APPENDIX A The FEMA Manual for Sandy Hook row official vse only Federal Emergency Management Agency Exoiaae Plan Bmatgaicy Response Poi Mata CoauaMy Oril Matt CaauUbca frying Cfrildtcn Federal Emergency Management Agency FEMA Site Activation Call-down Drill Exercise Plan [Mass Casualty drill] Cxercise Dale: 12/14/12 Publishing Date: 10/08/12 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 219 FEMA Cxercise Plan Mm Casualty Drill FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Federal Emergency Management Agency Emergency Response For Mass Casualties involving Children Final INTENTION ALLY LEFT BLANK l r OR OFFICIAL l SE ONLY 220 The FEMA Manual for Sandy Hook FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Federal Emergency Management Agency Exercise Plan Emergency Response For Mass Casualty Drill Mass Casualties Involving Children Preface National Preparedness is sponsored by FEMA and the Department ofllomcland Security. This Exercise Plan was produced with input, advice, and assistance from the National Incident Management System (NIMS) exercise planning team, which followed the guidance set lorth in the federal Emergency Management Agency (FKM A). Homeland Sccuntv Exercise and I valuation Program (I IS EE. P) The Plan gives officials, observers, media personnel, and p lasers from participating organizations the information necessary to observe or participate in an all hazards preparedness exercise focusing on participants' emergency response plans, policies, and procedures as they pertain to specific scenarios. '11k information in this document is current ;ls of the date of publication. 10 OK 2012. and is subject to change as dictated by the National Incident Management System exercise planning leant The Preparation for Muss Casualty is a ctaviified eiereiw The control of information is hosed more oil public sensitivity regarding the nature of the exercise than on tbc actual exercise content Souk exercise material is intended for the rxclusivc use of exercise planners, controllers, and evaluators, hut play ers may view other materials deemed necessary to their performance. The Exercise may he viewed by all exercise participants, Inn the ('ontrtdler amt f'vatiuilor <( .YE) Handbook is a restricted document in tented for controllers and evahmior* only. All exercise participants should use appropriate guidelines to ensure the proper control of information within llwir areas of expertise and to protect this material in accordance with current jurisdictional directives Public release of exercise materials to third parlies is at the discretion of 11 k federal Emergency Management Agency and the Preparation for Mass Casualty exercise planning team. Prelace i FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Sensitive Document 221 FEMA Cxercise Plan Mm Casualty Drill Prelace FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Federal Emergency Management Agency Emergency Response Foe Mass Casualties involving Children This page is intentionally left blank. A FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Sensitive Document 222 The FEMA Manual for Sandy Hook FOR OFFICIAL USe ONLY Federal Emergency Management Agency Exercise Plan Emergency Response For Mass Casualty Drill Mass Casualties Involving Children Handling Instructions I I1k title of this document is Mass < usually Prill Involving Children Exercise firm (Exflani 2. The information gathered in this FvPIan is For Official I 'sc Only (FOUO) and should he handled as sensitive informal ion not to he disclosed. This document should be safeguarded, handled, transmitted, and stotvd in accordance with appropriate security directives. Reproduction of this document, in whole or in pari, without pnor approval from The Department of Homeland Security is prohibited. 3. At a minimum, the attached materials will be disseminated only on a necd-to-know basis and when unattended, will be stored in a locked container or area ottering sutlicient protection against tliell. compromise, inadvertent access, and unauthorized disclosure. 4. For more information, please consult the follow ing points of contact ( PCX's): Agency POC : Tom Romano Federal Emergency Management Agency X60.236-0R44 (office) thomas lomaiHvact.gove Fxereise Director: Not Available Handling Instructions FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Sensitive Document 223 FEMA Cxercise Plan Mm Casualty Drill Handling Instructions FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Federal Emergency Management Agency Emergency Response For Mass Casualties Involving Children Tim page is intentionally left blank. hr FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Sensitive Document 224 The FEMA Manual for Sandy Hook FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Federal Emergency Management Agency Exercise Plan Emergency Response For Mass Casualty Drill Mass Casualties Involving Children Contents Preface ...........................................................................................................I Handling Instructions Hi Chapter 1 : General Information ... 1-1 Introduction 1-1 Confidentiality 1-1 Purpose 1-1 Target Capabilities 1-1 Exercise Objectives 1-2 Chapter 2: Exercise Logistics 2-1 Exercise Summary 2-1 Exercise Tools 2-3 Exercise Implementation 2-3 Accident Reporting and Real Emergencies 2-4 Communications Plan 2-4 Chapter 3: Player Guidelines 3-1 Player Instructions 3-1 Chapter 4: Evaluation and Post-Exercise Activities 4-1 Exercise Documentation 4-1 After Action Report 4-1 After Action Conference and Improvement Plan 4-1 Appendix A: Participating Agencies A-1 Appendix B: Standard Script for Calls B-1 Contents v Sensitive Document FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 225 FEMA Cxercise Plan Mm Casualty Drill Contents FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Federal Emergency Management Agency Emergency Response Foe Mass Casualties involving Children This page is intentionally left blank. vi FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Sensitive Document 226 The FEMA Manual for Sandy Hook FOR OFFICIAL use ONLY Federal Emergency Management Agency Exercise Plan Emergency Response For Mass Casualty Drill Mass Casualties Involving Children Chapter 1 : General Information Introduction 'Che Preparation for Mnvc Casualty i\ a drill declined to establish a learning environment fur p lasers to exorcise emergency response plans, policies, and procedures as they pertain to a mass casualty incident involving children. A drill is used to validate a single specific operations or function of a single agcncx organization and can be used to practice maintain skills This Exercise Plan (ExPlan) was produced at the direction of the Department of Homeland Security with the input, advice, and ;tvtixlance of the Preparation for Mass Casually planners Confidentiality The Preparation for Mass Casualty is a classified exercise . The control of information is bused more on public sensitivity regarding the nature of the exercise than on the actual exercise content Some exercise material is intended for the exclusive use of exercise planners, controller;, and evaluators, but players may view other materials deemed necessary to tlieir performance. Ibis ExPlan may be viewed by all exercise participants, but the ( ontroder and Evaluator (C/E) Handbook is a restricted document intended for controllers and euduators only. All exercise participants should use appropriate guidelines to ensure the proper control of information within their areas of expertise and protect this material in accordance with current Department of Homeland Security directives. Public release of exercise materials to tliinl parlies is at the discretion of the Impairment of Homeland Security and the federal Emergency Management Agency and the Preparation for Mass Casualty Planning Team. Purpose The purpose of this exercise is to evaluate plaver actions against current response plans and capabilities lor a mass casualty incident response. Target Capabilities The National Planning Scenarios and the establishment of the National Preparedness Priorities have steered the focus of homeland security tow ard a capabilities -based planning approach Capabilities -based planning focuses on planning imder uncertainty, since the next danger or disaster can never be forecast w ith complete accuracy Therefore, capabilities -based planning takes an all -hazards approach to planning and preparation which builds capabilities that can be applied to a w ide variety of incidents States and l ’rban .\rcas use capabilities -based planning to idcnlily a baseline assessment of their homeland security efforts by comparing their current capabilities against the Target Capabilities last (TCI.) iukI the critical tasks of the I mvcrsal I ask l.bt (l TE). This approach identifies gaps in current capabilities and focuses efforts on identifying and developing priority capabilities and tasks for the jurisdiction. These priority capabilities are articulated in the jurisdiction's homeland security strategy and Multi-Year Training and Exercise Plan, of w hich this exercise is a component of. Chapter 1: General Information 1*1 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Sensitive Document 227 FEMA FOR OFFICIAL use ONLY Federal Emergency Management Agency Exercise Plan Emergency Response Foe Mas* Casualty Drill Mass Casualties involving Children 1 he capabilities listed below haw been selected by the Preparation tor Mass Casualty planning team from the priority capabilities identified in the federal Emergency Management Agency s Multi-Year framing and Exercise Plan. These capabilities provide the foundation for development of the exercise objectives and scenario, as the purpose of this exercise is to measure and validate performance of these capabilities and their associated critical tasks CORK CAPABILITY KKSKAKCII INIT1ATIVK I he IJJS.gov team striven to provide useful and pertinent information to the whole community. In order to deliver relevant lessons learned and innovative practices to our users, the LLlSgov team is focusing its research on Core Capabilities, as defined in the National Preparedness (ioal Ihe IJJS.gux team uwn the results of Stale Preparedness Reports (SPRs) to identify the capabilities slates have selfancned as both high-priority and low -proficiency Ihe LUSgov team lias already conducted research on Mass Care Serv ices. Cvbcreceurity. and Community Resilience , and will soon begin research on Housing Ihe goal of this research is In gather lessons learned, innovative practices, and resources from subject matter experts at all levels of gov eminent. NTKX and the private sector and share them w ith the whole community. Click on the pages below to view tlie gallicrcd resources, and please consider contributing your expertise. I.M flic Target Capabilities To He Kxcrckerfc • Mass Prophylaxis • Mass Death of Children at a School by Fircanm • Suicide or Apprehension of I n known Shooter • t Tse of Media for FAalual ion • Use of Media for Information Distribution Exercise Objectives Ihe lYepantfion for Mass Casualty exercise planning team selected objectives that focus on evaluating emergency response procedures, identifying areas for improvement, and achieving a collaborative attitude This exercise will focus on the following objectives: This k a Ikt of S4mplr objectives that ap|>ty to this r\mhc. Drills traditionally have I to 3 specific objectives. Site Call-Dow n. Ability to contact arid ensure facilities are available for emergency response functions. I . Measure the time needed for the jurisdislion to contact owners or managers of Emergency Dispensing Sites dining a mass casually or incident involving children, in occordanoc with MOlIs. Chapter 1 : General Ini ormal ion 1 -2 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Sensitive Document 228 The FEMA Manual for Sandy Hook FOR OFFICIAL USe ONLY Federal Emergency Management Agency E x ere me Plan Emergency Response For Mass Casually OrMI Maas Casualties Involving Children 2. Measure the lime needed For the jurisdiction to receive access confirmation from owners or managers of Emergency Dispersing Sites during a mass casualty incident involving children, in accordance with NIOl s 3. Measure the percentage of sites that are available foe use during a mass casually incident involving children, in accordance with MOl 's. Chapter 1 : General Information 1-3 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Sensitive Document 229 FEMA FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Federal Emergency Management Agency Exercise Plan Emergency Response Foe Mtu Casually Drill Man Casualties Involving Children Chapter 2: Exercise Logistics Exercise Summary General The Preparation lor Mass Casuah> is desired to establish a learning environment lor player* to exercise their plans and procedures for responding to an incident involving children as casualties. The Preparation tor Mass Casually will he conducted on 12 13 1 2. beginning at 8:00 am. Exercise play is scheduled until the Kxeretsc Director Controller determines that the exercise objectives have been met. Everyone must Mgn ui w ith controller upon arrival. Assumptions and Site Call-Down Instructions This s4>« linn contains the basic instructions on how to oiikIimI this drill using both a manual and automated call-clow n system. These Msumptiom and instructions arc derived from spec ilk' CDC guidance and should result in the necessary «*ut|Hit lor data collection. For more details, please see: Chan. Edvard, el al. Working Piper: Operational Assessments for SSS Readiness. Santa Monica: R.WD Health, 2006. Assumptions constitute the implied factual Inundation for the exercise and. hence, are assumed to be present before the start of the exercise. The following general assumptions apply to the Preparation for Maw Casually • Site call -down list to be tested. Jurisdictions have dilTcrcnl lists of sites that w ould be called in an emergency. Example site call-down lists include I.DSs and warehouse locations. Site call-down lists should he kept up-to-date, readily accessible, and usable. Jurisdictions should select one of more of these lists for use during this site call-down dnIL • So-nouce' no availability drill. To collect the best possible perf ormance metrics, site call- down drills should not involve prior notice to those being calk'd, however, the drills need not require actually making the site available for use by the health department • So-notiee. Given that the purpose ol the assessment is to estimate the percentage of live sites on the calling list Hut ore reachable and available on a given day, we recoiiunend live drill be conducted on a no-noliee birds. At most, only the players who are required to initiate the site call-down procedure should he notified of the drill, but even they need not he warned beforehand. If using an automated calling system, only players who must activate the automated syxlcm need to be notified. • So site activation required. To reduce the burden associated with gathering performance metrics, sites on the call-down list are not required to actually make their site available for use by the health department. • It is critical that this mesvage is conveyed to lire contacts rcceiv ing the site activation call Chapter 2: Exercise Logistic* 2-1 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Sensitive Document 230 The FEMA Manual for Sandy Hook FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Federal Emergency Management Agency Exercise Plan Emergency Response For Mass Casualty Drill Mass Casualties Involving Children • Calling vi/wpnwni. Players should have access lo all calling equipment and any call revptrme mniulnring technology that would he used during a real emergency in order to track the call responses received • Automated calling system Jurisdictions using automated calling systems should collaborate with the provider of their calling lyrtcm to perform the site call-down drill • Manual railing system. Junvdiclions using nuimul calling systems should run the drill using the same equipment and facilities that would he used during a real emergency. If this is not practical, the dnll should be conducted using equipment and facilities that arc as similar as possible. • Response method. Jurisdictions should determine the method by which site* on the call* down list will acknow ledge receipt of the call-down message and report their ability to make Uicir site available. Automated calling system • I/an attlomaled response function is available. Sites on Ibc c .ill -down list should follow the instructions of the automated calling system lo acknowledge receipt of like call-down message and report whether or not they are able to make their cite available. Typically, persona called can enter a number on their phone after a prompt. • If an automated response function is not mailable. Upon being called, sites on the call-down list should acknowledge receipt of the call-dosvn message and report their ability to make their site available. The response can be in the form of an e- mail. phone call, or tcM message to a phone number specially designated for this purpose. Another option is to set up a call center to receive responses Only responses received w ithin a predetermined amount of time should be recorded for use in the performance metrics. Manual calline svslcin • During successful phone calls, the caller can manually record receipt of the call- down message and the ability of each site on the call-dow n list to make their site available • Protocol for non-respondent follow up. For the purposes of this drill, the following non- responses indicate Hut the site on the call-down list has not acknowledged receipt ol'lltc call-down message. « Rusy signal • No answer • Voicemail • Wrong person answering but correct person is unavailable • Wrong number. Jurisdictions should determine the protocol for how callers or automated calling systems should handle non-responses. Chapter 2: Exercise Logistics 2-2 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Sensitive Document 231 FEMA FOR OFFICIAL use ONLY Federal Emergency Management Agency Exercise Plan Emergency Response Foe Mm« Casually Drill Mass Casualties Involving Children Exercise Participants The following are I lie categories of participants involved in tins exercise, for purjx*o. of this call-down drill, participant* include the following: • Players. Players are the personnel who Jo lie calling during the exercise lie players in ihe exercise should he (he people who would do (lie calling in a real emergency • Hxerciie DircetorlConirotteri li valuator. Iliis position has the overall responsibility for planning, coordinating, and overseeing all exercise functions, lie she monitors the status of play and the achievement of the exercise design objectives. They declare when the drill starts and ends and manage the flow of Ihe drill. This is the only participant who will provide information or direction to the player*. However, because the drill focuses on the collection of time-based metrics, they should not intervene in timed activities while the drill is in progress. He she is responsible for liming the overall drill, gathering individual call data collection sheets, computing metric*, and taking notes to identify areas for improvement. F or an automated calling system. He she should remain unobtrusive and not intervene with player action. l or a manual c ailing m stent He she should not intervene with player action Ideally, the evaluator should be able lo listen in on the calls that the players make Exercise Tools Controller and Evaluator Handbook I tic Preparation for Mass Casualty Cl Handbook is designed to help exercise controllers and e valuators conduct and evaluate an effective exercise. This handbook also enables controllers and evaiuators to understand their roles and responsibilities in exercise execution and evaluation Should a player, observ er, or media representative find an unattended handbook, it should be provided to the nearest controller or evaluator. Master Scenario Events List Ihe MM. I outlines benchmarks, as well » tniects that drive exercise pl.lV h also details realistic input lo tlw exercise players as well as information expected to emanate from simulated organizations (i.c . those nonpartieipating organizations. agencies, and individuals oho would usually respond to the situation 1 Kir the purpose of this drill, the MSIT . will not contain injects, but will instead only contain anticipated actions of the players. Exercise Implementation Exercise Play Exercise play w ill begin at 8:00 ain on December 13" 2012. Play will proceed according to the events outlined in the MSF.l. in accordance with established plans and procedures Ihe exercise Chapter 2z Exercise Logistics 2-3 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Sensitive Document 232 The FEMA Manual for Sandy Hook FOR OFFICIAL USe ONLY Federal Emergency Management Agency Exercise Plan Emergency Response For Mess Casually Drill Mass Casualties Involving Children will conclude upon the completion of operations and attainment of the exercise objectives, as determined by the Exercise Director Controller. Ihe exercise is expected to end at 1 1 :59 pm on 12 13' 12 and be evaluated on 12 14 12 as a real-time event Exercise Rules The following are the general rules that govern exercise play • Real-world emergency actions take priority over exercise actions. • Exercise participants will comply with real-world response procedures, unless otherwise directed by control stall. • All communications (written, radio, telephone, etc.) made during Ihe exercise will begin and end with the phrase. "This it a drill, ~ Accident Reporting and Real Emergencies Hue lo Ihe nature of this drill, it is not anticipated that any accidents will occur, however, if an accident or real world emergency does occur. Ihe participant is lo immediately stop exercise play and altcnd to Ihe accident or real-world emergency as necessary and notify tlic Exercise Directrix Controller as soon as possible If a real emergency occurs that affects the enure exercise, tlic exercise may be suspended or temrinalcd al lire discretion of ihe Exercise Director Controller. Communications Plan Exercise Start, Suspension, and Termination Instructions The exercise is scheduled lo run until the Exercise Diwdor Controller dctcnniiws that the exercise objectives have been met- All apoken and written communication will start and end with the statement, “This is a Drill.” Player Communication (layers will use routine. tmplace agency communication systems Additional communication assets may he made available as the exercise progresses. The need to maitilain capability for a real -world response may preclude the use of certain communication channels or systems that would usually be available for an actual emergency incident. In no instance will exercise communication interfere with real-world emergency communications. See Appendix H: Standard Script for (alh for an outline of the recommended script for calling. Chapter 2: Exercise Logistics 2-4 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Sensitive Document 233 FEMA FOR OFFICIAL use ONLY Federal Emergency Management Agency Exercise Plan Emergency Response Foe Mum Casually Drill Maas Casual! lea Involving Children Chapter 3: Player Guidelines Player Instructions Before the Exercise • Participants should he familiar with the appropriate emergency plans, procedures, and exercise support documents During the Exercise • Respond to the exercise events and information as if the emergency were real, unless otherw ise directed hy an exercise controller • All exercise communication will begin and end with the phrase “t his is a drill" Urn is a precaution taken so anyone overhearing the conversation will not mistake the exercise play for a real-world emergency. Data Collection Data collection responsibilities depend on the calling system used l or an Automated Culling System the drill evaluator is responsible for all data collection and analysis. Most Automated Calling Systems have the capacity to generate reports detailing the results of the call -down. The drill evaluator is responsible for extrapolating the following information from the report: 1 . Recording I he drill information, including date and location of drill, number of players, etc. (sec Excel-based data collection spreadsheet I. 2. Recording the following process time stamps t to the hour and minute): a. When the automated system begins contacting sites on the call-down list b. When the automated system completes contacting sites on the call-down list c. When all sites have acknowledged receipt of the call-down message and reported their ability to make their site available by a pre-detemuned target lime, or a predetermined amount of time has passed. 3. ( ompuling the performance metrics after the drill. For jurisdictions using a Manual Calling System, the players will record data that must be collected by the evaluators in the post-cxcrvise period Ihc players (callers) are responsible for 1 . Recording the following time stamps (to the lumr and minute): a. When the player begins contacting sites un the call-down list b When the player completes contacting sites on Die call -down list 2. Recording for each site on the call down hit: a. Whether the site acknow ledged receipt of the call-down message h. Whether the site reported being able to make their site available hy the target time Ihc drill evaluator is responsible for 1 . Recording the drill information, including date and location of drill, number of players, etc. (sec Fxccl-hascd data collection spreadsheet X 2. (lathering the dttut collection .s/rreadxheels from each player. Chapter 3: Player Guidelines 3-1 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Sensitive Document 234 The FEMA Manual for Sandy Hook FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Federal Emergency Management Agency Exercise Plan Emergency Response For Mass Casualty Drill Mass Casualties Involving Children 3. Computing the performance metrics after the drill . Chapter 3: Player Guidelines 3-2 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Sensitive Document 235 FEMA FOR OFFICIAL USt ONLY Federal Emergency Management Agency Exercise Plan Emergency Response Foe Mass Casualty Drill Mass Casualties involving Children Chapter 4: Evaluation and Post-Exercise Activities Exercise Documentation 'Die goal of the drill is to comprehensively exercise and evaluate the Department of Homeland Security and the l-cdcrul Emergency Management Agency's plans and capabilities as they pertain to a potential mass casualty incident involving children Alter the exercise, data collected by controllers evaluators, and platers will he used to identify slrenglhs and areas for iinprovctnenl in Hie context of the exercise design objectives Exercise Evaluation Guides 1)1 IS lias developed Extras* Evaluation Guides (EKGs) that identity expected activities for evaluation, provide consistency across exercises, and link individual tasks to disciplines and expected outcomes. 'Die l. 1C is selected by the Preparation for Mam Casiahy trusted agents are eonlaiiK'd in the esalualor materials packet along with the C F Handbook. Supplemental evaluation material designed for the drill may also be used. Data Collection Spreadsheet and Scoring Metrics The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the RAND Corporation have developed a data collection spreadsheet and scoring metrics compulation spreadsheet, for axxcwing site call-down capability. After Action Report I he .L\K is the culmination ol' the Preparation lor Mara Casually II is a wnticn report outlining the strengths and areas lor improvement identified during the exercise. The AAR will include the timeline, executive summary scenario description, missiim outcomes. ant capability analysis The AAR will Ik drafted by a core group of individuals from the exercise planning learn After Action Conference and Improvement Plan The improvement proex'ss represents the comprehensive, continuing preparedness effort of which the drill is a part the lessons teamed and recommendations from the AAR will Isc incorporated into an Improvement Plan (IP). The After Action Conference is a forum for jurisdiction officials to hear the results of the evaluation analysis, validate the findings and recommendations in the draft AAR. and begin development of the IP. The IP identifies how recommendations w ill be addressed, including what actions will he taken, who is responsible, and the timeline for completion. It is created by key stakeholders from the Preparation for Mass Casualty participating agency officials during the Alter Action Conference. Chapter 4: Evaluation and Sensitive Document Po si -Exercise Activities 4.1 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 236 The FEMA Manual for Sandy Hook Exercise Plan Mm> Casualty Drill FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Federal Emergency Management Agency Emergency Response For Mass Casualties Involving Children Appendix A: Participating Agencies Table A.1 Participating Agencies Participating Agencies Federal (it applicable) State (rf applicable) [Jurisdiction A) [Jurisdiction B) (If applicable) Appendix A: Participating Agencies A-1 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Sensitive Document 237 FEMA FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Federal Emergency Management Agency Exercise Plan Emergency Response Foe Mass Casualty Drill Mass Casualties involving Children Appendix B: Standard Script for Calls Callers and automated calling systems should use a standard script to ensure accuracy and consistency of messages and to ensure that time estimates taken from the drill rvlkct the pace of activity in a true emergency I he script should: I ) clearly state that tins is a drill; 2> assess ability to make their site available (by a hypothetical time I : and 3) in the ease of a calling tree, provide instruction* for further calls. I he 'hi poilirlicnl linn ' should rrflt'ti a rralKlii approximation of the lime needed to |**c pare a host fat ility for thr rveript of response \talT ami supplies. Sample Call- Down Script • This is a site call-down drill being conducted by the Department of Homeland Security and the Federal Emergency Management Agency Your site is on tlie Department of Homeland Security's list of facilities th.il may be used in an emergency If this were a real emergency, you would be asked to make your site available for use by lie I Xpartniciit of Homeland Sec unis \ health department. • Again, this is tmly n drill. There is no need for you to make sour site available as a result of this call. Appendix B: Standard Script for Cafla Sensitive Document B-1 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Downloadable from "FEMA/DHS 12/14/12 Plan for "Mass Death of Children at a School by Firearms", memoryholeblog.com (8 October 20 14) or by using this link: 201 4/ 10/drill-site-activation-call-down-exercise-plan _a.pdf 238 The 20 Children and their Homes APPENDIX B The 20 Children and their Homes by Nick Kollerstrom, Ph.D. Twenty families had children allegedly killed at the Sandy Hook event of 14 December, 2012. Each of these families owned their own home in Newtown. Most of them had acquired it relatively recently before the event, a couple of years before. We here examine patterns in that property acquisition. Seven out of the twenty families were Jewish and the data suggests that they seem to have played some key role. The FBI’s year-summary of crimes had no murders registered in Newtown over that period. Nor have any birth certificates, death certificates or coroner’s inquests been to-date produced for the twenty alleged children who died [Editor ’s note: apart from the fake death certificate discussed in Chapter 11.] Therefore their status, as to whether they really lived, remains unclear. Without wishing to prejudge the issue, we shall here allude to them as “SHUC”, Sandy Hook Undead Children. The SSDI Social Security Death Index is closely linked to the database of ancestry.com, and is widely regarded as a reliable guide to who really lived and died in America. It based upon a unique account number owned by each US citizen; plus in addition, parents may apply for their child’s SSDI for tax-deduction purposes, so that young children may also have them. All twenty of the SHUC had been given SSDIs, and these recorded their deaths on 14 December, 2012, whereas that for Adam Lanza, their alleged killer, was for 13 December 2012. Did the killer die the day before his victims? This suggests that somebody has, to say the least, tampered with the data. 239 Nick Kollerstrom, Ph.D. Where Nightmares Take Form Newtown came into existence in the 1930's, centered on the construction and staffing of a Psychiatric Hospital (aka Fairfield Halls Military Programming Facility) during WW2. It seems to be a place where storied and mundane history somehow overlap. In the year 2000, a film, ’The Sandy Hook Lingerie Party Massacre ’, had a deranged killer strike in the aftermath of a hurricane. Then, the ritual sacrifice of 22 children was portrayed in the global bestseller, ‘The Hunger Games’ { 2008) by Suzanne Collins, who was and is a resident of Newtown: she lives just two streets from where Nancy Lanza (mother of the alleged killer Adam Lanza) is supposed to have lived. {Editor s note'. On that claim, see Chapter 7). That story had 22 children die, while the ‘Sandy Hook Massacre’ allegedly had 21 (including Adam Lanza). It premiered as a film in March 2012. The Hollywood blockbuster, The Dark Knight Rises had an area on the Gotham City Map (used in the viral marketing campaign, and in the movie) changed to Sandy Hook. A Mr. Scott Getzinger was the prop master who did this, and he lived in the Sandy Hook school district; his widowed wife still does. He was killed in April 2012 in a car accident in which first responders noted his injuries were “not life threatening”. He died in the hospital later that night. His widow is public in her belief that he was murdered. In July 2012, the Batman film, ’ The Dark Knight Rises’, premiered, alluding to the ‘Sandy Hook’ region of Gotham City as a portion of the city of Gotham during a setup of one of the bad guy’s dirty deeds. Early promotions of the film the year before did not (as Alex Jones discovered) contain that Sandy Hook reference. Then, in 2013, the ‘Sandy Hook Lingerie Party Massacre ’ was re-released under a new title, ‘Jersey Shore Lingerie Party Massacre’ . Singing at the Superbowl Fifty days after the event at Sandy Hook, ten of the SHUC were observed singing happily in the Sandy Hook Choir at a Superbowl conference-with Beyonce! They are identifiable-but curiously they were some years older. From this students have inferred that the images of the ten six to seven- year-old children put out as having died at Sandy Hook, had actually been taken some years earlier. The table below gives data on these ten SHUC families: the official birthdates are given, but these would seem to be impossible in view of their more mature appearance at the Superbowl. 240 The 20 Children and their Homes 'jack Pinto Carolyn ^Previdi Parker Daniel Barden (possible) flrwMy I Hubbard Missing: Dylan Hockley Catherine Hubbard Ana Marquez vn 'f |Breene James Mattiofi (actually Ion ndfcut We will come on later to the property prices, shown on the right-hand side of the table. Important research on this topic has been done by Dr. Eowyn, who traced each of the twenty SSDI records and these include the states in which they were issued as ‘State of Issue.’ Only four out of the ten SHUC who sang ‘after-death’ at the Superbowl had their SSDls issued by the State of Connecticut (of which Newtown is a part). SSDls are issued by the state in which the individual was born, not where he or she died. Property Date of Child D.O.B. SSDI Parents Rel. cost $ purchase Charlotte Helen Bacon 22.2.06 NJ Joel 0 J 387.500 20.8.07 Avlelle Rkhman 17.10.06 CA Jennifer & Jeremy Rictvman j 560.000 4.21.11 Josephine Gay 11.12.OS Mary Bub & Michele Gay 0 12.25.09 Ben Wheeler 12.0.06 NY David & Francis Wheeler i 365.000 27.7.07 fcmilie Parker 12.S.06 Utah Robert & Alissa Parker 0 2.4.12 Caroline Previdi Conn Hden J & tuRenc Prov O 25 12 09 Grace McDonnell 4.11.05 Conn lynn McDonnell 0 25.12.09 Olivia Rose Engel 18 7 Ob Conn Brian Engel 0 12.2S.09 Daniel Barden 27.9.0S NY Murk Barden i 450.000 10.19.07 Jessica A. Rekos 10.5.06 Conn Richard & Krista Rekos 530.000 6.23.10 The children s names are on the left, their parents in the centre. 241 Nick Kollerstrom, Ph.D. There is evidence of false identity. Sandy Hook appears to have been a virtual-reality event, which set up huge revenue streams of income for certain Newtown residents. Thus ‘Avielle Rose Richman’, for example, seems to have been Lenie Urbina, whose parents Curtis and Richmond Urbina are both directly associated with the Newtown area synagogue. They seem to have loaned their daughter — or at least a picture of her — for this event: the alleged-parents Jeremy Richman and Jennifer Hensel were thereby able to establish the ‘Avielle Foundation’ and its smart website on 14 December 2012, the very day of the ‘shooting.’ This aimed to raise $5m in the first year. As for ‘Ben Wheeler’, his purported parents, Ben and Francine Lobis- Wheeler, appear to have had only one child, Nate Wheeler. ‘Owen Wright’ seems to have been the child whose photos were used, where his mother, Jennifer Wright, was rewarded by his appearance at the Superbowl concert. The next table shows the ten SHUC not observed singing at the Superbowl: Nainr l)OK SSDI Krl Par fills Property Cost S Property Isought on Dylan C. Hockley 8.3.06 Conn Nicole A Ian 0 25.12.09 Madeleine F. Ilsu; 10.6.06 Conn John &. Donna Arnold 0 7.4.09 Catherine V. Huhluu! 86.06 Conn Matthew & Jennifer H 0 25. 12.00 t luse M. Kowalski. 31.10.0 J Com Stephen & Rchcvta K. 0 25.12.09 Jesse M. Lewis: 30.6.06 Conn Scarlett L. 0 25.12.09 James Mattioli: 22.3.06 Conn } Mark & Cynthia M 5*5.000 3.S.07 Jack A. Pinto: 6.5.06 Conn Dean & Tricia P J> 25.12.09 Nobody is likely to tell us what differences there are between these two groups; all one can say is that all in this second table have SSDIs from Connecticut. Dr. Eowyn was startled to discover that the Social Security Death Index (SSDI) is a database of death records created from the federal government Social Security Administration’s ‘Death Master File’ and the latter does not have SSDIs for any of the twenty SHUC. Notice that Dr. Eowyn ascertained that exactly one of the children had not been issued a SSDI, as shown here. [. Editor’s note: See Chapter 9.] Homes Purchased on Christmas Day Another mystery of the Sandy Hook story — which has a tendency to be ignored because it is so strange — is that most of these families acquired their properties on Christmas Day 2009, apparently for free (i.e., the recorded price for these transactions was zero dollars). Was this just some computer glitch on the part of local estate agents, as has been claimed? If so, it seems 242 The 20 Children and their Homes odd that those $0 sale prices were never corrected: how can a city make their budget work with such sloppy documentation? Seven of the children — James Mattioli, Noah S. Pozner, Ana Marquez- Greene, Charlotte Helen Bacon, Avielle Rose Richman, Ben Andrew Wheeler and Daniel Barden — came from Jewish families and had Jewish funerals. These families did not (bar one or two) get their properties free, but paid around half a million dollars for them. In the far-right column of both Tables, dates of purchase of most of the parents ’ homes appear as being within two years of the event. Only non-Jewish families obtained their homes on Christmas Day 2009 (or at least were registered as doing so.) and these largely got their homes free. It may help to depict these facts with a simple 2x2 table of binary (i.e., yes or no) logic: House purchases registered In Newtown, of the twenty familes Purchased on 12.25.09 /or not Paid for / Free Jewish (7) 0/7 5/2 Non-Jewish (13) 10/3 1/12 If we divide the families between those registered as acquiring their property prior to Christmas Day 2009, and those who acquired it on or after that date, then most of the Jewish families acquired theirs before that date (5 out of 7), while conversely only 3 out of 13 non-Jewish families acquired theirs before that date. Four of the Jewish families reportedly acquired their homes in the year 2007. Two of the Jewish families are recorded as having acquired their Newtown home for free, while all but one of the thirteen non-Jewish families did so. Nearly all of the non-Jewish families had this mysterious transaction recorded as happening on Christmas Day 2009 — a day when no business is normally conducted — whereas not one Jewish family did this. The town records show that several of the “$0 sales” were preceded by a sale to the same person a few years before for what appears to be a “market price” — as if the Sandy Hook victim had bought the house previously, then sold it to themselves for $0.00 a few years later — suggesting that the loan was paid off by someone else and the deed remained in the original buyer’s name. Some of these homes appear to have been re-sold shortly after the “massacre”, where it would be worth investigating to what extent the families moved in a while before the shootings and left not long after. 243 Nick Kollerstrom, Ph.D. Did that day have any special significance? If we accept that the Sandy Hook episode was an act of state-fabricated terror, then there is another such episode, namely, the ‘crotch bomber’ scam, which happened on Christmas Day 2009. This was on a passenger flight from Amsterdam to Detroit and we were supposed to believe that he threatened to blow up the plane. Do the ‘Illuminati’ — or whoever else one takes to be perpetrating these state-fabricated terror events — intend to link them up in this way? For comparison, the Madrid railway station bombing happened 911 days after 9/11; and then, before the Boston Marathon race began, there was 26 minutes of silence one for each of the Sandy Hook victims — also for a race over 26 miles. Thus the Marathon was themed to link with the Sandy Hook massacres, where the two events had in retrospect quite a bit in common. So that 2009 Christmas Day could appear as being somehow significant, linking one fictional terror event with another. The central issue in state-fabricated terror of the 21 st century is usually false or fabricated identity. Who really were the people involved? Did the twenty families ever really have these little children running around in their back gardens, or not? Vast charity revenues have accrued through these fictional deaths. It is hoped that the schematic approach here taken may assist citizens of America in resolving the complicated levels of deception involved. I suggest that a panel ought to be established for a ‘Real Identity of the Sandy Hook Children’ study, to examine the photographs and families involved, find their real dates of birth, etc. We need the truth. 244 Sandy Hook School Massacre Timeline APPENDIX C Sandy Hook School Massacre Timeline by James F Tracy, Ph. D. The following timeline of the December 14, 2012 mass killing of 20 children and 8 adults in Newtown Connecticut attempts to demonstrate how the event was presented to the public by corporate news media. The chronological assemblage of coverage is not comprehensive of all reports published on the incident but rather seeks to verify how the storyline was to a substantial degree constructed by federal and state law enforcement authorities and major media around the theory that 20-year-old Adam Lanza was the sole agent in the massacre. This scenario became an established reality through the news media’s pronounced repetition of the lone gunman narrative and meme. This proposed scenario significantly obscured the fact that police encountered and apprehended two additional shooting suspects on the school’s grounds within minutes of the crime. These suspects remain unaccounted for by authorities but the roles they may have played arguably correlate with the shifting information presented by authorities and major news media on injuries and weapons vis-a-vis the mass carnage meted out in the school. 245
Sunday, February 11, 2018
Chapter 15 Appedix A and B The FEMA Manual for Sandy Hook from Nobody Died at Sandy Hook
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment