SHENANIGANS ALREADY REPORTED; ARE THEY TRYING TO WALK AWAY?
Well as we approach the final day of voting in this years American (s)election season, there are already reports of election shenanigans, a fact which does not bode well for the outcome. Consider the following stories, shared by V.T., and L.H.:
All of this is, I suspect, in aid of preparing the narrative for another massively contested election. Indeed, as Catherine Austin Fitts and I observed in her last quarterly wrap up report, it certainly seems as if "they" are trying desperately to split the country. As Ms. Fitts has often observed, a split of the country could enable the banksters and politicians to literally walk away from their obligations. In any case, the following article lays out, as good as any I've seen, the "options" available to contest the election:
Will Secession be the real winner in November?
What is intriguing about this article is its mention of a scenario that has been entertained on this website before, and that, again, Ms. Fitts and I have also mentioned as a possibility in her quarterly-wrap ups in the past couple of years. Here's the way the article puts it:
It is no secret that America faces a very uncertain future heading into the November 5th elections. On one side are a desperate cadre of elites, criminals, and rabid cultists cowering at the fear of what a Trump electoral victory could mean for their exclusive clique which has run the American political system for at least the last century. On the other side are many ordinary Americans who have been driven to the edge domestically in all aspects of their lives by failed elitist policies and criminal enterprises sanctioned by the increasingly imperial government in Washington DC. It is a mercurial period which is bearing much resemblance to the lead-up of several flashpoints in American history, such as the conflicts in the 1770s, 1860s, and 1940s.
Into the midst of this volatile mixture has been thrust the news that state legislators in West Virginia have proposed legislation whereby the state will refuse to recognize the results of any presidential election it deems compromised. While the full ramifications of such a proposal have yet to make waves in the American political sphere, it was a proposed act of defiance on par with Texas defying Supreme Court orders to open the border earlier in the year. It is also an act which could provide a glimpse into what is coming after November 5th if the “unstoppable force meeting an immovable object” scenario plays out into any one of several previously unthinkable outcomes.
...
Certain Democratic leaders have been openly admitting that they will likely refuse to certify the election in Trump’s favor if he wins the election night vote. This tactic would only work, however, if those refusing to certify held a majority in the House of Representatives. This then poses the question of whether the Elites may decide to focus on stealing control of Congress instead so as to thwart a Trump return to the White House through the certification process. The polls for the House seem to point to a Democrat advantage, and even if the Republicans do retain control, a slim enough majority would make it easy for a couple elitist Republicans to cross over and prevent a Trump return. The Senate is a close call also with questions as to whether Republican seats in states like Texas and Nebraska might not be ripe for an upset. When taken in conjunction with electoral fraud being a significant factor in this election, a strong possibility exists that the real steal on election night will focus on Congress rather than Trump.
There are other signs to indicate this may indeed be the first backup plan if Trump cannot be defeated in the vote count. The first is that Trump’s sentencing in the New York criminal case was moved to after the election on November 26th. The peculiar re-scheduling of that event would seem to suggest that the Elites might use his conviction and sentencing as justification for not certifying the election. The second is the existence of a bulletin issued from the DC intelligence community warning of widespread “election-related grievances” turning into violence from “domestic extremists.” Logically, the only reason for publication of such a bulletin would be the expectation of a significant backlash from disgruntled Americans who see themselves as robbed of the candidate they freely chose. The third, and perhaps most telling, sign is the security precautions being implemented for the Capitol on January 6th, 2025, the day the 2024 election results will be certified. It is a preparation rooted in fear and public image, and hints that those pulling strings in DC are expecting their actions on that date to be wildly unpopular with the general public.
Amid these various possibilities, and quite evident preparations of various narratives that can be activated depending on what circumstances emerge, the West Virginia vote is crucial because it suggests that course of action that Ms. Fitts and I have also discussed, the option that would, in effect, be a de facto secession:
This is where the act of the West Virginia legislators mentioned at the beginning comes into perspective. With the stakes so high, it is no longer unthinkable that certain states as well as state and local leaders would begin to take very serious steps to defy DC in the face of what would be perceived as a blatant coup d’état. A taste of this was seen in the Texas border standoff earlier in 2024 when 25 states (joined later by the legislatures of Arizona, Kansas, Kentucky, and North Carolina) rallied behind Texas’ open defiance of stand down orders from not only the current administration, but the Supreme Court in regards to securing the border. This stark divide could re-appear very quickly post-election if the blatant power-grabbing tactics of many Elites become too much for local leaders to ignore. With the Elites unlikely to back down in the face of such defiance, it is hard not to see a “national divorce” resulting from the constitutional crisis which will unfold from any of the possible actions listed. America will begin to divide naturally, first states from the DC union, then certain states will divide as local communities seek to join with those of similar values to protect their culture and heritage.
One hopes, of course, that none of these scenarios or alternatives will happen.
But there is one final point that must be mentioned in regard to the above shenanigans, and the various scenarios outlined in the secession article. What does emerge from the article is the undertow, the strong current or suggestion that the cultural divisions within the country are too large and too wide to be held together for any prolonged period of time by mere force or even external pressure such as a major war. Those cultural divisions have been incipient since before the country's founding and independence, and surfaced into full scale internal warfare in the 1860s. They did not disappear at the end of that war. They merely were papered over, and transformed into a very different manifestation. They are with us still, and in an even more exacerbated form. We are now at a state of society and culture where we are no longer debating the absurdity of whether a black person is 3/5ths of a person, but now what a man and a woman is. One part of the culture is insane and convinced of its moral superiority over all else, a moral claim which is used to justify egregious violations of law and justice; the other, the sane part, merely wants to be left alone. So no matter what happens after Nov 5th, the one thing that I think must be the take away is that the crackup is eventually inevitable, because mere force is never sufficient to hold together cultural and cosmological views so diametrically in opposition to each other. if is no longer a matter of if, but only of how fast, and how...
See you on the flip side...
(If you enjoyed today's blog please share with your friends)
No comments:
Post a Comment