Orientation for new readers; American Domestic Bioterrorism Program; Tools for dismantling kill box anti-law
Email from reader:
Subject line: Keep the WHO out of Georgia - HB 570
…I
am wondering if it’s possible to know whether a bill is what they are
saying it is without knowing legalese…I am sure there are several other
states trying to pass similar bills…Before I pass this on to family and
friends, I want to make sure it’s not embedded with other codes that
actually imprison us even more. Could you give me your opinion?
My reply:
Thank you for sending this email.
I can say a few things about it. Very briefly, I think these bills are symbolic gestures, but not aimed at substantive reform.
The
problem is that all of the things the WHO and UN want, as far as
control, are exercised by means of public health emergency laws in each
state. WHO and UN don't need to have direct jurisdiction over a state or
local government, so long as the state and local governments have
themselves enacted state and local laws that require their agents (state
and local health officials) to implement specific quarantine and
treatment policies and programs in the event that a state or local
executive (i.e. a governor or a state health department secretary)
declares a public health emergency and triggers the deployment of all
the public health emergency powers and legal immunities.
The enemy, so to speak, is much closer to home than in the UN or WHO.
I've
written a handful of posts on these issues, most of them linked at the
bottom of these two, which are overviews of where I think bills like
Georgia HB570 go off-target.
The
approach I think is better targeted, is to try to get state
legislatures to repeal the public health emergency laws they themselves
(the state legislatures) put in place.
There
was a first round of state adoption of these laws around 1976, after
the Three-Mile Island incident, and then another round starting roughly
in 2001, after 9/11. (It’s also useful to try to get Congress to repeal
the federal public health emergency laws).
In
the last two years or so, I've participated in a handful of orientation
meetings for people who thought they might be interested in working at
this level in several states, but have not seen much follow-up.
So,
to the extent that you are interested in trying to build public
understanding, I think you can use HB570 as a conversation starter, and
you can say that it may be a good symbolic move, but that those kinds of
bills are also a bit misleading, because they suggest that the enemy is
outside the US government (which passed and uses the federal enabling
laws) and the state and local governments (which passed and use the
state and local enabling laws), when in fact, the enemy and his enabling
laws are embedded inside the US and state governments…
April
17, 2024 - Globalist misleaders focus public attention on WHO
International Health Regulations to distract people from understanding
and repealing federal and state public health emergency law.
A
few weeks ago, I got an email asking for my views on international and
US domestic law, as related to state bills attempting to protect state
citizens from forced communicable disease surveillance, reporting,
quarantine (apprehension and detention), and treatment, including
vaccinations.
The email writer referred, as an example, to Louisiana Senate Bill 133, “to disallow the exercise of jurisdiction by certain international organizations” including the World Health Organization, and similar proposed bills.
I
think it’s a good idea for state lawmakers to draft, introduce and vote
for bills that help each state lawmaker go on public record as denying
that officials representing the United Nations, World Health
Organization, and other supranational entities have legal jurisdiction
over American citizens living in American states.
However,
such laws are not enough to protect Americans from officials
representing American state governments, and the US federal government,
exercising domestic legal jurisdiction, under American federal and state
law, to surveil, report, apprehend, detain and poison Americans under
‘public health emergency’ pretexts.
Louisiana
citizens, for example, are currently subject to communicable disease
surveillance, reporting, quarantine, and treatment, including
vaccination, within their own state and country, under federal
communicable disease control law (42 USC 264, 42 CFR 70, 42 CFR 71, and related statutes, regulations and executive orders)
and under Louisiana state communicable disease control law and policy,
enforceable by Louisiana public health and law enforcement officers.
See, for example: 29 LRS 764A(2)(e) and A(4)(c) and related laws and communicable disease control program guidelines.
Louisiana
citizens are also currently subject to surveillance, reporting,
quarantine and vaccination under existing law if they choose to travel
abroad, under the federal laws as implemented by other countries'
governments to execute the terms of the WHO International Health
Regulations treaty.
In
my view, fights around the WHO pandemic treaty and WHO IHR amendments
are distraction maneuvers to occupy the time and energy of people who
might otherwise work on repealing or nullifying federal and state public
health emergency and communicable disease control law.
Seven
federal public health emergency, communicable disease control,
biological product licensing and vaccination laws that should be
repealed by Congress, and nullified by state legislatures:
Quarantine and Inspection, 42 USC §264 to 272 (in effect since 1944)
Chemical and Biological Warfare Program, 50 USC §1511 to 1528 (since 1969)
Licensing of Biological Products, 42 USC §262 to 263 (since 1944)
Public health emergencies, 42 USC § 247d to 247d-12 (since 1983)
National Vaccine Program and National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 USC §300aa-1 to 300aa-34 (since 1986)
Expanded access to unapproved therapies and diagnostics program, 21 USC §360bbb to 360bbb-8d (since 1997)
National All-Hazards Preparedness for Public Health Emergencies, 42 USC §300hh-1 to 300hh-37 (since 2002)
Tools Congress members and state lawmakers can use to repeal and nullify the federal laws, and the state versions of same:
Sept.
20, 2024 - Federal and state poison-legalizing laws and quarantine laws
matter more than the UN, WHO and the IHR. Congress and state
legislatures have the political authority to repeal poison-legalizing
laws and quarantine laws. Lawmakers choose not to acknowledge their
authority and choose not to use it.
Reader questions received a few days ago, about efforts to get Congress to withdraw US from United Nations.
I’ve addressed this in several posts, linked below.
Whether
the US government in 1945 validly ratified and signed the UN charter as
a treaty, and whether or not Congress repeals one or more of the
presumed ratification acts, my view is that the UN and UN-WHO directors
(and their non-public handlers) have always been interested in creating
redundancy by using international agreements — whether validly ratified
or not — as the political basis for obtaining compliance from national
lawmakers, and state-level lawmakers within each nation, to install
enforceable versions of the terms of the international agreements.
The
one-world atheist technocratic bankers’ government has no visible law
enforcement mechanisms, although they do use the US military through its
personnel, weapons and bases all around the world; the Bank for
International Settlements and national central banks, through their
control of financial transactions and currencies; and the World Trade
Organization, through its control of commercial contracts. Those three
banker-controlled supranational entities (with a handful of others)
enforce the terms of specific commercial contracts such as the Pfizer
vaccine supply contracts with national governments around the world.
In other words, it
doesn't matter what the UN, WHO or IHR texts say in themselves. They
have already been used to generate military and economic momentum (see
previous paragraph) and also political momentum for getting Congress and
all 50 US states (and other countries’ governments) to adopt federal
and state laws that are enforceable, including all of the 'public health
emergency' preparedness and response laws.
This
is the main point on which my work differs from the social, political
and economic organizing work of those who refuse to discuss the federal
and state laws already on the books.
Their silence on the existing federal and state laws is the basis on which I assess their work as non-credible.
They
want to keep public attention on largely irrelevant, unenforceable
international legal instruments, to keep it away from extremely
relevant, enforceable, deceit-, mutilation- and murder-legalizing
federal and state kill box statutes, fake-regulations, and case law.
Related:
Nov. 13, 2023 - Opportunities
for US state lawmakers to shield their populations from the next
'public health emergency'-predicated federal assaults.
Jan. 10, 2024 - On
international and US legal instruments governing "adjustment of
domestic legislative and administrative arrangements" and exercise of
political authority during declared public health emergencies.
Jan. 20, 2024 - On the historical development and current list of 'quarantinable communicable diseases.'
Jan. 22, 2024 - On
the omission of the July 28, 1945 Senate ratification vote, from a
draft Congressional repeal bill purporting to withdraw the US from the
United Nations.
April 2, 2024 - Help
state and federal lawmakers understand the legal predicaments created
and maintained by international and domestic public health emergency
law.
April 5, 2024 - Congressional
acts passed between 1990 and 2022, implementing the World Health
Organization, International Health Regulations (2005)
April 19, 2024 - Current
Congress members have legal authority and moral agency to stop
vaccine-mediated mutilation and killing programs worldwide. That's why
so many people work so hard to make it difficult for Congress members to
understand the authority they hold in their hands, and to use it.
May 7, 2024 - Pandemics are fake. Federal and state public health emergency kill box laws can be repealed and nullified.
June 13, 2024 - Parsing "Yay, we did it!" informational misdirection campaigns.
Jesus meets Veronica. Carlo Caliari.
No comments:
Post a Comment