Wednesday, June 12, 2024
4885-4886: International Public Notice: Fire Alarm. from Lincoln County Watch
By Anna Von Reitz
Yes, all Hell is about to break loose --- unless we arrest the criminals and keep our heads and hearts together.
Most
recent statistics show that 40 million Americans can't pay their bills,
but these statistics don't begin to reveal the actual state of affairs,
because these statistics are tracking the impact of inflation on people
on fixed incomes, people working minimum wage jobs, and people who were
"low income, but making it" just a few months ago before the Fed began
cranking up its hyperinflation machine.
Those
are the "new" impoverished who are seeking help for the first time from
food banks and churches and philanthropic NGOs and "government"
programs.
This
Fire Alarm does not count the long-term unemployed (substantially
unemployed for three years or more), the alienated (such as those living
on "Indian Reservations") and the generationally impoverished (like
those living in Appalachia who have been poor for a hundred years or
more).
If
you look at real poverty in America, the number is more like one
quarter of all Americans below the poverty line and struggling to
survive. Right now.
There are also many other strange cracks appearing in the facade of the corporate "government".
Why,
you may ask, is the DOD, that is, the Municipal United States
Department of Defense paying for school lunches? (Hint: Occupying forces
are required to provide food, water, and shelter to the civilian
populace.)
Why
are all these people being imported from South America, China, and the
Middle East, and being injected with the mRNA poison as a condition of
being here?
They
stagger across the border, accrue a tremendous amount of "book value"
by being redefined as "Americans" and within seven years, statistically,
they will be dead.
All
their purported American estates will be up for grabs -- at least
that's what the Perps who are planning on profiting from all the death
and misery are counting on, along with charging everyone here for all
the medical care for the dead and dying, all the disabled and maimed.
Let the arrests begin.
Let
the lawsuits against the Congress, Inc. begin, along with the lawsuits
now possible against the vaccine producers who no longer have any cover
from calling something that was never a "vaccine" by that name.
We'll vaccinate them all, right in the wallet.
And the lawyers and judges will help us do it, because their families have been decimated, too.
Issued by:
Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary
The United States of America
In care of: Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652
June 12th 2024
----------------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
Helpful Insights for Coordinators and Members of State Assemblies
By Anna Von Reitz
We've
experienced considerable struggle within the Assemblies regarding
"member agreements" and "road maps" and now, "SOPs" --- which have all
been attempted to be used as contracts, as if membership in the State
Assembly was commensurate with membership in a club. This betrays a
basic misunderstanding about the difference between "public" and
"private" institutions. Our Assemblies are public and members of the
General Public we serve, Americans who have forsworn "US" citizenships,
must be allowed to freely participate.
What
I early on and somewhat wrongly described as a "Membership Agreement"
was in the early Assemblies more commonly called a "Code of Conduct",
but that description is again, a sea-going term that doesn't quite get
the intent across. In these early Assemblies being carried over from
Colonial days, there were prohibitions including things like--- no
public urination on the streets immediately surrounding the meeting
place, no brandishing of walking canes or sticks against members of the
assembly, no "loud talk" or "abusive language" during meetings, and so
forth.
The
import of these published standards of behavior for the Public
attending your meetings and events is to establish a common knowledge of
what is acceptable behavior in your meetings. You can do this in a
number of ways. You can innumerate the behaviors you with to curtail,
such as, no spitting, no hitting, and no shouting --- which is what our
ancestors tended to do, or you can invoke published "Rules of Order"
that you adopt for the purposes of establishing and maintaining
reasonable standards of behavior at public meetings. Many Assemblies
have adopted simplified versions of Robert's Rules of Order for this
purpose. Each new member is given a copy and that's that. No
signatures or oaths or other individual acceptance is required.
The
intent here is not to unreasonably restrict any discussion or
interaction but to promote an atmosphere of common civility and common
standards of behavior wherein business can be efficiently conducted. We
don't want "drunk and disorderly" behavior impinging on the ability of
the Assembly to do its work. We don't want people discussing their
private court struggles for hours during Assembly meetings. We don't
want the group's time wasted on personality conflicts
between individuals or infighting by political factions. So the purpose
of these published rules is always to promote a common understanding of
good behavior leading to the efficient and pleasant conduct of business for the group, that is, the Public we serve.
The
theory is that the individual rights of the assembly members to conduct
their business in safe, pleasant, and efficient conditions somewhat
overrides any right of each individual to take up group time with
private concerns or spleen-venting. Adult people should understand and
agree to abide by reasonable standards of behavior for the benefit of
the group as a whole. I hope this gives insight into the purpose of what
we ineptly described as a "Membership Agreement". It's not a contract
and you aren't joining a club. It's a published standard of behavior
for the conduct of public business.
Moving
on, we caution everyone that all levels of our government practice
separation between church and state. This is part of our immutable law
and it exists because our Founders and many of their families had
experienced direct religious persecution as a result of belonging to one
Christian sect or another. Catholics were persecuted by Protestants,
Jews were persecuted by everyone. Our Founders very decisively rejected
the idea of forming a theocracy and rejected the idea of allowing the
government to enforce any particular form of religion or belief on
anyone.
They
did this because they realized that they could best safeguard their own
religious freedom by guaranteeing the religious freedom of everyone
else. Whenever mankind has sought to use the powers of government to
oppress the feelings, beliefs, and natural freedom of people to hold
their own convictions, it has led to persecutions. Our Forefathers
wisely chose to live and let live; as long as people live peaceably
among us, they can worship as they please.
There
is, however, this caveat: if, for example, a religion requires
something that harms others, such as a human blood sacrifice, the crime
of murder will not be tolerated as a religious act. It will be
prosecuted as murder and that prosecution will be maintained, even if
the victim gave their permission to submit to a practice of ritual
killing.
There
is also the long-standing tradition of our public meetings
acknowledging, in some form, the protection and blessing of what the
Forefathers termed, "Divine Providence". This "Divine Providence" is
not identified with any particular religion per se and participation in
any prayer of thanks or moment of silence offered during public meetings
is a matter of personal choice.
This
brings us to another generalized misunderstanding that is somewhat
prevalent. We have observed that our Founders adopted The Ten
Commandments as the underlying basis of our Public Law, so that no
Public Law we have ever adopted has run counter to the principles of The Ten Commandments. By this we mean that our Public Laws do not and cannot enshrine, for example, bearing false witness.
The Founders
adopted The Ten Commandments because they offer acceptable standards
for all three major western religions -- Christianity, Judaism, and
Islam, and they are not objected to by Buddhists, Hindus, and other
faiths and philosophical doctrines that agree on such fundamentals as
"Thou shalt not kill."
That
said, though our Public Laws are established in conformity with the
principles of The Ten Commandments, they do not prescribe or dictate
belief; in keeping with our aforementioned separation of church and
state, there is no Public Law requiring anyone to fulfill any particular
religious observance or to adopt any religious belief, no Public Law
requiring payment of religious tithes, for example, can be forced on the
General Public.
So
long as people observe the even more fundamental law of doing no harm
to others or their property, they may do, think, believe, or not, as
they please.
Some
people have taken our observation that our Public Law is founded on The
Ten Commandments out of context and assumed that we, as a government,
impose The Ten Commandments on everyone. This is not true. There is a
profound difference between forming the body of Public Law in conformity
with the guiding principles of The Ten Commandments and imposing The
Ten Commandments themselves as Public Law.
Doing
any such thing would obviously break the separation of church and state
and ultimately threaten freedom of religion itself.
Yet
another misunderstanding involves the limits of discipline that may be
imposed on members of the Public engaged in participating in their State
Assembly.
Unlike
many European countries, Americans do not have an obligation to
participate in their public government and are not under citizenship
obligations. So the decision to participate in or not participate in
public government functions at any level is a choice. Some people take
their right and responsibility to participate in and uphold the American
Government very seriously; others may go a lifetime and attend no
public meetings at all.
Thus
when someone voluntarily joins an Assembly at State or County level,
they are doing so voluntarily, and their unabridged right to do so must
be maintained, so long as they are willing to abide by the "no spitting,
not hitting" sorts of standards published by the Assembly as discussed
above. If people break these basic "conduct of business" standards after
being made aware of them and do so even after being admonished, they
can be removed temporarily and restrained by progressively applied "time
outs".
They cannot be banished, barred, or permanently removed or prevented from peaceably participating in their own government.
Here are a couple examples to drive the point home.
A
man shows up at an Assembly meeting, drunk as a skunk, raving and
calling other members names and complaining because they did something
or failed to do something, and so, the Marshal at Arms removes him from
the meeting, tells him he is drunk and disorderly, go home and sober up,
and don't come back for two weeks. That's a time out.
The
same man appears a month later, drunk and disorderly, calling other
members names, causing a disturbance and disrupting the conduct of
business again, so the Marshal at Arms removes him from the meeting,
tells him that he is drunk and disorderly and disrupting the flow of
business, go home and don't come back for two months. That's a
"progressive time out".
At
each juncture the problem is made explicit, a disciplinary action is
applied, and if the same bad behavior continues unabated, the
disciplinary action scales up until the miscreant is discouraged from
continuing the bad behavior and they are substantially prevented from
harming the Assembly's ability to do business by increasing degrees of
removal.
It's
crucial to observe that: (1) the disruptive behavior is willful; (2) it
substantially harms the conduct of business; (3) the member is
explicitly told to stop and continues anyway. The punishment in terms
of being unable to participate increases only as the member continues to
be willfully disruptive.
When they stop and settle down, cease causing harm to the group's ability to function, they are welcome to return.
Not
all disruptive activity is so overt. We've had cases where people
simply got far ahead of the group and started working on and considering
issues that were outside the current agenda and capability of the
Assembly, but when the current agenda and need to progress on those
issues was invoked, the man in question persisted in continuing to bring
up future issues.
He
didn't immediately see it as disruptive to want to discuss things that
would naturally become issues in the future, but spending meeting time
on things that the Assembly members could not presently address was
actually taking valuable time and attention away from the assembling
process itself --- so his behavior was in fact "disruptive" and
preventing the Assembly from conducting its necessary business.
We
mention this to point out that not all disruptions are loud and
obnoxious; some perfectly reasonable behaviors that detract from the
actual agenda and flow of business can be just as damaging as more
obvious interruptions.
We've
also had cases of people being in the wrong Assembly and causing
disruptions because they had different issues and expectations. This is a
common enough phenomenon for us to address your attention to it.
People who are Municipal District Assembly members are reasonably
expecting religious overtones to meetings and expecting community care
issues to be the focus, as the Municipal Government of the United States
is a theocracy.
They
are alarmed to find that we practice separation of church and state and
are disoriented even though this has been the position of our General
Government for over 200 years. Such people, or their other brethren,
the British Territorial U.S. Citizens, who mistakenly stumble through
our doors and expect us to spend the majority of our time studying
Federal Code, can be very disruptive and very stubborn in their
demands.
It's
important for us to recognize where they are coming from and to realize
that they are not "wrong" but are simply in the wrong Assembly.
We
can't let them take things over; but, we have to redirect them to find
and join their own appropriate District Assembly. These other
assemblies exist. You often see campaign signs referencing their
political elections: "Elect Dick Jones, District 4 Assemblyman" and so
on.
Our
State Assemblies are based on Counties, not Districts. Our Public Law
which includes the Law of the Land, is not fundamentally based on or
concerned with Codes and Statutes. When these people come into our
Assemblies they can be very loud-mouthed and determined to focus on what
they consider to be the key concerns --- religion or Federal Code ---
neither one of which are our focus.
If
upon having things explained to them they continue to attend our
meetings and continue to cause trouble or simply draw attention away
from our legitimate business at hand, they have to be removed and time
outs applied. There is, apart from their own choices, nothing
preventing these people from being valuable members of our State
Assemblies, but until they clarify their status in their own minds and
make the necessary changes and commitments, they can cause a lot of
disruption and be very angry and combative and spread a lot of
"information" that does not apply to what we are doing.
Coordinators
and Marshals at Arms are asked to fully inform these individuals and to
escort them out of our premises and meetings when appropriate. These are the only cases in which removal can be more or less permanent, always
leaving open the possibility that these men and women who are born in
this country or naturalized to it as much as anyone else, may come to
recognize that they belong in our Assembly after all, and that lacking
federal work commitments, they are eligible to take part in our work.
Please
take both the spirit of our government and the facts presented into
your minds and hearts as you struggle to organize yourselves into a
living, breathing government of and for and by the people of this
country. It has taken nine years to accomplish all that has been done
at the International, National, and local levels; some states are far
advanced and some are limping along, but all are standing as General
Assemblies.
Working
together with a common understanding of the history, the law, our
identity, the duties, and the work to be done, is key to getting on
track, being on track, and staying on track. As you ponder this
information, you can forward additional questions through your
Coordinators. Coordinators are encouraged to contact us directly
whenever needed.
----------------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
No comments:
Post a Comment