by Dr. Ana Mihalcea and Dr. Radu DelaCroix
I
have previously discussed the 2021 report by the UK Ministry of Defense
in partnership with the German Bundeswehr Office for Defence Planning.
Human Augmentation – The Dawn of a New Paradigm - UK Ministry of Defense States: Vaccination IS Human Augmentation
The audacity of this report becomes obvious on pg. 13 in Feasibility Assessment:
We
cannot wait for the ethics of human augmentation to be decided for us.
We must be part of the conversation now. The ethical implications are
significant but not insurmountable; early and regular engagement will be
essential to remain at the forefront of this field. Ethical
perspectives on human augmentation will change and this could happen
quickly. There may be a moral obligation to augment people, particularly
in cases where it promotes well-being or protects us from novel
threats. It could be argued that treatments involving novel vaccination
processes and gene and cell therapies are examples of human augmentation
already in the pipeline.
The
need to use human augmentation may ultimately be dictated by national
interests. Countries may need to develop and use human augmentation or
risk surrendering influence, prosperity and security to those who will.
National regulations dictating the pace and cope of scientific research
reflect societal views, particularly in democracies that are more
sensitive to public opinion. The future of human augmentation should
not, however, be decided by ethicists or public opinion, although both
will be important voices, rather, governments will need to develop a
clear policy position that maximizes the use of human augmentation in
support of prosperity, safety and security, without undermining our
values.
Human Augmentation
In
other words, we may need to “augment you” due to our national interest,
whether you want it or not. We cannot wait for ethical considerations
to catch up and it will be our moral obligation to augment you, i.e.
modify you into a cyborg, against your will.
We
are already being manipulated daily – our media serves the sole purpose
to manipulate our emotions and ultimately our behaviors. Noam Chomsky
wrote about this in his 1988 book “Manufacturing Consent: The Political
Economy of the Mass Media.” We, as humans are easy to be manipulated –
fear, greed, anger, envy are easily exploited by the mass media or
social media to form our thinking and dictate our behaviors. Their
divisive strategies have succeeded in separating us and distracting us
from what is going on within us: The silent takeover and control of our
minds and bodies. It is time shed light on these nefarious actors and
understand our responsibility in our future evolution and prosperity.
In
my recent posts showing how former Directors of Intelligence Agencies
like the FBI, CIA, MI5, Canadian Intelligence and Israelia Mossad are
investing and actively involved in microelectronic technology delivery
through vaccination platform, it becomes evident that what was written
in the Human Augmentation document is happening now, and it is in fact
happening around the world.
Please
note some investments of the AWZ group, including into geoengineering
and vaccine microtechnology as well as infectious disease solutions:
Stardust Solutions
A U.S.-Israeli startup called Stardust Solutions
that plans to someday launch reflective particles into the stratosphere
has raised $15 million, according to its chief executive officer and
co-founder, Yanai Yedvab. Stardust's investors include SolarEdge, an Israeli green energy company, and Awz Ventures, an Israeli-Canadian venture capital fund that highlights on its website a partnership with Israel's Ministry of Defense.
Nanopass
NanoPass
has revolutionized intradermal delivery with its groundbreaking
MicronJet™ product platform. This next-generation technology enables
superior product delivery, offering precision, consistency, and safety
that surpasses any traditional injection methods. The MicronJet™
solution platform leverages (MEMS) Micro Electro Mechanical Systems
technology, meticulously designed to optimize product delivery
performance, setting a new standard in both challenging and commonly
performed therapeutic and aesthetic procedures. The key features of the
MicronJet™ platform include a proprietary pure silicon crystal-made
hollow pyramid structure.
101 Therapeutics
101 Therapeutics is a Phase II pharmaceutical company on a mission to cure infectious diseases by targeting the pathology not the the pathogen.
Without
consent, for the purpose of national security, people are injected with
irreversible technological platforms that create the new Transhuman
Species.
The
disrespect for free will and informed consent in this military
weaponized human experimentation encompasses the greatest crime against
humanity ever perpetrated.
If
you look at this statement, the arrogance and disregard for the
sovereign individual is breathtaking. Who is deciding on the morality of
the need for non consentual irreversible augmentation? What human being
on earth would have the moral authority to fuse a natural human being
against their consent with nano and microtechnology?
There
may be a moral obligation to augment people, particularly in cases
where it promotes well-being or protects us from novel threats.
I
urge the people of Europe amidst the political turbulences and war
drums to pay attention to this most important issue for the continuity
of our human species - in which the reckless arrogance of technocrats
and military intelligence will decide for you to “augment” you into a
Cyborg slave without your consent.
We
know that with the COVID19 bioweapon, this has already happened. And
medical injectables and procedures continue to contain these
microelectronic circuitry and biosensors with ever greater frequency.
Human experimentation without consent is a crime.
The
Nuremberg Military Tribunal’s decision in the case of the United States
v Karl Brandt et al. includes what is now called the Nuremberg Code, a
ten point statement delimiting permissible medical experimentation on
human subjects. According to this statement, humane experimentation is
justified only if its results benefit society and it is carried out in
accord with basic principles that “satisfy moral, ethical, and legal
concepts.” To some extent the Nuremberg Code has been superseded by the
Declaration of Helsinki as a guide for human experimentation.
–“Permissible
Medical Experiments.” Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg
Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10. Nuremberg October
1946 – April 1949, Washington. U.S. Government Printing Office (n.d.),
vol. 2., pp. 181-182.
The
voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This
means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give
consent; should be situated as to be able to exercise free power of
choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit,
duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or
coercion, and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the
elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an
understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires
that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the
experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature,
duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which
it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be
expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly
come from his participation in the experiment. The duty and
responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon
each individual who initiates, directs or engages in the experiment. It
is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to
another with impunity.
The
experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of
society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random
and unnecessary in nature.
The
experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal
experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or
other problem under study that the anticipated results will justify the
performance of the experiment.
The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
No
experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to
believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in
those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as
subjects.
The
degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the
humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
Proper
preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect
the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury
disability or death.
The
experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified
persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through
all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the
experiment.
During
the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to
bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental
state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be
impossible.
During
the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared
to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to
believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful
judgment required by him that a continuation of the experiment is likely
to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.
Dranamihalcea.com
No comments:
Post a Comment