US Out of 66 Orgs. Now Let's Make it MatterIt's a first step, but now the task is to make sure that the other steps get taken or this step has absolutely no real significance other than window dressing.
On Wednesday, December 7, 2026, President Trump “withdrew the United States from 66 international organizations and treaties, including the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. In a presidential memorandum, Trump said it is “contrary to the interests of the United States to remain a member of, participate in, or otherwise provide support to” the organizations, which also include groups geared toward education, economic development, cybersecurity and human rights issues, among others. He directed all executive departments and agencies to take steps to “effectuate the withdrawal” of the U.S. from the organizations as soon as possible.”¹
² Thirty-one UN organizations and 35 [supposedly] non-UN organizations have been jettisoned, in addition to the ones Trump directed the US to withdraw from in his February 4, 2025, Executive Order No. 14199
³ . In that EO, Trump explicitly removed the UN from further participation in the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC), the UN Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO); and the UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA). Secretary of State Marco Rubio was further directed to review all other US memberships international organizations by August 5, 2025 and report to the President by that date on his recommendations as to which memberships were contrary to US policy and interests. In fact, we at PreventGenocide2030.org pressed the Secretary for a copy of his required report on August 5, 2025, but never received it. Apparently, like the mills of the Gods, those of the Department of State grind exceeding slow but it would appear that they grind exceeding fine.⁴ While
there is a good deal of justified celebratory talk about this bold and
necessary move, such as the social media pean by Myron Ebell,
chairman-elect, American Lands Council (Washington, DC)⁵, President Trump at one stroke has removed the United States from a long list of harmful foreign entanglements, headlined by the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Getting out of the UNFCCC is great news for Americans and can also be great news for people all over the world suffering from energy poverty policies if it hastens the collapse of the international climate racket. President Trump deserves deafening applause for taking another bold move to advance American interests. Secretary Rubio and his team at the State Department should also be congratulated for doing such a thorough review of whether U.S. membership in every international organization and treaty is in the national interest. Credit is also due to all the brave groups and individuals that opposed the UNFCCC since it was first proposed at the Rio Earth Summit in 1992. there is also a lot, and I do mean a LOT of misinformation rolling around about what has happened and what it means. And, frankly, once we get that cleared up, we can roll up our sleeves and set about doing the real work that this Executive Order opens up. Now that we have removed billions of dollars from the UN coffers, and shaken it to its core, apparently, we have two jobs ahead. The first is to complete the total US withdrawal from that toxic organization and the second, far more difficult task is to do a Deep Legislative Detox, getting rid of the deeply embedded, literally deadly UN parasite which has accomplished regulatory capture. Getting the US out of the UN is necessary, but not sufficient. Getting the UN out of every cell of the US Body Politic is necessary and sufficient.  There’s a great deal of chatter going on about the Constitutionality of what Trump has done alleging that the President does not have the authority to withdraw from a treaty ratified by Congress (as treaties must be). While we can be quite certain that globalist-happy forces will bring this action to Court, here’s the way I see it: The is not now, nor has there ever been, a treaty lawfully entered into by the United States and the United Nations or any body, organization, program, Framework or protocol associated with the United Nations. Nor can there ever be one. Harry S. Truman deceived the Congress of the United States in 1945 by personally presenting the ADOPTION of the UN Charter, written by Alger Hiss, a highly probable Marxist Soviet agent, by the way, to the Senate as if it were a Treaty. Since, by definition, reinforced by the Vienna Conference on the Law of Treaties⁶ of the United Nations itself, and followed by the US Department of State, TREATIES ONLY CAN EXIST BETWEEN SOVEREIGN STATES, AND THE UNITED NATIONS IS AN ASSOCIATION, NOT A SOVEREIGN STATE, THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A TREATY WITH THE UN OR ANY OF ITS ORGANIZATIONS.⁷ So the bogus “ratification” of the UN charter by am 89/11 Senate vote was a nice bit of political theater and PR flimflam, pretty much like Truman’s “brave choice” to drop two nuclear weapons on Japan to “end the war” 2 weeks after the Emperor had sued for peace and agreed to Japan’s complete surrender, asking only that the Emperor not be charged with war crimes. Unlike the horror of Hiroshima and Nagasaki,
the “ratification” was not constitutionally sanctioned (since nowhere does the “ratification” of membership in an organization which does not exist until the US joins it, as was the case with the UN in 1945) and nowhere is US membership in an organization the same as Constitutional permission to alter laws as the organization wishes. After all, that is what a treaty is: two or more sovereign countries agree to alter their laws to bring them into conformity on a particular issue. That is why a treaty becomes “the supreme law of the land” which must be enforced in every Court of the land.
But such agreements cannot be concluded with any entity other than a sovereign state, making every “treaty” signed with any part or party to the United Nations structure (other than another fully sovereign state) at best bogus and at worst, fraudulent.
If you want more specifics on why the US is actually not a member of the UN and, in fact, never has been, the case is laid out clearly in this Legal Memo. In brief, then, the US, which has never fulfilled the UN Charter requirement of depositing a Document of Ratification with the US Department of State Repository (because, we believe, there was never a valid “Ratification” of the UN Charter, nor could there be) is not actually a member of the Country Club (that is, merely a club of countries) known as the’ United Nations’ and has no treaty obligations with it or any of its parts and pieces.
So, OK, Trump has pulled us out of approximately 35 UN organizations and an equal number of similar organizations as well, for a welcome total of 66 international organizations. And some might say, “Well and Good! Job well done!” and move on.
But that’s where things get tricky. You see, even if we withdraw from the UN entirely tomorrow (and I truly hope we do!), unless we end the nearly total regulatory capture
that has been carefully accomplished over the last 80 years of its supposedly benign influence, reaching into, quite literally, every aspect of our lives will continue. The programs, protocols, policies, “Sustainable” [sic] “Development” [sic] “Goals” [sic], public-private partnerships, guidelines and mandates (yes, mandates), that have been so carefully infiltrated into every town, city, county, State, Department, Council and Authority must be removed as clearly and surgically as Trump just severed our ties with the 66 organizations in his January 7, 2026 Executive Order. These
regulations are the spawn of the UN parasite and our survival as a
country free of globalist destruction depends, quite literally, on a
successful Deep Legislative Detox. And,
while you are there, I invite you to become part of the effective work
group that is going to make sure that Detox gets done. I am inviting you
to join the Council of Concerned Citizens (C3) here
One of the benefits of membership in C3 is an invitation to a private, Member’s Only Fireside Chat on Tuesday from at 7:30 PM EST (that’s one hour earlier than last week’s Fireside Chat. We had an absolutely amazing meeting in which talents, resources, ideas and capacities were shared among the attendees. There was a little chit chat, and a lot of hard and serious, forward moving and productive work. These Members’ Only meetings are not recorded and, if last week’s meeting was any indication, you probably want to be there if you are interested in solving this problem. When you join C3, you will get a registration link for the Fireside Chats. It was a truly inspiring meeting, and I am looking forward to this coming Tuesday, January14. So why was I so quite this past week? Because I have been recovering from massive dental surgery.
Here’s the story, which may be instructive and possibly helpful. I only use the dental services of biological dentists, those dentists who understand the dangers of silver fillings, improper root canals and so on. No health insurance I have ever had has ever covered their services, so I have paid exclusively out of pocket for my dental care. As you know, it can be very expensive. I was seeing a well-experienced dentist here and feeling good about how conservative his approach was, avoiding major work if it were not necessary, and how available he was to discuss options with me. Nice guy, very pleasant, lovely front office gal. All good. Until. About a month ago, I had the beginning of something going not quite right and went to see him. “Oh,” he said, “I can put a temporary fix in place, but you are going to need extensive dental work immediately. It’s a real emergency or you will lose all 7 of your front teeth in your upper jaw. That will be $15,000. When would you like to start?”
” Why didn’t you tell me I had massive problems in my mouth?” I said. “Oh’” said the kindly gent, “up till now it wasn’t so bad, so I didn’t mention it.” And, by the way, he apparently made both his diagnosis and treatment plan with a Ouija Board,
since he took no x rays whatsoever. (I am not a fan of dental or other x rays, but sometimes you do need them - and this was one of those times). No! Not! Uh UH!
I was horrified by all the components of this wrongness. The next day, during my guitar lesson I was still sputtering over it and shared it with my guitar teacher who said that he had a GREAT dentist in Nogales, Mexico, a border town less than 2 hours away. He asked if I would like him to set up an appointment for a consultation when he went down the next week. I jumped at the chance. He was right. His dentist, a bi-national US/Mexican citizen who lives not far from where I do, had a superbly equipped, State of the Art office with exceptionally helpful and pleasant staff. He took detailed x-rays, and we had a two-hour consultation (for all of which I was charged $50) in which he laid out the result of considerable dental neglect and unfortunate errors by my kindly, well-spoken US (expensive!) biological dentist. The result? the irrefutable data made it clear that I need 4 times as much dental work as my previous dentist said I did and the total cost will be about 2/3 of the total presented by my previous dentist. So last Wednesday, while Donald Trump was pulling the US out of 66 organizations, I was sitting in a dental chair for 5.5 hours having various things pulled out of my head (teeth) and other things put in my head (posts for implants and stiches). Like most people, I truly dread dental pain and almost totally, I had none. But that is not the same as tissue pain. That was pretty fearsome for the last 5 days. I am still on yogurt and apple sauce and tepid pureed soups. Although I know it is not true, it feels like I will be doing that forever. However, I’ll have the stitches removed in two weeks and a whole bunch more of the dental procedure done at the same time. I certainly hope that it is less uncomfortable, but I am thrilled to have a real diagnosis with a highly skilled dentist performing the extensive work. Of course, I talk a bit funny right now. Let
me share what I am doing instead of pain killers and antibiotics, by
the way. Remember, this is not medical advice. These are my personal
choices. Oh, one other announcement: The Tuesday Dr. Rima Truth Reports Podcast and the Saturday Catalytic Conversations Podcast are merging. You can join us live streaming on Rumble.com/User/PeopleForPeople2022 every Saturday from5-7 PM EST. See you there! xxx 4 Henry Wadsworth Longfellow, in his 1845 poem, Retribution, restated the ancient Greek proverb to read, “Though the mills of God grind slowly, yet they grind exceeding small; 7 The U.S. signed the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969) on April 24, 1970. However, it has never ratified it. The treaty was transmitted to the U.S. Senate for advice and consent to ratification in 1971 (as Treaty Doc. 92-12), but the Senate has never given its approval, so the U.S. is not a party to the convention and is not legally bound by it. This status is confirmed by official sources, including:
The U.S. does consider many provisions of the Vienna Convention to reflect customary international law on treaties and often applies them in practice. As of the latest available data (around 2025–2026), there are 118 parties that have ratified or acceded to the convention, with the U.S. among the signatories that have not ratified (about 15 such states total). https://www.state.gov/treaties-pending-in-the-senate You're currently a free subscriber to Dr Rima Truth Reports Substack. For the full experience, upgrade your subscription. |
No comments:
Post a Comment