Case 23-1073 RALAND J BRUNSON, Petitioner, V. SONIA SOTOMAYOR, et, al.,

In The

Supreme Court of the United States

♦

RALAND J BRUNSON,

Petitioner,

V.
SONIA SOTOMAYOR, et, al.,

Respondents.

♦

On Petition for Writ of Certiorari To The United States Court OfAppeals For The Tenth Circuit

♦

PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI

Raland J Brunson
4287 South Harrison Blvd., Apt 132 Ogden, Utah 84403
Phone: 385-492-4898
Petitioner in pro se

 

 

QUESTIONS PRESENTED

A serious conflict exists between decisions rendered from this Court and lower appeal courts, along with conflict that exists between constitutional provisions and statutes that do or do not protect treason and misprision of treason.

1. Also, under the U.S. Constitution and supportive citations as demonstrated in this case, doesn’t the lower court have jurisdiction to try the merits of this case?

2. Also, under acts of treasons doesn’t the lower court have the authority to remove sitting Justices of this the Supreme Court of the United States, while deeming them unfit from ever holding a office under Federal, State, County or local Governments found within the United States of America?

3. Also, the doctrine of equitable maxim, created by this Court, doesn’t it set in direct violation of

   jurisprudence affecting every court in America?

4. Also, doesn’t the requirement that permission must first be granted before suing a Federal Officer place a unconstitutional restriction against the free exercise of the First Amendment to petition the government for a redress of grievances?

5. Also, isn’t it unconstitutional for any statue, or citations or any legalese that provides a shield of immunity towards the protection of the guilty rather than the accountability of the guilty? 

   6. Due to the fact that the last few words of the oath of office state “So help me God” does this not mean that when this oath is taken they have sworn to God with allegiance to God and the Holy Bible?

   7. Also, when one violates the oath of office is it not an act of treason?

   8. Also, does not a remedy exists that supersedes the unconstitutional governmental immunity while still protecting governmental officials making other remedies redundant and unconstitutional?

   These questions/conflicts call for the supervisory power of this Court to resolve these conflicts, which has not, but should be, settled by this Court without delay.