The Joe Cell Breakthrough Alex Schiffer—1999

The Joe Cell Breakthrough

Alex Schiffer—1999

To date, Alex Schiffer has converted four car engines to run on orgone energy using the Joe Cell Method. This is a clean and freely available source of energy that will revolutionize society. Although nobody as yet fully understands how this process works, following are three explaination of how the Joe Cell might work.

An Interpretation using Walter Russel's Theories
"There is a neutral ether consisting of countless myriads of inconceivably small particles per cubic centimetre having no electric charge and no mass. Universal mind places electrostatic charges on these particles when there is a suitable magnetic field so that the become charged particles. The complexity of the charge determines the type of charged particle and its behaviour." Beyond the Atom, Walter Russel
The above nicely explains several points to the average reader:

1. As ether, ( Orgone ) has no mass or electric charge it makes it very difficult to measure. If you read about the efforts that science has gone to, to measure gravity waves and neutrinos, you will more fully comprehend the problems of measuring these "forces". Suffice to say that just because scientists cannot measure Orgone energies does not mean that Orgone does not exist.
2. As our Joe cell geometry, chemistry, electrolysis, location, materials and experimenters vary from cell to cell, the Joe cell will thus produces a whole series of different effects for different experimenters. The cell can lose weight, cause rain, heal people, make people sick, "create" various elements and even do what you want it to do ie. power an internal combustion motor.

So, how does a Joe cell "run" a car? Again I will stick my neck out and suggest an answer that makes sense to me. Obviously it is a theory and is only in place until a reader suggests a better theory, in which case I will remove mine and insert his with full credits.
Have you ever considered exactly what occurs when you use a battery for your radio, torch, etc. I mean what is in the battery that makes your device work and why does it go flat? There is many chemical and electrical ways of explaining the process, but I would like to explain it to you from a slightly different perspective. Lets set the stage:

1. Every unbalanced action must eventually be balanced no matter how long it takes. Remember that I have mentioned in another section of this book the great clue, Rhythmic balanced interchange. All things in creation including our battery and the Joe cell obey this fundamental rule.
2. Electricity is dividing a pressureless condition into two opposite pressures which desire release and thus a return to a state of balance. So our 1.5 Volt battery for example, does not want to have a positive and negative pole and is trying to return to a state of balance ie. eventually the battery will go ² flat ² the duration depending on how much work we ask it to do.
3. Work is the result of unbalanced matter seeking a rest in balance. Notice how we make our battery work for us by letting it return to a state of balance. JUST AS IN THE JOE CELL!!!
4. So the charge of the battery, ( or the Joe cell ) is a pressureless condition separated into two opposite pressures.
5. A charged battery is dually unbalanced by the opposite pressures which desire release, exactly as in the Joe cell. Opposites oppose, they never perform any other function than to oppose. Opposites are not things; they are conditions.

Okay, if we look at the above clues and using the car battery as an example, we can readily see that the electrolysis that occurred in the battery when we charged it via the car alternator has created an unbalance that is frantically trying to return to a state of balance. If you do not believe me and if you are foolish enough, just put a spanner across the terminals of a charged battery and watch it melt and disappear. Please don't do it, take it as fact. In like manner, when we charged the Joe cell, ( which is also acting as an accumulator ) we have created an unbalanced condition that is also frantically trying to return to a state of balance.
A car battery reaches a state of balance by finding an electrical path either in the battery (self discharge) or outside the battery in a resistive load ie. turning your lights on. The Joe cell reaches a state of balance if you accidentally short the cell when it is charged, or in the combustion chamber of the car by using the timed spark plug spark or a similar electronic "trigger" to allow it to drop to a lower or balanced density (the state it was in before you forced it to do work). The result of the Joe cell "working" is translated into an expansion of the intake air charge and thus the forcing of the piston down the bore to turn the crankshaft etc.
Now a few words of mine should fall into place for you. A stage 3 cell is charged ie has sufficient unbalance to do work. A leaky cell is a self discharging cell. A balanced or stage 1 cell cannot perform work. To make the cell work, we must have an efficient transfer to the point where the work is required, ie. we must contain the unbalanced condition until it is in combustion chambers by using the right type of cone, tube, blind plug, motor and electrical connection.
The Joe cell accumulator is constantly trying to return to a state of balance and given the slightest excuse will return to balance and thus be useless to you. As you build up you familiarity with your cell, you will find that the cell is constantly giving you small clues as to what it is doing. As such working with the Joe cell is an interactive exercise and developing the skills of a good observer will be highly beneficial.

*             *             *

Alternative Explaination 1—Blacklight Power Inc.
The inventor of BlackLight Power's technology and founder is Dr. Randell L Mills. (For more information visit http://www.blacklightpower.com) His theory is the existence of previously undiscovered lower energy states of hydrogen. Mills calls these lower energy states of hydrogen "hydrinos" and dihydrinos. This theory of lower energy states of hydrogen has the potential to change everything that we understand about physics and the physical world. Now before you get excited by the above, please realise that Walter Russell listed many, many elements lower than hydrogen on the periodic table way back in 1926! Similarly is we call Orgone "hydrinos" we are back to square one ie. the massless force that is at the base of all things. Needless to say, other scientists think that Dr. Mills claims are preposterous.
Traditional physicists claim that the "ground" state of the hydrogen atom is the lowest energy state possible. According to the "experts", all levels of the hydrogen atom are accounted for in quantum mechanics. As far as the majority of physicists are concerned, there is nothing to suggest that other levels exist.

It turns out that a fundamental error in physics ignored the existence of a second non-radioactive form of hydrogen which is an inert gas ( just like Orgone, what a coincidence! <grin>). Low energy hydrogen can be made from ordinary hydrogen when its electrons orbit drops to about one twentieth its ² normal ² size. When this happens ( in a vacuum at about 2,500 deg. Kelvin with potassium vapour as the catalyst ) the hydrogen atom release up to one thousand times as much energy as needed to get hydrogen from water. This means a lot of energy is available with no pollution at all. In theory a 200 hp car using this system could go 100,000 miles on the hydrogen in a single tank of water.

Art. B. Rosenblum

The byproduct of Mill's chemical reaction is a hydrino, the lower energy hydrogen atom. It is chemically inert and floats into space in much the same way helium ( or Orgone ) in a balloon floats in space.

Kendall

Lets sum it up. The creation of hydrinos from hydrogen create a vast amount of heat and thus useable power. But what would happen when the hydrinos from the sun or the Joe cell interact with the water in the motor and/or the air in the combustion chambers? Under the influence of a high electrical disturbance eg. spark-plug or similar, would we get an expansion in the combustion chamber/s and a resultant drop in temperature? If so then the hydrinos = Orgone and I have no arguments with Dr. Mills. I would suggest that you go to the Blacklight Power site as shown above and make up your own mind.

*             *             *

Alternative Explaination 2 -Muon hydrogen
I quote the following:

The Muonic hydrogen (MUH) group is a research collaboration of physicists based at http://www.triumf.ca/homepage.html. The group attempts to understand the reactions involving muons and different isotopes of hydrogen, as well as muon catalysed fusion.

A muon is an elementary particle which can have a negative or positive charge and has approximately 207 times the mass of an electron. The MUH group works with negatively charged muons, which carry the same charge as an electron. These muons are produced at TRIUMF by directing a beam of hydrogen ions(protons) moving at 3/4 the speed of light at a target consisting of beryllium or carbon. In this way particles called pions are produced, and shortly these pions decay to become muons. Unfortunately the muon has an average lifetime of 2.2 microseconds (or millionths of a second), and one challenge when working with muons is to use them efficiently before they decay.

There are three isotopes (varieties) of hydrogen atoms. First there is protium (H), by far the most common of the three, which has one proton (a massive positively charged particle) as its nucleus. Then there is deuterium (D), whose nucleus is made up of one proton and one neutron (slightly more massive than a proton with no electric charge) bound together as a deuteron (d). About 0.015% of all hydrogen atoms in nature are deuterium. Finally there is tritium (T), with a proton and two neutrons forming a triton (t) to make up the nucleus. Unfortunately tritium, though very useful in these experiments, is radioactive and its safe containment is a major concern. Any two of these isotopes will be bound together by orbiting electrons to form a hydrogen molecule (the most common of which is 2 protiums making normal hydrogen gas).

Beyond reactions involving muons and hydrogen, the MUH group is concerned with creating muon catalysed fusion. Unlike other fusion processes, muon catalysed fusion can be carried out at room temperatures or (as is the case in this group) at about 3 degrees Kelvin (-270 degrees Celsius).

To create muon catalysed fusion, a beam of negative muons is stopped in layers of solid hydrogen isotopes. A muon will then replace the electron in a hydrogen atom. The muon can then bind the two atoms together in a special muonic molecule or molecular ion. Since the muon is 207 times as massive as the electron, the hydrogen atoms are bound together far more tightly, so that the nuclei can fuse, creating energy and ejecting the muon.

Theoretically, the same muon could go on to catalyse many more reactions, creating enough energy for this process to be used as a power source. However, sometimes the muon sticks to a charged fusion product such as an alpha particle, and is lost to the cycle. Over 100 fusions per muon have been recorded in other experiments but it is estimated that with the current equipment it would take somewhat more than this in order to "break even" energy-wise.

The goal of clean, inexpensive energy from this source may be far in the future if ever attained, so don't look for portable Muon Catalysed Fusion generators on the market any time soon.

More information can be found in the MUH contribution to the TRIUMF
http://www.triumf.ca/muh/doc/annrep/annrep94.ps
http://www.triumf.ca/muh/pics/
http://www.triumf.ca/muh/muh.html

End of quote
So this theory rests on the presumption that if you put moun-hydrogen in the presence of a spark, then some of the electrons could replace the muons. The now normal hydrogen atoms would expand and the spare muons would decay and the resultant expansion would do the work. See: http://ourworld.cs.com/elhoreth/hydr.html
Again dear friends we are calling the same rose by a different name. At the end of the day it does not matter in the least as to what the name of the force is as long as we know its cause and not just use the effect as we have been doing. You will find out that sooner or later, our scientists will have to admit that they have no idea as to the causes of our present forces. Only when we admit that our sum knowledge of the causes of energies can be written on the head of a pin with 10 meter high letters, will we start to really learn.