CHINA’S HYPERGRAVITY CENTRIFUGE SPINS UP SPECULATIONS
There is a hyper-gravity machine in China that just captured the world record, according to the following article shared by E.G. (with our deep gratitude), but the real story may not be the world record, but rather, the general implications of such machines. Brace yourself, because today's high octane speculation is a whopper doozie, but first, the article that E.G. spotted and was kind enough to share:
There you have it: China and the USA (and presumably a few other countries) have built hyper-gravity centrifuges to study the behavior of materials under conditions of extreme gravitational stress. The idea, of course, is not new, and has been around since the dawn of the space age, as large centrifuges were built to place human test subjects under high gravitational stress to study the effects on human physiology and if, indeed, humans could survive the high-g stresses of being launched by rockets into outer space. Most of us have seen those films of American and Russian astronauts and cosmonauts being spun in those centrifuges, and watched with a mixture of curiosity and horror as their faces appear to be turned into rubber, and squished into a variety of macabre expressions.
But the hypergravity centrifuges have taken the basic concept much further, and subject materials to gravitational stress far beyond the abilities of organic life to survive. In this case, the Chinese centrifuge is capable of generating stresses of 1900 g's.
But there is a lot of high octane speculative implication hidden in this very simple technology, and as usual, I am going to take my usual headlong run to the end of the twig of the tree of high octane speculation, and do my Wile E. Coyote nosedive into the canyon of speculation below, and offer a speculation about what this technology may really represent, and thus far exceed in speculation the evidence adduced from the article to support it. I'm going to compound the irrationality of my lunge into the canyon even further by maintaining that I fully believe that we are very deliberately not being told the full story and reasons for building such massive centrifuges, which reasons are the subject of my speculation.
So with that in mind, consider the following statements from the article, with the statement that intrigues me italicized in its context:
For instance, creating a three-meter model of a dam wall and spinning it at 100g puts the same amount of stress on it as a 984-foot (300-meter) wall would in the real world. This happens because all objects on Earth are subject to gravity and to the centrifugal force generated by the planet’s rotation.
By generating forces thousands of times stronger than the Earth’s gravity, machines such as CHIEF compress time and distance. This allows lab-based studies to investigate phenomena spanning decades or extending over kilometers.
Other real-world applications of this research can be to estimate how pollutants migrate through soil over multiple millennia or how high-speed rail tracks resonate with the ground – scenarios that are impossible to study in real time. (Italicized and boldfaced emphasis added)
Now, by compressing time and distance, we may easily substitute the words "warping time and space", since distance is a dimensional property of space. And with that, the hypergravity centrifuge technology is revealed for what it really is, a prototypical space warping technology, and, one may also add, a time warping technology. Notably this is all accomplished by rotating a mass of matter at extreme speed to create the extreme gravitational stresses to be studied. Now extend that principle to rotation of a mass (like a large hadron) at near light speeds (like the hadron collider), where, according to Einstein, the mass of said object should approach infinity (and thus, create gravitational effects?) and again, one has some food for a whole lot of thought and speculation. But for the fact that these hypergravity centrifuges are dealing with much larger mass and agglutinations of matter and much lower velocities of rotation, the principle is the same. Indeed, if one thinks about it, a higher mass in slower rotation velocities might be able to accomplish the same space-and-time-warping phenomena as a lower mass at higher rotation velocities(with apologies to Henrik Lorentz for not mentioning his transforms, which properly speaking I should do in this context, except that it would only overly complicate things, and not dispel the main point)... and perhaps, just perhaps, the real research being done here is also to determine the exact thresholds of the factors of resistance of the physical medium itself relative to a rotating system of mass (yea, I know, that's a noodle-baker, but that's what high octane speculation is supposed to do).
In short, there's much more going on here than studying "a three-meter model of a dam wall" or how "pollutants migrate through soil over multiple millennia or how high-speed rail tracks resonate with the ground" or any other scenarios "that are impossible to study in real time." To study those, you need to compress time. And to compress time, you need to create very high localized gravitational acceleration. And to create very high local gravitational acceleration, you need to rotate mass at extremely high mechanical rotation. And because you're creating such high local gravitational and time effects, do not be surprised if you might get some odd results, like levitation, or things being "attracted" into the vortex. But in any case, you need a time machine; you need a gravity-making machine.
See you on the ... Oh... one more thing. Just for kicks, does anyone want to take any bets that the protocols of operating these things include removing any "loose objects" like pencils, pens, spectacles, &c in the vicinity of these centrifuges when they're in operation?
See you on the flip side...
(If you enjoyed today's blog, please share it with your friends.)
No comments:
Post a Comment