Boston: Irresponsible,
Disgusting Conspiracy Theories
By Devvy Kidd
4-28-13
Disgusting Conspiracy Theories
By Devvy Kidd
4-28-13
Over the past nearly two decades,
every time some horrific 'event' happens, wanna be "journalists" come
out of the wood work with their conspiracy theories based on absolutely
nothing. Bloggers who specialize in no facts, just rank speculation.
Irresponsible people out to make a name for themselves or to get people to
their web sites. They have zero credibility and hurt the rest of us by being lumped
together. I have debunked conspiracy theories in the past based on
documentation. I get attacked as if I'm the bad guy for pursuing the truth!
There are conspiracies and cover-ups, but we want the truth, not speculation.
As
someone who works at home, I have been able to see events as they unfold where
most folks are at work; perhaps at school. Way back when, the Communist News
Network (CNN) was pretty much the only source for manufactured "news"
besides the "big three". The media lies about the first World Trade
Center bombing in 1993 were taken as fact until one of the FBIs CI's opened his
mouth. It
was a sting operation the FBI let get out of control:
- See more
at: http://www.rense.com/general95/boston_dev.html#sthash.2OddTymo.dpuf
"Law-enforcement
officials were told that terrorists were building a bomb that was eventually
used to blow up the World Trade Center, and they planned to thwart the plotters
by secretly substituting harmless powder for the explosives, an informer said
after the blast. The informer was to have helped the plotters build the bomb
and supply the fake powder, but the plan was called off by an F.B.I. supervisor
who had other ideas about how the informer, Emad A. Salem, should be used, the
informer said.
"The
account, which is given in the transcript of hundreds of hours of tape
recordings Mr. Salem secretly made of his talks with law-enforcement agents,
portrays the authorities as in a far better position than previously known to
foil the Feb. 26 bombing of New York City's tallest towers. The explosion left
six people dead, more than 1,000 injured and damages in excess of half a
billion dollars. Four men are now on trial in Manhattan Federal Court in that
attack."
I
researched that bombing. Janet (Butch) Reno and Bill Clinton covered up the
truth and then spun the new official lie. Not one single person involved in the
FBI was ever indicted and tried for facilitating the murder of six people,
those injured and all the damage to the building.
I
watched the media deliberately lie about the murder of former Commerce
Secretary Ron Brown. CNNs reporter on the ground at the Dubrovnik airport
reported live the rescue was underway in the ocean. Within an hour, suddenly,
the plane is found washed clean up on the side of a mountain. Ron Brown had
a bullet hole in the top of his head. How is that possible if the plane
crashed into the ocean? Another cover-up aided and abetted by the disgraced
media.
I
watched Ruby Ridge unfold. Then the massacre at WACO and yes, it was just that.
David Koresch could have been arrested in town several times before the first confrontation.
The ATF and FBI lied to the military and the slaughter began. It was murder.
Murder of almost 100 Americans including 17 children. It was a publicity stunt
gone bad and I'm not the only
one who thinks so. Again, no government official involved was ever held
accountable. It was all "justified" and the American people went back
to watching their favorite tv show or shopping.
I
watched the media deliberately lie from morning until night the day the Murrah
Building was blown in OKC. I am very fortunate to have had many long
discussions while visiting my dear friend, retired Brigadier General Ben
Partin, about WACO and OKC; Oklahoma
City Bombing: Expert Analysis. Ben briefed U.S. senators on both 'events';
they have gone along with the cover-up. There's no question in my mind it was a
sting that went bad based on my endless hours of research and watching videos.
Besides
McVeigh and Terry Nichols, rogue FBI agents responsible for that bombing not
only have never been prosecuted, many of them were promoted. In June 1998, I
put on a day long event at the Santa Clara Convention Center to launch The
Wallace Institute with Larry Becraft. Ben was a key note speaker. The links to
his speech are at the bottom of this column. He explains both in great detail;
I hope you'll take the time to watch his presentation.
TWA
Flight 800. Again, a first class cover up. In discussions with Ben, he is convinced it was likely a
missile. Ben based his conclusions on his 33 years experience in the U.S.
Air Force as someone who had hands-on experience in designing many different
types of weapons systems.
- See more
at: http://www.rense.com/general95/boston_dev.html#sthash.2OddTymo.dpuf
Umar
Farouk Abdulmutallab, dubbed the "underwear bomber" was clearly
government entrapment:
• Terror
War Cheerleader Gets Reality Check On Underwear Bomber Facts
• Infowars Nightly News: Kurt Haskell Breaks Down Underwear Bomber Trial False Flag
• Kurt Haskell Says He Will Sue Feds in Underwear Bomber Case
• Infowars Nightly News: Kurt Haskell Breaks Down Underwear Bomber Trial False Flag
• Kurt Haskell Says He Will Sue Feds in Underwear Bomber Case
None
of the FBI or CIA involved have ever been held accountable. They risked the
lives of everyone on that flight. Damn good thing Abdulmutallab was a bumbling
idiot.
Sandy
Hook slaughter in Connecticut. Many have emailed and ask why I haven't written
about it? Well, there has been some excellent coverage already. There's also
the garbage spewed out by people who never went there, never did anything other
than speculate while making wild allegations and accusations.
What
I do is collect articles, columns and videos. In the case of Sandy Hook, the
only way to get answers is the same way I went about getting them for
Columbine: you order autopsy reports, copies of search warrants and affidavits,
toxocology reports, ballistics reports, etc. Those things take time and in some
cases, agencies will not release them for months because it's an on-going, active
investigation. Some have been released:
Do
I have questions about Sandy Hook? But, yes, but not because I believe it was a
false flag operation. I have some because I believe local law enforcement was
simply overwhelmed from minute one. Very few rural police and sheriff's
departments have the kind of training necessary to respond to a mass shooting
because everyone thinks it can't happen where they live. Sure, they train and
might read a few bulletins or pamphlets from the FBI, but reality is a whole
different thing. Honest mistakes are made, but not corrected which would expose
them and make law enforcement look incompetent. The confusion in real time adds
fuel to the fire.
But,
that does not excuse some of the grossly irresponsible, splashy head lines on
the Internet about Sandy Hook being staged; dead children not dead. You name
it, some mush head has slapped it up on some web site. When I get the documents
and sort through everything, then I will write a column and scan whatever
documents I receive that might be different from the ones in the link above.
Then,
of course, we have the grand daddy of them all: 9/11. In particular, the deluge
of yellow "journalism" about Flight 93 turned my stomach. Individuals
who sat at computer keyboards declaring Flight 93 did not crash outside of
Shanksville, PA. Their rank speculation is then taken as fact and is still
plastered all over the Internet.
It's
very difficult for the average American to go to all the locations for
disasters over the past 20 years. I went to Columbine and OKC. I also went to
Shanksville to do my own on site investigation in an effort to try and find out
the truth. It wasn't cheap since I lived in Sacramento at the time, but I
wanted to try to sift through the bull and find the truth. One jackass put up
"headlines" on the Internet: Da plane, Da plane! A parody from the
old tv program, Fantasy Island. Yeah, some joke.
One
thing I can tell you, the good people of Shanksville and surrounding bergs
highly resent the conspiracy theories posted all over the Internet. I ask a
friend of mine who is an attorney to meet me in Shanksville. One of our stops
was the local airport. Besides being a lawyer, Dane is also a pilot. While
there we spoke with a couple of first responders who happened to be in the
building at the time. They were angry about all the conspiracy theories the
plane never crashed where it did and I don't blame them. People really cannot
appreciate what happened to all the folks in that area; the horror and clean
up.
Before
the dust even settled out in Boston, irresponsible individuals slapped their
crap up on the Internet. Why, do you know those were actors in Boston? The
amputees were actors faking it? Do you know fake blood was used? And, fake bomb
dust! Of course! All the EMTs who were already there because at big
marathons like that triage tents are common for runners or even bystanders who
might have a medical problem, why they had to be actors, too! They're all part
of a staged event as well as hundreds of average, ordinary Americans watching
the runners. And, people believe it because they send me emails as
"proof".
The
link above claims a
vet who did lose his legs in Afghanistan was a knowing participant in
perpetrating fraud on the American people. There is a resemblance, but how
insulting to Nick Vogt to be used in such a way.
Boston
Bombing Story UnravelsFake New York Times Article
by Stuart Wilde - April 19, 2013 - Conspiracy Theories
by Stuart Wilde - April 19, 2013 - Conspiracy Theories
"The
picture of a man in a wheel chair that supposedly lost his legs in the Boston
bombing, was in fact that of an army vet called Nick Vogt that lost his legs in
Afghanistan. He is an actor in the eventa stooge. Another Government false
flag op eh? Like Sandy Hook. The Media said the Moslems did it. Sure…and next
we'll have the tooth fairy posing topless for a Honda ad. See fake New York
Times story below."
On
that site you will also see the photo of Carlos Arredondo, whose son was killed
in Iraq in 2004. Do people really think that man who has suffered so much was a
willing participant as an "actor" in the "fake Boston
bombing"? Would he so dishonor his son's memory? But, wait! Arrendondo and
Jeff Bauman, Jr. are still
continuing their roles as actors:
'I
gave him a kiss on the cheek as it was beautiful to see him doing so well':
Boston victim who lost both legs reunited with the cowboy hat hero who saved
his life".
It's
sickening. Not too long ago I was
looking at a piece about people who could be twins, but don't even know
each other. When you put their photos side by side, you'd swear they were the
same person, but they weren't. Here's
another one.
"Tragedy
of woman, 18, in iconic Boston blast image being comforted by man in red
t-shirt: Student had her limbs shredded and her mom's legs were amputated.
Picture of a wounded Sydney Corcoran being aided by strangers was seen around
the world."
Oh,
sure, those strangers who happened to be at the marathon that day helping
people like Sydney Corcoran were all just part of a giant hoax. Mother and
daughter must be continuing their starring roles:
A
different reality': Mother-daughter bombing victims look ahead
'I just wanted to die': Mother relives horror of Boston blast and how her husband saved her life by wrapping belts around both her mangled legs."
'I just wanted to die': Mother relives horror of Boston blast and how her husband saved her life by wrapping belts around both her mangled legs."
The
people involved in the Boston massacre in the hundreds had their lives changed
forever that day. Dozens of people lost arms, legs or one of each or both.
Think they don't get wind of all the grotesque conspiracy theories and that
somehow they're involved because it was all a staged fake? I guess all the
doctors and surgeons who worked around the clock to save lives were also part
of the fakery. After all, the blood was fake, the bomb dust was fake, those who
lost their limbs - all faked.
Much
has been made about bomb sniffing dogs. Well, I'm sorry to disappoint all the
conspiracy people, but since 9/11, bomb sniffing dogs are at most big events.
Allegedly, there was a drill that day regarding readiness for any kind of
threat. That is still being checked out by many of us. The same thing happened
right after 9/11: FEMA's
Prior Knowledge of 9-11 Put to Rest. That's my investigation.
If
I got one, I got a hundred emails with similiar captions:
Proof
Craft/Blackwater did Boston Bombing!
Mercenary Militia at Boston Bombing!
Evidence Mounts Boston Bombers Were FBI Assets!
Mercenary Militia at Boston Bombing!
Evidence Mounts Boston Bombers Were FBI Assets!
All
of those theories stem from photos of a couple of guys wearing specific
clothing. The same flavor of men I saw at while attending the GOP convention up
in St. Paul in 2008. They were all over the place as well as FBI who weren't
wearing jackets that identified them. Guess what? Those individuals have been
identified as members of the Massachusetts National Guard Civilian Security
Team (CST).
Identity
of the Khaki Wearing Boston Bombing Operatives Revealed (Do take the time
to read the article and hit on the links.)
"According
to this article from the Air National Guard
site: "The Massachusetts team was on duty during the running of the
Boston marathon, augmented by similar civil support teams from the New York and
Rhode Island National Guards." So it would appear that the CST team on
duty during the explosion was the Massachusetts Army National Guard's 1st Civil
Support Team, augmented by New York's 24th CST and Rhode Island's 13th
CST."
Do
people see how harmful it is to send out emails proclaiming some company's
employees were part of killing and maiming Americans when they had nothing to
do with it? Proof my arse. Perhaps Craft should sue all irresponsible bloggers
for slandering their company and accusing them of a heinous crime. How do all
those bloggers and wanna be "journalists" think those Massachusetts
Army National Guard guys feel about being fingered as perpetrators in the
bombing?
People
whine the "mainstream" media and cable networks lie and don't give
the facts. They should look in the mirror. It's one thing to ask responsible
questions and we should, but never should such wild accusations be acceptable.
The examples above by irresponsible individuals "reporting", if you
can even call it that, is not acceptable.
So,
what really happened and who was behind the bombing? I have a lot of questions
myself and since day one I've been building my file for purposes of filing
state records act requests to FOIAs at the federal level as well as obtaining
the search warrants, affidavits and a whole lot more. But, it takes time
because law enforcement at all levels simply won't release a lot of documents
until they're ready - or they refuse then you have to file a lawsuit. Too many
people think the CSI programs on the boob tube is how it is in real life. It's
not.
The
19-year old reportedly confessed. After being read his Miranda rights, he
decided not to talk anymore. Is that a lie? At this time, we don't know because
I sure as hell don't believe anything that comes out of the mouth of the FBI,
ATF, CIA or the Department of Justice. Unless some documents are released to
the media by an individual(s) fed up with the lying or a big media outfit sues,
it will be awhile before anything is released. If ever, just like the 23 videos
the FBI still has under wraps of the OKC bombing. That's exactly what happened
with Glen Beck: people sick of the lies and cover ups provided him with
documentation:
Many
readers are familiar with Joel Skoussen and his history. Joel's research is
impeccable and he doesn't publish hysterical claims with nothing to back them
up. Joel has a weekly subscription newsletter that comes out every Friday. I
believe he's done a superb job in giving a detailed over view about many
aspects of that slaughter from the suspects, the lying by the FBI and much
more. His analysis brings even more questions that must be answered. I have
taken the liberty of putting his excellent (and rational) piece in an addendum
(click below). He, like so many of us, are digging for the truth, not
headlines.
Is
this another false flag operation where rogue elements within the federal
government suckered a couple of brothers into murdering and maiming Americans?
I believe there's a high probability some individuals within the federal
government were involved. Or, it could be yet another sting operation that went
bad involving individuals in alphabet soup agencies. We just don't know at this
time. People will shake their heads and say, it can't be! Our government would
never do anything like that! Knowing what I know about OKC and 9/11, it is very
possible.
Just
like OKC and 9/11, Americans simply cannot process the evil gripping this
country and who is behind it. That's why the truth about 9/11 is so important -
it was the "next Pearl Harbor" needed to begin destroying our rights
and freedoms for false security. Hacks like Sean Hannity & Bill O'Reilly
and their million dollar a month plus paychecks will label anyone questioning
the official story as tin foil hat people and other derogatory labels. Frankly,
I don't care. What I care about is the truth, holding everyone responsible and
seeing justice (executing them) done.
As
a matter of fact, I would say FOX viewers are the least educated on the issues
and events like OKC and 9/11. When my dear friend and I were at the state
capitol in Austin this past January, we visited the offices of many
Republicans. Every office had FOX news on their tv. Yet, when ask about Agenda
21, the response was: What's that? Agenda 21 is one of the top hottest issues
in this country, yet there are people who have never heard of it. Why? Because
FOX picks and chooses what they want you to know. CNN and all the others do the
same thing. When I say that, people get mad because FOX is the "only
network that gives us the truth". Okay. Stay in denial and in your comfort
zone.
The
American people continue to be lied to and kept in a state of terror to further
the agenda of the shadow government. Foolishly, they have allowed a
totalitarian police state to grow unchecked out of fear. I am reminded of
something Dr. Edwin Vieira wrote back in 2005:
"To
answer the question "Why is this happening?" one must ask the deeper
question: Cui bono? Who benefits? Whose "security" is being obtained
by the systematic abridgment of common Americans' constitutional liberties? And
by the step-by-step creation of a national police state that could (and
doubtlessly is designed to) eliminate those liberties altogether? And by what
is obviously a plan in the works to cement that police state into place by scrapping
the Constitution when a suitable occasion and excuse arises or can be
contrived?
"Well,
what good is the "security" of a thoroughgoing police state to its
victims? Obviously, none. A police state provides security only for the
elitists who run it and who benefit from the repression it imposes on the mass
of citizens. By hypothesis, then, today's push for "homeland
security" actually aims, not at the security of the United States or of
the American people under the Constitution, but at the Establishment's security
over the Constitution and against the people."
‘Boston
Strong’: Marching In Lockstep With The Police State Tyranny
Boston and gun confiscation hysteria
Boston and gun confiscation hysteria
How
many more of these terror events are going to be covered up? If I lived in
Boston, I would get together with trusted friends and begin gathering every bit
of documentation and film I could, whether through state records act or FOIA's,
and put it all together in a professional report. The next step would be a
grand jury.
|
Subscribe to the NewsWithViews Daily News Alerts!
Enter Your E-Mail Address:
|
- See more
at: http://www.rense.com/general95/boston_dev.html#sthash.2OddTymo.dpuf



No comments:
Post a Comment