“YAHWEH”: The Most Consequential Religious Psyop In Human History
Scientific Proof Provided By Biblical Linguistics
Expert Confirms That The Old Testament “Yahweh” Narrative Is Entirely False
SOTN Editor’s Note: Before the evidence from the “Biblical Linguistics Expert” is referenced, the following historical background on the Knights Templar is first presented which further proves that “YAHWEH” was none other than a vicious and merciless ET warlord who compelled and coerced the Israelites into his warmongering camp. Clearly, the Zionist regime terrorizing the entire Middle East today is following in YAHWEH’s footsteps. The Palestinian Holocaust since 1947 shows that the Zionist genocidal maniacs are actually marching in lockstep with the biblical YAHWEH’s MO, as does the most recent Gaza Genocide slaughtering well over 40,000 women and children, elderly and infirm.
“Very sorry to tell you folks, but the so-called god of
the Old Testament–YAHWEH–is most definitely
not the one true GOD of the New Testament to
whom Jesus the Christ prayed.”
— An Ordained Christian Minister & Doctor of Christian Ministry
Submitted by Revisionist Historians for World Peace
SOTN Exclusive
Since The Da Vinci Code was first authored by Dan Brown, everyone has wondered why the Knights Templar were taken down in a day and a night. The answer to that question actually has several very good answers, but the following is perhaps the single most important reason why their presence was swiftly erased from all of Europe in a day and a night.
Perhaps the most noteworthy excerpt from the following screenshots is this:
“Jesus called the Hebrew god “YAHWEH” Satan and he reproached the Jews for having made the devil himself into their only single god.”
The true history that follows is as earth-shattering as it is unsurprising in view of the state of human affairs throughout the Middle East in 2024.
(Source: Knight Templars & the Knights of Malta)
BIBLE FRAUD REVEALED
This skeleton of this revolutionary new narrative is actually fleshed out quite conclusively by
[1]
The Old Testament is just the story of the alliance/relationship between Yahweh and the family of Jacob-Israel, and such a tale is deprived of any universalistic perspectives (a later invention of Christianity). This alliance, which did not even involve all the descendants of Abraham’s family but only one of its branches, that of Jacob-Israel, is not a universal but a particular account of events that happened at a specific time in history in a specific place: today we would perhaps label it as a local history book. Yahweh, the protagonist of the Old Testament, was just the leader of the family of Jacob.
Other families, peoples, and nations had their leaders; only they did not take the pain to write an accurate account of such relationships. Or maybe they did, and the books went lost. But the question is: who were these “leaders” that the ancient people considered “deities” and referred to by different but equivalent names? The Sumerians called them “Anunnaki,” the Egyptians called them “Neteru,” and the Babylonians called them “Ilanu.” The Bible calls them “Elohim.” Who were the Elohim, then?
[…]
If you read the Bible, literally everything becomes understandable and plain because the biblical authors did not feel the need, as we do, to advocate for a precise monotheistic theological perspective or a moral authority of religious order. The biblical authors wrote what they experienced, saw with their eyes, or heard with their ears, even when the image of Yahweh from those reports was all but flattering. As a theologian of a loving God, how do you explain that Yahweh orders the extermination of men, women, and children and claims for himself 675 sheep, 72 oxen, 61 donkeys, and 32 virgins after a battle against the Midianites (Numbers 31:32-40)? This portion of the spoils was not for the service of the tabernacle, as Numbers 31 explains: it was for Yahweh’s personal use. One only wonders why a spiritual and transcendent “God” would need 32 virgins — or 61 donkeys, for that matter
[…]
Mainly I focused on the identity and character of Yahweh and the meaning of the term “Elohim.” To make a long story short, when we read the term “God” in the Bible, this usually comes from the Hebrew term “Elohim.” However, at least when I worked for Edizioni San Paolo, the term “Elohim” was left untranslated into the interlinear edition of the Bible that we prepared for scholars and academia. In the Bibles available to the public, the same term was translated as “God.” Therefore, where people read “God” and believe that the biblical authors wrote the equivalent of the word “God,” scholars read the term “Elohim.” This was to alert them that this word is problematic, to say the least, for the unbiased translator.
Furthermore, Yahweh is just one of the many individuals who comprise the group of the “Elohim.” As shown, this term is the equivalent of the Sumerian “Anunnaki” or the Egyptian “Neteru,” which described a pantheon of a multiplicity of deities. Monotheism arose quite late on the roots of a previously widespread polytheism that affected all the peoples of the ancient Near East, including the Israelites. This fact is now recognized even in Bible study circles. Professor Mark Smith of Princeton Theological Seminary has written extensively on the polytheistic roots of the Bible and the long development of monotheism from an earlier polytheism.4
At any rate, nobody who is intellectually honest can be sure of what “Elohim” means, but there is substantial evidence that “Elohim” does not mean “God” at all. Our very idea of God as a transcendental, omniscient, omnipotent being has nothing to do with the idea the ancient Biblical authors had in mind when employing the term “Elohim.” The Bible mentions several other “Elohim” besides Yahweh, of whom we even know the names, such as Chamosh, Milcom, Astarte, Hadad, Melqart, and many others. The “Elohim” was thus a group.
We could also add that the Old Testament tells the story of how Elyon, the most powerful of the Elohim, the commander-in-chief, would divide the lands and peoples of the earth among all the various Elohim leaving some of them satisfied and others dissatisfied.6 Yahweh was one of them, and he received only the people of Israel, who were still landless. As the Bible says, “Yahweh alone led him; no foreign El was with him” (Deuteronomy 32:12). In a very significant passage, the Bible also describes an “assembly” of the “Elohim.” To be an assembly, they must have been more than one. Traditional translators argue that “Elohim” here means “judges,” but they are contradicted by the Bible itself, which always uses a different word for “judges.” Also, this is an entirely arbitrary affirmation. I wonder on what ground can we say that “Elohim” at times means “God” and at times mean “judges.” What criteria are we following? In Psalm 82, Elyon rebukes the assembly of the gathered “Elohim” and reminds them that although more powerful than humans, they also “die like Adam,” thus emphasizing a clear distinction between the “Adamites,” the descendants of Adam, and the group of the “Elohim.”
It won’t be surprising that the term “Elohim” has a grammatical plural ending. “Elohim” is a grammatical plural. Translating “Elohim” in the singular as “God” would be nothing more than a simplification of monotheistic theology. Therefore I think it should be left, to be safe, untranslated.
Yahweh’s character is also worth investigating. When not violent, Yahweh’s behavior often seems bizarre, extravagant, and arbitrary. Yahweh’s words demonstrate his eagerness for the smell of the smoke of burnt flesh, prescribing elaborate rituals for the holocausts and commanding that violation of pedantic rules for the sacrifices be punished by death. Yahweh also moves and intervenes in human businesses in peculiar ways; for example, at times, he literally arrives “flying riding on a cherub” (Psalm 18:10) or aboard flying machines called “ruach” or “kavod,” which I discuss extensively in Gods of the Bible. Yahweh destroys cities with terrifying weapons, crushes villages, and demands his share of the spoils.
In my view, biblical scholarship and theology hopelessly oppose each other. However, I don’t deny the existence of God in general; I only say that God is not present in the Bible. Luckily so! This supposedly loving God theologians have come up with shows himself in the Old Testament as a cruel, sadistic, manipulative, and narcissistic individual.
Yahweh was undoubtedly endowed with unique qualities that made him superior to man in power and knowledge, but he was not superior in morals and ethics. It is enough to remember Yahweh’s exterminations, cruel rules, and bizarre behaviors, like sniffing the smoke of burned flesh, which he needed to relax. This matter was so important that any violation of the ritual could result in the death of the sacrificer. I detail this in Gods of the Bible and propose my interpretation of the sacrificial rituals occurring in all ancient religions, including Greek and Roman cults.7
Gods of the Bible is just my last attempt to bring some light to our ancient past through the narrative found in the Bible. I aim to narrate, understand, and describe in detail the reasons and habits of that group of individuals called “Elohim,” of whom Yahweh was part, one of many. Yahweh was the Elohim of the family of Israel — and only of them and their descendants. I deny the universality of the Bible. The Old Testament records Israel’s covenant and relationship with Yahweh. Other Elohim, as we have seen above, had inherited other peoples, families, and nations.
The Elohim of other peoples are mentioned and addressed several times in the Old Testament. These passages suggest that these “foreign Elohim” were similar to Yahweh and had identical abilities and habits. The Elohim had advanced technology unavailable to our ancestors; lived longer than humans but were mortal; had weapons and tools that could do wonders; they were more powerful and knowledgeable, and yet they could be abandoned, betrayed, and deceived, just like humans, because they knew a lot but were not omniscient.
The space of a short article would only allow for briefly summarizing some of the aspects of the Elohim that I have detailed in this new book and all my previous works.8
Still, perhaps it is not superfluous to end by mentioning something about the fascinating biblical term “ruach.” This term has always been translated as “spirit” through the influence of the Greek culture and the so-called Septuagint version of the Bible, which renders it with “pneuma.” The Ancient Hebrew term “ruach” actually had a very definite and concrete meaning as it stood for “wind,” “breath,” “moving air,” “storm wind,” and, in a broader sense, “that which moves quickly through the air space.” In modern biblical translations, the term “ruach” is always rendered as “spirit” because it responds to monotheistic theology’s spiritualist needs.
In the Old Testament, however, this “ruach” appears to be flying through the air, making noise, and taking people from one place to another, with a loud clangor and visible manifestations, taking off and landing in specific geographical locations — in very concrete ways.
The two following passages illustrate what has just been said.
“The [ruach] lifted me and brought me to the gate of the house of Yahweh that faces East. There at the entrance of the gate were twenty-five men, and I saw among them Jaazaniah, son of Azzur, and Pelatiah, son of Benaiah.” (Ezekiel 11:1)
“Look,” they said, “we, your servants, have fifty able men. Let them go and look for your master. Perhaps, the [ruach] of Yahweh has picked him up and set him down on some mountain or valley.” “No,” Elisha replied, “do not send them.” But they persisted until he was too embarrassed to refuse. So he said, “Send them.” And they sent fifty men, who searched for three days but did not find him. (2 Kings 2:16-17)
(Source: Gods of the Bible: A new interpretation of the Bible reveals the oldest secret in history)
Clearly, the real YAHWEH (also known as Jehovah) of the Old Testament is very similar to the Zionist Jews who currently occupy the Holy Land today via so much war and terrorism, land theft and apartheid policies.
It’s no wonder why Jesus the Christ was sent to Jerusalem by his Heavenly Father to overturn the Old Testament by offering a new truly divine way forward for those spiritually lost people of Israel.
Now we know also why Jesus went into the main Hebrew Temple in Jerusalem and overturned the tables used by the moneychangers, who were defiling that supposedly sacred place, before he chased them out with a whip.
It’s also no wonder why the Sanhedrin called for and stealthily perpetrated the crucifixion of Jesus in light of how he came to expose YAHWEH as a complete and total fraud. They were just like the name stealers known as the Khazarian Cabal are today who have expropriated the Jewish heritage and religion for their own extremely selfish ends toward total world domination.
KEY POINT: There’s a very good reason why Christian Zionists and Evangelicals and Pentacostals the world over focus so much on the Old Testament (OT); that’s where their Zionist-educated and -trained ministers quite purposefully direct their attention to. They want those Churchianity congregants completely fixed on YAYWEH, not on Jesus Christ or his teaching. As a matter of fact, many of those mind-controlled OT biblebots are more preoccupied with many of the outdated (and unspiritual) messages of the Old Testament than they are with the New Testament. This whole situation is responsible for bringing the world to a very dangerous place. The U.S. Congress is now populated by totally misguided Christian Zionists who have enabled the apartheid Zionist state of Israel to carry out the full-blown genocide in Gaza after decades of conducting the Palestinian Holocaust. And they are systematically implementing these mass murders in the name of their god—YAHWEH (who “shows himself in the Old Testament as a cruel, sadistic, manipulative and narcissistic entity”).
Revisionist Historians for World Peace
State of the Nation
August 16, 2024
SOURCE
[1] Gods of the Bible: A new interpretation of the Bible reveals the oldest secret in history
No comments:
Post a Comment