5295- 5299: The Witches from Lincoln County Watch
By Anna Von Reitz
We never bother watching talk shows; we don't watch television news.
This
is because we long ago realized that the media in this country has been
gagged and directed as propaganda since the First World War.
Journalism in America has been dying a long and quiet death, with only a few stubborn heroes still defending the Fourth Estate.
Jon
Rappoport, Chris Hedges, O'Keefe--- a few actually carried on the
traditions of investigative journalism, but they did it on their own
tickets, without the backing of major networks and the so-called news
services like Reuters and the Associated Press.
We
exited the Media Faithful in 1987-89 when over a two year period we
conducted some evaluations of our own. We did quirky things like
keeping a "news story headcount" -- which was merely a yes or no verdict
on whether news stories were actually news. Then we added another
filter, if it was news, was it useful news for the audience?
Even
the actual news stories which made up about half of the content (at
that time) tended to be shock-event stories that excited dismay or fear
or whatever emotion, but didn't imply any meaningful action the viewer
could take in response.
Example:
Three semi-truck trailers slide off the road on a stretch of interstate
highway in Colorado, killing eighteen kids in a school bus and injuring
34 other people in a mammoth 40 car pile up.
It's news, but is it useful news? Is there anything to be done? Anything new to be learned? Or was it just "shock value"?
We
all know that icy road conditions cause accidents, sometimes really bad
ones. Traffic consultants for the State of Colorado might be inspired
to increase sand allocations for that stretch of interstate in the
future, but for the rest of us, it was just a horror story.
There are a lot of horror stories out there right now, pretending to be news.
It's
the same with talk shows. There are a lot of talk shows with a
political agenda so blatant that their opinions can be taken for
granted. Just name the topic. You know what the talk show hosts will
say, how they will say it, and you can even guess how long they will
snark it up like a gang of setting hens.
This is called a "group reinforcing activity" in which people of similar ideology get together and pick on everyone else.
The
View is an example of this variety of politically biased "talk" show
which has always been about as enlightening as watching chickens peck at
other chickens in a chicken yard.
The
only thing special about The View is that for the past four years of
the Biden Regime, the hosts have participated in Ritual Shaming on the
public airwaves, literally practicing witchcraft on television.
Any
time they wanted to vent their spleen or fear or loathing, the "Guest"
became the target and was immediately made to stand for something larger
--- made into a poppet, a practice of witchcraft, and then ritually,
concertedly, with malice aforethought --- condemned and shamed and
marginalized by these evil, self-important "Hosts".
During
the Biden Era these politicized talk shows had a field day. Their
hosts said anything they wanted to say about anyone or anything no
matter how unfair, unfounded, or damaging. Logic was never a necessary
element, and forget mercy of any kind. The View was a Sisterhood of
Victimhood -- created by wealthy, privileged, snooty women letting all
the rest of us know what they thought.
As if we cared?
That's one reason we like Donald Trump. He doesn't care.
Carrie
Underwood, the popular country singer, appeared to be stunned as she
sat silent and let these vicious View hosts "foretell" the end of her
career, her loss of fans, sponsors and support, all because she had the
audacity to sing "America, the Beautiful" for Donald Trump.
The
shaming and the foretelling of disaster went on and on, each witch
taking her turn spewing her venom, each one doing their own little
incantation of hate, doom, and disaster on Underwood and her career. It
was easy to see that they were confident and that they had the backing
of the Network Brass. Underwood sat there in the "Guest" chair, like so
many others before her, as a heretic at an inquisition.
At
the end of their Ritual Abuse, even The View hosts seemed to sense that
they had gone too far, and Underwood's stunned silence spoke volumes
for her. There was a little shuffle, as Whoopi Goldberg glanced
dismissively down and to the side, a flutter of energy like a stage
manager appearing with a broom and dustpan to sweep up the shards from a
broken glass.
And
that was that. You could almost hear them congratulating each other
and assuring each other that Carrie Underwood, and her career, and
everything she stood for --- "were toast".
Both The View hosts and the Network Brass were laughing out the other end as Underwood's defamation suit hit their desks.
They
had indeed harmed Carrie Underwood and her career, just as they
intended. They never expected to pay for that, however, thanks to
loopholes in the laws that generally allow such excoriation of "public
figures".
Carrie
had good lawyers. In discovery related to the case, they established
the malicious and purposeful nature of the attack. Turns out the
Network Brass primed The View hosts and their motive was purely
mercenary.
They wanted to create conflict and drama and raise their ratings.
So, yeah, destroy Carrie Underwood. For fun and profit.
Underwood's
one billion (with a "b") dollar lawsuit is leaving the Network Brass
and The View hosts as stunned and silent as Carrie Underwood was herself
during her trial, conviction and on-air sentencing by The View Cult.
We
think this is a profoundly good result for the country as a whole and
hope you will join us in our own little victory dance in honor of Carrie
Underwood, who in this case, is that one determined American it always
takes to put a stop to Evil.
Only
Underwood is not just stopping it, she's cutting it's head clean off.
Get out your ax and the hoe, Mama. Tip your hats, Gents.
With
the success of Underwood's lawsuit, big changes are on the horizon for
media networks and conglomerates worldwide. From now on, they'll have
to think about something more than their ratings. They will have to
think about who they are hurting and the quality and nature of their
commentaries.
As for all the rest of us, it's another wake up call to be discerning consumers of media.
And feel free to Turn the Knob when appropriate.
Granna
----------------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
Saturday, March 1, 2025
The
need for Rare Earth Minerals, especially Lithium, took a big nose dive
this past week, with China's announcement that it has developed a means
to recharge Lithium batteries "indefinitely".
This
means that instead of having to buy new Lithium batteries to power
electric cars and other machinery, and therefore mine new Lithium for
these new batteries, the need for new Lithium has been rendered obsolete
in the near term.
So there is no longer the "critical need" for Lithium.
Please
note that although a great deal of attention has been focused on
Ukraine's five percent (5%) of the world's Rare Earth Minerals, no
intelligent discussion has been devoted to the vast amounts of Rare
Earth Minerals that both Russia and America already possess.
Neither
Russia nor The United States need Rare Earth Minerals, and if they did,
they could easily obtain them from Africa. So the whole focus on the
Ukrainian Rare Earth Minerals deal is another Red Herring; rather, Trump
was trying to recoup some of the money that Joe Biden wasted on the
Ukrainian War, and bring about the one thing that Britain never wants
---- peace.
Here is a fairly good recount of the situation to date:
Throughout,
remember that this country doesn't need Rare Earth Minerals; all we
have to do is overturn Teddy Roosevelt's Natural Resource Conservation
Plan and start mining --- and maybe we should do so anyway.
The
Resource Conservation Plan hasn't substantially changed since 1908. It
has served us well, but like any "Rainy Day" provision, the heirs have
to recognize rain and dip into the savings bank when appropriate.
A
more interesting issue has surfaced in the disparity between the U.S.
and Ukrainian claims regarding the amount of U.S. Aid that Ukraine has
received.
Congressional
appropriations and additional aid through Non-Governmental
Organizations indicate that around $500 Billion in aid was sent to
Ukraine during the Biden Administration, not counting loan guarantees
and other benefits.
To
this, Zelensky says he has received only $77 Billion and it was in
military equipment stockpiles -- not cash, which is fairly credible, as
large amounts of this surplus military equipment wound up on the
international black market and was resold to countries in the Middle
East.
Sounds
like -- as usual -- "Foreign Aid" to Ukraine was derailed and laundered
back into the pockets of the Usual Suspects, in which case, we should
be collecting from George Soros and the DNC, instead.
What
about Europe's role in all this? Mr. Starmer and other EU government
officers have misled Zelensky to think that they have and will deploy
the resources to protect Ukraine -- when they don't and won't -- without
The United States.
Of
all the commentaries, perhaps Jeffrey Sachs' evaluation of the
situation in the most correct and balanced way to look at it all,
beginning with the eastward expansion of NATO in direct contravention of
American promises not to expand NATO "one inch" to the East:
But so everyone understands:
It isn't that we learned everything from the British; it's that the British have been using us as a storefront.
They
commandeered our bureaucracy and unlawfully converted our military to
serve as a Mercenary Force in 1861. We've been their bitches ever
since.
That's why there has been such a stunning similarity. Until now.
Contrary to Mr. Starmer and Mr. Merz, Ukraine is no longer a matter of urgent concern to us.
If
the European people wake up and look around, they will see that the
same Players have done the same thing to their unique National
Governments --- overtaken the bureaucracies, dismantled the militaries,
leveraged the courts and universities --- and quietly installed
commercial police states in preparation for imposing their brand of
Corporate Feudalism.
Notice to Principals is Notice to Agents; Notice to Agents is Notice to Principals.
Issued by:
Anna Maria Riezinger -- Fiduciary
The United States of America
In care of: Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652
March 1st 2025
----------------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
International Public Notice: The Fungible Nature of Gold and Empire
By Anna Von Reitz
In
1934 Britain defaulted on its World War I debt to the Americans, who,
in the depths of the Great Depression, were forced to take desperate
measures such as the Emergency Securities Act and the Emergency Banking
Act.
These
Acts resulted in the corporate United States hegemony "securitizing"
the labor of its own citizens as an asset --enslaving those who worked
for the Federal Government's Civil Service and subjecting the military
to press-ganging and peonage. It also resulted in FDR's famous
house-to-house search for privately owned gold and the outlawing of
private gold ownership.
After
the Great Depression eased, the US Corporation continued these
practices of securitizing labor and extending them via various means of
entrapping average Americans and placing ownership claims on their
private assets to be used as collateral for public debts.
As
another aspect of this, Federal Reserve Notes were forced upon the
American Public via unlawful Legal Tender Laws, and an arbitrary
one-to-one Exchange Rate was established, declaring that one Federal
Reserve Note was equivalent to one United States Silver Dollar --- for
government purposes, of course.
This
resulted in millions of Americans having to give up their silver
currency in inequitable exchange for paper promises to pay "sometime" in
the future; exactly what we were to be repaid with or when was never
settled. The "good faith and credit" of the British Territorial U.S.
Congress was supposed to be sufficient to back this unsecured loan of
our goods and services.
The
complex and highly unlawful and illegal practice of latching onto
American babies and registering them as British Territorial U.S.
Citizens began in earnest with the passage of the Sheppard-Towner Act in
the 1920's --- just in time to secure a population of purported
twenty-something "British Territorial Subjects" in America, who could be
legally subjected to the draft and the infamous Buck Act of 1940.
At
first, this "padding" of the Federal citizenry rolls only applied to
orphans and other actual Wards of the State, but it was so highly
profitable to seize upon the assets of the living people that the
for-profit government services corporations were highly incentivized to
concoct more means to invoke ownership claims via registration,
enrollment, induction, and enfranchisement of new "Federal citizens".
These
evils were kicked off by British debt defaults from the First World
War, but the British had already caused another whole set of debts and
problems for the Americans via the bankruptcy of the Scottish Commercial
Corporation they booted up in 1868 and called "The United States of
America" -- Incorporated.
This
Scottish Corporation seized upon the assets of the Americans living in
the eleven Southern Confederate States (which are business enterprises
doing business as "states of states"), including their gold, as "war
reparations and repayments" following the Mercenary Conflict they
mischaracterized as The American Civil War.
They
created the entire Fourteenth Amendment "Federal Citizenship" Scheme
and set up the quasi-Administrative Court System as a means to extract
these payments from the Municipal Civil Service workers, former black
plantation slaves, and whoever else they could beguile, misidentify, or
charge as a "rebel" or a Ward of the State.
This
is what turned the Administrative Courts into de facto Collection
Agencies for the government corporations that were always foreign
Subcontractors on our shores.
We've
had the British Crown Commercial Corporations and the Holy Roman
Empire's Municipal Corporations, both, bleeding us dry under False
Pretenses ever since.
It
was during this time that a preponderance of American and importantly,
American-Spanish gold was taken offshore for "safekeeping" by the
British-controlled United States Navy.
Though
this gold was never identified as a "debt" owed to Britain, these gold
resources were nonetheless seized upon by the British and most of it was
melted down and re-Hallmarked in Indonesia as British gold before being
removed to permanent storage in the Philippines and Bank of England.
All
this was taking place in the years just prior to World War I, as the
British Crown prepared to bankrupt the Scottish Imposter calling itself
The United States of America --- Incorporated, in 1906.
These
American assets were thus claimed as British gold by the Bank of
England to ensure that they were not included in the bankruptcy and the
British were able to maintain the assets on their balance sheets as
"trust property" owned and controlled by them "for" the unknown American
owners -- our actual States and people.
This is when we, Americans, became "Foreign Sovereigns" and the whole oxymoronic conundrum of "Sovereign Citizens" began.
On
one hand, the Bank of England was taking care of the American gold as a
Trustee and had to admit that these were foreign trust assets belonging
to who? "Missing" American Foreign Sovereigns presumed to exist.
At
the same time, confused Americans were waking up and complaining about
being press-ganged and conscripted by British Crown corporations --- so
they claimed to be "sovereign" and the British claimed they were
"citizens" based on the undisclosed registrations of the American babies
as U.S. Citizens.
Although
they never had any right or reason to seize upon our gold as any war
reparations owed by the Southern States-of-States were not attributable
to the actual States and people of this country to whom the gold
belonged, the Brits nonetheless contrived to latch onto and use our gold
as collateral under their management.
Similarly,
they never had any right or reason to latch onto our people and make
false and self-interested claims against their individual Good Names and
assets --- and promote the unlawful and undisclosed conversion of
Americans to the political status of British Territorial Subjects.
These
activities enabled them to continue their warmongering and pernicious
Empire building as they could invest our assets, build the trust
collateral, and use this to finance their ongoing investments in such
activities as the Raj in India and the corporate South African
government under Cecil Rhodes. They could also "legally" conscript our
people as their citizens.
This
explains how the British, who defaulted on their World War I debts in
1934, nonetheless had millions of pounds of gold to spend on World War
II, just six years later, as described in this handy-dandy video
presentation:
They
weren't paying us British gold as part of the Cash and Carry program;
they were repatriating American gold that was already owed to us and --
don't forget -- receiving goods and services equal to the value of the
gold from us.
So we were paying them for our own purloined gold. Churchill paid his war debts using our gold to "buy" our resources.
Franklin
Delano Roosevelt, a supreme Anglophile, knew this and joked about it.
He also bragged about going house to house and seizing gold watches and
wedding rings and collecting 20,000 tons of gold, which he then
"reinvested", giving 6,000 tons to the Federal Reserve, and the balance
to the World Bank and IBRD.
It's
time for a reckoning and so, as the American Administration of the
British Crown Corporation now operating as the United States of America,
LLC, threatens to audit the contents of Fort Knox, there has to be an
explanation of how British Hallmarked gold is showing up in our banks.
Now
you have the rest of the story. We paid for it all twice -- once as we
collected the gold in the first place, and second, when we allowed the
Brits to trade back our own gold for goods and services.
In
the video presented herein the supposition is made that Fort Knox is
full of British Hallmarked gold bars, and the truncated history of this
is being offered as the explanation; but, what if there is no gold in
Fort Knox, British Hallmarked or otherwise?
We
can only say that there certainly should be plenty of American gold
stashed in Fort Knox--- and elsewhere; and, if there isn't, there will
be hell to pay--- and this time, the action will be against the actual
Perpetrators who have engineered all this deceit, war, and mayhem for
their own unjust enrichment.
The
Bad Faith of the British Government has recently been highlighted by
their backdoor 100 year agreement with Ukraine and their presumption
that they could entice the British Crown Corporation operating as the
United States of America, LLC, to take the bait and agree to British
control of the Rare Earth Minerals that we would be left fighting for
and paying for via the cost of conducting a long term war of attrition
with Russia.
Pay
attention and realize that Britain is leveraging all its promises to
Ukraine on the backs of its Allies and Confederates in the European
Union.
Also
note that while Starmer is saying the equivalent of "There, there...."
to Zelensky, our truth varies significantly from the British Labour
Party's version of reality.
In
our view, the War in Ukraine should never have happened, and wouldn't
have happened except for criminal activities of NATO members in Ukraine
--- including our own criminally misdirected DOD.
In
our view, Britain has been stirring the pot again, trying to get World
War III ginned up, for its own benefit -- and once again, we have been
tagged as the ones to pay for it.
In
our view, thanks to the Biden Administration, we've already lost $350
Billion dollars down that rat-hole and a significant portion of that
money found its way back into the pockets of the Democrats and their Pet
Pigs like George Soros, who openly admits his hatred for this country.
In
our view, Trump was trying to work out a solution, both to our wasted
money and Ukraine's precarious position -- one that would benefit both
nations and bring an end to the carnage that Britain so obviously
desires to continue.
Nothing has changed.
For the past 300 years, British Mercantile Interests have been the bane of the entire world. And they still are.
Issued by:
Anna Maria Riezinger -- Fiduciary
The United States of America
In care of: Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652
March 1st 2025
----------------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
Earth is Expanding
By Anna Von Reitz
People need to understand that the Earth is expanding and renewing itself. Two great rifts have opened — one splitting Africa in half longitudinally, one splitting the California Shelf from Vancouver to Baja. There is also a lot of volcanic activity associated with these changes. China's mega-volcano, Mt.Changba, is coming alive as is Mt. St. Helen's .
Without
hundreds of millions of US Aid to constantly build and rebuild
Ukraine's' electrical grid, Europe will have to make hard choices. We
doubt very much that Europe, old, fat, and spoiled, will bear the
weight. If it does, it will mean a long and prolonged fight which will
quite possibly give the British war-mongers what they signed up for —- a
hundred years of war in Ukraine.
Thank
goodness that Trump can think his way out of a box and that he realized
that once Zelensky and the Brits set up the long term war, we'd be the
ones paying for it and Zelensky would lack the mindset and desire to
make peace.
So there we are— on a planet undergoing great changes, but at least not playing the rubes anymore.
Cutting
off the funding for the Ukrainian electrical grid may seem particularly
cold-hearted, but it sends a strong message to Ukraine that we are not
playing around and it will no doubt hasten the end of the war.
Which is what Trump is trying to do.
----------------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
A Quick Observation
By Anna Von Reitz
The
British have signed a provisionary agreement with Ukraine that will
allow them to control and develop Ukraine's Rare Earth Minerals.
So,
as usual, they are inserting themselves as middlemen before a deal is
even struck, however, they will only uphold their end if the "US" agrees
to defend Ukraine with ground troops and a full-on commitment to armed
defense of Ukraine.
Mr.
Zelensky, anxious to get whatever it is that Britain promised him
already, was intent on getting Donald Trump to do a 180 and agree that
Vladimir Putin is a very bad man and Russia is a very bad country and
yada, yada, yada, ring the war bells and rattle the sabers --- which is
not the attitude needed to achieve peace.
Mr.
Trump looks at this reversal --- because before Mr. Zelensky seemed to
understand the need for peace and the precarious position that Ukraine
is in --- and concludes, to paraphrase: this guy doesn't want peace.
He doesn't understand the position he is in and his own need for peace.
He wants to fight, fight, fight and keep on fighting.
So,
if Mr. Trump falls for the set up, and commits US troops and financial
support to defend Ukraine in exchange for Rare Earth Minerals, Zelensky
can go on milking the US and tap into US troops and money and supplies
to go on fighting a war that he has already essentially lost. And that
appears to be what Zelensky really wants to do --- snooker us into a
long term war with Russia.
This
would be a stalemate war of attrition in which many more soldiers would
die, many of them Americans, and billions more dollars spent, and all
sorts of foreign governments and defense contractors would be delighted,
but this is not what Mr. Trump wants.
Trump
wants peace established, and then, if he cuts a deal to buy Rare Earth
Minerals from Ukraine, the presence of US Mining and Refining Companies
in Ukraine would probably be somewhat of a deterrent, but it would be a
civilian business deal with no military strings attached.
If Zelensky isn't committed to peace and doesn't want peace, there's no point in talking.
He,
Zelensky, has two choices: (1) peace with some lucrative mining
contracts to help rebuild his country, or (2) continue to slug it out
with Russia --- without US aid --- in which case, he will lose after
having bled his country dry.
We've
already lost over $350 Billion dollars in grants made to Ukraine by the
Biden Administration, more than two-thirds of that money isn't
accounted for ---and Zelensky is unwilling to repay or trade minerals
against any of that.
Trump
isn't going to throw good money after bad, or be entangled in a way
that would leave him (and America) committed to any kind of ground war
with Russia.
So it's deal or no deal, and it's looking like no deal.
Which means we cut our losses:
That's okay. We have enough Rare Earth Minerals of our own.
The European countries
will have to pay their own bills if they want to defend Ukraine against
Russia. Their own Butcher's Bill, too.
Everyone
wants to fight a war for profit-- with someone else's lives and money.
Britain always wants to sit in the middle and control everything, with
no actual skin in the game.
Only
this time, Donald Trump is in charge, and he knows when to cinch up his
purse-strings and walk away, which is precisely what he has done.
Unless
the European countries support Zelensky, countries that are -- bear in
mind -- used to spending only two percent of their GDP on defense, the
War in Ukraine is over.
As
many Ukrainians see it, Zelensky had his chance, and blew it today.
They are left to pay the consequences of his failure to seek peace ---
which can only mean further devastation of their country, the loss of
more lives, and most likely, the loss of Ukrainian sovereignty.
What should we think as Americans?
We should think, today was a good day.
Granna
----------------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
No comments:
Post a Comment