First, a few quotes to give a bit of background.
5G speed, for people who must download a whole season of their favorite show in two seconds:
"It's the next (fifth) generation of cellular technology
which promises to greatly enhance the speed, coverage and responsiveness
of wireless networks. How fast are we talking about? Think 10 to 100
times speedier than your typical cellular connection,
and even faster than anything you can get with a physical fiber-optic
cable going into your house. (You'll be able to download a season's
worth of 'Stranger Things' in seconds.)" [CNET.com]
Lunatic 5G installation of small transmitters packed close together every few hundred feet:
"The next big thing in cellular technology, 5G, will bring
lightning-fast wireless Internet - and thousands of antenna-topped poles
to many neighborhoods where cell towers have long been banned."
"Wireless companies are asking Congress and state lawmakers
to make it easier to install the poles by preempting local zoning laws
that often restrict them, particularly near homes. The lobbying efforts
have alarmed local officials across the country.
They say they need to ensure that their communities do not end up with
unsightly poles cluttering sidewalks, roadsides and the edges of front
yards."
"They also are hearing from residents worried about possible
long-term health risks. Until now, much of the cell equipment that emits
radio-frequency energy has been housed on large towers typically kept
hundreds of feet from homes [also harmful
to health]. The new 'small cell' technology uses far more antennas and
transmitters that are smaller and lower-powered, but clustered closer
together and lower to the ground." [The Washington Post]
I keep hammering on this 5G issue, because it contains the blueprint of a future only elite madmen want.
For the rest of us, it's a catastrophe in the making.
I've covered the extreme health dangers of 5G in another article. Here, I want to flesh out the hidden agenda.
A few decades ago, a movement was started to create an
interconnected power grid for the whole planet. We were told this would
be the only way to avoid wasting huge amounts of electricity and, voila,
bring all nations and all people into a modern
21st century.
But now, it's a different story, a classic bait and switch.
The bait was the promise of One Grid for all. The switch is what 5G will
bring us:
100 billion or more NEW devices online, all connected to the
Internet and the Cloud. What could be more wasteful? What could be more
ridiculous? This is the opposite of sane energy use.
Who really cares whether his 5G-connected refrigerator keeps
track of the food items inside it and orders new items when the supply
dwindles? Who has to have a 5G driverless car that takes him to work?
Who must have a 5G stove that senses what is
being cooked and sets the temperature for four minutes? Who lives and
who dies if a washing machine doesn't measure how much soap is stored
inside and doesn't order new soap? Who is demanding a hundred devices in
his home that spy on him and record his actions?
With 5G, the ultimate goal is: every device in every home
that uses energy will be "its own computer," and the planetary grid will
connect ALL these devices to a monitoring and regulating Energy
Authority.
As Patrick Wood details in his classic, Technocracy Rising,
that worldwide Energy Authority was the dream of the men who launched
the Technocracy movement, in America, in the 1930s.
They set out the key requirements---which weren't technically
possible then, but are quite doable now: continuous real-time measuring
of both energy production and energy use from one end of the planet to
the other...
So that both energy production and energy consumption could be controlled. "For the good of all," of course.
5G is the technology for making this happen.
The Globalists: "We're promising a stunning long-range future
of 'automatic homes', where everything is done for you. But really,
that's the cover story. Ultimately, we want to be able to measure every
unit of energy used by every device in every
home---and through AI, regulate how much energy we will let every
individual consume, moment to moment. We control energy. We are the
energy masters. If you want to run and operate and dominate the world,
you control its energy."
Terms and projects like smart grid, smart meters,
sustainability, Agenda 21, smart cities, climate change---all this is
Technocratic planning and justification for Rule through Energy.
The beginning of an actual rational plan for energy would start this way:
DUMP 5G. Dump the whole plan of installing small
transmitter-cells on buildings and homes and trees and lampposts and
fences all over the planet. Forget it. Don't bring 100 billion new
devices online. Aside from the extreme health dangers,
it's ridiculously expensive. It's on the order of saying we need
thousand-foot robots standing on sidewalks washing the windows of office
buildings.
If some movie star wants to install 30 generators on his
property and have engineers build him an automatic home, where he can
sit back, flip a switch, and have three androids carry him into his
bathtub and wash him and dry him, fine. But planning
a smart city? Who voted for that? Who gave informed consent? Nobody.
A global Energy Authority, of course, is going to decide that
a small African country needs to be given much more energy, while
Germany or France or the US will have to sacrifice energy for the cause
of social justice. But this is yet another con,
because you won't see government cleaning up the contaminated water
supplies of that small African country, or installing modern sanitation,
or curtailing the forced movement of populations into poverty-stricken
cities, or reclaiming vast farm land stolen
by mega-corporations and giving that land back to local farmers.
The whole hidden purpose of an Energy Authority is control.
And because the Authority is Globalist and Technocratic, it
aims to lower energy use in industrial nations and help wreck their
economies, making it much easier to move in and take over those
countries.
Who in his right mind would propose a wireless system that
relies on many, many, many cells/transmitters placed closely to each
other, all over the world?
This system would be far more vulnerable to physical disruption than the present 4G.
You can find many articles that claim the US military must
have 5G for their most advanced planes---and for their developing
AI-controlled weapons. How does that work? Where will all the
transmitter/cells be placed on the ground and in the air??
Something is missing here. Is there another version of 5G we're not
being told about? Is geoengineering of the atmosphere the means for
tuning up space so 5G signals can be passed along without
cells/transmitters?
Part of the US obsession to bring 5G online quickly stems
from competition with China, which at the moment is in the lead on
developing and exporting the technology. "If China has it, we have to
have it sooner and better." This attitude sidesteps
the issue of why we must have 5G in the first place.
And now there are reports that the US government is
considering a plan to build the whole 5G network itself---rather than
leaving the job to corporations. Of course, a few favored companies
(like Google) would be chosen by the government in a non-bid
situation to provide VERY significant help. If such a plan were to
launch, we would have a very tight club at the top of the communications
and energy pyramid. And that club would maximize 5G to expand
already-saturated surveillance of populations.
Wouldn't you---if you had nothing better to do than control the world?
|
No comments:
Post a Comment