"When gigantic mega-corporations steal land from Third World people
and then poison these people with horrific pollution, why isn't it
called murder? Is that too stark? Does it offend delicate
sensibilities? Would you say that a drug gang who shoots
up a bar and kills ten innocent bystanders is just carrying out
'typical business practices in their field of endeavor', and should
therefore never be prosecuted in a court of law on a charge of
homicide?" (The Underground, Jon Rappoport)
---This article assembles facts contained in my ongoing series on the
"China
epidemic." To get the details, I recommend going back and
reading all those articles.
If a group wants to stage a fake and frightening epidemic, how would they do it?
First of all, what reasons would they have to launch such an audacious plan?
On one level, they want to cover up human harm that is already occurring.
They want to explain this harm with a false story. For example,
suppose a combination of deadly corporate air and water and 5G*
electronic pollution is making
people sick and killing them. The parties responsible are surely not
going to admit their crimes. No. Instead, they're going to claim a new
virus is causing this harm in the form of, say, lung disease. The
virus just "emerged." "It showed up out of nowhere.
It crossed species from animals to humans."
So...the first thing needed is a cluster of cases in one locale. A
small group of people who have the same symptoms. This is easy to
find. How about ordinary flu symptoms? Fever, fatigue, weakness, with
an emphasis on lung complications [from the forms
of pollution]. A few of these people are very ill. Two of them die.
Now, the publicity/news machine swings into gear.
It's called an "outbreak." It isn't, but that's the story. "They were
all 'exposed to something'" at, say, a riverfront dock restaurant.
The news---shoveled directly into mainstream outlets---comes from elite
public health agencies like the CDC and the World Health Organization
(WHO).
It's an OUTBREAK.
To use a technical term, this is all BULLSHIT. Understand? People in
the locale of the "new case cluster" are falling ill and dying as a
result of the actual pollution-causes I listed above.
But the news takes a different slant: "Researchers from WHO and
CDC state that a 'mystery illness' has emerged in City X, and they are
working to discover the virus..."
Who said it was a virus? Who made that unwarranted assumption? WHO and CDC.
They always say it's a virus.
At this point, suddenly, it's news all over the planet, and most of the
population is roped in, right from the get-go. Virus. Yes. I see.
Which virus?
And shortly and miraculously, the answer comes: it's VX-20. A new
virus, never seen before, "which probably emerged from fish and crossed
over into humans. One fisherman has already died."
Voila. We have a new disease. VX-20.
Next question: did researchers actually find this virus? Did they?
Follow the next piece closely. There is sleight-of-hand involved.
One scenario: Researchers used what are called "indirect
markers" to INFER that a new virus was there, in samples of tissue taken
from several people in the original "cluster" of riverfront victims.
The researchers didn't actually use basic procedures to purify the
tissue sample from even one patient, and they didn't see MANY identical
viruses in an electron microscope photograph of the purified sample---if
they took such a photograph at all. They certainly
didn't perform this complete test on several hundred emerging
patients---they should have, but they didn't. And most certainly, other
researchers, including INDEPENDENT analysts, didn't perform the
necessary electron microscope test on hundreds of so-called
"epidemic patients."
So...the CDC and WHO researchers came up with a notion, an idea, an
inference about a virus, through these indirect markers. And via a
process of continuing inferences, they characterized the virus they
never saw.
Scenario two: Let's be generous and assume the researchers did
bother to look at electron microscope photos, derived from only a few
patients, not hundreds of patients, as they should have. What did they
actually see in the photos? Maybe they saw
a few particles that looked similar to each other, BUT quite possibly
these virus-like particles were just passengers that ordinarily live in
the body and cause no harm. However, the researchers jump up and down
and say, THIS IS IT. THIS IS THE NEW KILLING
VIRUS. AND WE WILL NOW ASSEMBLE ITS GENETIC SEQUENCE.
AND THEY DO.
So what? These researchers don't bother to make the distinction between
viruses that might do harm and those that do nothing. Why? Because
they're determined to find something. Anything. That's their basic
mission.
In both scenarios, they've fallen woefully short of proving that a new virus is responsible for making people ill.
But never mind---news outlets and governments are already on the march.
THIS IS IT. A new epidemic. VX-20. A whole city is already locked
down. Screeners are waving wands at passengers getting off planes.
Some US talking head is saying there is now a
rush to develop a vaccine. New cases of VX-20 are showing up in other
cities and other countries. Boom.
Let's examine that last part, about new cases and "spreading"--- because
this is where people REALLY fall for the con. They say: "Well, here is
a city where there is no air or water or 5G pollution, and they're
discovering new cases, so how do you explain
that?"
The new cases and the spread are based entirely on DIAGNOSTIC TESTS.
Those test-results determine whether there is an "epidemic case" or a
"spread."
There are two main tests: antibody and PCR. In a nutshell, neither test
is adequate to say HERE IS A NEW CASE. Both tests are unreliable and
worthless.
It's more of the con. Both tests will claim to show "new
cases" when they DON'T. They might show some antibodies or a few tiny
fragments of what might possibly be a virus, but they show NOTHING that
directly points to human illness. Relying on those
tests would be on the order of laying down a bet on a game that isn't
even scheduled. It's a farce.
Antibody tests, which purport to prove illness coming from a virus, are
actually showing, at best, that the patient came in contact with a
virus. Actually, before 1984, this was generally taken to mean the
patient was in good shape. His immune system had
defeated the germ. But then, for several no good reasons, the science
was turned on its head. All of a sudden, a positive antibody test was
taken to mean the patient was ill or would soon become ill. Nonsense.
Farce.
The PCR test takes a tiny, tiny sample from a patient that might contain
a virus, but the virus particle is far too small to comprehend. The
PCR blows up that particle many times, so it can be analyzed. BUT the
test says nothing about HOW MUCH virus, if any,
is replicating in the patient's body. And you need millions and
millions of a virus replicating in the body to even begin talking about a
cause of actual illness.
AND both tests rely on the unwarranted assumption that a virus actually causing illness---VX-20---was truly discovered in the first place.
Armed with these pathetic tests, public officials begin
reporting a new epidemic case here and a new one there, and pretty soon
40 countries have new cases, and
the public falls for it, hook, line, and sinker.
And THAT'S HOW you stage a fake epidemic. The rest is pure publicity and lockdown and theater.
Dangerous theater.
Toxic drugs and toxic vaccines will be brought on board to treat the epidemic that was never there.
The ACTUAL ONGOING causes of illness and dying will remain in place,
shoved into the deep background. And THIS amounts to a capital crime.
As in: murder. Remember that.
People will be told not to question the official line on the
"epidemic." This is called a clue. Why not ask questions? Because the
answers might lead to a correct conclusion about
the enormous con job.
Let me add a few comments.
The World Health Organization itself states that every year, there are
millions of cases of ordinary flu around the world, and several hundred
thousand deaths. This isn't "coronavirus." But the flu sufferers can
easily be called "new epidemic cases." Ordinary
flu can be statistically "imported" and called "coronavirus."
Then there is the medical treatment imposed on people who are told they
are "coronavirus cases." I'm talking about highly toxic antiviral
drugs, which have the ability to stop natural reproduction of cells in
the body. Particularly when such people already
have weakened immune systems, or organ-function problems, the results
can be catastrophic. The patients can die. Of course, if they do, they
will be called "deaths from the epidemic."
Finally, there is something else you may have heard of. I mentioned it a few paragraphs ago:
murder. Do you really think the people who are consciously
launching a fake epidemic, with all its consequences---including
covering up and never remedying ongoing real causes of dying and
death---would stop short of staging a few spectacular incidents
of dying and death, in order to make a splash and convince the public
that the virus is really a killer? Are you KIDDING? For example,
suddenly, out of the blue, a few friends, previously healthy, in a small
town, fall ill, and a few days later, they're
dead. Health officials state they were "positive for the virus." "It
came on quickly." Are tests run to detect an intentional covert act of
direct poisoning? Of course not. Media blare this horrible story all
over the world: "THE VIRUS IS ON THE MOVE."
Same thing happens to a previously healthy family in Country X. They
fall ill and die. And then a group of travelers on a mountain in
Country Y become ill and die.
Murder. However, the cover story is: "THE VIRUS KNOWS NO
BOUNDS. IT CAN COME ON ANYWHERE, AT ANY TIME." THESE EVENTS OF DEATH
"CAN ONLY BE EXPLAINED BY THE VIRUS." That's right, when the audience
is brainwashed and completely naïve.
"But...but how could anyone actually commit premediated murder of
innocent people, in order to convince the public that a virus is
spreading in unlikely places?"
As I mentioned, such controllers are ALREADY guilty of murder, because they're hiding
the actual ongoing causes of death with the cover story of a
virus. This sort of cover-up of crime has been happening, around the
world, for a long, long time. To cite just two instances, look at parts
of Africa and Haiti, where the "HIV story" has
been promoted and funded, wall to wall, in order to conceal
intentionally created and sustained poverty, stolen farm land, and
corporate takeovers involving massive poisonous industrial pollution.
When you go back in history---as I have---you'll realize that fake
epidemics are standard operating procedure. SARS, Swine Flu, West Nile,
Zika, etc. I've written about every one of these phonies in detail...
(*) Concerning 5G technology and China, I recommend watching Dana Ashlie's video,
"The BEST NEWS re CΟRΟNΑ VΙrus you've heard all month! Kinda" on YouTube. |
No comments:
Post a Comment