"Matrixology 101: You're supposed to be fixated on the fiction of One." (The Underground, Jon Rappoport)
I've written a number of articles taking apart the Zika hoax, piece by piece, lie by lie. Here, I want to present an overview.
My analysis centers on two questions.
One: Is there a true "outbreak" of microcephaly in Brazil?
Two: Has the purported cause, the Zika virus, been established scientifically?
First, is there a surge of microcephaly in Brazil, where the story
started? That depends on who you ask. The Brazilian health authority,
so far, has reported only 404 confirmed cases of microcephaly (babies
born with small heads and brain impairment) in the whole country. Not
4,100 cases, as first claimed.
But a second new report states that, in the northeast of the country,
since 2012, there has been a significant increase of microcephaly cases.
This second report was just presented by Dr. Sandra Mattos. See:
"Microcephaly in northeastern Brazil: a review of 16,208 births between 2012 and 2015" and this news report:
"Brazil's Pre-Zika Microcephaly Cases".
She and her team studied the birth records of babies born in the
northeastern state of Paraiba, and found between 2,000 and 4,000 cases
of microcephaly per year, since 2012. The biggest spike in cases was in
2014. The number of the most severe cases has increased since the last
part of 2015.
If Dr. Mattos' report is accurate, then there is a significant microcephaly problem in the northeast of Brazil.
Why the difference between her figures and the Brazilian health
authority's estimate, so far, of only 404 confirmed cases of
microcephaly in the whole country? Answer: unknown.
Apparently, until now, Brazil hasn't been focused on counting cases of
microcephaly. Who knows what the actual numbers have been, going back
10 years, 15 years, 20 years?
As you can see, the reporting system is a mess. It turns out Brazil
isn't alone in this regard. A further search of estimates in the US
reveals a huge disparity. Depending on which source you consult, you
can say there are 1,000 microcephaly cases in the US every year, or you
can say the number is 25,000.
Therefore, in answering my first question above, about an "outbreak" of
microcephaly in Brazil, I would say the answer is unknown---but Dr.
Mattos' analysis suggests there could be an upward trend, in the
northeast, of babies born with smaller heads and brain damage. I say
"could be," because she has no figures available before 2012.
It would be nice to have a definite answer, but such answers aren't always available. However, one thing is certain here:
Brazilian health authorities and the World Health Organization
jumped the gun in asserting there was an epidemic, based on 4,100 cases
they later cut down to 404. That was a press release, not science.
It signaled propagandist promotion of an epidemic---particularly
because the cause was announced right away: Zika virus. And here we
have a definite answer to the question: has Zika been proved to be the
cause of microcephaly?
No.
Not even close.
In those 404 cases of confirmed microcephaly admitted by the Brazilian
health authority, only 17 have shown "a relationship with the Zika
virus."
This is abrupt, simple, and convincing evidence AGAINST Zika as the
cause. If you're looking for one cause, you must establish, for
starters, that the virus is present (and at high levels) in most, if not
all, cases. That fact has been swept off the monopoly board of the
medical cartel.
I'm aware of several recent small studies which purport to show evidence
of Zika virus in the bodies of a few babies born with microcephaly.
These studies prove nothing, since they're limited to three or four
cases. And their analysis is incapable of measuring the
amount of Zika in each baby---a crucial factor.
Millions and millions of a particular virus must be present in a person to even begin to say the virus is causing anything.
Furthermore, Zika has been known about since 1947. It has never been
considered a health threat. It has been linked to mild transient
illness with few symptoms. So, in that regard, it's an absurd candidate
for causing microcephaly and brain damage.
There was no reason to assert that Zika was the cause of microcephaly in the first place. It was all hype and no science.
Now, I'll move along to related matters. In particular,
the "one condition-one-cause" fallacy that has spread through medical research.
Surely in Brazil, microcephaly isn't the only infant problem. In fact,
in those 404 "confirmed" cases of microcephaly, Brazilian researchers
admitted some cases could actually be, instead, other kinds of
nervous-system impairment.
There are many
arbitrary names and labels for such
nervous-system destruction. These names overlap. The conditions
overlap. They resist neat and separate definitions. Autism, autism
spectrum, developmental delay, Fragile X syndrome, Intellectual
Disability, Asperger's Syndrome, Rett Syndrome, CDD, etc.
The artificial attempt to separate them is typical nonsense. Likewise,
the attempt to ascribe different and distinct causes to each is
preposterous.
So in Brazil, instead of obsessively looking for one cause of
"microcephaly," true researchers would be looking for multiple causes
where, in general, brain and nervous-system damage is the result.
Causes such as? Toxic pesticides, including Roundup and atrazine.
Brazil uses more pesticides than any nation in the world, and many of
these chemicals are banned in other countries.
Toxic vaccines---for example, the Tdap, which was recommended to
pregnant women in Brazil in 2014. The MMR vaccine. Other vaccines.
Look, for example, at aluminum ingredients, which cross the blood-brain
barrier and are neurotoxic.
Genetically-engineered mosquitoes, released to combat mosquitoes that carry dengue fever. No human health studies were done.
Anti-mosquito sprays.
Chemicals used to fumigate public places.
The mosquito-killing insecticide, pyroproxyfen, which has been dumped in water supplies.
And of course, those traditional immune-system destroyers, severe
malnutrition, lack of basic sanitation, overcrowding, and stolen farm
land.
There are other potential causes.
Narrowing the range to microcephaly and one cause is not an answer, and
it isn't a gateway into a solution for the overall long-term crisis.
Every time a new potential cause of microcephaly is exposed, people jump
on that bandwagon. This is it! No, this is it! Instead, back away
from the single-cause fixation and look at the overall picture.
Understanding will follow.
Even if we infer a new level of microcephaly has surged in northeastern
Brazil, that doesn't mean there has to be one cause. Thinking that way
often cuts you off from the truth.
"One new effect equals one new cause"---this ironclad mandate looks like logic but it isn't.
I'll offer an assessment based on almost 30 years of investigating
so-called outbreaks and epidemics. The specific condition or disease
which is promoted in the press isn't one condition at all. It's the tip
of an iceberg. Underneath, you'll find all sorts of symptoms and
maladies---and they have existed for a long time. As time passes, ebbs
and flows, surges and declines occur---but the number of people
suffering is always a high number.
There is never one cause for the
ongoing and largely unexplored crisis. There is a combination of
factors that toxify human beings and reduce the capacity of their immune
systems.
This analysis is not friendly to the medical cartel, which obsessively
focuses (to their advantage) on the one-disease one-cause scenario.
Their (false) cause is inevitably a virus. Making that assessment leads
to vaccine and drug development, profits, and totalitarian control of
the arena of human suffering.
Cleaning up contaminated water supplies, improving sanitation,
eliminating overcrowding, introducing nutritious food to replace no-food
or junk food---these and other non-medical measures would make people
healthier and drastically reduce their need for any medical intervention
at all.
That's called a clue. What medical organization wants to take that route, thereby committing suicide?
In Brazil, an upsurge of microcephaly (if it is actually happening) is
the tip of the iceberg. Other babies are being born with other severe
neurological problems. Immune systems of pregnant women and mothers are
compromised, which leads to numerous, serious, life-threatening
infections in mothers and babies. The germs involved in the infections
would never cause any harm in persons
whose immune-defenses were strong.
No comments:
Post a Comment