Monday, July 17, 2023
4299-4302: No, Bobby.... from Lincoln County Watch
By Anna Von Reitz
The
thing being improved was the States of America. The unincorporated
Union of States was adding to its organizational capabilities. It
already had the Federation of States in place and it set up a
Confederation, too. In addition to, not instead of. "In order to form a more perfect Union...."
They weren't talking about some theoretical "union", they were talking about their Union of States.
All
the instrumentalities and doing-business-as names were retained. They
all continued in use from 1781 to the 1850s when some changes were made
to bring the language conventions we use into conformance with our
Official Language --- English.
Otherwise, and
throughout, the different bodies simply come in and out of Session, and
the member delegates changed hats to do business in different
jurisdictions --- national, international, and global, using the same
group of doing-business-as names to accomplish that.
The
same people ran the original Union, the Federation, and the
Confederation. The Confederation ran the Federal Republic, which was
the American Federal Subcontractor.
If all three Federal Subcontractors ceased functioning tomorrow, our Federation of States still stands and is still able to conduct business internationally and globally.
How
do we know that? Because the Federation did all the work later
delegated under the Constitutions for five years, 1776 to 1781, all by
itself. If need be, it can do it all again.
So we called the Federation and its Member States back into Session for the first time in a 160 years.
We
identified people who were eligible and willing to claim their
birthright political status as Americans born in one of the
nation-states, and we had them declare and record and publish their
political status, so that they and their assemblies are fully
empowered.
Each State Assembly represents a Member State in the unincorporated Federation of States.
The
Confederation is inoperable because its members were States-of-States
that were either bankrupted or ruinated during the Civil War. The
Confederation of States and the Federal Republic both have to be
reconstructed by the States and that hasn't been done yet, because the
State Assemblies have been dormant all this while.
So
for now, both the Confederation and the American Federal Republic are
down for the count, waiting for the States of the Union to finish
getting assembled and then set up new State of State organizations for
themselves and then, finally, convene them as the restored
Confederation.
After that, the Confederation can take up
the reins and run the American Federal Subcontractor, the so-called
Federal Republic, if that's what the appropriate Congressional Body
decides.
I don't have a crystal ball, but it may be that
they decide not to contract with the former service providers and do
everything themselves. There doesn't seem to be any reason, for example,
to continue a relationship with the British Monarch as our Trustee on
the High Seas and Navigable Inland Waterways. Those issues and more
will have to be discussed.
My point to you is that we
have thoroughly researched these issues for many years and if we were
wrong, we'd be in jail. The proof is in the pudding. We have already
constructed the peaceful means -- the properly assembled State
Assemblies -- to make the needed changes: completion of the
Reconstruction, control of the Courts, and an end to trespassing on our
jurisdiction.
My further point to you is that a Jural Assembly is a natural part of
a State Assembly. The Jurors are all members of the State Assembly
because the Jury Pool is drawn from the membership of the State
Assembly. No "Jural Assembly" exists without a State Assembly.
You
and Ron and the others are all charging around claiming to have a
separate "Jural Assembly" without bothering to build or become members
of the State Assembly that already exists ---and which formed in 2019,
years before anything you got going.
So you can either be
members of The Oregon Assembly and participate as members,
therefore,also functioning as members of The State Jural Assembly, or
you can continue to be off-track and headed for trouble.
The
same kinds of assumptions that you are making are what got the Colorado
Nine jail terms of over thirty years each. Instead of being a help to
me or to help anyone else, these know-it-all men got themselves
cashiered away and unable to even help themselves. They've become an
additional burden to me, as I am obliged to seek their freedom and
extend diplomatic efforts on their behalf.
Is that what
you want to happen in Oregon? A whole bunch of you get arrested and
tried and jailed, and then the rest of us have to expend our time and
effort to negotiate your release? A process that requires us to take
responsibility and guarantee that you won't go off on a tangent again,
and will instead seek peaceful redress in the ways required by
international and national law?
If we can't get you to
see sense now, how are we supposed to guarantee that you'll see the
light after you've cooled your heels in jail?
It's
emotionally and mentally exhausting to deal with groups like yours,
because I already know where you are going with this separate
"Washington Jural Assembly". I already know where the trail leads, and I
am warning all of you just like I warned the Colorado Nine --- and I
quote my last conversation with Bruce Doucette: "For God's sake, wake
up, and don't do this. You can't get where you want to go on this
path."
Now I find myself saying the same thing to you and
Ron, laying out the same plain facts. And just as it was with The
Colorado Nine, I am getting all these men thinking that they know better
than me and telling me I'm a traitor and a this and a that and some
other thing, throwing personal insults in my face and making ridiculous
accusations, because I don't agree with them.
I have
studied this for going on fifty years and know what I am talking about.
Everything that has happened has borne out that I know what I am talking
about.
1. I warned The Colorado Nine. They didn't listen. Where are they?
2.
I warned Rod Class and told him in advance what to expect if he took
his deer rifle into Washington, DC. What happened with that? I think
he is still on an ankle-bracelet.
3. I warned the January 6th Protestors.
I told the Oathkeepers they were being set up. I told them weeks
before. It's on the record of my blogs. Where are they? In jail.
4. I have warned President Trump and his Legal Team, too. And where are they? Scrambling around, desperate and confused.
5. And here I am warning all of you in Oregon, too.
There is a right way and a wrong way to do everything on this Earth.
My
husband and I and those working for the Federation of States (not the
"Federal" Government) have led everyone forward to the point where our
State Assemblies have traction internationally as the free-standing,
recognized, and lawful American Government. That is not an "accident"
-- that's the result of a lot of hard work and applied knowledge of
history and law.
If you want to take your rightful
place and have a Jural Assembly that has teeth, you need to park your
pride and learn some things, then take appropriate action to build your
State Assembly and your Jural Assembly with it.
I don't like being right about some things, but life and time have proven that I am.
Continue on the road you are on at your own peril. I have told you to "Cease and Desist" for your sake, not mine.
----------------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
Don't Be Fooled
By Anna Von Reitz
Remember that the Satanist Game is always Divide and Conquer.
In order to play this game, there have to be two sides.
So they create both sides and control the game. It's that simple.
However they want the game to run, they set it up.
If
they need faster results, they make one side look really bad (Joe
Biden) and the other side look really good (Donald Trump) to the
audience they are playing to.
Some
of you are already well-aware of Good Cop - Bad Cop manipulation, and
this is just the same kind of manipulation on a larger scale.
This
time around, they want to make the British Empire look good and the
Roman Empire to look bad. So they introduce their British Crown team as
the saviors and they promise you things like this:
1. We'll give your "securities" back.
2. No conflict with the US System.
3. Diplomatic immunity.
People think --- money and safety!
And unfortunately for many, that's as far as they think.
They
don't tell you that Rome is already in control of them, so that no
matter what you do, or which side you choose, you are still in the grip
of Rome. And that's why there's no conflict with the US System.
Why would there be? It's all part of the same system.
Just like they don't tell you that it was always illegal and unlawful to "securitize" you and your assets.
They don't have any choice about returning them-- what's at issue is how your assets get returned and under what terms.
Under our plan, you and your States of the Union get the ownership and control and full benefit.
Under
their plan, they retain control and ownership and feed you bits and
pieces while everything, including you, still belongs to their King.
And their King still belongs to the Pope.
According
to our plan, you get your stuff back and it's yours under your control
and under the control of your traditional American Government--- which
you also control.
According to their plan, they institute a new banking system that allows them to control and survey every purchase you make.
They can control what brand of butter you buy. Or deny you the ability to buy anything at all.
And
for a while, as long as they are afraid of a slave rebellion, they'll
give you more of your own chicken feed, but then they will crack down
again. Harder than ever.
If
you take their "offer" via David Straight and guys like Richard down in
Louisiana, all you cows and sheep get corralled again, and you spend
your lives endlessly shuffling between their pillar and their post.
The promise of "diplomatic immunity" is another farce.
You already have "diplomatic immunity" and they are being slammed (by us) for their failure to provide it.
They've
been trespassing on our turf against our people and we called them on
it. So now, under international law, they have to back off.
So is Diplomatic Immunity a benefit they are giving you, or is it simply what you are already owed ?
We are the ones enforcing your "Diplomatic Immunity". They never "gave" it to you.
They are the ones who have been illegally and unlawfully trespassing against your immunity all along.
Now that we are forcing them to honor it, they want to make it look like they are the source of this benefit?
Count your fingers when you shake hands.
These
people are Liars and Players and they are good at it, but if you have
been paying attention you already know that the only good changes are
those that our State Assemblies and our Federation of States are
creating.
And don't be fooled when they put on a different mask.
Some
of the "very elect" will be fooled and seduced by these promises of
peace and plenty: just sign up for a TreasuryDirect Account, adopt
British Territorial U.S. Citizenship, join us and give up your claim to
be Americans --- and our King will be generous to you.
He
will give you back a tiny portion of what's yours, about one percent,
and in exchange, you will hold him and his government harmless and
subject yourselves and your children to his rule.
That's the deal they are actually offering you.
In
the search for peace and plenty, you must be your own source and
determine your own destiny. You cannot rely on any government but your
own and even your own government needs your attention.
No,
you can't just leave your own government on autopilot for 160 years and
forget how it works. You have to stand up and be your own good guys,
and put on your own white hats.
And
if you have the brains of a mouse in heat, you already know how the
British King treats his own people. The list of grievances hasn't
changed from 1776 to today.
----------------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
Reply to Ron Vrooman --- Again, and Everyone Being Misled by Him
By Anna Von Reitz
You have it completely backwards and have always had it completely backwards.
In 1787, as we know from period Dictionaries, the word "Federal" meant "Contract".
The Federal Government is and has always been composed of Governmental Services Subcontractors.
The American Subcontractor was popularly known as the "Federal Republic".
It was run by the Confederation of States doing business as the States of America.
This
is confirmed by the records and by the construction of the name and
title of "The Constitution for the united States of America" ratified in
1787. See? The organization receiving the contract was "States of
America".
This
is the "Organic" Federal Constitution which created, empowered --- and
at the same time, limited, the new American Federal Subcontractor.
All
this history has been explained to you multiple times, the documents
have either been provided or you have been given the proper citations.
So who or what "subcontracted" with all these service providers, both American and foreign?
It
was not as you say and mislead people to believe "federal citizens"
making these contracts. They would be contracting with themselves
according to your "theory".
Remember
that the "federal citizenry" didn't exist prior to the Constitutions.
That's why they are always focused on the constitution, the
constitution, the constitution to the point of ignoring all else ---
because without their particular Constitution, they have no jobs and no
viable political identity.
We
are not in that boat. With or without any federal Constitution or
Subcontractors at all, our Federation of States and our States continue
to exist.
Which is another bone to pick with you.
The phrase "We, the People" has meaning in both Law and Grammar. The people live in our nation-states of the Union, while the People function as Lawful Persons in international venues.
The
people are those we refer to as State Nationals or the General Public,
those who have no particular obligation to serve the government at any
level.
The People refers to State Citizens,
who owe no obligation, but who freely renounce any allegiance to any
other government and serve as International Fiduciary Deputies for their
State of the Union.
We
know this from the history, from the way international business was
conducted among nations in the 1700s, and from the grammar. These
State Citizens serving as Fiduciary Deputies of the actual States are
the "People" in "We, the People", who contracted with the three Federal
Subcontractors on behalf of their States.
Only
State Citizens can enforce the Constitutions because State Citizens are
the only ones who created and ratified the Constitutions. They and
their Successors are the only Parties to the Constitutions from the
American side of the contract
The
Union being referred to at the time and place, during the ratification
of the Constitutions, is the original Union formed by the nation-states
in 1776, and is not to be confused with the "Union" that fought in the
Civil War.
You
are completely mistaken if you actually believe that "no Federal
Constitution exists" simply because various hirelings dropped the ball,
stopped providing services, were not retained, and so on.
At
the level of the Principals who created these contracts, they are still
very much in play --- and it doesn't matter how many times the US INC.
or the US CORP or the UNITED STATES or the USA, Inc. or the United
States of America, Incorporated, or The United States of America,
Incorporated, goes bankrupt or out of business.
And as for Oaths of Office, the Informer researched that 30 plus years ago and nothing has changed.
Out
of thousands of "oaths" and offices examined, exactly four people had
oaths that met the requirements for a valid Oath of Public Office. This
means that these people who are seeming to occupy these Public Offices
are not actually seated in those Offices. They are appearing to be
Governors and Sheriffs and so on, and they are exercising the powers,
but in actual fact, they have never accepted the liability attached to
the job.
This
is just a small part of what has to be addressed, but if people like
you continue to ignore, misinterpret, and mislead people who are already
confused enough, that effort to clean this mess up just gets harder to
do.
Cease and desist. The Oregon Assembly was duly called into Session in 2019. You are eligible to join it, but not supplant it.
----------------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
What Richard Discovered --- What Kind of Common Law?
By Anna Von Reitz
I wish to comment briefly on the use and misuse of the words "Common Law".
I am told that by July 27th,
the Military will invoke a National Emergency, and President Trump ---
who is still President for their purposes, will use Continuance of
Government (COG) provisions to arrest various criminals and return the
police and judiciary officers to operating under Common Law.
It is necessary to ask -- what kind of common law?
Military Common Law is not, overall, a good thing,
Many
Americans hearing this rumor are encouraged and joyful, thinking that
American Common Law is about to be restored, believing also that their
American Federal Republic is going to be repopulated by people loyal to
America.
Don't just "believe". Require proof.
We've been fooled too many times by the charlatans and actors operating out of the District of Columbia
This
current situation is just as likely to be an illegal imposition of
Military Common Law, following or in tandem with an illegal occupation
of our American Federal Republic by British Territorial Operatives
disguised as Americans.
Tories
don't come with a label neatly typed across their foreheads. They can
appear to be just as American as you or I. Like Ray Epps. They don't
speak with English accents, but they are loyal to the British Empire and
its government. They come in many different kinds and colors. All are
destructive to our Government and our way of life.
When
you hear someone ranting about "our democracy" you know that they are
either ignorant as Pat's Pig, or they are blatantly promoting a form of
foreign British Territorial Government best exemplified by the Raj in
India.
When
you inquire more deeply, you will find that what Americans mistake as
their government and their Presidents and Governors are anything but.
The
men and organizations that appear to be filling these functions and
offices are in fact acting as foreign usurpers and Pretenders, though
most of them have been born in this country and have at least pretended
allegiance to it-----and virtually none of them have ever provided their
required Oath of Office, so they haven't actually entered into any
Public Office.
All
legitimate Public Oaths of Office including those required by the
Constitutions must be written, witnessed, signed, and recorded in a
place and by means accessible to the Public.
Care to guess how many Oaths of Public Office we've found that meet those requirements --- out of thousands examined? Four.
These
men and women have merely appeared to occupy a Public Office and have
exercised the powers of our Public Offices as imposters.
In
my view, both of the Municipal Corporations headquartered in the
District of Columbia have acted in Gross Breach of Trust and in
Violation of their Commercial Service Contracts (the Constitutions).
That was our finding in 2014 and that is our finding still; though some
corrective measures have been taken, the bulk of the errors and abuses
remain.
Forgive
me if I view the Trump Advocates among us with a somewhat jaundiced
complexion; in my view, Mr. Trump is an excellent business man and made
many efforts in that domain that were practical and beneficial for this
country overall --- however, I do not lose track of the fact that he is
working for a foreign Municipal Corporation that is intent on
maintaining its grip on this country, our natural resources, and our
personal (as in corporate) assets.
What
better stunt than to let the other Municipal Corporation bear the brunt
and blame, while they exercise military powers to maintain the Big Lie
we've been living in?
One
must remember that the British Territorial Military, and especially the
U.S. Army, have been in control of this Mess since April of 1863. All
the lauds and all the blame belong to them. And so does Mr. Trump. He's
their man. Not ours.
This
may be difficult for most Americans to grasp, but our Military has been
a prostitute -- a Mercenary Force for hire -- under the control of the
British Territorial "United States" Government for many decades. In my
opinion, she's the Great Whore, drunk with the blood and wealth of
nations.
And the seven hills fit Washington, DC, just as well as Rome.
I wish it wasn't so.
Notice
that a British Corporation, SERCO, is acting as the Paymaster for "our"
Military. That's not even possible in a sane world wherein our
government is free and independent and sovereign.
Consider
also the long roster of men pretending to be our Diplomats, Executive
Officers and Generals accepting Knighthoods from HRM Elizabeth II ---
Henry Kissinger, George Herbert Walker Bush, General Norman Schwarzkopf,
General Colin Powell? Knights? Really?
Do you imagine that these honors of the British Empire are bestowed without allegiances and quid pro quos?
I certainly don't.
So
when you are promised "Common Law" from the American Raj, take care
that it isn't simply the common Law of the Jungle known as Military
Common Law, or British Common Law, or Territorial Common Law, or
District Common Law, or, or, or --- because there is only one Common Law
that satisfies us, and that is American Common Law.
And
if they announce a new "Federal Republic" and propose to take the reins
of Delegated Powers bequeathed to our American Federal Republic ---
look sharp. Is that a British Territorial "Federal" Republic that I
see?
Or something recognizable as the product of our fifty nation-states and our States of the Union?
All that glitters is not gold and words do not change actions.
The
British Government has earned its labels. All of Africa calls them a
"nation of thieves", and so do the Irish, the Indians of the Indian
Subcontinent, and the Natives of our country as well. Even Shakespeare
refers to them as "perfidious Albion", so mark me well.
If
there is a Military Occupation, that's exactly what it is --- a foreign
British Territorial Occupation using our own misled sons and daughters
as a front to hide British Imperialism.
If there is a new Federal Republic declared under Mr. Trump, look sharp and more than once.
I
see no movement on his part to protect or advocate the Reconstruction
necessary to restore the actual American Federal Republic. I wish I
did, but I don't.
----------------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
No comments:
Post a Comment