizenship obligations is
not the same as an intention to renounce one's birthright nationality.
Issued by:
Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary
The United States of America
In care of: Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652
December 17th 2024
----------------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
No comments:
Post a Comment