They were right. They were always right, and they were right to be concerned, too.
Obama
wasn't born in this country and therefore could not meet one of the
primary requirements to serve as President of the United States. He was
born in Kenya, as many knowledgeable people, including members of his
own family said. That has now been proven.
But now we get down to the nitty-gritty of the Great Fraud and the multiple deceptions revolving around, "Which United States?"
Option
1: There is "the United States" related to our original American
Federal Republic, and it's doing-business-as name from 1787 to 1861 ---
which was unlawfully and immorally latched upon by the British
Territorial U.S. Congress on February 2nd 1871, and which they have been
misrepresenting ever since.
Option
2: There is "the United States" related to the Municipal Government
operated as a Holy Roman Empire Municipal Corporation.
Never mind that when people the world over say "United States" they are all thinking of The United States, the actual country.
While there is little doubt that Obama was operating under Option 1, as his Predecessors have done, is it still a crime?
The
action undertaken by the British Territorial Government operating as
the U.S. Congress in 1871 was self-interested and lacked Due Notice and
Due Process owed to the actual Owners of the Federal Republic. They
deliberately covered up changes that occurred during and after the
commercial Mercenary Conflict that they also misrepresented as a "War"
--- The American Civil War.
As
a result of that and undeserved prosecution of our American States and
American Federation Officers to whom they owed "good faith service",
they have been operating our Federal Republic and using its
doing-business-as name, "the United States" as if it was their rightful
property and as if they had the right to fill the Office of the Federal
Republic's President, too.
As
the British Territorial U.S. Congress made their vacuous claim on
abandonment in 1871, they became the apparent owners and ran this
version of "the United States" and the associated Presidential Office
under False Pretenses.
They
were actually operating as "the United States of America, Incorporated"
or as "The United States of America, Incorporated" and their actual
Presidents were operating as Presidents of the United States of America,
Incorporated, and as "Commanders in Chief" while also occupying the
stolen office of "President of the United States".
As
the President of the United States of America, Incorporated, (either
version) they were never obligated to be natural born in this country.
As
their version of "United States" was owned and operated as a wholly
owned subsidiary of the United States of America, Inc., they just
pressed the issue in the case of Obama, and bypassed that old-fashioned
requirement that the President of the United States ---whichever one it
was --- had to be born in this country.
The
bottom line to all of this is that the American people were
purposefully deceived and lied to, under color of law. Even the nature
of the political party elections were obscured and misrepresented as if
these straw polls were the equivalent to our public elections.
Not
only the Republic, but the republican form of government underlying it
were thoroughly misrepresented and subourned and commandeered by the
usurping British Territorial Subcontractors.
Thus, Barack Hussein Obama, was never our President.
He
was never elected by any public election process. The nature of his
office was obscured from the electorate, but the American People knew
that something was wrong. So they kept digging.
And
there it is, posted above, proof that Barack Hussein Obama could not
qualify as the actual President and was not elected by a public
election.
Does that change anything?
As
"President" of a British Crown Commercial Services Corporation calling
itself "the United States of America" Incorporated, or, "The United
States of America, Incorporated" no "natural born" requirements apply.
Issued by:
Anna Maria Riezinger -- Fiduciary
The United States of America
In care of: Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652
March 2nd 2025
----------------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
International Public Notice: The Dirty, Dirty Brits Are "At It" Again
By Anna Von Reitz
Only
six days before President Trump's Inauguration, Britain inked a long
term (100 year) agreement with Ukraine, promising economic and military
support to the Zelensky Regime, in exchange for control of Ukraine's
Rare Earth Minerals.
So,
when Donald Trump suggested that we offer a deal to Ukraine along the
same lines, Zelensky had already given away the farm to the Brits.
There was just one problem.
Britain can't possibly provide the security guarantees that the Zelensky Government wants and needs.
So
the Brits have a deal they can't fulfill on their own, and probably
can't provide even if they talk a majority of European countries into
supporting their devious plan economically.
The
reality is that Europe only pays 2% of their GDP on defense and is
unlikely to embrace a situation that is likely to require a very much
larger percentage of GDP being spent on war -- Britain's favorite thing,
but not so much esteemed on the Continent.
As for committing troops, Britain may hope to set itself up.
Send a token force of soldiers to Ukraine, and when they are inevitably killed, Britain pulls its NATO card to force the
US to come in and support them, thus entrapping us into yet another
British intrigue and yet another British-led war in which we pay the
price and they reap the profits.
The only reply to this is evident --- to leave NATO and refuse to be played again.
The
rest of the world and the people of Europe must recognize this pattern
from both WWI and WWII. Britain is always at the bottom of the dog
pile and it still is.
Notice to Agents is Notice to Principals; Notice to Principals is Notice to Agents.
Issued by:
Anna Maria Riezinger -- Fiduciary
The United States of America
In care of: Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652
March 2nd 2025
----------------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
In Memoriam: Arthur Firstenberg
By Anna Von Reitz
Arthur
Firstenberg, Author, Activist, and Caring Human Being is dead; he was
relatively young and died after a long illness; he was surrounded by
family and friends. His thirty-plus year career spent reporting on the
effects of ever-increasing electromagnetic pollution on the environment
and biological life was not in vain.
He
had his first run-in with radiation sickness while a medical student at
the University of California Irvine; after receiving more than 40
dental x-rays he suffered radiation sickness and never forgot the misery
and debilitating effects.
Firstenberg
became one of a growing number of early critics of technologies
including HAARP which in one way or another, impinge on our bodies and
our health and the health of our planet invisibly and silently, and with
ever-increasing impact every single year.
While
those benefiting from these technologies are eager to promote more and
more uses and applications for them, there is comparatively little or no
money being invested in studying the impact of such technologies on
biological life.
Section
704 of the Telecommunications Act prohibits communities from denying
applications to install cell towers, which Arthur viewed as a gross
overreach of federal authority. In 2021 he led a challenge of Section
704 of the Telecommunications Act all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court;
they refused to hear the case, but it remains a landmark effort in the
struggle to restore local control over local environmental issues, and
will no doubt be revisited in years to come.
Major
die-offs of Marine Mammals have been attributed to increasing EM
pollution and changes in the magnetosphere for two decades, but despite
the Endangered Species status of many of these animals, nothing has
happened to protect them or us from ever-increasing electromagnetic
radiation and magnetic field activity in our homes, communities, and
nations.
Exposure
to increased electromagnetic radiation is known to cause numerous
serious health effects, but we are relentlessly pushed onward to accept
3G, 4G, 5G, 6G.... with no reference to when or if this assault on the
energetic environment will end.
4G,
it is widely said, was sufficient to carry all needful telephone and
computer-based signals at speeds well beyond the capability of humans to
use and process the information transferred; we have been pressed to
accept 5G and now 6G with no consideration of what this may be doing to
us and to our environment for no discernible benefit.
Many
researchers suggest that such in-depth and high energy blanketing of
electromagnetic radiation may be causing increased birth defects,
contributing to autism, and increasing the number of free radical
molecules and genetic transcription errors that occur in our bodies.
Firstenberg
was one of the first and most knowledgeable critics of reckless
electromagnetic development, and the Voice of Conscience in the research
community. If you have not read The Invisible Rainbow: A History of Electricity and Life,
this would be a good time to do so -- and remember to silently thank
this gentle forthright man and be grateful for his insights.
Publications:
The Invisible Rainbow: A History of Electricity and Life (Chelsea Green, 2020, more than 100,000 copies sold); Microwaving Our Planet: The Environmental Impact of the Wireless Revolution (1997); and, most recently, The Earth and I (Skyhorse, 2025).
His memorial gathering took place yesterday, March 1st 2025, in Santa Fe, New Mexico. He will be missed.
"The only thing we can really do for the Earth is to stop destroying it," he wrote. "Then the Earth will take care of itself."
Granna
No comments:
Post a Comment