DIVERSION OF RESOURCES
The
World Health Organization has failed to demonstrate that the proposed
Pandemic Agreement will actually improve the health of people around the
world. On the contrary, it is merely a means to redistribute wealth
under the guise of "equity." The Pandemic Agreement is not about
improving health. It’s a corrupt business deal designed to make
countries purchase pharmaceutical products. In a world were the vast
majority of people do NOT die from infectious diseases, the Pandemic
Agreement amounts to a massive misallocation of funds, resources and
energy. The open-ended “coordinated financing mechanism” would redirect
billions of dollars towards the manufacturing of "pandemic-related
products" that actually cause more harm than good. Pandemics are
extremely rare events. With estimated contributions totaling $30 billion
annually, the “coordinated funding mechanism” would divert valuable
resources away from the primary causes of disease and death. The net
result would likely be a worldwide decline in health. See Article 20
NO AFTER EVENT REVIEW OR ANALYSIS
The
World Health Organization has failed to conduct a thorough independent
investigation into the mistakes, crimes and abuse of power that has
occurred over the past 5 years. Their "lessons learned" completely
ignore the harms that were caused by lockdowns, mask and "vaccine"
mandates as well as the adverse health effects caused by the masks, PCR
swabs, “approved therapeutics” and the "vaccines" themselves. The
absence of a truly independent and impartial review of the WHO’s role
and recommendations during the COVID-19 “pandemic” risks the
legitimization of ineffective, failed and harmful pandemic responses. A
thorough independent investigation and analysis of the past 5 years must
occur before any agreement may be adopted.
MaskCharade.com
PCRfraud.com
NotSafeAndNotEffective.com
THE PARADOX OF INEQUITY
The
World Health Organization has failed to adequately explain what
possible health benefits could arise by ensuring “equitable access” to
poisonous pandemic-related products and deadly injections to the low and
middle income nations that did 10-30 times better on a per capita basis
than the wealthy nations that had far greater access to these unsafe
and ineffective, but highly profitable pharmaceutical products.
https://data.who.int/dashboards/covid19/deaths?n=c
FAILED PUBLIC HEALTH MEASURES
The
World Health Organization has failed to admit that travel restrictions,
lockdowns, contact tracing, social distancing and mask mandates are not
valid methods to contain the spread of disease and that the enforcement
of these “public health measures” actually severely damaged the
physical, mental and emotional health of millions of people and ripped
apart the very fabric of our society. Not to mention that they are a
clear violation of fundamental human rights and freedoms!
PCR FRAUD
The
World Health Organization has failed to admit that pretending to
determine cases via inadequate RT-PCR protocols is a fraudulent and
inappropriate way to attempt to diagnose disease. They have failed to
address the fact that the act of inserting a swab into someone’s
nasopharynx, especially when done improperly, requires truly informed
consent due to the serious harm that such an invasive procedure can
cause and has caused. PCRfraud.com
NO EVIDENCE OF A VIRUS
The
World Health Organization has failed to provide evidence that the
pathogen that they named SARS-CoV-2 exists anywhere outside of a
computer storage device and has been properly isolated in the physical
realm.
NO CAUSAL EVIDENCE
The
World Health Organization has failed to provide evidence that the
pathogen that they named SARS-CoV-2 is actually capable of causing of
the disease that they named COVID-19 and they have failed to provide
evidence that it can be transmitted from one human to another.
NO ANIMAL (ZOONOTIC) SOURCE
The
World Health Organization has failed to truly identify the purported
animal source of the pathogen that they named SARS-CoV-2.
NO PATIENT ZERO
The
World Health Organization has failed to identify the so-called “patient
zero” who was the first human to (supposedly) be infected with
SARS-CoV-2 and contract COVID-19.
INFLUENZA DISAPPEARED
The
World Health Organization has failed to explain how and why typical
seasonal influenza simply disappeared when respiratory ailments were
rebranded as COVID-19.
PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS ONLY
The
WHO has failed to recognize the benefits of fundamental nutrition,
natural vitamins, minerals, herbs and and other non-pharmaceutical
remedies. These are not included nor are they even considered to be
“pandemic related health products.”
AVOIDANCE OF ESSENTIAL MEDICINES
The
World Health Organization has failed to recognize the benefits of
repurposed essential medicines that are affordable and truly shown to be
safe and effective after decades of use and they have failed to
recognize that the failure to recommend the use of effective essential
medicines was a catastrophic mistake.
NO PREVENTATIVE OR EARLY TREATMENTS
The
World Health Organization has failed to acknowledge and admit to the
enormous harm that was caused by the rejection of preventative and early
treatment with truly safe and effective methods and they have been
silent regarding the brutal persecution of those brave souls who tried
to save lives with reasonable, affordable, logical and scientifically
valid protocols.
HARMFUL PROTOCOLS
The
World Health Organization has failed to recognize the deadly side
effects of “approved” therapies such as remdesivir, high-flow oxygen and
the misuse of Midazolam and ventilators.
FAILED “VACCINES”
The
World Health Organization has failed to acknowledge the undeniable fact
that the AstraZeneca and the J&J jabs were taken off the market due
to the massive amount of serious adverse events that they caused.
MORE FAILED “VACCINES”
The
World Health Organization has failed to come to terms with the fact
that the COVID-19 mRNA gene-therapy injections were never studied to
stop infection or transmission because they are unable to perform the
most fundamental purpose associated with something referred to as a
“vaccine.”
THE “SAFE AND EFFECTIVE” LIE
The
World Health Organization has failed to define the term “safe and
effective” and they continue to ignore the massive numbers of serious
adverse events and deaths that have been caused by these injections.
UNDEFINED TERMS
Despite
the fact that the word "pandemic" appears in the latest version of the
document 200+ times, the term "pandemic" is not defined in the proposed
Pandemic Agreement. The failure to define the terms “pandemic” and
“vaccine,” as well as many other terms, is absolutely unacceptable. See
Article 1
MISGUIDED FOCUS
The
World Health Organization has failed to acknowledge the reality that
spending billions of dollars on a massive “One Health Agenda” for the
worldwide “preventive” surveillance of pathogens with pandemic potential
will only succeed in monetizing and incentivizing the discovery and
spread of such pathogens.
GAIN OF FUNCTION
The
World Health Organization has failed to address the hazards associated
with gain-of- function research as well as the desire of many people
that such research be permanently stopped.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
The
World Health Organization has failed to address the ongoing and
pervasive issue of conflicts of interest. Corporate representatives and a
vast array of special interest lobbyists have been allowed to
participate in the “Pandemic Agreement negotiations, but there has
effectively been no true public discussion or debate. We the people
neither want nor need a Pandemic Agreement, and certainly not one that
fails to take our input into account. The conflicts of interest involved
in the core structure of the World Health Organization are absolutely
enormous. CLICK HERE and HERE for a detailed list of special interest groups that have been participating in these negotiations.
NO, YOUR AGREEMENT IS NOT OUR RESPONSIBILITY
The World Health Organization has failed to justify inclusion of text which claims
that “individuals... are under responsibility to strive for the observance of the objective of the present Agreement.” It
is absolutely absurd to claim to place every man, woman and child in a
position of responsibility for any agreement in which their
participation has largely been prohibited. The World Health Organization
has failed to justify the statement that member states bear the primary
responsibility for the health and well-being of their peoples.
Individual men and women are ultimately responsible for their own
health.
ONE HEALTH APPROACH
The
World Health Organization has failed to justify how the “One Health
Approach” is anything more than a vague and scientifically unproven
concept. The only reason that such a concept is being considered is for
the all-inclusive reach that it would give to unelected bureaucrats
around the world to control each and every aspect of life on Earth. See
Article 1(b) and Article 5
REGULATORY CAPTURE
The
World Health Organization has failed to address the obvious fact that
regulatory agencies around the world have been captured by
pharmaceutical interests. In fact, they are profiting from it. The
subsequent lowering of safety and quality standards has actually
resulted in a level of adverse events that, in and of themselves
constitute a Public Health Emergency of International Concern. The
proposed Pandemic Agreement seeks to expedite a regulatory review and/or
emergency regulatory authorization process that would surely fail to
protect the health and safety of billions of people. The deeply flawed
and corrupt process by which the WHO grants “authorization” for
products, and the fees that it charges for “vaccines,” diagnostics, and
male circumcision devices, MUST be reformed. Also, see Article 14.2(a)
LIABILITY
The
World Health Organization has failed to address the untold amount of
damage that has been done to the health of millions of people by
pharmaceutical drugs and injections. Rather than strengthen and
globalize liability protection for pharmaceutical companies,
manufacturers must be held accountable for the harm that their products
continue to inflict upon billions of people worldwide. See Articles 13.6
and 13bis(8)
PATHOGEN ACCESS AND BENEFIT SHARING
The
proposed Pathogen Access and Benefits Sharing System would effectively
monetize and incentivize the search for "pathogens with pandemic
potential." This will not make the world safer, but will have exactly
the opposite effect. See Article 12
INAPPROPRIATE CELL AND GENE BASED THERAPIES
The
World Health Organization has failed to justify the inclusion of cell-
and gene- based therapies in the category of pandemic-related health
products. It is absolutely unethical to experiment with genetic
manipulation under the guise of emergency response. See Article 1(d)
GLOBAL SUPPLY CHAIN AND LOGISTICS NETWORK
The
World Health Organization has failed to demonstrate why it should be
given the authority to oversee and/or operate a Global Supply Chain and
Logistics Network to control access to pandemic-related products. See
Article 13
CONFERENCE OF THE PARTIES
The
World Health Organization has failed to demonstrate the need to set up
yet another new bureaucracy (the Conference of the Parties) consisting
of unelected, unaccountable and largely unknown bureaucrats. This will
surely lead to more waste and corruption long before it helps to
prevent, prepare for, or respond to any future "pandemics." See Articles
21-37
INFORMED DISSENT
The
World Health Organization has failed to demonstrate its wisdom and
expertise in improving people’s health. In fact, the health of the
people of the world has been steadily declining. The World Health
Organization still seems to believe that they know what is best for
everyone even after having been proven to be so horribly wrong over the
past 5 years. Unfiltered information must be allowed to flow from
multiple sources, but the WHO assumes itself to be infallible in matters
of health, superseding the true authority of individual men and women.
To have any chance of preventing disease, everyone must be encouraged
and enabled to openly share their own health experiences, observations
and wisdom, and we must be empowered take responsibility for their own
health and allowed to make their own health decisions. The World Health
Organization does NOT get to decide what is true. They do NOT own the
science. See Preamble #3
This
is a statement on behalf of 32 CSOs across WHO regions, and with 8 or
more participating in this meeting, either online or in person.
As
CSOs, we are usually delighted to see more text getting
greened—indicating progress towards a meaningful instrument with
effective measures to protect public health and avoid past tragedies.
However, this time, there is no excitement. Many diplomats tell us this
will be a hollow treaty, with the current text resembling a “green cloth
with big holes.” We have several critical questions for Member States,
and we expect their responses:
Article 4:
What’s new or impactful? While some define this article as a priority,
they avoid negotiating meaningful measures, opting for vague future
processes. Preventing outbreaks like Mpox, and ensuring they do not
escalate into PHEICS or pandemics, requires urgent and practical
measures, not abstract commitments to future negotiations.
Article 12:
Many Members have shown willingness to negotiate substantively PABS
throughout the INB process. Yet, they face extreme pressure to defer
PABS discussions to a future annex. Why not now, given its centrality to
the instrument? If not now, when?
Article 9:
What protections does it guarantee to countries during emergencies,
apart from exposing their populations to clinical trials with uncertain
benefits?
Article 10:
How will it strengthen manufacturing and production diversification
without commitments to share technology, financing, or removing IP
barriers? Are we aiming to limit WHO’s role under IHR 2005 - the only
binding instrument on health emergencies?
Article 11: What
remains of this article? How does it improve access to technologies?
Why is it not asking Parties to improve IP laws on flexibilities for
public health? The reluctance to agree to a peace clause in IP laws is
detrimental.
Article 13: Why delay finalizing the Global Supply Chain Network’s basic structure and functions, which are not contested elements?
Article 19:
Where is the obligation for Parties with resources and capacities to
support those with limited capacities? What happened to the promise to
reflect the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities
without using the phrase?
Article 20: Does
it generate a clear obligation to provide funds for sustainable
implementation of the instrument, pandemic PPR and core health systems
strengthening? Or is it only a call for project funding driven by
private actors?
Even
in a framework convention, a baseline of legal rights and obligations
is essential for the instrument to function. The current draft shows no
such baseline. Instead, it protects the interests of pharmaceutical and
digital companies, not the people’s rights or globally shared interests.
We
had hoped that negotiating a public health instrument for equity at WHO
would yield better outcomes than what we witnessed at the WTO during
the pandemic.
You
still have the opportunity to be on the right side of history. We
believe you can create a legally binding pandemic instrument that
provides real protection for everyone, regardless of who or where they
are. The world needs an instrument you can be proud of, not just a photo
opportunity post-COVID-19. The possibility is in your hands.
https://twn.my/title2/health.info/2025/hi250101.htm
No comments:
Post a Comment