The Regime Rejoices as Trump Is Elected

 

The Regime Rejoices as Trump Is Elected

By John Kennedy

November 23, 2024

 

 

 

Introduction 

The regime needed Trump. Many people have come to believe that the establishment has taken a major blow by the election of Donald Trump, but this is not true. While many liberal-minded elites are upset by the outcome, the true power of the American government is completely delighted. Since 9/11, America, both domestically and overseas, has lost much of its prestige and authority. The neocons have dragged America into useless foreign entanglements, and the “woke” groups, such as BLM, the LGBTQ, and other liberal organizations, have turned the American social norm into a complete joke. 

 Despite this, these organizations have been a tremendous tool for the regime. The attacks against Trump in 2016 and 2020 were carried out by these groups in order to discredit his populist movement, which was a true threat to the regime at that time. But unlike in 2016, there were no massive protests or riots in the days after the 2024 election. In fact, the difference is quite striking; CBS reported in 2016 on the “protests that roiled across major cities in America” and how the “fires raged in Oakland as 7,000 gathered while an effigy of the president-elect burned.” Today, shortly after the 2024 election, there is nothing closely related going on; in fact, the New York Times reported on this change of momentum among the activism on the left. They said:  Pagan America: The Dec... Davidson, John Daniel Best Price: $19.25 Buy New $19.24 (as of 05:11 UTC - Details)

“Last time around there was the immediate call to action” Ms. Mayer said, referring to the Women’s March, the mass demonstration that took place the day after Inauguration Day in 2017 but had its planning begin as the 2016 election results rolled in. “This time around, it’s sort of just a resigned feeling.” 

It goes on: 

“In interviews, multiple social media users said they were surprised by how quiet their feeds seemed on Wednesday, with some users posting the sorts of things they would share on a typical day.(…) But some who remember the anti-Trump protests in the immediate aftermath of the 2016 election — many of which were organized online or at least amplified there — say calls to action seem curiously absent on social media.” 

The change of heart is not from the progressives themselves; instead, it was the refusal by the regime to mobilize these groups effectively. The American government has lost too much support from the white and working-class population, so these groups had to be pushed aside. They had done their duty in 2020, as a Time magazine article titled “The Secret Bipartisan Campaign that Saved the 2020 Election” explains: 

“There was a conspiracy unfolding behind the scenes, one that both curtailed the protests and coordinated the resistance from CEOs. Both surprises were the result of an informal alliance between left-wing activists and business titans. The pact was formalized in a terse, little-noticed joint statement of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and AFL-CIO published on Election Day. Both sides would come to see it as a sort of implicit bargain–inspired by the summer’s massive, sometimes destructive racial-justice protests–in which the forces of labor came together with the forces of capital to keep the peace and oppose Trump’s assault on democracy.” 

Because of this coalition, many Americans started to question the legitimacy of the election process-a process that gives the regime itself legitimacy. It’s fair to say that the United States found itself cracking just as the USSR was during the 1980s; its people were losing faith in the system itself. 

Collapse 

Ethnically diverse nations cannot lose the support of their most powerful group; if it does, it loses the leadership, expertise, and economic power that the group would have provided. This is what happened to the USSR, as Vladislav Zubok notes in his book “Collapse, p. 98-99.” He states: 

“In 1989, according to the census and the nationality that people claimed, ethnic Russians numbered 145 million, over half of the Soviet population of 287 million. For decades they had been told that “their home” was the entire Soviet Union. Most of them did not feel any special connection with the term “RSFSR” (Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic) And many of them had grown up thinking that the entire Soviet Union was historically “Russia.” Indeed the RSFSR was anything but a “Russian Republic.” 

The ethnic majority, the Russians, had lost faith in the system and so demanded that the Russians as well should have what the other nationalities had: a Russian writers union, an ethnically centered party, and preferential quotas for universities in Moscow and Leningrad. The Politburo would come to an ultimate conclusion in July 1989, saying: 

“The Russians would inevitably demand the same sovereign rights as the Balts, Georgians, Armenians and other non-Russians. And this would mean the end of the Soviet Union.”  

America faces a similar situation where ethnic minorities and groups such as homosexuals, despite making up a small percentage of the population, are seen as wielding massive power. Of course these groups were nothing more than useful functions of power to discredit Trump in 2016, but they went too far, and the regime found its most powerful ethnic group, removing their support and faith from the system. Whites make up 75.3% of the US population, and it would be an understatement to say that white Americans have been attacked by the shifting culture of the past decade; books such as White Fragility and the 1619 Project had condemned whites to shame and guilt.  

This is why the demographics of the election showed that 60% of white men and 53% of white women had voted for Trump in 2024; for this exact reason, the regime needed Trump to win in order to bring whites back into the system. Especially since the richest man in the world, Elon Musk, had not only endorsed Trump but plans to work with him; even The Washington Post, which is owned by Jeff Bezos, had refused to endorse Kamala Harris in 2024. This creates a counter-elite that is dangerous to the ruling power, so in the coming years, Trump and his team will be given sacrifices. 

What to Expect How Your House Works: ... Wing, Charlie Best Price: $10.79 Buy New $11.49 (as of 11:26 UTC - Details)

In a phone call interview with Larry Elder about the 2020 election, Thomas Sowell gave his view on how the politicians were treating the police. He states: 

“When I see people talking seriously about abolishing the police force, my gosh, I mean it’s insanity, and of course the biggest losers if you do that, will be the low-income minority communities who already have these rising rates of murder as the police withdraw. The police themselves when they realize they have politicians who would throw them to the wolves rather than confront loudmouths, they fall back. They are not gonna go out there and risk their lives needlessly, knowing the politicians will turn against them if there are any problems.” 

The “woke” mob are now going to be the ones that will be thrown to the wolves; an Elderly Kamala voter was the first on November 8th, 2024. In an article published by ABC, an 82 year old woman with a Harris pin attacked a “brown-skinned” Trump supporter. She is now being charged with a hate crime. The article states: 

“I hate the racism in this country, I hate how people are treated,” the suspect continued. “And so I’m wondering, why would somebody with brown skin support this man? And that was my question.” She told the officer the Trump supporter “immediately started screaming ‘racist'” in her face. 

This woman will be the first of many to go; others, such as General Milley, are afraid that Trump will court-martial him if elected. The idea of DEI and the ones who supported it are very likely going to be sacked in the new Trump administration, but the idea of social justice will not disappear; it will merely be absorbed by Trump’s movement.