This article is a follow-up to my piece last week, Data Sets, Fraud, and the Future.
Let’s say a minor religion emerges in Ohio. Its basis is a story about a miraculous tree growing in an arid desert.
The
only problem is, if the members of this Church bothered to check, they
would discover the exact place where the tree supposedly grew was no
desert. Instead, it was an ocean. The ocean had been there for a billion
years.
But
no one bothers to check. They collectively INVENT AND ACCEPT the notion
of the tree in the desert. They’re not aware that this is what they’re
doing, but they ARE doing it.
They build rituals and ceremonies and art---“data banks”---around the idea of the tree.
The
same factors are present in the case of promoting a new virus. In this
situation---the virus is collectively dreamed up and accepted by
virologists---the “checking” would occur by doing a retrospective
step-by-step analysis of what happened in the lab where the virus was
“discovered.”
But
no analysis is carried out. None of the professionals believes it’s
necessary. The traditional methods of virus-discovery are beyond
reproach.
And
if an outsider, a skeptic demands an inquiry into the process of
discovery, he is labeled a sinner. The lab is an inner sanctum. The mere
presence of an outsider looking over the shoulders of the researchers
(priests) at work would be an offense against the Church.
What we’re left with is a collective idea whose content is: “new virus.”
That’s all.
“Would you like to look at our line of hats that go with your new virus?”
“How about a mutant strain?”
“The vaccine, of course, is free.”
Another
collective idea: the 300 official mental disorders, promoted by the
American Psychiatric Association. The truth is, the so-called disorders
have no accompanying definitive lab tests, for diagnosis.
Collective ideas give rise to data banks and data sets that bolster and expand the original ideas.
“25%
of all college students have at least one mental disorder.” Here are
the studies and surveys and confirmations from leading
researchers---data sets.
“Three
major public health organizations have formed a task force to study
solutions to the growing mental illness problem among college
students.” More data sets will be created and deposited in data banks.
“MIT
and Harvard, cooperating in a federally funded program, are developing
AI software that will predict future trends in mental illness among
college students, in an effort to identify preventive measures which
might head off this growing problem…” More data sets placed in data
banks---but this time, all the work, and its logic, are hidden behind
walls of automatic AI.
Collectivism=collective ideas=data banks filled with supposed confirmation of the truth of the ideas.
The
whole op involves creating more and more layers between the data sets
and the original collective ideas, until no one considers examining
those ideas.
As
IoT (Internet of Things), enabled by 5G tech, makes more of the
functions of society automatic, successive generations of the
populations are pushed farther and farther away from the collective
ideas which form the basis of AI programs.
Here is a passage from John Klyczek’s article, “From
UNESCO Study 11 to UNESCO 2050: Project BEST and the Forty-Year Plan to
Reimagine Education for the Fourth Industrial Revolution,”
published at unlimitedhangout[dot]com. Consider the sheer number of
layers, data sets, and AI involved in the monster project Klyczek is
describing:
“…UNESCO’s
Study 11 was carried out through international public-private
partnerships between communist, socialist, and capitalist countries
coordinating efforts between multinational telecommunications and
computer corporations. Working in concert with academic institutions and
national government agencies, Study 11 affiliates lobbied to
restructure laws in order to globalize school systems through
proto-internet technologies manufactured by Big Tech companies, such as
Microsoft, IBM, and Apple, which are now steering the Fourth Industrial
Revolution into a new political system of communitarian technocracy
driven by a new economic system of ‘stakeholder capitalism’ through
‘community-based’ public-private partnerships that are managed by Big
Data.”
“…schools
around the entire world are forced to rely on the technocratic IT
infrastructure that has been set up by Study 11 and Project BEST through
their public-private partnerships with Microsoft, Apple, and IBM. These
partnerships are now converting brick-and-mortar schoolhouses into
virtual classrooms that digitally data-mine students through computer
hardware devices, such as Apple iPads and Macbooks, which transmit video
teleconferencing through software programs, including Microsoft Teams,
supplemented by adaptive-learning courseware and other
artificial-intelligence applications like IBM’s Watson Education.”
Getting
the picture? Imagine how many parents are hypnotized and baffled by the
total load of data sets which establish this new global education
system, vs. the number of parents who will see through the layers of the
con to the collectivist root.
Want
a parallel? Try the current debate over the origin of the “pandemic
virus.” It jumped from bat to human. No, perhaps other animals carried
it. No, it was born in a Wuhan lab. Fauci and his agency funded gain-of
function research at the lab. Well, perhaps they did, but the total
amount of money was really an insignificant pittance. What did Fauci
know, and when did he know it? Layer after layer, built higher and
higher.
And
at bottom, the virus was never isolated (never discovered), and it was
never authentically sequenced. It was an idea, collectively concocted.
Every
death from, and case of, COVID virus infection can be explained (as I
have, over the past year) without the need for, or reference to, a
virus.
In
the old days, a stage magician would show his empty hands, then start
pulling the edge of a colored handkerchief from one closed fist. A whole
string of handkerchiefs would appear. But now, the magician presents 12
empty cabinets stacked on top of one another, and he seems to make
those handkerchiefs ascend from the lowest to the highest cabinet.
Each cabinet is a data bank, and he isn’t even on the stage. He’s a hundred miles away talking to the audience via Zoom.
And soon, he won’t be a he. He’ll be a constructed image of a human.
And
the image won’t be transporting handkerchiefs. It’ll be notifying
people they have a disease; and the drugs will arrive promptly at their
door.
The
drugs will be toxic and won’t heal. The diagnosis will be flawed or
completely irrelevant. The standard cause of the so-called disease will
be false. The research on which the cause was based will be fake.
Just like now. But the layers of AI data all along the line will transmit a more powerful illusion.
~~~
(The link to this article posted on my blog is here -- with sources.)
(Follow me on Gab at @jonrappoport)
No comments:
Post a Comment