by Jon Rappoport
August 18, 2015
"When I ran for a
seat in the US Congress in 1994, I was very aggressive in demanding that
we go after the FDA as a rogue criminal agency. Others, at the time,
who were in favor of Health Freedom, said I should dial back my
rhetoric; all we needed was a good law that would protect our right to
take nutritional supplements. They were wrong then, and they're still
wrong." (Running for Congress, Jon Rappoport)
Libertarians see big government as an obstruction to a free-market economy.
Some
Libertarians believe the FDA is unnecessarily restraining commerce by
driving up the cost of drugs and slow-tracking the approval of new
drugs.
This is not how the game works. The FDA has clients, and
those clients are the drug companies. On the whole, the FDA speeds up
its drug approvals and thereby unleashes a torrent of toxic compounds on
the public, killing, at a conservative estimate, 100,000 Americans
every year, or a million Americans per decade.
The FDA is aiding and abetting criminal companies.
There
are various solutions to this ongoing catastrophe that would depend on
the basic honesty of Big Pharma. That honesty doesn't exist. And the
Dept. of Justice has no interest in waging a big-time war against
Pharma.
Even in a society where Libertarian philosophy was the
guide, government, however limited, would still have the role of
protecting citizens from poisoning and rank fraud.
You could, of
course, completely eliminate the government from having any say-so in
the approval of medical drugs. You could have the Wild West. Let the
buyer beware. Whether this would result in more deaths per year is an
open question. It's quite possible such a free system would eventually
make people more cautious about what drugs they ingest; and thus the
number of deaths would diminish. People wouldn't be able to rely on the
government to tell them what's safe and what's dangerous. In the long,
long run, I believe this is so: no FDA is better than FDA.
I've
been writing and speaking about dangerous medical drugs for almost 30
years, and I haven't seen any limits placed on the basic FDA-Pharma
partnership. This isn't case of seeing a) government or b) corporations
as the basic criminal. They're both criminals, in collaboration with
each other.
In a half-sane society, the big drug companies
would have been prosecuted to the sky long ago. Their charters to do
business in any state would have been revoked. Their CEOs, executives,
and scientists would have been put behind bars for life. Even a limited
federal government would have done that.
Here is where I'm in
accord with Libertarians: people have right and the freedom to refuse
medication, under any circumstances, even where the experts claim death
will be the inevitable outcome. And people have the right to ingest any
compounds they decide might help them.
If that were the basis
for the system, then government couldn't overwhelm the population with
rules about mandatory vaccines and drugs.
In case you hadn't
noticed, all national health insurance plans, in whatever countries
they've been established, are the road to perdition, because they can be
manipulated to coerce citizens into accepting designated toxic medical
treatments.
The freedom of refusal is the only protection when crime bosses rule both government agencies (like the FDA) and pharmaceutical companies.
Trying to reform Pharma or the government is a losing proposition.
In
countries other than the US, the FDA-type agencies are likewise stacked
with Pharma-favoring allies. These people have no conscience and no
accountability. They are dangerous criminals who should be locked up.
But how is that possible when they are embedded within government?
If
benign UFOs from another solar system were stationed above Earth,
observing civilization at work, one of the first things they would
notice is the mass-poisoning operation I'm writing about in this
article, especially because it is taking place under the cover of
delivering health to the planet's population.
Someone aboard one
of the ships would say, "Oh yes, this is a typical 'greatest good for
the greatest number' cover story, concealing a war against the people.
We see that everywhere."
Save the village by destroying it.
No comments:
Post a Comment