Ch. I - 9/11 Through the Eyes of an American Skeptic
Chapter I
9-11 Through the Eyes of an American Skeptic
As a journalist with an independent weekly newspaper based in
Washington, D.C., I became caught up in the events of 9-11 from the minute it
happened and was able to write freely about the terror attacks that were
exploited to start the pre-planned War on Terror.
From my position as a skeptic of the unproven official version, I
have examined the facts and evidence since the day it happened and have concluded
that the U.S. government and controlled media have engaged in a conspiracy to
deceive the world about what really happened on that terrible day.
The Dream
The early morning hours of September 11, 2001 found me with my
family driving through New York City en route to Washington, D.C. after a
weekend trip to Stowe, Vermont. We had visited the Trapp family lodge and
gotten a late start from Stowe on Monday afternoon. By the time we
reached New York City, our two small children were fast asleep in the back seat
of our rented Buick.
Because the hotels were all full or outrageously expensive, I was
left with no choice but to continue driving down the highway when I should have
been sleeping. To keep me awake as I drove through New York City, my wife
Helje told me about a vivid dream she had had a week earlier, the night before
we had left our home near Chicago.
I had heard parts of Helje's strange dream when she had first told
it to our children in the backseat of the car as we set out across Indiana for
Washington, D.C. Now, to help keep me awake on the busy highways of New
York City, she told me her dream from the week before.
In the dream we were driving toward a city with a skyline of
densely packed skyscrapers when a large airplane flew right at our car and dove
into the road about 50 meters in front of us. She turned and saw the
plane emerge from the ground behind us and another plane coming at us from
another angle. This was a strange dream in which she felt that our family
had been under attack.
Helje's dream turned out to be an eerie and uncanny premonition of
what was to happen in the skies of New York City less than eight hours
later.
It was about 3 a.m. on September 11 when we finally found an
affordable hotel room just inside the state of Maryland on Interstate 95.
The kids woke up and jumped on the beds and then we all fell asleep about a
half-hour later.
I woke up about 8:30 a.m. and went down to the lobby for a cup of
coffee. The television was on in the breakfast area reporting that a
plane had struck the North Tower of the World Trade Center in Manhattan.
I grabbed some pastries and coffee and hurried back to the room and turned the
television to the news channel.
The children and I went to get more donuts and coffee and were on
our way back to the room when the second plane hit the South Tower. Helje
had seen it happen live on television. We were shocked by the events and
realized that America was under attack. I immediately called my office in
Washington, D.C. and told my boss that kamikaze airplanes had hit the World
Trade Center. He thought I was joking. I said I wouldn't joke about
such a thing and told him to turn on the radio. I called the office again
after the Pentagon was hit and said we would not be coming to Washington but
were heading home to Chicago. Having no idea what would happen next, I
thought it would be best to take the country roads and stay away from big
cities.
We drove through rural Lancaster County past Amish farmers
harvesting a very tall corn crop. I stopped and walked into the fields to
ask some of the German-speaking farmers if they knew what had happened in New
York City. They said they had not heard anything about it and carried on
working with their horse-drawn harvester.
Our route from Pennsylvania to Chicago took us near the site in
Shanksville where Flight 93 supposedly crashed, but I had no desire to go to
the scene of the disaster. We stopped for lunch in a small town.
The diner was full of people but nobody was talking. The people sat
quietly, as if mesmerized, listening to the news on the
radio.
Indications of Israeli Involvement
We listened to the radio as we drove across Pennsylvania. It
was a beautiful sunny day with a bright blue sky. About noon I heard a
news report that five "Middle Eastern" men had been seen in New
Jersey videotaping and celebrating the destruction of the World Trade
Center.
"They're probably Israelis," I told Helje. For
millions of Americans who automatically associate "Middle Eastern"
with Arab, this news report planted the idea in their minds that Arabs from the
Middle East were behind the terror attacks on New York and Washington.
This line of thinking quickly became the media's only acceptable
version of events and although it has still not been proven, it has become the
official version of 9-11.
The first indication that the attack on the World Trade Center was
an elaborate "false flag" operation came with the arrest of the five
men on the New Jersey side of the Hudson River. These men, described as
"Middle Eastern" in the first media reports, were later identified as
Israelis. A false flag operation is a crime which is designed and carried
out so that another party or nation is blamed.
That the five jubilant Middle Eastern men, who had photographed
themselves smiling and celebrating with the burning World Trade Center in the
background, were indeed Israelis (namely Sivan and Paul Kurzberg, Oded Ellner,
Omer Marmari, and Yaron Schmuel) and that two of them were known to U.S. law
enforcement and intelligence agencies as agents of Israeli intelligence, was
ignored by the mass media.
The men had been observed taking video or photos of themselves
with the World Trade Center burning in the background. Sivan Kurzberg
told the police that the men had been driving in their van in the immediate
vicinity of the towers that morning. He was photographed flicking a
lighter with the burning towers behind him.
A woman who had observed the jubilant Israelis said she was struck
by the expressions on the men's faces. "They were like happy, you
know," she said. "They didn't look shocked to me. I thought it
was very strange."
When they were arrested, Sivan, the driver of the van, told the
police, "We are Israeli. We are not your problem. Your problems are our
problems. The Palestinians are the problem."
The story of the five men celebrating the destruction of the Twin
Towers was dropped from the national news when it became known that they were
not Arabs or Muslims from the Middle East, but Jews from Israel.
The noteworthy fact that these men, who clearly had prior
knowledge of the attacks, were in fact Israelis, and that they had been
arrested at gunpoint with box cutter knives, multiple passports, and thousands
of dollars in cash in a van that tested positive for explosives was only
reported by Paolo Lima in a local New Jersey newspaper, the Bergen Record, the following day.
This important and timely information, however, was completely
ignored by the New York Times and the
other national mass media outlets based across the river in New York
City.
I discussed the pertinent details with Lima by phone, and this
important and suppressed story became the subject of my first article about
9-11. I realized then, during the first week after 9-11, that the
mainstream news media was ignoring and covering up important information and
evidence about the terrorist attacks.
There would be, for example, no reporting in the mainstream media
of Israeli involvement or prior knowledge of the attacks. And this was
just the beginning of the censorship the controlled media was to impose on the
events of 9-11.
The possibility that these men could be Israeli intelligence
agents involved in a spectacular "false flag" terror attack was
discussed in my article that went to print in the American Free Press on September 20, 2001. It was the only
newspaper in the United States where such thoughts could openly be
expressed.
Months later, Forward, a
well known New York-based Jewish newspaper, confirmed that Urban Moving
Systems, the Weehawken, New Jersey-based "moving" company that the
men worked for, was actually an Israeli intelligence front operation and that
at least two of the men, evidently the Kurzberg brothers, were known agents of
Mossad, Israel's military intelligence agency.
Dominic Suter, the Israeli "owner" of the company and a
prime suspect, was somehow allowed to flee to Israel after the Federal Bureau
of Investigation had initially interviewed him, but before they could
interrogate him a second time. He has not been extradited to the United
States since.
After being held for 10 weeks, the five Israelis were sent back to
Israel on visa violations. Ellner, Marmari, and Schmuel appeared on an
Israeli television show, without the Kurzberg brothers, in November 2001.
Three of the Israeli agents arrested on 9-11 appeared on Israeli television in November 2001 and admitted that their mission had been to document the 9-11 attacks. "The fact of the matter is that we come from a country that experiences terror daily," Oded Ellner (center) said. "Our purpose was to document the event."
One would think that such a revealing public admission by a
suspect, claiming prior knowledge of the terror attack and saying that his
purpose "was to document the event" would be extremely newsworthy
information in the United States.
Sadly, this was not the case. Rather than discuss the
evidence, the mainstream media has constructed and defended an unproven version
of events in which the blame is assigned to nineteen Arabs with ties to Osama
Bin Laden and Al Qaida.
Indications of Israeli involvement in 9-11 were conspicuous from
the beginning. Benjamin Netanyahu, the former Israeli prime minister and leader
of the right wing Likud Party, actually said that he viewed 9-11 as a positive
development. On the day of the attacks, Netanyahu was interviewed by James
Bennet of the New York Times:
Asked tonight what the
attack meant for relations between the United States and Israel, Benjamin
Netanyahu, the former prime minister, replied, "It's very good." Then
he edited himself: "Well, it's not good, but it will generate
immediate sympathy."
Benjamin Netanyahu (right) and Ehud Olmert are Israeli politicians from the extreme right-wing Likud party, which grew out of the Zionist terror organization, the Irgun. Olmert, then mayor of Jerusalem, made a secret visit to New York City the day before the terror attacks. Asked what the attacks meant for U.S.-Israeli relations, Netanyahu said, "It's very good."
Netanyahu predicted that the attack would "strengthen the
bond between our two peoples, because we've experienced terror of so many
decades, but the United States has now experienced a massive hemorrhaging of
terror."
Prior knowledge of the 9-11 attacks clearly indicates complicity in
the murder of some 3,000 people.
Journalists, like myself, who challenge the official version with
evidence and facts are marginalized as "conspiracy nuts." I
have been portrayed as an anti-Semitic writer by the leading media networks
simply because I dare to investigate the evidence of Israeli involvement in the
terror attacks.
The level of the personal attacks against me increased
dramatically in August 2006, when a police assault by three unidentified
heavily-armed men resulted in my right elbow being fractured and my being
unjustifiably shocked with 50,000 volts from a police device known as a
TASER. This outrageous and illegal assault occurred at my home in front
of my wife and eight-year-old daughter.
I was taken to jail and subsequently charged by the police with
resisting arrest and aggravated assault, both misdemeanor charges. In the
Chicago system nearly everyone in such a situation is forced to plead guilty
and accept the sentence meted out by the judge. I refused to plead guilty,
however, and spent nearly one year trying to defend myself against the baseless
charges and malicious prosecution. In early June 2007, I was found guilty
of both misdemeanors after a seriously flawed four-day trial in which the
police were allowed to destroy the video evidence and then openly lied on
the stand. My expert witness and evidence were not allowed to be
presented by the Cook County judge, Hyman Riebman, a Zionist Jew. Having
seen that there was no way to obtain justice in the corrupt court system, I was
compelled to leave Chicago with my family before the date of sentencing.
It would have been irresponsible for me to allow this criminal system to cause
more harm to me and my family than it already had.
Odigo Warnings
In the first days and weeks after 9-11, I paid very close
attention to the large number of Israeli terror suspects arrested, which was
more than two hundred by November 2001, and investigated the published reports
that an Israeli instant text message service had been used to warn Israelis of
the attacks in New York - hours before they occurred. Many Israelis
were evidently forewarned of the attacks through an Israeli instant messaging
service called Odigo. This story, which presents the clearest evidence of
Israeli prior knowledge of the attacks, was reported only very briefly in the
U.S. media – and then forgotten.
According to the published reports, Israel-based employees of
Odigo reported having received warnings of an imminent attack at the World
Trade Center hours before the first plane hit the north tower. Odigo, an
Israeli-owned company, had its U.S. headquarters two blocks from the World
Trade Center, but the forewarned Odigo employees did not pass the terror
warning on to the authorities in New York, an act that would have saved
thousands of lives.
Two weeks after 9-11, Alex Diamandis, Odigo's vice president,
said, "The messages said something big was going to happen in a certain
amount of time, and it did – almost to the minute." "It was
possible that the attack warning was broadcast to other Odigo members, but the
company has not received reports of other recipients of the message,"
Diamandis said. Four thousand Israelis were expected to have been working
at the World Trade Center on 9-11, yet only one was reported to have died at
the complex. Based on the Israeli government figure that 4,000 Israelis
were expected to have been at the World Trade Center at the time of the
attacks, it seems evident that many Israeli Odigo users got the message of
warning.
Odigo, which offers real-time messaging, has a feature called
"People Finder" which allows a user to send an instant message to a
large group based on a common characteristic, such as Israeli
nationality. "People Finder" allows Odigo users to search for
online "buddies," with filters like Israeli nationality, while
maintaining user privacy at all times. The message was probably sent in
Hebrew. The Internet address of the sender of the warning was allegedly
given to the FBI. Two months later it was reported that the FBI was still
investigating the matter. Since then there have been no further media reports
about the Odigo warning of 9/11.
These two news stories about the fake Israeli "movers"
and the Odigo messages, which clearly indicated that some Israelis had very
specific prior knowledge of the attacks, were published in American and Israeli
newspapers shortly after 9-11. Had the recipients of these Odigo instant
messages contacted the New York police department, thousands of lives could
have been saved. The question that has not been asked is, why didn't
they?
Cui Bono?
There were several early indicators that Israelis were involved in
9-11 and that it was a spectacular "false flag" terror attack
designed to serve as a casus belli to drag the United States into the "War
on Terror." Apart from the previously mentioned evidence of Israeli
prior knowledge, there were also the amazingly insensitive comments of
Netanyahu about 9-11 being "very good" in his view.
Netanyahu, it should be noted, is the author of several books
which call for the western nations to engage in a global "War on
Terror." Since 1986, Netanyahu has urged the United States and
western democracies to take up arms against the enemies of Israel in the name
of "fighting terrorism," which is the title of one of his
books. The "terrorists" that Netanyahu wants the West to wage
war on, however, all happen to be the people and states opposed to Israel's
illegal occupation of Palestinian land.
I approached the 9-11 investigation with a twenty-five year history
of living in and following the events of the Middle East. After many
years of traveling in Europe and the Middle East, I obtained a degree in
History from the University of California at Santa Cruz in 1992. My
academic emphasis was on Palestine and Israel. After the first U.S. war
against Iraq, which I was actively opposed to, I spent my final year of
university researching the Soviet occupation of the newly liberated Baltic
republics and completing my courses at the University of Bergen in Norway.
Fate brought me into the proximity of another mass disaster on the
morning of September 28, 1994, when I arrived by ship in Sweden and learned
that the Baltic ferry named Estonia
had sunk during the night with 852 victims lost at sea. My wife's first
husband, a famous Estonian singer named Urmas Alender, was among the
missing. While it was abundantly clear that something much more explosive
than a "monster wave" had sunk the ferry, the Swedish government and
media pretended that natural forces had caused the catastrophe. In the
process of investigating what happened in the ferry disaster, I came to realize
that a modern "democratic" state, like Sweden, could actually be
complicit in the cover-up of the mass murder of hundreds of its own citizens.
When in the year 2000, I began working as a journalist for the
Washington-based Spotlight, later to
become the American Free Press, I
turned my attention to the mysterious 1996 crash of TWA Flight 800 off the
coast of New York. I attended the final sessions of the government agency
(NTSB) involved in investigating the "crash" of Flight 800 and was
appalled at the obvious cover-up of the facts. I watched how three Jewish
members of the board completely dominated the NTSB final sessions and how the
testimonies of more than 100 eyewitnesses, who had testified to having seen a
streaking object hitting the aircraft in flight, were categorically dismissed
because, according to a young Jewish member of the board, based on the time of
the observations, all of the witnesses must have been drunk and
hallucinating. After the two-day presentation of the NTSB findings there
was no press conference or session allowing for questions from the media or
public. This was clearly another cover-up.
I had also studied the Israeli attack on the USS Liberty and seen how the U.S. government and military had
covered up the truth of the Israeli military attack on the unarmed Navy vessel
off the coast of Egypt in 1967. With this background I approached the
events of 9-11. Well aware of the history of false-flag terror, the
overwhelming Zionist influence in government and media, and dishonest official
investigations into recent mass disasters, I was a natural skeptic from the
start.
Evidence of Explosions Ignored
The administration of George W. Bush rushed the nation and its
allies into war in Afghanistan within one month of the 9-11 attacks using the
unsolved crime as the casus belli for an overt act of aggression that had been
planned long before. The war against the government of Afghanistan,
called Operation Enduring Freedom by the government and military, began on Oct.
7, 2001.
The week before the war began I wrote an article about the immense
oil and gas reserves of the Caspian Basin and the new "Great Game" to
gain control of these valuable energy resources. I also wrote several
articles about the long-standing business and personal ties between George W.
Bush and the Bin Laden family. One month after 9-11, I wrote about how
the mass media was ignoring the large number of eyewitness accounts describing
explosions at the World Trade Center before the collapse of the Twin Towers and
Building 7.
"Despite reports from numerous eyewitnesses and experts,
including news reporters on the scene, who heard or saw explosions immediately
before the collapse of the World Trade Center, there has been a virtual silence
in the mainstream media," I wrote in the article titled "Some
Survivors Say 'Bombs Exploded Inside WTC.'"
"After the airplanes hit the World Trade Center there were
some explosive devices inside the buildings that caused the towers to
collapse," Van Romero, an explosives expert and former director of the
Energetic Materials Research and Testing Center at New Mexico Tech, told the Albuquerque Journal minutes after the
collapses. The collapse of the structures resembled controlled implosions
used to demolish old structures and was "too methodical to be a chance
result of airplanes colliding with the structures," Romero said.
Coming from a man who is an expert in the effects of explosives on structures,
Romero's comments carried a lot of weight in my opinion.
"It would be difficult for something from the plane to
trigger an event like that," Romero said. If explosions did cause the
towers to collapse, "It could have been a relatively small amount of
explosives placed in strategic points."
"One of the things terrorist events are noted for is a
diversionary attack and secondary device," he said. Then suddenly,
ten days after the attack, without any explanation, Romero did a complete about-face
in his analysis of the collapse. "Certainly the fire is what caused the
building to fail," he told the Albuquerque
Journal on September 21.
A friend of mine from Brooklyn told me that he had been standing
among a crowd of people on Church Street, about two blocks from the South Tower
(WTC 2), when he saw "a number of brief light sources being emitted from
inside the building between floors 10 and 15." He saw about six of these
brief flashes, accompanied by "a crackling sound" immediately before the
tower collapsed.
Even a veteran 51-year-old fire fighter, Louie Cacchioli, told People magazine that he had witnessed
explosions in the South Tower: "I was taking firefighters up in the
elevator to the 24th floor to get in position to evacuate workers. On the last
trip up a bomb went off. We think there were bombs set in the building."
What is most peculiar about the eyewitness reports of explosions
was that they were completely ignored by the mainstream news media, even when
the reports came from their own reporters on the scene. Stephen Evans of
the BBC, for example, was in the South Tower where he witnessed "a series
of explosions" and felt a "big explosion, from much, much
lower." Yet the BBC, like the rest of the mainstream media failed to
investigate or even discuss the evidence of explosions in the towers.
How did the editors of the mass media networks in the United
States and Britain make the decision not to discuss the evidence of explosions
even when the information came from their own reporters on the scene?
Eyewitness reports and images of explosions were broadcast only once and then
swept under the carpet. It soon became quite clear that the mass media
was censoring any discussion of the evidence of explosions in the World Trade
Center.
Within a few weeks I realized that the media and government were
working together to deceive the public about what really had happened on 9-11
and that there was a conspiracy to promote a false version of events in order
to gain public support for a previously planned war policy in the Middle
East. The mass media engaged in a comprehensive propaganda campaign to
instill fear in the public. My family and I decided that it would be
safer and more sane to live in Europe, so at the end of November, after the
Thanksgiving holiday, we flew to Germany.
Destruction of Evidence
In Germany, I had the opportunity to interview Andreas von Bülow
near Köln. Von Bülow, an author and former member of the Bundestag (the German parliament) served
on the parliamentary commission which oversees the three branches of the German
secret service. Von Bülow said he thought Israel's intelligence service,
Mossad, was behind the 9-11 attacks. These attacks, he said, were carried out
to turn public opinion against the Arabs and boost military and security
spending.
"You don't get the higher echelons," von Bülow said,
referring to the "architectural structure" which masterminds such
terror attacks. At this level, he said, the organization doing the planning,
such as Mossad, is primarily interested in affecting public opinion. The
terrorists who actually commit the crimes are what von Bülow calls "the
working level," such as the nineteen Arabs who allegedly hijacked the
planes on September 11. "The working level is part of the deception,"
he said.
"Ninety-five percent of the work of the intelligence agencies
around the world is deception and disinformation," he said, which is
widely propagated in the mainstream media creating an accepted version of
events. "Journalists don't even raise the simplest questions,"
he said. "Those who differ are labeled as crazy."
Eckehardt Werthebach, the former president of the Verfassungsschutz (a branch of German
intelligence), told me that "the deathly precision" and "the
magnitude of planning" behind the attacks would have needed "years of
planning." Such a sophisticated operation, Werthebach said, required
the "fixed frame" of a state intelligence organization, something not
found in a "loose group" of terrorists. Both Werthebach and von
Bülow said the lack of a complete "blue ribbon" investigation, with
congressional hearings, into the events of September 11 was
incomprehensible. These men made more sense to me than anyone in the U.S.
government or media.
As incomprehensible as it might seem, the Bush administration
delayed and avoided an official investigation for as long as possible – at
least until all of the evidence was destroyed. The steel from the World
Trade Center was quickly shipped to Asia where it was melted down. The
evidence from the crime scene was being destroyed as quickly as possible.
This was clearly criminal, yet the highest authorities in the U.S. government
and the Department of Justice were allowing it to happen.
Molten Metal
I consider 9-11 to be an unsolved crime and have done what I can
to investigate the crime using the available evidence. In the summer of
2002, for example, I wrote an article about the seismic data that showed
unexplained spikes occurring at the beginning of each collapse.
In my research into the removal of the rubble, I learned from one
of the contractors and a demolition expert that molten metal had been
discovered at the bottom of the rubble pile in the lower basement levels.
This molten metal was described to me as "molten steel" by Peter Tully,
president of Tully Construction of Flushing, New York, and Mark Loizeaux,
president of Controlled Demolition, Inc. (CDI) of Phoenix, Maryland.
The molten steel was found "three, four, and five weeks
later, when the rubble was being removed," Loizeaux said. He said molten
steel was also found at WTC 7, the 47-story building owned by Larry
Silverstein, which collapsed mysteriously in the late afternoon. Loizeaux
said, "If I were to bring the towers down, I would put explosives in the
basement to get the weight of the building to help collapse the
structure."
The molten metal found beneath the rubble was clearly important
evidence that could explain how the towers were brought down. Because
each tower was held up by 47 huge box core columns, there had to be an
explanation for what caused these columns to fall. The official
explanation that fires had caused the floor trusses to give way failed to
explain what happened to the core columns. To explain the extremely quick
collapse of the core columns, the seismic spikes and molten metal seemed to be
very important clues.
Steven E. Jones, a professor of physics at Brigham Young
University (BYU) in Utah, contacted me in the summer of 2005 and asked me what
I had learned about the discovery of molten metal at the World Trade
Center. I told Jones exactly what Peter Tully and Mark Loizeaux had said
about the discovery of molten iron in the basements of the Twin Towers and
Building 7. After studying the reports and photographs of molten metal,
Jones had been able to obtain some fragments of the metal. He concluded
that the fragments were primarily iron and possible evidence that Thermite had
been used to demolish the buildings.
The author and Professor Steven E. Jones discuss the evidence of thermite in May 2006.
Encouraged by his research, I visited Professor Jones on the
campus of Brigham Young University in the spring of 2006. From Provo,
Utah, I then traveled by train to the University of California at Davis where I
met with Professor Thomas A. Cahill, an expert on airborne particles. Dr.
Cahill had conducted a study of the particles contained in the thin bluish
smoke that rose from the rubble for nearly four months after 9-11.
Cahill's air sampling began on October 2 and continued until late December
2001, when the last fires were finally extinguished.
Asked why it took so long to begin a scientific evaluation of the
air contamination that accompanied the destruction of the World Trade Center,
Dr. Cahill said he had assumed that there were scores of agencies and
scientists monitoring the air quality in New York City after 9-11.
"I assumed it was happening. I could not believe it was not," Cahill
said. "The EPA [Environmental Protection Agency] did nothing."
Cahill's work revealed the presence of extremely small metallic
aerosols in unprecedented amounts in the plumes coming from the burning WTC
rubble. Most of the particles in these plumes were in the categories of
ultra-fine and nano-particles: from 0.26 to 0.09 microns. The
extraordinarily high level of ultra-fine aerosols was one of the most unusual
aspects of the data, Cahill said. "Ultra-fine particles require
extremely high temperatures," he said, "namely the boiling point of
the metal."
Since the scientific data supports the theory that some form of
Thermite was used to destroy the towers, the question is how it got onto the
81st floor of the south tower, where large amounts of molten metal were seen
falling before the collapse?
Molten iron pours out of South Tower about one minute before the tower disintegrated.
The official final report of the fires does not explain what was
on the 81st floor, which seems odd because this is the floor, leased by Fuji
Bank, into which the airplane crashed. A former employee of the bank came
forward and told me that the bank had reinforced the floor in 1999 to support a
very heavy load of computer back-up batteries. "The whole floor was
batteries," he said, "huge battery-looking things." They
were "all black" and "solid, very heavy" things, which had
been brought in during the night. They had been put in place during the
summer prior to 9-11, he said. But were they really batteries? "It's
weird," he said. "They were never turned on."
So, what really was on the 81st floor of the South Tower?
What was in these heavy "battery-looking things?" Were they
batteries, or were they Thermite? And is it more than a coincidence that
both planes flew directly into secure computer rooms in both towers and that
both spectacular explosions showed evidence of Thermite-produced white
smoke?
The Cover-up Continues
Despite the legal difficulties, slander, criticism, and other
setbacks, I have continued to examine the evidence from 9-11 and ask the
questions that demand to be answered. The wasted lives of the thousands
of victims from the terror attacks and the illegal wars that have been waged in
the name of 9-11 deserve to be honored with the truth, not a pack of lies
pushed by the controlled media onto a gullible public.
It would be naïve and foolish for us to expect the truth from a
government that has been shown to have repeatedly lied to the media and
international community in order to accomplish its dubious goals. The truth of
9-11 will certainly not be given to us on a silver platter. It is
something we will have to fight for.
Finis
This chapter was originally written in February 2007 for ZeitenSchrift, a Swiss magazine.
Benjamin Netanyahu quote from "Spilled Blood is Seen as Bond
That Draws 2 Nations Closer," by James Bennet, New York Times, 12 September 2001
Original - February 2007
Latest Edit - June 15, 2011
Latest Edit - June 15, 2011
No comments:
Post a Comment