Everything now points to a major false flag ship attack being staged bythe Zio-Franco-Anglo-American Axis and NATOon the U.S. Navy in the eastern Mediterranean.
Nothing galvanizes the American public to war like a surprise attack on a ship.
History offers several glaring examples
of where false flag and outright attacks on ships were set up by the
Western powers to provide a provocative pretext to wage war. As follows:
“Remember the Maine”was
used a pretext to start the Spanish–American War. American yellow
journalism began in earnest with the sinking of the USS Maine–an
American naval ship that was sunk in Havana Harbor during the Cuban
revolt against Spain.
The sinking of the RMS Lusitania in
1915 by a German U-boat was actually set up by Great Britain as a way
of inflaming sentiments against Germany, which it did. False information
was deceptively back-channeled by British agents to the German navy
about weapons being transported in order to draw the outrageous attack.
President Franklin Delano Roosevelt allowed the attack on Pearl Harbor(authentic
US Gov’t documents have proved his foreknowledge) to guarantee U.S.
military involvement in World War II. While this was not a false flag
attack, Roosevelt’s failure to prevent it worked like a charm.
The fake Gulf of Tonkin incident was
used by President Lyndon Johnson to greatly intensify the Vietnam War.
US Secretary of Defense Robert S. McNamara admitted that theAugust 4Gulf of Tonkin attack never happened.
There are other stealth attacks on
prominent ships which have served to trigger specific outcomes, not
necessarily armed conflict, throughout modern history. One of the most
shocking demonstrations of the power of false flag ship attacks was the
intentional sinking of the RMS Titanic.
Quite unfortunately, President Donald
Trump already has 2 strikes against him. He has shown a great
willingness to go along with the transparent false flags in Syria. On
two occasions (both conducted in April) the whole world knew that the
false flag chemical attacks in Syria were staged by the American
coalition. Nevertheless, the POTUS trumpeted an entirely false narrative
to the world, and then followed up with an unlawful missile attack on a
sovereign nation in both instances.
KEY POINT: Trump
also ‘bought’ into the patently false narrative surrounding the nerve
agent poisoning of the Skripals in Salisbury, England. He then grossly
overreacted — before any conclusive evidence was presented — by expelling 60 Russian diplomats and officers based on what has turned out to be a naked and quite deliberate lie.The
world community of nations knew that the poisoning was carried out by
the British intel community; why didn’t President Trump?
Where it concerns Syria, however, we can
see Trump’s Achilles’ heel. He has shown no inclination to even
ascertain the truth of the matter BEFORE LAUNCHING A MILITARY ATTACK.
This illicit presidential behavior is not only unprecedented, it’s
setting him up to have the same knee-jerk reaction when a U.S. naval
vessel is sunk via a CIA-NATO coordinated black operation in the eastern
Mediterranean. Such a cynical false flag attack by the Western powers
could have the practical effect of starting the hot phase of World War
In all likelihood, this is exactly how
the clandestine perpetrators will goad the United States and her allies
into a full-scale conflict in Syria. They know that nothing assaults the
American psyche like a U.S. warship going down in flames. They’re also
aware that once this particular false flag trigger is pulled, there’s no
putting the genie back in the bottle.
Nonetheless, both a wider war in the
Northern Levant and/or a WW3 scenario can be averted altogether when a
sufficient number of Alt Media outlets are collectively disseminating this critical information.The single best way to prevent these Operation Gladio attacksis to expose them in advance.Were
the “global village” (i.e. planet made small because of the Internet)
to have known about the 9/11 false flag operation well before September
11, 2001, the perps would not have executed that US government-sponsored
N.B. The hypothetical analysis below fleshes out the skeleton of this quite likely scenario.
SITREP: A false flag attack on a USN ship next?
by Nick for the Saker blog
The USS Harry S. Truman Carrier Strike Group left the east coast Naval Station Norfolk, VA on 11th April.
The aircraft carrier is accompanied by
the guided-missile cruiser USS Normandy, the guided-missile destroyers
USS Burke, Bulkeley, Forest Sherman and Farragut, and the destroyers USS
Jason and The Sullivans. The strike group carries 6,500 sailors and
Carrier Air Wing One.
Recent announcements about Russia’s
hypersonic Kinzhal (‘Dagger’) missile system having made these vessels
effectively obsolete, this means that the ships and their crews are
essentially being sailed into a bloody scrapyard.
Even without the recent upgrading of the
Kinzhal system, the experience of the British fleet in the Falklands
conflict illustrates the vulnerability of warships to low-flying
missiles. In addition to the sinking of the HMS Sheffield and Sir
Galahad, virtually every British ship was hit by at least one of
Argentinian’s French-made Exocet missiles – a weapons system which was
already 20 years old at the time.
Exocet missile sinks HMS Sheffield during Falklands War:
Reportedly the only thing that saved the
UK force from obliteration was that the Argentinians had got their
missile altimeter settings wrong.The Russians will not make the same sort of error!
These facts are of course known to the US
military planners and – one would assume and hope, for it is duty to
know – by Donald Trump. And yet the US fleet is now nearing the coast of
Syria, where it will met up with American and other NATO warships
already in position.Together, they will make one big flock of sitting ducks.
If the people pushing Trump manage to get
him launch a new strike on Syria (and we must expect a new false flag
attack) and if the massive increase in NATO firepower means that enough
missiles get through to enough targets to kill Russians, then Putin
really has no choice but to sink the US fleet.
No choice because, whatever the danger of
doing so, failure to respond would signal Russian defeat and retreat in
Syria, which would of course lead to a rapid escalation of military
pressure against Lebanon and Iran, and mean that when the Empire then
rolls on to strike Russia, her most reliable allies will already have
gone and her ‘soft underbelly’ will be seriously exposed.
So Putin orders the destruction of the US
fleet, and an hour later all that is left is debris and mangled corpses
in some oil slicks – and some ‘great’ photos and video clips to
illustrate Trump’s declaration of war on account of “Russia’s deadly
sneak attack on a US humanitarian force”.
Sounds familiar?It should do. Because we’re not just thinking here of the USS Maine, the Lusitania and the Gulf of Tonkin.The Washington habit of using sunken ships as the causus belli also of course included Pearl Harbor.
Just in case you need a reminder, here’s
just one example of the many short videos out there on the truth about
the Japanese attack on 7th December
1941 which explain how Roosevelt had advance intelligence of the
planned attack, but decided not to pass it on to the anchored sitting
The more or less official excuse (the
President’s guilt never having been formally acknowledged) is that to
have alerted the fleet would also have tipped off the Japanese that
their naval codes had already been broken. But the truth is of course
that deliberately didn’t warn the fleet because he knew that the
sacrifice would goad the American people into a war against Hitler to
which he and those around and behind him were committed, but which the
American people opposed.
circumstances this time are of course somewhat different, not least
that everyone with even a passing knowledge of the Russian missile
capability already knows that 6,500 sailors are “on their way to
Which makes Donald Trump either a
criminally incompetent fool, a bad poker player or a wholly controlled
puppet of the psychotic Anglo-Zionist elite. If he is one of
the first two of these, then there is of course still a chance that he
might respond to the disaster by blinking and retreating. In which case,
the Beltway elite will use the human tragedy and his humiliation to
remove him from office (not a bad consolation prize, from their point of
But if he is the third, then the ‘shock’ blitz on the US fleet will lead to the immediate declaration of World War Three.
Indeed, if things get that far (and we’re
probably 48 hours and one White Helmets’ video away from it) then the
only thing that realistically stands a chance of stoppingthe
racist Anglo-Zionist psychopaths in their tracks is if the Russian
attack and its result are such a devastating show of ‘shock and awe’ as
to make it impossible for them to ignore a simultaneous public warning
by Putin to Netanyahu that any further US hostile response will place
Israel directly in the firing line as well.
That might JUST be enough to make the
Neocons back off. If not, then World War Three it will be. It might not
go nuclear straight away, but even while it is conventional EVERYTHING
Dissident anti-war voices such as this
will rapidly be silenced by blanket censorship and internment; your sons
and daughters will be conscripted; your taxes will go through the roof –
and you will have to live with the ever-present fear that, once China
enters the war against Washington and its client states, the tide will
run so fast against the ‘democratic allies’ that their ‘humanitarian
missiles’ will end up with nuclear tips.
If that disturbs you (and it surely
should) then all I ask is that you take the Pearl Harbor analogy and get
busy spreading it on social media RIGHT NOW. Because once those young
sailors and airmen have been sacrificed, the demand for a war of
‘revenge’ will be unstoppable.But if the warmongers realize that plenty of people have already understood the plan, it might just spook them into backing off.
In which case the fleet can do a few
face-saving maneuvres and then sail home again and we can look forward
to a summer which may be warm, but not as uncomfortably hot as it could