The COVID Dossier, ExpandedA record of military and intelligence coordination of the global Covid event. This expanded version contains many more countries and details, thanks to reader contributions.
This is a set of facts and references compiled by independent researchers Debbie Lerman and Sasha Latypova. The COVID dossier was originally published on February 4, 2025, the 5-year anniversary of the date on which a novel coronavirus was designated by the Pentagon and by the HHS Secretary in the U.S. as a “national security threat,” leading to no public announcements and no journalistic investigations. We have received a lot of feedback and additional information from all over the world. Big thanks to those who commented and provided references to the global military/intelligence coordination. This is the updated, expanded version of the original Dossier. EXECUTIVE SUMMARYThe COVID Dossier is a compilation of the evidence we have amassed over the last three years supporting the following claim: COVID was not a public health event, although it was presented as such to the world’s population. It was a global operation, coordinated through public-private intelligence and military alliances and invoking laws designed for CBRN (chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear) weapons attacks. The Dossier contains information regarding the military/intelligence coordination of the Covid biodefense response in the U.S., U.K., Australia, Canada, the Netherlands, Germany, Italy, France, Norway and more. For some countries we have extensively documented information. For others, we have some documentation of military/intelligence involvement, but not all the details. For as many countries as possible, we list the military/intelligence agencies in charge of their country’s Covid response; dates on which emergency declarations were made in each country; military/intelligence-related agencies and bodies in charge of censorship/propaganda; and top people with military/intelligence jobs who were known or reported to hold leadership positions in the response. We also list connections to global governing bodies, including the EU and UN/WHO, through which the response was coordinated. In the final section, we include a list of military/intelligence/biodefense alliances that provide multinational frameworks for responding to a bioterror/bioweapons attack. By providing all of this information in one place, we hope to dispel the notion that Covid was a public health event, managed independently by each country’s public health agencies, with some limited, logistically focused military involvement. We also hope to drive home the shocking realization that not only were military and intelligence agencies in charge of Covid in all of these countries, but the response to what was represented as a public health crisis was coordinated through military alliances, including NATO. This should be the subject of front-page news everywhere. We are calling on investigators, whistleblowers, and anyone with information related to this topic to contact us and/or publish the information so that we can continue to construct the full picture of what happened to the world starting in early 2020 and continuing to this day. HOW IT STARTED: February 4, 2020On February 4th, 2020, two things happened that almost nobody knows about, but that played an important role in the course of recent world history: 1) Two declarations for CBRN (weapons of mass destruction) emergencies – EUA and PREP Act – made by the U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services, were registered on this date. [ref][ref] EUA stands for Emergency Use Authorization. Legally, EUA powers are intended for situations of grave, immediate emergencies involving weapons of mass destruction. They allow for the use of countermeasures against CBRN (chemical, biological, nuclear or radiological) agents without the regulatory oversight intended to ensure safety and efficacy, because the immediate threat of a CBRN attack is deemed so much greater than any potential risks caused by the countermeasures.[ref] The PREP Act is the legal indemnity granted to anyone involved in using an EUA countermeasure, because if a weapon of mass destruction is involved, the risk of the CBRN attack is so great that no one should face legal consequences for potential collateral damage caused by using unregulated countermeasures. In order to activate EUA, the law requires “A determination by the Secretary of HHS that there is a public health emergency… that involves a CBRN agent or agents, or a disease or condition that may be attributable to such agent(s). [ref] So when the EUA was officially activated on February 4, 2020, it was in essence a declaration of a state of emergency involving weapon(s) of mass destruction. 2) A pharmaceutical executive was caught on tape saying that on that date the U.S. Department of Defense called to inform him “that the newly discovered Sars-2 virus posed a national security threat.” [ref]  It is important to note that on February 4, 2020, there were fewer than a dozen confirmed cases of the novel coronavirus disease (later called Covid-19) in the US, and zero deaths. Worldwide, the death count was fewer than 500. There was nothing about the virus, at least as it was presented publicly, that would make anyone believe it posed a threat to national security. These two events are remarkable for several reasons:
Thus, on February 4, 2020, a military CBRN countermeasure deployment campaign was officially launched against a poorly defined illness that was alleged to have killed a few hundred people worldwide. Within six weeks of that date, in order to ensure a market for the countermeasures (among other aims), the lockdown-until-vaccine response – which is a military/counterterrorism plan and has nothing to do with public health [ref] – went into effect all over the world. WHY THIS INFORMATION IS CRUCIALIt is crucially important to understand that Covid was a globally coordinated response, based on legal frameworks intended for biodefense/biowarfare situations. The attack that initiated the global Covid response could have been real, perceived or invented – regardless of the trigger, the lockdown-until-vaccine paradigm originated in the military/intelligence biodefense playbook, not in any scientifically based or epidemiologically established public health plan.[ref] This means that nothing about the response – masking, distancing, lockdowns, vaccines – was part of a public health plan to respond to a disease outbreak. Rather, every aspect of the response was intended to induce public panic in order to gain compliance with biodefense operations, culminating with the injection of unregulated mRNA products, which were legally treated as biodefense military countermeasures (MCMs), into billions of human beings. Who ordered and directed these operations? Who benefited from them? Who was and still is covering them up? We have been investigating these questions for the last several years, and we hope many who read this will join us moving forward. CALL TO ACTIONMost journalists in both corporate and alternative spaces are either unaware or unwilling to cover the military/intelligence/biodefense/global coordination aspects of Covid. We need to change that. Please help us shift the conversation to focus on the true nature of the Covid response and the existential questions raised by it. COVID Dossier: USMilitary/intelligence agencies in charge of pandemic response
Dates when those agencies were known to be in charge
Dates, types, and names of unprecedented emergency declarations
Military/intelligence agencies involved in public communications/ propaganda/censorship
Key figures in COVID response linked to military, intelligence community (IC), UN/WHO
COVID Dossier: UKMilitary/intelligence agencies in charge of pandemic responseDates those agencies were publicly known to be in charge
Dates, types, and names of unprecedented emergency declarations
Military/IC–affiliated groups involved in messaging/propaganda/ censorship
Key figures in COVID response linked to military, IC, UN/WHO
COVID Dossier: AustraliaMilitary/intelligence agencies and special committees involved in response
Dates those agencies/committees were publicly known to be in charge
Dates, types, and names of unprecedented emergency declarations
Key figures in COVID response linked to military, IC, UN/WHOCOVID Dossier: CanadaMilitary/intelligence agencies and special committees involved in response
Dates those agencies/committees were publicly known to be in charge
Dates, types, and names of unprecedented emergency declarationsIn Canada, the emergency declarations were made by the provinces as follows [ref]:
Military/IC-affiliated groups involved in messaging/propaganda/ censorship
Key figures in COVID response linked to military, IC, UN/WHOCOVID Dossier: The NetherlandsMilitary/intelligence agencies and alliances involved in responseDates, types, and names of unprecedented emergency declarations
Military/IC-affiliated groups involved in messaging/propaganda/ censorship
Key figures in COVID response linked to military, IC, NATO, EUCOVID Dossier: GermanyMilitary/intelligence agencies, committees, and groups involved in response and dates they were announced
Key figures in COVID response linked to NATO, UN/WHO, military, IC
COVID Dossier: ItalyMilitary/intelligence agencies, committees, and groups involved in response and dates they were announced
Military/IC-affiliated groups involved in messaging/propaganda/ censorship
Dates, types, and names of unprecedented emergency declarations
Key figures in COVID response linked to NATO, UN/WHO, military, ICMinutes of a CTS meeting held on March 5, 2020, obtained through FOIA [ref], include statements by General Bonfiglio, identified as belonging to the “NATO UEO point of the DPC.” [ref] Below is a screenshot of the minutes in Italian, followed by English translation:
Gen. Bonfiglio, NATO WEU Point of the Department of Civil Defense, is invited and reminds of the commitments regarding the handling of confidential documentation that must be subject to the rules of restricted external communication and dissemination. Gen. Bonfiglio recalls Law 124/2007 emphasizing that the transmission of documents produced in CTS (Scientific Technical Committee) will henceforth be done through the NATO WEU Point of the Department of Civil Defense and the Ministry of Health. COVID Dossier: FranceMilitary/intelligence agencies, committees, and groups involved in response and dates they were announced
COVID Dossier: NorwayKey figures in COVID response linked to NATO, UN/WHO, military, IC
“In the four weeks that have passed since the strictest restrictions since World War II were introduced in Norway, Espen Rostrup Nakstad has become an important and clear spokesperson for Norwegian health authorities.” [ref] A CBRNE (chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, and explosive) expert, Nakstad served as the Norwegian Armed Forces’ senior consultant in CBRNE medicine and has represented Norway in the NATO Joint Health Agriculture and Food Group (JHAFG). [ref] COVID Dossier: Spain, Austria, Portugal, Ireland, Slovakia, Hungary, & TurkeyFor these countries, we have some information regarding military and intelligence roles in each country’s pandemic response:
COVID Dossier: Latin America
COVID Dossier: Asia
COVID Dossier: Military/Intelligence/Biodefense Plans & AlliancesThe following plans and alliances provide frameworks for responding to a bioterror/bioweapons attack. The information provided in this Dossier suggests they may have been invoked in the global COVID response.
COVID Dossier: Recommended Reading for Historical, Economic, Political, & Sociological ContextToby Green and Thomas Fazi. The COVID Consensus: The Global Assault on Democracy and The Poor—A Critique from the Left. C. Hurst & Co. (Publishers) Ltd., 2023. CJ Hopkins. The Rise of the New Normal Reich: Consent Factory Essays, Vol. III (2020–2021). Consent Factory Publishing, 2022. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. The Wuhan Cover-up and the Terrifying Bioweapons Arms Race. Skyhorse Publishing, 2023. Unlimited Hangout investigative series: Moderna’s “Hail Mary.” Arnold Toynbee, A Study of History, abridged and illustrated edition, 1972 (out of print; used copies available). You're currently a free subscriber to Debbie Lerman's Substack. For the full experience, upgrade your subscription.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment