Chapter 9 Secret societies: The Committee of 300 by Dr. John Coleman from antimatrix.org
If it were not so, why all the need for secret societies? If
we are ruled by an open system run by democratically elected officials, why the
need for a secret Masonic order in every village, town and
city across the United States? How is it that Freemasonry can
operate so openly and yet keep its secrets so well hidden? We can't ask the
Nine Unknown Men of the Nine Sisters Lodge in Paris that question, nor can we
ask it of their nine fellows in the Quatuar Coronati Lodge in London. Yet these
eighteen men form part of an even more secret government, the RIIA, and beyond
that, the Committee of 3OO.
How is it that the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry could brainwash John Hinckley
to shoot President Reagan? Why do we have such secret orders as the Knights of
St. John of Jerusalem, the Round Table, the Milner Group and so on down line
upon line of secret societies? They form part of a world-wide chain of command
and control running through the Club of Rome, NATO, the RIIA and finally right
up to the Conspirators' Hierarchy, The Committee of 300. Men need these secret
societies because their deeds are evil and must be hidden. Evil cannot stand in
the light of truth.
In this book we shall find an almost complete list of the conspirators, their
institutions, fronts and publications. In 1980 the Aquarian Conspiracy was in
full swing and its success can be seen in every facet of our private and
national life. The overwhelming rise in mindless violence, serial killers,
teenage suicides, the unmistakable signs of lethargy - "long range
penetration" is a part of our new environment, as dangerous, if not more
so, than the polluted air that we breathe.
The coming of the Age of Aquarius caught America totally unprepared. We as a nation were not prepared for the changes about to be forced upon us. Who ever had heard of Tavistock, Kurt Lewin, Willis Harmon and John Rawlings Reese? They were not even on the American political scene. What we would have noticed, if we bothered to look at all, was a falling off of our ability to withstand futuristic shock as we became more fatigued, distressed and eventually entered a period of psychological shock followed by widespread apathy as an outward manifestation of long range penetration warfare.
The Age of Aquarius was best described by Tavistock Institute as the vehicle for delivering turbulence:
"There are three distinct phases in the response and reaction to stress displayed by large social groups. First, there is superficiality; the population under attack will defend itself with slogans; this does not identify the source of the crisis and therefore does nothing to address it, hence the crisis will persist. The second is fragmentation. This occurs as the crisis continues and social order breaks down. Then, there is the third phase where the population group goes into 'self realization' and turns away from the induced crisis and there follows a maladaptive response, accompanied with active synoptic idealism and disassociation."
Who can deny that with the huge increase in drug usage-
"crack" making thousands of instant new addicts each day - the
shocking rise in the murder of infants each day (aborticide), which by now far
exceeds casualties suffered by our armed forces in both World Wars, Korea and
Vietnam, the open acceptance of homosexuality and lesbianism whose
"rights" are protected by more and more laws each year, the terrible
plague we call "AIDS" washing over our towns and cities, total failure
of our education system, the stunning increase in the divorce rate, a murder
rate that shocks the rest of the world into disbelief, satanic serial killings,
the disappearance of thousands of young children, snatched off our streets by
perverts, a virtual tidal wave of pornography accompanied by
"permissiveness" on our television screens - who can deny that this
nation is in crisis, which we are not addressing and from which we are turning
away.
Well-meaning people who specialize in these things blame a lot of the problem
on education, or what passes for it in the United States. Criminals now abound
in the age groups 9-15. Rapists are quite commonly as young as 10. Our social
specialists, our teacher's unions, our churches say it is all due to a faulty
education system. Witness how test scores keep dropping. The specialists bewail
the fact that the United States now ranks around 39th in the level of education
in the world.
Why do we bemoan what is so obvious?
OUR EDUCATlON SYSTEM WAS PROGRAMMED TO SELF-DESTRUCT. THAT WAS WHAT DR. ALEXANDER KING WAS SENT HERE BY NATO TO ARRANGE. THAT IS WHAT JUSTICE HUGO BLACK WAS ORDERED TO ARRANGE. THE FACT IS, THE COMMITTEE OF 300, WITH THE APPROVAL OF OUR GOVERNMENT, DOES NOT WANT OUR YOUTH TO BE PROPERLY EDUCATED.
The education that Freemason Justice Hugo Black, Alexander
King, Gunnar Myrdal and his wife came to give the children of the United States
is that CRIME PAYS, EXPEDIENCY IS WHAT COUNTS.
They taught our children that United States law is unequally applied, and that
is perfectly in order. Our children were properly educated by a decade of
corrupt examples; Ronald Reagan and George Bush were ruled by greed and became
totally corrupted by it. Our education system hasn't failed. Under the guidance
of King, Black and the Myrdals it is actually a great success, but it all
depends from whose point of view we look at it. The Committee of 300 is
DELIGHTED with our education system, and will not allow one comma of it to be
changed.
According to Stanford and Willis Harmon, the induced trauma of long range
penetration of which our education is a part, has been going on for 45 years,
yet how many are aware of the insidious pressures being applied to our society
and the constant exposure to brainwashing that goes on every day? The
mysterious gang wars that broke out in New York in the 1950's is an example of
how the conspirators can create and stage-manage any type of disruptive
elements they like. Where those gang wars came from nobody knew until the
1980's when researchers uncovered the hidden controllers who directed the
so-called "social phenomena."
Gang wars were carefully planned at Stanford, deliberately designed to shock
society and cause ripples of disturbances. By 1958 there were in excess of 200
of these gangs. They were made popular by a musical and a Hollywood movie,
"West Side Story." After making the news for a decade, suddenly, in
1966, they disappeared off the streets of New York, Los Angeles New York, New
Jersey, Philadelphia and Chicago.
Throughout the near decade of gang violence, the public reacted according to
the profiled response Stanford expected; society as a whole could not
comprehend gang warfare and the public responded in a maladaptive manner. Had
there been those wise enough to recognize in gang wars a Stanford e periment in
social engineering and brainwashing, the conspirator's plot would have been
exposed. Either we did not have trained specialists who could see what was
going on - which is highly unlikely - or else they were threatened and remained
silent. The cooperation with Stanford by the news media brought to light a
"new age" attack on our environment just as predicted by the social
engineers and new-science scientists at Tavistock.
In 1989 gang warfare, as a social conditioning to change,
was reintroduced to the streets of Los Angeles. Within a few short months of
the first incidents, gangs began to proliferate-first in the scores, then in
the hundreds on the streets of the East Side of Los Angeles. Crack houses and
rampant prostitution proliferated; drug dealers dominated the streets. Anybody
who got in their way was gunned down. The outcry in the press was loud and
long. Stanford's targeted large population group began defending itself with
slogans. This is what Tavistock called the first phase, with the targeted group
failing to identify the source of the crisis.
The second phase of the gang war crisis was "fragmentation." People
not living in the areas frequented by gangs said, "Thank God they are not
in our neighborhood." This ignored the fact that the crisis continued with
or without recognition and that social order in Los Angeles had begun to break
down. As profiled by Tavistock, those groups not affected by gang war
"broke away to defend themselves" because the source of the crisis
was not identified, the so called "maladaptation" process the period
of disassociation.
Apart from the proliferation of drug sales, what is the purpose of gang wars?
First, it is to show the targeted group that they are not safe, i.e.,
insecurity is generated. Secondly, it is to show that organized society is
helpless in the face of such violence and thirdly to bring about a recognition
of the fact that our social order is collapsing. The present wave of gang
violence will go away just as quickly as it started, once the three phases of
the Stanford program are completed.
An outstanding example of social conditioning to accept
change, even when it is recognized as unwelcome change by the large population
group in the sights of Stanford Research Institute, was the "advent"
of the BEATLES. The Beatles were brought to the United States as part of a
social experiment which would subject large population groups to brainwashing
of which they were not even aware.
When Tavistock brought the Beatles to the United States nobody could have
imagined the cultural disaster that was to follow in their wake. The Beatles
were an integral part of "THE AQUARIAN CONSPIRACY," a living organism
which sprang From "THE CHANGING IMAGES OF MAN," URH (489)2150-Policy
Research Report No. 4/4/74. Policy Report prepared by SRI Center for the study
of Social Policy, Director, Professor Willis Harmon.
The phenomenon of the Beatles was not a spontaneous rebellion by youth against
the old social system. Instead it was a carefully crafted plot to introduce by
a conspiratorial body which could not be identified, a highly destructive and
divisive element into a large population group targeted for change against its
will. New words and new phrases - prepared by Tavistock-were introduced to
America along with the Beatles. Words such as "rock" in relation to
music sounds, "teenager," "cool," "discovered"
and "pop music" were a lexicon of disguised code words signifying the
acceptance of drugs and arrived with and accompanied the Beatles wherever they
went, to be "discovered" by "teenagers." Incidentally, the
word "teenagers" was never used until just before the Beatles arrived
on the scene, courtesy of the Tavistock Institute for Human Relations.
As in the case of gang wars, nothing could or would have been accomplished
without the cooperation of the media, especially the electronic media and, in
particular, the scurrilous Ed Sullivan who had been coached by the conspirators
as to the role he was to play. Nobody would have paid much attention to the
motley crew from Liverpool and the 12-atonal system of "music" that was
to follow had it not been for an overabundance of press exposure. The 12-atonal
system consisted of heavy, repetitive sounds, taken from the music of the cult
of Dionysus and the Baal priesthood by Adorno and given a "modern"
flavor by this special friend of the Queen of England and hence the Committee
of 300.
Tavistock and its Stanford Research Center created trigger words which then
came into general usage around "rock music" and its fans. Trigger
words created a distinct new break-away largely young population group which
was persuaded by social engineering and conditioning to believe that the
Beatles really were their favorite group. All trigger words devised in the
context of "rock music" were designed for mass control of the new
targeted group, the youth of America.
The Beatles did a perfect job, or perhaps it would be more correct to say that
Tavistock and Stanford did a perfect job, the Beatles merely reacting like
trained robots "with a little help from their friends" - code words
for using drugs and making it "cool." The Beatles became a highly
visible "new type" - more Tavistock jargon - and as such it was not
long before the group made new styles (fads in clothing, hairstyles and
language usage) which upset the older generation, as was intended. This was
part of the "fragmentation-maladaptation" process worked out by
Willis Harmon and his team of social scientists and genetic engineering
tinkerers and put into action.
The role of the print and electronic media in our society is crucial to the
success of brainwashing large population groups. Gang wars ended in Los Angeles
in 1966 as the media withdrew its coverage. The same thing will happen with the
current wave of gang wars in Los Angeles. Street gangs will wither on the vine
once media saturation coverage is toned down and then completely withdrawn. As
in 1966, the issue would become "burned out." Street gangs will have
served their purpose of creating turbulence and insecurity. Exactly the same
pattern will be followed in the case of "rock" music. Deprived of
media attention, it will eventually take its place in history.
Following the Beatles, who incidentally were put together by the Tavistock
Institute, came other "Made in England" rock groups, who, like the
Beatles, had Theo Adorno write their cult lyrics and compose all the
"music." I hate to use these beautiful words in the context of
"Beatlemania"; it reminds me of how wrongly the word
"lover" is used when referring to the filthy interaction between two
homosexuals writhing in pigswill. To call "rock" music, is an insult,
likewise the language used in "rock lyrics."
Flower Children and Hippy Revolution
Tavistock and Stanford Research then embarked on the second phase of the work commissioned by the Committee of 300. This new phase turned up the heat for social change in America. As quickly as the Beatles had appeared on the American scene, so too did the "beat generation," trigger words designed to separate and fragment society. The media now focused its attention on the "beat generation." Other Tavistock-coined words came seemingly out of nowhere: "beatniks," "hippies," "flower children" became part of the vocabulary of America. It became popular to "drop out" and wear dirty jeans, go about with long unwashed hair. The "beat generation" cut itself off from mainstream America. They became just as infamous as the cleaner Beatles before them.
The newly-created group and its "lifestyle" swept
millions of young Americans into the cult. American youth underwent a radical
revolution without ever being aware of it, while the older generation stood by
helplessly, unable to identify the source of the crisis, and thus reacting in a
maladaptive manner against its manifestation, which were drugs of all types,
marijuana, and later Lysergic acid, "LSD," so conveniently provided
for them by the Swiss pharmaceutical company, SANDOZ, following the discovery
by one of its chemists, Albert Hoffman, how to make synthetic ergotamine, a
powerful mind-altering drug. The Committee of 300 financed the project through
one of their banks, S. C. Warburg, and the drug was carried to America by the
philosopher, Aldous Huxley.
The new "wonder drug" was promptly distributed in "sample"
size packages, handed out free of charge on college campuses across the United
States and at "rock" concerts, which became the leading vehicle for
proliferating the use of drugs. The question that cries out for an answer is,
what was the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) doing at the time? There is
compelling circumstantial evidence that would appear to indicate that the DEA
knew what was going on but was ordered not to take any action.
With very substantial numbers of new British "rock" bands arriving in
the U.S., rock concerts began to become a fixture on the social calender of
American youth. In tandem with these "concerts," the use of drugs
among the youth rose in proportion. The devilish bedlam of discordant heavy
beat sounds numbed the minds of listeners so that they were easily persuaded to
try the new drug on the basis that "everybody is doing it." Peer
pressure is a very strong weapon. The "new culture" received maximum
coverage from the jackal media, which cost the conspirators not one single thin
dime.
Great anger was felt by a number of civic leaders and churchmen over the new
cult but their energies were misdirected against the RESULT of what was going
on and not against the CAUSE. Critics of the rock cult made the same mistakes
that had been made in the prohibition era, they criticized law enforcement
agencies, teachers, parents anybody but the conspirators.
Because of the anger and resentment I feel toward the great drug plague, I make
no apology for using language which is not customary for me to use. One of the
worst drug slobs ever to walk the streets of America was Alan Ginsberg. This
Ginsberg pushed the use of LSD through advertising which cost him nothing,
although under normal circumstances it would have cost millions of dollars in
TV advertising revenues. This free advertising for drugs, and LSD in
particular, reached a new high in the late 1960's, thanks to the ever-willing
cooperation of the media. The effect of Ginsberg's mass advertising campaign
was devastating; the American public was subjected to one cultural future shock
after another in rapid succession.
We became over-exposed and over stimulated and, again, may I remind you that
this is Tavistock jargon, lifted from the Tavistock training manual,
overwhelmed by its new development and, when we reached that point, our minds
began to lapse into apathy; it was just too much to cope with, that is to say,
"long range penetration had taken hold of us." Ginsberg claimed to be
a poet but no greater rubbish was ever written by anyone who ever aspired to
becoming a poet. Ginsberg's designated task had little to do with poetry; his
main function was to push the new subculture and force acceptance of it upon
the large targeted population group.
To assist him in his task, Ginsberg coopted the services of Norman Mailer, a
writer of sorts who had spent some time in a mental institution. Mailer was a
favorite of the leftwing Hollywood crowd and so had no problem with getting
maximum television time for Ginsberg. Naturally Mailer had to have a pretext -
not even he could blatantly come out with the true nature of Ginsberg's
television appearances. So a charade was adopted: Mailer would talk
"seriously" on camera with Ginsberg about poetry and literature.
This method of getting wide television coverage at no cost to themselves was
followed by every rock group and concert promoter who followed the example set
by Ginsberg. The electronic media moguls had big hearts when it came to giving
free time to these dirty verminous creatures and their even dirtier products
and filthy ideas. Their promotion of horrible garbage spoke volumes and,
without abundant help from the print and electronic media, the drug trade could
not have spread as rapidly as it did in the late 1960's-early 197O's, and
probably would have been confined to a few small local areas.
Ginsberg was able to give several nationally televised performances extolling
the virtues of LSD and marijuana, under the guise of "new ideas" and
"new cultures" developing in the art and music world. Not to be
outdone by the electronic media, Ginsberg's admirers wrote glowing articles
about "this colorful man" in the art and social columns of all of
America,s largest newspapers and magazines. There had never been such an
acrossthe-media-board free advertising campaign in the history of newspaper,
radio and television and it cost the promoters of the Aquarian conspiracy, NATO
and the Club of Rome not one red cent. It was all absolutely free advertising
for LSD, only thinly disguised as "art" and "culture."
One of Ginsberg's closest friends, Kenny Love, published a Five-page report in
the New York Times. This is in accordance with the methodology used by
Tavistock and Stanford Research:
If something is to be promoted which the public has not yet been fully brainwashed to accept, then have someone write an article, covering all sides of the subject matter. The other method is to have live television talk shows in which a panel of experts promotes the product and or idea under the pretext of "discussing", it.
There are point and counter-point, both pro and con
participants airing their support or opposition. When it is all over, the
subject to be promoted has been dinned into the public mind. While this was new
in the early 1970's, today it is standard practice on which talk shows thrive.
Love's Five-page pro LSD pro Ginsberg article was duly printed by the New York
Times. Had Ginsberg tried to buy the same amount of space in an advertisement,
it would have cost him at least $50,000. But Ginsberg didn't have to worry;
thanks to his Friend Kenny Love, Ginsberg got the massive advertising all for
free. With newspapers like the New York Times and the Washington Post under the
control of the Committee of 300, this kind of free advertising is given to any
subject matter, and more especially to those promoting decadent life styles -
drugs - hedonism - anything that will confuse the American people. After the
trial run with Ginsberg and LSD, it became standard Club of Rome practice to
call upon major newspapers in America to give free advertising on demand to
people and ideas they were promoting.
Worse yet - or better yet, depending upon the viewpoint- United Press (UP)
picked up Kenny Love's free advertising for Ginsberg and LSD and telexed it to
HUNDREDS of newspapers and magazines around the country under the guise of a
"news" story. Even such highly respectable establishment magazines as
"Harpers Bazaar" and "TIME" made Mr. Ginsberg respectable.
If a nation- wide campaign of this magnitude were presented to Ginsberg and the
promoters of LSD by an advertising agency, the price tag would have run into at
least $1 million in terms of 1970 dollars. Today the price tag would be nothing
less than $15-$16 million dollars. It is no wonder that I refer to the news
media as "jackals."
I suggest that we try to find any media outlet to do an expose on the Federal
Reserve Board, which is what I did. I took my article, which was a good expose
of the greatest swindle on earth, to every major newspaper, radio and
television station, magazine house and several talk-show hosts. A few made
promises that sounded good - they would definitely air the article and have me
discuss it - give them about a week and they would get back to me. Not one of
them ever did, nor did my article ever appear in the pages of their newspapers
and journals. It was as if a blanket of silence had been thrown over me and the
subject I was endeavoring to promote, and indeed that was precisely what had
happened.
Without massive media hype, and without almost around the clock coverage, the
hippy-beatnik rock, drug cult would never have gotten off the ground; it would
have remained a localized oddity. The Beatles, with their twanging guitars,
silly expressions, drug language and weird clothes, would not have amounted to
a hill of beans. Instead, because the Beatles were given saturation coverage by
the media, the United States has suffered one cultural shock after another.
The men buried in the think tanks and research institutions, whose names and
faces are still not known to but a few people, made sure that the press played
its part. Conversely, the media's important role in not exposing the power
behind the future cultural shocks made certain that the source of the crisis
was never identified. Thus was our society driven mad through psychological
shocks and stress. "Driven mad" is taken from Tavistock's training
manual. From its modest beginnings in 1921, Tavistock was ready in 1966 to
launch a major irreversible cultural revolution in America, which has not yet
ended. The Aquarian Conspiracy is part of it.
Thus softened up, our nation was now deemed ripe for the introduction of drugs
which was to rival the prohibition era in scope and the huge amounts of money
to be made. This too was an integral part of the Aquarian Conspiracy. The
proliferation of drug usage was one of the subjects under study at the Science
Policy Research Unit (SPRU) at Tavistock's Sussex University facility. It was
known as the "future shocks" center, a title given to so-called
future oriented psychology designed to manipulate whole population groups to
induce "future shocks." It was the first of several such institutions
set up by Tavistock.
"Future shocks" is described as a series of events
which come so fast that the human brain cannot absorb the information. As I
said earlier, science has shown that there are clearly marked limits to the
amount of changes and the nature of them that the mind can deal with. After
continuous shocks, the large targeted population group discovers that it does
not want to make choices any more. Apathy takes over, often preceded by
mindless violence such as is characteristic of the Los Angeles street gangs,
serial killers, rapists and child kidnapers.
Such a group becomes easy to control and will docilely follow orders without
rebelling, which is the object of the exercise. "Future shocks," says
SPRU, "is defined as physical and psychological distress arising from the
excess load on the decision- making mechanism of the human mind." That is
Tavistock jargon lifted straight from Tavistock manuals - which they don't know
I have.
Just as an overloaded electrical circuit will activate a trip switch, so do
humans "trip out," which is a syndrome that medical science is only
now beginning to understand, although John Rawlings Reese conducted experiments
in this field as far back as the 1920's. As can be appreciated, such a targeted
group is ready to "trip out" and take to drugs as a means of escape
from the pressures of so many choices having to be made. This is how Drug usage
was spread so rapidly through America's "beat generation." What
started with the Beatles and sample packages of LSD has grown into a flood-tide
of drug usage which is swamping America.
No comments:
Post a Comment