"Logic students used to learn: you can have a perfectly valid
argument, even if your premises, your first assumptions are completely
false. Well, if the argument is about politics, your conclusion will be
insane. Implementing the conclusion will earn you praise as you
destroy lives. What we're talking about here is a species of mind
control." (The Underground, Jon Rappoport)
What's the latest solution to
the virus that causes nothing?
Here we go.
Punch line: MIT Technology Review, 2/8/16:
"We have the technology to destroy all Zika mosquitoes."
"A controversial genetic technology able to wipe out the mosquito
carrying the Zika virus will be available within months, scientists say.
"The technology, called a 'gene drive,' was demonstrated only last
year in yeast cells, fruit flies, and a species of mosquito that
transmits malaria. It uses the gene-snipping technology CRISPR to force a
genetic change to spread through a population as it reproduces.
"Three U.S. labs that handle mosquitoes, two in California and one
in Virginia, say they are already working toward a gene drive for Aedes aegypti,
the type of mosquito blamed for spreading Zika. If deployed, the technology could theoretically drive the species to extinction. (emphasis added)
"'We could have it easily within a year,' says Anthony James, a molecular biologist at the University of California, Irvine.
"Any release of a gene drive in the wild would be hotly debated by
ecologists...But with Zika sowing fear across Latin America and beyond,
the technology is likely to get a closer look. 'Four weeks ago we were
trying to justify why we are doing this. Now they're saying "Get the
lead out,"' says James. 'It's absolutely going to change the
conversation.'"
No kidding.
Unforeseen consequences? Unpredicted results? Ecological domino
effect? Transfer of genes from mosquitoes to humans? Don't be silly.
All is well. Don't worry, be happy. Move straight ahead with your
mouth shut and your eyes closed.
In previous articles, I've been reviewing the basics of covert ops,
because Zika fits the bill. In this case, take a virus that causes
nothing, falsely link it to a tragic condition (babies born with small
heads and brain damage), and then slide in the real agendas. I've
already spelled out some of those plans, which are materializing in
front of our eyes.
Gene editing is a towering plan: technocrats don't like a species---wipe it out.
Build up the threat with lies and obfuscations and false science and
wall-to-wall propaganda---then introduce the grand solution.
Depopulation turns out to be easy. Just reconfigure genes. Snip-snip.
The Zika virus isn't "sowing fear," as the MIT Review claims. The World
Health Organization is inventing that fear. In the 70 years since Zika
was discovered, it has, at worst, caused mild transient illness. Now,
suddenly, it's supposed to be creating radical birth defects. Of
course, the Brazilian researchers can only find a
possible correlation between Zika and the birth defect in 17 cases. Seventeen. Maybe.
But never mind. Wipe out all the mosquitoes that may be carrying Zika. Wipe out the whole species.
And come to think of it, could a case be made that certain human
populations are destructive and, well, superfluous? There are people
who think so. They also think that, in the onrush of automation and AI,
efficient robots could replace those useless populations.
Face it. Despite all the warnings about viruses running out of control
and wiping out half the world, the depopulation freaks just haven't been
able to put a dent in the global population. They hope, they pray, but
no dice.
However, they have been able to produce one result: planting
fear of viruses in humans. They're adequate to that task. So wake up and smell the cover story.
"In order to destroy the imminent threat of viruses and save the human
race, we must turn to cutting-edge technology: gene editing. That's our
ultimate hope."
Destroy the village in order to save it.
Here are the final paragraphs of the MIT article:
"But a gene drive [gene editing] can also make mosquito populations
disappear. The simplest way to do that is to spread a genetic payload
that leads to only male offspring. As the 'male-only' instructions
spread with each new generation, eventually there would be no females
left, says Adelman. His lab discovered the Aedes aegypti
gene that determines sex only last spring. The next step will be to link it to a gene drive.
"Kevin Esvelt, a gene-drive researcher at MIT's Media Lab who has
been outspoken about the need to proceed cautiously, also thinks Aedes aegypti
eradication should be the goal, so long as the public is onboard and the safety of the idea proved.
"'Technologically, we could probably do it in a couple of years,'
says Esvelt. 'I'm sure we'll be able to do it before people can agree if
we should.'"
Did you get that last piece? The "cautious" scientist says: what the
hell, let's eliminate a whole species if "the public is onboard" and we
prove it's safe.
How to prove safety before launch? Hard to say. Basically, try it and
then we'll know. Vote for the bill and then you can read what's in it.
Allow a global explosion of GMO crops based on zero science about
health and economic consequences, and see what happens. Expand the list
of mandated vaccines for children from six to 60 and see what happens.
Spray poisonous pesticides all over the planet and see what happens.
No comments:
Post a Comment