Tuesday, June 19, 2018
Robert David Steele: Grand Theft, Mass Murder and Legalized Lies – Clapper Book Review as Epitaph
James R. Clapper, Facts and Fears: Hard Truths from a Life in Intelligence (Viking, 2018), 432 pages, $17.99, ISBN-13: 978-0525558644.
There was a time when I thought James Clapper was one of the top five
flag officers among the sixty-five or so that I had worked with over 40
years.
I’ve known Clapper since 1994 and it is with distress that I conclude
his judgment was diminished in 2007 when he became the first
professional Undersecretary of Defense for Intelligence (USDI),[1]
following Stephen Cambone, a political appointee himself with mixed
talents.[2]
Between the two of them, they turned defense intelligence into a
spending cesspool biased toward technical collection and mass data
storage, fully in line with what one author calls “Grand Theft
Pentagon.[3]”
Clapper’s tenure as Director of National Intelligence (DNI) can be
summed up quite simply: one trillion dollars spent, to no good
end. There is no question about Clapper’s being respected and trusted by
his own professionals. Nor is there any question as to Clapper’s
competence as an administrator. What is at question is the veracity of
his book – and its utility to the public – when it includes twenty
separate assertions that according to all available open source
evidence, are lies.[4]
In fairness to Clapper, there are three pre-existing conditions that
made it much easier for him to “go along” and much more difficult for
him to actually sound the alarm and insist on reform – as Amy Zegart has
documented so ably, the secret intelligence system is so corrupt and
dysfunctional that it can only be fixed with a Presidential mandate –
“fix big or don’t fix at all.”[5] Clapper went along to get along. The
pre-existing conditions are:
01 Strategic: Pay to Play. The
standard kick-back for both Senators and Representatives is 5%.[6] They
get this amount as donations to their Political Action Committees (PAC)
in return for keeping the money moving and growing regardless of need
or outcome. Bill Binney has provided recurring testimony on the National
Security Agency (NSA) as a case in point: they are not focused on
creating Signals Intelligence (SIGINT) that will put down traitors and
criminals including pedophiles as well as white collar criminals looting
the public treasury; rather they are there to “keep the money
moving”[7] to which I would add “and growing.” That is why NSA “leaders”
killed the internally-devised and very inexpensive Thin Thread
program[8] and instead spent billions on the extremely expensive
externally-devised (contractor) approach – a total failure –by Science
Applications International Corporation (SAIC).[9] NSA got to spend more
money without actually improving, and Members of Congress were richly
rewarded by SAIC and other contractors for authorizing and appropriating
funds not at all related to the public interest.
02 Operational: Budget-Building.
Chuck Spinney calls this the plans/reality mismatch,[10] but in the
absence of an intelligence community (IC) actually capable of evaluating
all threats, programs, and costs (true cost economics), and given the
corruption of both past Presidents and past Congresses all too willing
to borrow ever-increasing amounts of money (which is unconstitutional)
for ever-decreasing capabilities, what this really is an alternative to
competition for promotion – instead of fighting for promotion within a
closed system where you are either promoted or retired (or fired), the
game is to build the budget, hire more people, and create for yourself
endless promotional opportunities. As Bob Gates himself has pointed out,
no one in Washington gets fired for incompetence[11]. They do get
promoted if they can build their budget and hire more incompetents.
Expensive solutions that require more hiring and more spending, whether
they work or not, are the preferred objective for any aspiring chain of
command seeking to promote itself without having to compete for
otherwise limited jobs.
03 Tactical & Technical: Cult of Secrecy & Covert Operations. I nearly fell out of my chair when I read on page 159 of Clapper’s book the following sentence:
I always cautioned the president and secretaries that intelligence work was about acquiring and assessing foreign secrets, not predicting events or reading minds.
This is a blatant misrepresentation of the craft of intelligence.
Intelligence is about decision-support – the outputs, most of which can
be unclassified – not about secret collection, processing, and analysis,
a tiny fraction of the totality of threat, policy, and cost
information.[12] Intelligence is also, as my colleague Bill Binney has
reminded me, about predicting “intentions and capabilities.” I agree
with Bill when he concludes that Clapper went along with the prevailing
pathologies (as did Mike Hayden) and misdirected secret intelligence
toward excessive spending on technical collection and mass storage while
neglecting human collection, processing, analysis, and actually
producing useful decision-support.[13]
What is really at issue here is not Clapper’s intelligence and integrity
– both are adequate but insufficient to the challenges he faced – but
rather that secret intelligence as it is now mis-managed is very
expensive (both profitable and wasteful) and totally lacking in
accountability. It is a private playpen, at taxpayer expense, for an
extremely incestuous (relatively small) group of senior executives
(government employees), contracting executives (generally former
government employees), and their bankers. Open Source Intelligence
(OSINT), for which I have been the primary proponent since 1988, is very
inexpensive and can answer almost all questions for all levels of
government decision-making, while generally eradicating corruption and
waste with transparent overt counterintelligence.[14]
Clapper – and his book – are the ultimate manifestation of a secret
intelligence system that thrives on grand theft, mass murder, &
legalized lies while absolutely rejecting with malice and knowledge of
falsity, the value of OSINT – and machine-assisted meta-analytics –
precisely because they are not an expensive enough “solution” and even
worse, would call into question 70% or more of what we waste money on
now[15]
The Back Story
I started the OSINT revolution in 1988 within the halls of government,
in 1992 in the public domain after four years of being blown off by
colleagues obsessed with secret sources and methods and not willing to
listen to reason. The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), which I was
proud to work for as a clandestine operations officer for nine years,
has fought to marginalize me from day one. They were furious when Deputy
Director of Central Intelligence (DDCI) Admiral Bill Studeman, USN,
agreed to speak at my first conference on Open Source Solutions in 1992,
and ordered them to attend. CIA retaliated by ordering the Marine Corps
to forbid me from every running another OSINT conference again, at
which point I resigned from my position as the second-ranking civilian
in Marine Corps Intelligence to pursue a policy revolution in the public
interest – I have trained over 7,500 officers across 66+ countries,
only to see all of them repressed by their own intelligence agencies
being bribed and mis-directed by CIA and NSA to ignore the clear
potential of OSINT.[16]
In 2000, with the recommendations of the Aspin-Brown Commission firmly
in mind,[17] an Open Source Agency (OSA) was approved by the leadership
of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) with an Initial Operating
Capability (IOC) of $125M toward a Full Operational Capability (FOC)
budget of $2 billion, precisely as recommended by The Challenge of
Global Coverage study in the 1990’s.[18] Sadly the leadership changed
and we lost our earliest chance to transform modern intelligence.
For thirty years CIA has successfully handicapped both US and foreign
OSINT, insisting that OSINT is only about “media monitoring” now
including social media monitoring, and that it must be “passive.[19]”
CIA refuses to allow Active OSINT[20], which is the organized,
persistent, and broad harnessing of distributed overt human experts in
all languages – the people who know the 90% that is not in English, not
online, and not accessible by the rather retarded – by choice – secret
world. From China to Denmark to Zimbabwe, there has been a decisive
shift away from the CIA position in the past two years, and I believe
the craft of intelligence is about to see a massive multinational
transformation, which makes Clapper’s failure as USDI and Director of
National Intelligence (DNI) all the more tragic.
In 2007 when Clapper was first feeling his way into mega-management, he
appointed Colonel Vincent Stewart, USMC (today Lieutenant General and
Deputy Director of the US Cyber Command) to study OSINT, and to then
Colonel Stewart’s credit, he reached out to me and I gave him every
possible support. He told me later that in the course of his
investigations, he had never in his entire career seen more lying,
cheating, and backstabbing than he encountered from secret intelligence
professionals on this topic (OSINT) that they clearly saw as a
budget-buster. He too, however, found that he needed to “go along” and
OSINT was never properly championed by USDI.[21]
I now realize – this is my speculative interpretation – that in
2007-2009 USDI Clapper saw OSINT the same way that Director of Central
Intelligence (DCI) George Tenet saw it when he commissioned the study in
1997, The Challenge of Global Coverage,[22]
in which my former boss Boyd Sutton concluded after exhaustive
investigation, that we needed to spend $2 billion a year (in contrast to
$80 billion a year or so on secret sources and methods) on OSINT. The
number was devised by Keith Hall, then Director of the National
Reconnaissance Office (NRO) and previously Director of the Budget Staff
for the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI) in a very simple
fashion: 200 countries and topics not covered by secret intelligence,
times $10 million a year for a range of offline and online monitoring
and international (not just US) Subject Matter Experts (SME) focused on
each of the 200 topics, thus providing a “safety net” or baseline
capability. As Boyd told me, when he delivered these findings to George
in 1997, George said “I am locking this study up, we will speak of it no
more.” Boyd’s interpretation, and my own, was that George was
distressed by the fact that the study not only did not justify a massive
increase in secret spending, but it actually opened to door to taking
the US IC toward 100% satisfaction of all US Government (USG)
decision-support needs at a tiny fraction of the cost of what we are
spending on secret sources and methods that provide “at best” 4% of what
a major commander needs (and nothing for everyone else)[23].
I tried one more time, in 2010, this time with the assistance of Joe
Markowitz, the former Director of the Community Open Source Program
Office (COSPO), which was itself gutted in the 1990’s by then Deputy
Director of Central Intelligence for Community Management (DDCI/CM) Joan
Dempsey, herself an intimate of Clapper’s at the time, who refused to
create a community-wide OSINT program equivalent to the community-wide
programs for the other disciplines. Although OMB senior staff again
agreed with Joe and I that there was a need for an OSA at $2 billion a
year, OMB’s approval was contingent on a Cabinet Department asking for
it, and Clapper had refused to entertain our leadership and staff
briefings in 2009.[24] I have the impression that CIA has very
successfully blocked my approaches to each of a secession of Secretaries
of State, all of whom would have benefited enormously from this
capability.
William Binney’s[25] experience with Thin Thread – an inexpensive
elegant way to find the needles in the digital haystack – mirrors my own
with OSINT, which is an inexpensive elegant way to do global coverage
and achieve 100% decision-support capability at the strategic,
operational or policy, tactical, and technical (acquisition) levels.
Clapper, Hayden, all of the so-called leaders of the US IC have not only
focused on spending as much money as possible as foolishly as possible,
but they have discarded the Constitution and the ethical obligations
associated with the oaths of office. Below is Bill’s summary of the
situation[26], which I take to be a signal (pun intended) failure by
Clapper and Hayden particularly.
As I summed it up for the Intelligence Policy Committee in the House of
Lords in the United Kingdom, drawing on Snowden’s materials, mass
surveillance is very bad for five reasons:
First, mass acquisition of everyone’s data (emails, texts, calls) creates an omni-powerful central government that achieves Stasi-like, Gestapo-like, Stalinist-like, capabilities.Second, mass acquisition makes the analysts dysfunctional – we are not doing the meta-data pattern analysis and anomaly detection but are instead burying the analysts with noise, which is why they can no longer achieve any sort of early warning on anything. We have lost the ability and the human skills necessary to predict “intentions and capabilities.”Third, mass acquisition has turned the US IC – NSA particularly – into forensics agencies (basically a law enforcement job).
Fourth, mass acquisition has been weaponized for political purposes, with US IC agencies (as well as allied agencies such as GCHQ[27] ) using their capabilities for political advantage.
Fifth, mass acquisition is extremely expensive in its demands for data storage with its attendant energy and water consumption levels, and is doomed.
Put most simply, whatever modest achievements Clapper may claim since
the mid-1990’s when he took over the General Defense Intelligence
Program (GDIP) as well as the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), his
career suffers from two tangible sucking chest wounds:
01 He failed to leverage OSINT and remained stuck at 4% performance after spending a trillion dollars.
02 He allowed NSA under Hayden to destroy Thin Thread and both
machine-assisted meta-analytics and human analysis, and instead embark
on a massive unconstitutional very expensive and ultimately doomed
attempt to spy on everyone digitally, particularly and illegally
including all US citizens.
Review of the Book
There were three aspects of the book that I found useful.
First, I was glad to read Clapper’s history and learn that he was
doubly-blessed. His father was a founding Colonel in the Air Force
SIGINT service; and he was selected as an aide to a flag officer early
on. In combination it is clear that Clapper – whose intellect and
integrity I admired in the early 1990’s – climbed quickly with those two
assists, and later in life, as a trusted water-carrier to
neo-conservative Bob Gates.
Second, the chapter “Consumed by Money” is worthy of inclusion in
mid-career courses, and also noteworthy for observing that we are
spending 20-25% of our total secret intelligence budget on Information
Technology (IT) – but in a very significant omission, Clapper neglects
to point out that for all that money, we process less than 1% of what we
collect[28], and simply do not have the “tools for thinking” that CIA
itself identified as necessary in 1985-1989.[29]
Third, the chapter “Snowden” is in my own view both a study in denial
and a study in hypocrisy – but I acknowledge that people I respect feel
very strongly to the contrary[30]. I am particularly galled by Clapper’s
praise for Mike Hayden, who is richly deserving of being recalled to
active duty for court martial – this is a man who violated the
Constitution twice, first in engaging in warrantless wiretapping and
mass surveillance at NSA[31], and then in fully embracing rendition and
torture and then drone assassinations with a 98% collateral damage
ratio, at CIA[32]. The idea that Snowden’s leaks are a threat to
national security when compared to NSA’s 100,000 interception points
across America and its many back-doors inserted into Dell, HP, IBM,
Intel, and other products with the active complicity of the leaders of
those companies (in gross violation of all their fiduciary
responsibilities) is for me absurd[33].
The book falls short on multiple fronts. Sadly, it fails to actually
outline lessons learned and a vision for an effective USG intelligence
function capable of answering decision-support needs across all
functions and levels of government. This book does not remotely approach
the substance of my own writings[34], or the three hundred books on
intelligence by others that I have respectfully reviewed[35]. There is
exactly one good idea in this book, on page 139, where Clapper, via his
ghost writer, articulates the need for a separate consolidated
intelligence authorization and appropriation, eliminating the
fragmentation, duplication, and mismanagement of the individual
intelligence elements within each Cabinet Department. I agree.
I searched in vain for learned information about where the various
intelligence disciplines from Human Intelligence (HUMINT) to Signals
Intelligence (SIGINT) and Imagery Intelligence (IMINT), to Measurements
and Signatures Intelligence (MASINT) or the various functional domains
from analysis to counterintelligence to processing, might be improved. I
note with pointed dismay that then Major General Vince Stewart, USMC,
Director of Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) who once championed OSINT
within USDI, is mentioned only once in this book, and I put that down to
Vince having the balls to publicly suggest that DIA today is
irrelevant[36]. Lieutenant General Mike Flynn, USA, Vince’s predecessor,
agreed with my own appraisal in 2014 of DIA as totally
dysfunctional[37]. OSINT is of course not mentioned in this book.
At a political level, this is a book of lies that not only refuses to
acknowledge the multiple false flag operations (I ran a false flag
operation for the CIA) used to start wars of profit on the basis of
lies, it also continues to retell many lies Clapper told while serving
as DNI, the two most important lies being that NSA does not spy on US
citizens (it actually collects every email and every phone call of every
US citizen with those of Members of Congress being the highest
priority); and that the Russians hacked the election[38]. Clapper’s
vitriolic hatred for our President Donald Trump is clearly captured in
the following quote on page 399:
We have elected someone as president of the United States whose first instincts are to twist and distort truth to his advantage, to generate financial benefit to himself and his family, and in so doing, to demean the values this country has traditionally stood for. He has set a new low bar for ethics and morality. He has caused damage to our societal and political fabric that will be difficult and will require time to repair. And close to my heart, he has besmirched the Intelligence Community and the FBI – pillars of our country – and deliberately incited many Americans to lose faith and confidence in them.
These are insulting words, malicious words, presumably with knowledge of
falsity, and they also violate the standing order against disrespect
for the President by any serving or retired member of the Armed Forces.
Among the many misrepresentations that Clapper and his ghost-writer
integrate into his book are these, all part of the official narrative,
and all known to be and documented to be lies:[39]
● 9/11 [40]
● Assange in Sweden [41]
● Benghazi [42]
● Bin Laden Raid [43]
● Boston Bombing [44]
● David Petraeus Firing [45]
● Gulf of Tonkin [46]
● Hillary Clinton is a Saint [47]
● Intelligence Community Fails Because of Others [48]
● Intelligence Community Has Ethics [49]
● Intelligence Community is Apolitical (No Witch-hunt) [50]
● Intelligence Community Speaks Truth to Power [51]
● Iraq Weapons of Mass Destruction [52]
● ISIS/ISIL (Islamic State of Iraq and Syria / Levant) [53]
● North Korea Unwilling to Denuclearize [54]
● NSA Not Spying on US Citizens (or Members of Congress) [55]
● President Donald Trump is Disgrace to America [56]
● Russians Penetrated Democratic National Committee (DNC) Computers [57]
● Russians “Hacked” the Election [58]
● Syrian Use of Chemical Weapons[59]
● Assange in Sweden [41]
● Benghazi [42]
● Bin Laden Raid [43]
● Boston Bombing [44]
● David Petraeus Firing [45]
● Gulf of Tonkin [46]
● Hillary Clinton is a Saint [47]
● Intelligence Community Fails Because of Others [48]
● Intelligence Community Has Ethics [49]
● Intelligence Community is Apolitical (No Witch-hunt) [50]
● Intelligence Community Speaks Truth to Power [51]
● Iraq Weapons of Mass Destruction [52]
● ISIS/ISIL (Islamic State of Iraq and Syria / Levant) [53]
● North Korea Unwilling to Denuclearize [54]
● NSA Not Spying on US Citizens (or Members of Congress) [55]
● President Donald Trump is Disgrace to America [56]
● Russians Penetrated Democratic National Committee (DNC) Computers [57]
● Russians “Hacked” the Election [58]
● Syrian Use of Chemical Weapons[59]
The two most significant omissions in this book – apart from its lacking
substantive value in relation to reforming and transforming the craft
of intelligence to enable evidence-based governance in the public
interest – are counterintelligence, and OSINT. Other than repeating the
fabricated narrative about the Russians as the “main enemy” (the Cold
War line in cyber-clothing) Clapper ignores what one author calls
“Friendly Spies” among whom Zionist Israel clearly stands out.[60]
I strongly suspect that Clapper is fully aware that the pedophilia
entrapment and blackmail operations of suspected Mossad officers Jeffrey
Epstein[61] and Ghislaine Maxwell are being carried out with the
complicity of the CIA and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and
the Zionists are also the primary force behind computer penetrations on
Capitol Hill, such as those carried out by Debbie Wasserman Schultz and
her Pakistani “patsies” on behalf of the Mossad.[62]
I strongly suspect that one reason Clapper does not address
counterintelligence in this book – the traitors among us – is because he
is well aware that Israel – Zionist Israel – is America’s greatest
enemy when it comes to the subversion of the US economy, the USG, and US
society (e.g. via Hollywood and its culture of pedophilia long promoted
by Disney and the likes of Shirley Temple)[63], but Zionist Israel and
the Zionist secret police and lead censors in the US, the
Anti-Defamation League (ADL), are the “trusted flaggers” for
#GoogleGestapo, controlled across the board by the Zionists on behalf of
the Deep State, with the primary mission right now of digitally
assassinating conservative voices and subverting the Presidency of
Donald Trump.[64]
His deliberate omission of OSINT is to be expected and is a minor footnote within his larger epitaph.
He ends his career with a whimper as the consummate bureaucrat unable to produce a truly great book.
Epilogue
After completing my endnotes I conclude that Clapper – however much he
might be respected by those he has worked with – has betrayed the
intelligence profession and the Republic. Together with John Brennan,
Mike Hayden, and George Tenet, he represents – whether intentionally or
unwittingly – the profound loss of intelligence and integrity and
imagination within the US secret intelligence community.[65]
IMAGE Credit: Collage and original Benghazi graphic created by Robert David Steele.
Notes
[1]Editors, “Undersecretary of Defense for Intelligence,” Wikipedia, undated, accessed 13 June 2018.
[2]Cambone
had one bright shining moment in 2004 when he articulated a need for
universal coverage by intelligence, at the neighborhood level of
granularity, and appeared to grasp that this could only be accomplished
with Open Source Intelligence (OSINT). Stephen Cambone, “Undersecretary
of Defense for Intelligence, Speech to the Security Affairs Support
Association (SAS) on Need for Universal Coverage at the Neighborhood
Level of Granularity,” Phi Beta Iota Public Intelligence Blog,
22 January 2004. Other than that he spent his time as a wonk and water
carrier for neo-conservatives, with a strong belief that tactical
nuclear weapons were both necessary and utilizable. Editors, “Stephen Cambone,” Wikipedia, undated, accessed 13 June 2018.
[3]Jeffrey St. Clair, GRAND THEFT PENTAGON: Tales of Corruption and Profiteering in the War on Terror(Common Courage Press, 2005). A summary review is free online.
[4]There
is an important difference between asserting that something is a lie,
and asserting that the person conveying that information is a liar.
Absent an investigation with the power to compel sworn testimony and a
polygraph examination, we cannot know if Clapper is repeating these lies
because he believes them, or if he is willfully lying himself. When I
refer to Clapper’s telling a lie, this distinction is very much in mind.
I will leave it to others to decide if Clapper is a serial liar by
intent; here is one article on that point: Jonathan Turley, “James Clapper's perjury, and why DC made men don't get charged for lying to Congress,” USA Today, 19 January 2018.
[5]Amy Zegart, Flawed by Design: The Evolution of the CIA, JCS, and NSC (Stanford, 1999). A summary review isfree online. My life’s work on intelligence reform is easily accessible at http://robertdavidsteele.com.
Bill Binney and I have agreed that we can eliminate 70% of all of the
secret intelligence agencies, and consolidate the 30% worth saving from
each as new directorates in a revitalized Central (Classified)
Intelligence Agency balanced by an Open Source Agency (OSA) in the
Executive Office of the Presidency (EOP) and hence not subject to
repression or manipulation by the secret world. The DNI can be
eliminated, and the National Intelligence Council (NIC) moved to the
EOP, perhaps occupying the White House space now being wasted on the
worthless fake news mainstream media press corps, or made the senior
element reporting to the Deputy Director of OMB for Management. The time
has come to fix big and that means transforming national intelligence
to the point that it can ably and inexpensively address all threats, all
policies, all costs, all the time for all possible consumers down to
desk officer and front line leader (military and police). Preliminary
recommendations including public education and election reform
pre-requisites are at Robert Steele, “Trump 2.0: Build the Base, Go Long (25 Years),” Phi Beta Iota Public Intelligence Blog, 12 March 2018, and Robert Steele, For the President of the United States of America Donald Trump: Subject:
Eradicating Fake News and False Intelligence with an Open Source Agency
That Also Supports Defense, Diplomacy, Development, & Commerce
(D3C) Innovation to Stabilize World. Earth Intelligence Network, 2017.
[6]As told to me by a former Director of the Budget Staff, Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI).
[7]I
first heard Bill Binney, who is now a monthly luncheon friend, make
this point at Hackers on Planet Earth (HOPE) in New York City in 2010.
Binney is to NSA as I am to CIA – if President Trump ever wants to “fix
big” we know how to melt down 70% of the IC (with a soft landing for all
who are dismissed including contractors), and consolidate the remaining
30% into a revitalized CIA complemented by an Open Source Agency (OSA).
[8]William Binney, “Thin Thread – Signals Intelligence within the Rule of Law,” Phi Beta Iota Public Intelligence Blog, 3 March 2018, integrating full text of Diane Rourk, “Thin Thread,” White Paper, May 2002.
[9]Editors, “Trailblazer Project,” Wikipedia, undated, accessed 13 June 2018.
[10]Franklin “Chuck” Spinney, Defense Facts of Life: The Plans/Reality Mismatch (Westview Press, 1985). A summary review is free online. See also Chuck Spinney, “Defense Dependency?” TIME,
13 November 2012 in which he summarizes his views on how government
specification cost plus engineering pioneered by the US military has
totally destroyed the intellectual and moral integrity of engineers
across all commercial sectors.
[11]Bob Gates, “Why Bureaucracies So Often Fail Us,” ABC News, 29 January 2017, excerpt from A Passion for Leadership: Lessons on Change and Reform from Fifty Years of Public Service (Vintage,
2017). I have ordered the book. It is possible that Gates, like Robert
McNamara and Bill Colby, has grown and reformed himself in his
post-service years. His new book is potentially important if it matches
the excerpt in quality. His book, From the Shadows: The Ultimate Insider’s Story of Five Presidents and How They Won the Cold War (Simon
& Schuster, 1997) was quite extraordinary from a policy relations
points of view, less so from the craft of intelligence standpoint since
Gates has always been a policy wonk rather than an all-source
intelligence professional. Still, that was the standard I was expecting
for Clapper’s book that Clapper and his ghost-writer have failed to
meet. A summary review of From the Shadows is free online.
[12]Intelligence
has never been properly defined within the US IC. To its credit, CIA
understands this, see for instance Michael Warner, “Wanted: A Definition of Intelligence – Understanding Our Craft,” Studies in Intelligence, Vol. 46 No. 3, 2002, which concludes, erroneously, that Intelligence is secret, state activity to understand or influence foreign entities. No,
it is not. Apart from the matter of needing to eradicate covert
operations including false flag operations and regime change operations,
intelligence done right is about decision-support. The process of
intelligence is one that starts with a requirement, moves on to
all-source collection, then multi-media processing and multi-lingual
analytics, and finally toward presentation to a decision-maker of facts,
estimates, known gaps, and speculative links. Most of what the US IC
does is classified information; there is very little “intelligence”
being produced. My own chapter, “The Evolving Craft of Intelligence,” in Robert Dover, Michael Goodman, and Claudia Hillebrand (eds.). RoutledgeCompanion to Intelligence Studies,
Oxford, UK: Routledge, July 31, 2013 explicitly addresses the three
eras of the craft, from secret war to strategic analytics to collective
intelligence. The US IC is 30 years behind the times precisely because
they have sought to marginalize all those seeking to reform them,
including Commandant of the Marine Corps Al Gray, whose article I
ghost-wrote, see “Global Intelligence Challenges in the 1990’s,” American Intelligence Journal, Winter 1989-1990, pp. 37-41. That was my first public article ever. It was followed in quick succession by “Intelligence in the 1990’s: Recasting National Security in a Changing World,”American Intelligence Journal, Summer/Fall 1990, pp. 29-36 and “Applying the ‘New Paradigm’: How to Avoid Strategic Intelligence Failures in the Future,” American Intelligence Journal, Autumn 1991, pp. 43-46. I was invited to help develop the National Security Act of 1992, a story told in “The National Security Act of 1992,” American Intelligence Journal,
Winter 1992, pp. 32-37. That reform effort was derailed by Senator John
Warner (R-VA) who refused to place at risk a single job in Virginia
even if the reforms would achieve savings and radically increase the
value of intelligence to the Republic. All of my publications can be
seen free online.
[13]William Binney to Robert Steele, personal communication (electronic mail), 13 June 2018.
[14]Supra Note
8. Thin Thread is now ethically and legally available from Pretty Good
Knowledge, a Dutch company based in Amsterdam and founded by William
Binney and Kirk Wiebe with Dutch partners. When applied to banking and
other transactions as available to the USG both within and outside the
secret world, it immediately reveals patterns and anomalies associated
with overpayments, duplicate payments, erroneous payments, and outright
collusion among Members of Congress and those who are looting the public
purse.
[15]It
is now legal to propagandize (lie to) the US public, at the same time
that the Department of Justice claims the right to lie to anyone,
including the Supreme Court, when asserting national security privilege.
I have written books,chapters, and articles about
the urgent need for intelligence reform (and more recently, about world
peace and prosperity). My reviews of three hundred non-fiction books
about the pathologies of secret intelligence as now practiced are free online. To understand the clash between secret and open intelligence cultures, see Robert Steele, “Modern History of Public Intelligence and the Opposition,” Phi Beta Iota Public Intelligence Blog, 25 June 2004, also available as a downloadable document.
[16]Cf. “OSINT Historic Contributions Directory,” Phi Beta Iota Public Intelligence Blog, 10 July 2011.
[17]Robert Steele, “Foreign Liaison and Intelligence Reform: Still in Denial,” International Journal of Intelligence and Counterintelligence, 20/1 Spring 2007, pp. 167-174, citing Preparing for the 21st Century: An Appraisal of US Intelligence,
Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1 March 1996. They found US
IC capabilities in the OSINT arena to be “severely deficient” and
recommended that this be a top priority for additional funding and a top
priority for DCI (then George Tenet) attention.
[18]The
Deputy Director of OMB approved it over dinner and then moved on to run
the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) before the
program decision could be locked down. Personal communications (face to
face) with a most senior OMB civil servant in 2000. See also Boyd
Sutton, “The Challenge of Global Coverage,” Phi Beta Iota Public Intelligence Blog, 18 July 1997; and Boyd Sutton, “Global Coverage, Looking Backward, Looking Forward,” Phi Beta Iota Public Intelligence Blog, 24 December 2006. More recently – this is still the most catastrophic failure in the US IC, Boyd Sutton, “Open Source and the World Brain,” Phi Beta Iota Public Intelligence Blog,
31 March 2014. A story about the Burundi exercise, in which Robert
Steele soundly defeated the entire US IC with six phone calls, is
provided by Noah Shachtman, “How to Restore Spies Credibility: Go Open Source,” WIRED, 14 December 2007.
[19]Online
information is roughly 1% of what can be known from a combination of
offline analog information and human knowledge accessed directly on a
person to person basis. CIA’s obsession with forbidding the exploitation
of overt human sources because that somehow diminishes their
“ownership” of HUMINT for which they are the primary proponent, is
criminally insane. Any Director of CIA who fails to properly exploit all
human sources, overt as well as covert, should be fired for ignorance
and incompetence. Cf. Robert Steele, Human Intelligence: All Humans, All Minds, All the Time, Carlisle, PA: Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College Press, 3 June 2010.
[20]Cf. Robert Steele, “Royal Danish Defence College: Lecture by Robert Steele on Open Source Intelligence Done Right,” Copenhagen, Denmark: Royal Danish Defence College, April 18, 2016. OFFICIAL VIDEO 59 Minutes; and “Robert Steele on OSINT – Why and How,”
Copenhagen, Denmark: Government of Denmark, April 18-20, 2016, as
commissioned and presented to military, police, and national services.
BRIEFING. The original monograph is Robert. The New Craft of Intelligence: Achieving Asymmetric Advantage in the Face of Nontraditional Threats,Carlisle, PA: Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College, Press, 1 February 2002; the original book is Robert Steele, The
New Craft of Intelligence: Personal, Public, & Political–Citizen’s
Action Handbook for Fighting Terrorism, Genocide, Disease, Toxic Bombs,
& Corruption, Open Source Solutions, Inc., 2002.
[21]From
2005-2008 there was an Assistant Director of National Intelligence for
Open Source, because Congressman Rob Simmons (R-CT-02) was making a fuss
during his tenure from 2001-2007. The combination of the individual
appointed (a former enlisted man without the global contacts and
knowledge needed to properly champion OSINT), CIA’s continued opposition
to OSINT, and Congressman Simmon’s loss of the 2006 election assured
the demise of OSINT as a contender for serious attention. Although I was
interviewed for the 9/11 Commission and its report includes a
recommended Open Source Agency on pages 23 and 423, that recommendation
was ignored by all DNIs from that date forward. Robert Steele, “Graphic: 9-11 Commission Open Source Agency,” Phi Beta Iota Public Intelligence Blog, 1 January 2010, citing 9-11 Commission Report: Final Report of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States,
26 July 2004. As found on Page 23 in the Summary and Page 413 within
Chapter 13, “How to Do It? A Different Way of Organizing the
Government.”
[22]Boyd Sutton, “The Challenge of Global Coverage,” Phi Beta Iota Public Intelligence Blog, 18 July 1997; and Boyd Sutton, “Global Coverage, Looking Backward, Looking Forward,” Phi Beta Iota Public Intelligence Blog, 24 December 2006. More recently – this is still the most catastrophic failure in the US IC, Boyd Sutton, “Open Source and the World Brain,” Phi Beta Iota Public Intelligence Blog, 31 March 2014.
[23]General
Tony Zinni, USMC, then Commanding General US Central Command
(USCENTCOM), engaged in two wars and twelve joint task force actions, is
on record at stating that he received, “at best,” 4% of what he needed
to know from the US IC. Editors, “Graphic: Tony Zinni on 4% ‘At Best’,” Phi Beta Iota Public Intelligence Blog,
7 December 2010. It merits comment that the Aspin-Brown Commission,
after receiving my testimony and commissioning a competition between
myself and the entire US IC on the topic of Burundi, concluded that we
were right and in its report directed that OSINT be a top priority for
funding and a top priority for the DCI. Tenet, preoccupied with his Gold
War on Russia and his preparation for supporting Dick Cheney’s 9/11,
ignored the Commission findings and recommendations. Preparing for the 21st Century: An Appraisal of U.S. Intelligence(GPO, 1997); Fred Burks, “Black Eagle Trust Fund,” WantToKnow.Info, 3 June 2011; and 9/11 @ Phi Beta Iota.
[24]Prior
to meeting with senior OMB staff we tried to secure Clapper’s interest
with two briefings, one for the leadership and one for the staff. Robert
Steele and Joe Markowitz, “DoD OSINT Leadership and Staff Briefings,” Phi Beta Iota Public Intelligence Blog, 10 September 2009.
[25]William
Binney, the former NSA Technical Leader and later Technical Director
for Military and Geopolitical Analysis & Reporting (6,000 people),
reported NSA to the Inspectors General of both the Department of Justice
(DoJ) and Department of Defense (DoD) for being far outside the rule of
law and corrupt to boot. The FBI was brought in to intimidate him
(including pointing a gun at his head while he was in the shower – and
he is a double amputee) but soon found that there was so much legal
back-stopping that they could not repress that they gave up their
unjustified harassment campaign. He continues to be mis-represented by
the mass media and #GoogleGestapo (including Wikipedia) as a “fringe”
voice, when in fact his is one of the most authentic, inclusive, and
truthful voices available to the President and Congress and the public
on this vital topic.
[26]William Binney to Robert Steele, personal communication (electronic mail), 14 June 2018.
[27]GCHQ is the British counterpart to NSA, Government Communications Headquarters.
[28]The
1% number is actually consistent with the low standards in the private
sector, where less than 1% of the “big data” in hand is analyzed. Yoda, “Mary Meeker’s Internet Report 2014 — Explosion in Hand-Helds and Data — Less Than 1% of Data Analyzed,” Phi Beta Iota Public Intelligence Blog,
29 May 2014. He also fails to mention – and may not even be aware of –
the looming specter of Amazon, funded by the US taxpayer, which is now
cross-correlating across intelligence, military, homeland security, and
law enforcement data entrusted to them, to create the ultimate police
state cloud, one that includes exquisite live streaming analysis and
facial Rekognition. He appears
unaware of the fact that Amazon is going to destroy all those who rely
on Amazon cloud and infrastructure services to serve the USG, and end up
being the “sole source” provider when they are all priced out of the
Amazon cloud and Amazon, “with a rectal grin,” becomes the only choice.
Amazon is very likely collaborating with the Zionists and making
everything Amazon touches available in Tel Aviv, never mind client
restrictions. Learn more at Arnold Amazon @ Phi Beta Iota.
[29]Diane Webb et al, CATALYST: Computer-Aided Tools for the Analysis of Science & Technology, Washington, DC: Central Intelligence Agency Office of Scientific and Weapons Research, October 1989. See also Robert Steele, “Worth a Look: 1989 All-Source Fusion Analytic Workstation – The Four Requirements Documents,” Phi Beta Iota Public Intelligence Blog,
31 January 2010. The Marine Corps won the Joint National Intelligence
Development Staff (JNIDS) competition in 1989 as I recall, only to have
the win over-turned by the Admiral in charge of JNIDS who was reported
to me years after that fact to have said “We are a Navy shop, we will do
a Navy problem.” No one on his staff had the integrity to at least tell
me so I could spin up the Commandant of the Marine Corps, or more
dangerously, to point out to the Admiral that he was in charge of a
joint national shop, not a Navy shop. Such unethical decisions are made
by careerists every single day and that is a major part of why the US IC
is pathologically dysfunctional and not worth what we are paying for
it. Today, decades after the requirements for “tools for thinking” were
clearly articulated; decades after the Advanced Information Processing
and Analysis Steering Group (AIPASG) of which I was founding member,
surveyed the entire US IC on these needs, we still do not have
meta-analytics or desktop analytics. Amazon is developing in some scary
directions and could end up hijacking the USG data function if wiser
ethical leadership is not forthcoming. This is probably the single
largest threat to the future of the Trump Administration, and one that
has not been briefed to the President. For my own recent thoughts on
where we need to go see the varied works linked at Robert Steele, ”Core Works for Those New to My Work,” Phi Beta Iota Public Intelligence Blog, 4 March 2018. On the Amazon threat to US data integrity, see Arnold Amazon @ Phi Beta Iota. A formal briefing with intimate details is available from Stephen E. Arnold.
[30]Several
of my former CIA operations course (1979) classmates are spread across
the USG in very senior positions, and I consult them when I write,
particularly when I write critically on national security and national
intelligence issues. The prevailing consensus among those still serving
is that Snowden materially degraded the ability of NSA to be effective,
while also violating every oath and commitment he ever made regarding
his duty to keep secret that with which he was entrusted. As much as I
abhor any violation of any oath, I cannot ignore the fact that Mike
Hayden’s warrantless wiretapping along with his rejection of Thin
Thread, and his embrace of rendition and torture as well as drone
assassination at CIA, are the greater threats from a presidential and
public perspective. Snowden, like Daniel Ellsberg, appears to have
served a greater good. In brief, the pervasiveness of secrecy across
both the government and in the private sector today (e.g. financial
fraud, #GoogleGestapo), and the crimes against the public that this
secrecy makes possible, strongly mitigate and recommend the value of
what Snowden did in directing public attention to the pathologies of a
national security state that is completely unaccountable to the Courts,
Congress, or the public – a national security state that is now known to
have targeted the Trump campaign with between 7 and 10 human
informants, while collaborating with GCHQ against presidential candidate
Trump, all under the personal direction of then President Barack Obama.
The crimes – and the motivations – simply cannot be compared. Cf. Editors, “Edward Snowden,” Wikipedia, undated, accessed 16 June 2018, and Ewen MacAskill and Alex Hern, “INTERVIEW Edward Snowden: “The people are still powerless, but now they’re aware,” The Guardian,
4 June 2018. The latter reference cites Sir David Omand crediting
Snowden with hastening attention toward a sounder and more transparent
legal framework. Shortly I will be reviewing David Omand and Mark
PhythianPrincipled Spying: The Ethics of Secret Intelligence (Georgetown
University Press, 2018). I was, as is generally the case, a quarter
century ahead of the pack with my own Robert Steele. “E3i: Ethics, Ecology, Evolution, & Intelligence,” Whole Earth Review, Fall 1992, pp. 74-79 and my companion statement to Silicon Valley, Robert Steele, “God, Man, & Information: Comments to Interval In-House,”
Palo Alto, CA: Interval, 9 March 1993, at the invitation of Rob Tow.
The best book today on truth (which is inherently ethical) is John
Caputo, Truth: Philosophy in Transit(Penguin Global, 2014).
[31]As
Director of NSA Hayden violated the Constitution and the law with
impunity. He was clearly told by his senior officers that the war clause
did not apply. Cf. Bill Binney, “Ed Loomis Jr. Letter to TIME on ‘The Spy Masters’ by Massimo Calabresi,” Phi Beta Iota Public Intelligence Blog, 9 June 2018.
[32]Robert Steele, “Book Reviews: Rebuttal -- Lies Presented as Truth; BROKEN – The Truth as Fiction,” Ethical Human Psychology and Psychiatry, Volume 18, Number 2, 2016, pp. 163-166; and Robert Steele, “Review Essay: UNHINGED: drone assassination – American suicide,” Intelligence and National Security, 33/1, March 2017, pp. 145-150.
[33]I
wrote the first warning letter to the White House on
cyber-vulnerabilities, and was shocked in later years to learn that
instead of protecting US commercial communications and computing
capabilities as the White House asked NSA to do in 1994, it instead
inserted backdoors with the complicity of the CEOs, for its own
convenience, actually making it easier for others to hack into
cyber-systems. Robert Steele, with James Anderson, William Caelli, and
Winn Schwartau, “Correspondence, Sounding the Alarm on Cyber Security,” McLean, VA: Open Source Solutions, Inc., August 23, 1994.
[34]My
first two books, each with a Foreword by a past or serving Chairman of
the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI), Senator David Boren
(D-OK) and Senator Pat Roberts (R-KS) remain classics – and are never
cited – there appears to be an absolute ban on anyone citing anything I
have ever written, and all of the camp followers are compliant with that
ban. Robert Steele, On Intelligence: Spies and Secrecy in an Open World, Open Source Solutions, Inc., 2001; and Robert Steele, The
New Craft of Intelligence: Personal, Public, & Political–Citizen’s
Action Handbook for Fighting Terrorism, Genocide, Disease, Toxic Bombs,
& Corruption, Open Source Solutions, Inc., 2002. See all my publications free online.
[35]Robert Steele, “Worth a Look: Book Reviews on Government Secret Intelligence,” Phi Beta Iota Public Intelligence Blog, 24 August 2011 updated 20 July 2015.
[36]Stew Magnuson, “DIA Chief Fears Agency Becoming Irrelevant,” National Defense, 7 June 2017.
[37]Robert Steele, “On Defense Intelligence: Seven Strikes,” CounterPunch, July 2, 2014.
[38]I
and 30 others – including President Barack Obama until he received his
instructions from the Deep State to the contrary – decisively refuted
the Russian narrative created by Brennan and supported by Clapper. Cf. Robert Steele, “The
Soft Coup Collapses – Blackmail Revealed – What Next? CIA was bluffing,
produced no evidence – Russians did not “hack” the election. Is this
the beginning of the end of the Deep State in the USA? Can Trump clean
house & wage peace? (Trump Revolution 06),” Phi Beta Iota Public Intelligence Blog, 9 January 2017 also on Amazon Kindle; and Robert Steele, “US
IC Allegations Against Russians Are Crap — Our Own Traitors, Not the
Russians, Are the Real Enemy, Fake Evidence & Fake News – UPDATE 22,” Phi Beta Iota Public Intelligence Blog, 30 December 2016. The CIA report on Russian “hacking” is all about Russian Today,
a relatively mediocre overt media operation. On page A-13 the CIA
report states that CIA’s conclusions are not based on evidence. The
Russians did not “hack” anything of significance; the only person who
“hacked” the election was Hillary Clinton, who stole thirteen primaries
from Bernie Sanders with electronic voting machine fraud. Cf. Mongoose, “Hillary Clinton Electoral Fraud Confirmed by Stanford University — Bernie Sanders Won…” Phi Beta Iota Public Intelligence Blog, 7 August 2016.
[39]I
am choosing to not include the case of Manning or the case of MH-17
allegedly being shot down by the Russians rather than being a false
flag, but both of these are also, in my view based on open sources I
have read, being mis-represented by this book. It is a truly sorry
situation when the capstone book by America’s recently retired top
intelligence officer appears to be completely divorced from reality. On
these two instances, see Manning @ Phi Beta Iota and MH-17 @ Phi Beta Iota.
[40]9/11
was planned by the Zionists from 1988. They had to wait for ZioCon Dick
Cheney to become Vice President with a well-intentioned but easily
manipulable President, to pull it off. Thirteen countries warned us
months in advance, in each instance Dick Cheney swore them to secrecy
and then promptly declared, months in advance, a national
counterterrorism exercise for “the day” such that he could control
everything. The dogs were removed two weeks in advance and not allowed
to return. The Federal Emergency and Management Agency (FEMA) command
and control center was set up the night before on the piers of NYC.
Zionist companies spent a year in advance of 9/11 deepening the channel
so the crime scene could be destroyed and exported as quickly as
possible (this is a general indicator of all false flags, note how each
club or school mass casualty event is promptly followed by the
demolition of the crime scene). As best we can tell the three towers in
NYC were brought down by controlled demolitions, with the airplanes
simulated by drones and of course nothing at all hit WTC 7. The Pentagon
was hit by a missile and the FBI has been covering everything up from
day one. Robert Mueller, as Director of the FBI appointed coincident
with 9/11, spent every moment from the day of his appointment covering
up for Dick Cheney. Cf. 9/11 @ Phi Beta Iota and more generally, False Flag @ Phi Beta Iota.
[41]Assange
had consensual sex with two adult groupies and all charges have since
been dropped. The irresponsible depiction of Assange in this book is
defamatory and malicious. Cf. Assange @ Phi Beta Iota.
[42]The
chapter on Benghazi is a cover-up. It tells a superficial tale that
avoids the core truths: that Libya was sold to the French by Hillary
Clinton in return for contributions to the Clinton Foundation – the
French were angry about not getting a better oil deal from Libya – while
the US stole Libya’s gold deposits; that we had SEVEN HOURS in which to
save Ambassador Stevens (who may well have been covering up CIA supply
lines in to rebels in Syria to include surface to air missiles) – both
Hillary Clinton and Leon Panetta failed to act when alerted SEVEN HOURS
prior to the death of Ambassador Stevens, even though the US had ample
assets within 1-2 hours of the danger zone. The book naturally does not
address all of the evils that CIA was fostering in the region,
specifically including regime change in Syria. See especially Berto
Jongman, “Benghazi – Leon Panetta Lied, Clinton Refused Pentagon Offer of Timely Help,” Phi Beta Iota Public Intelligence Blog, 18 October 2016; Berto Jongman, “Brennan, Clapper, Hillary & 400 SAMs from Benghazi to Al Qaeda,” Phi Beta Iota Public Intelligence Blog, 13 August 2013; and Robert Steele, “Graphic:
Benghazi Fiasco Master Post with Links to All Posts, Map of DoD Assets
Ordered to “Stand Down,” + RECAP Updated 11 May 13,” Phi Beta Iota Public Intelligence Blog, 4 November 2012. A number of additional posts by varied substantive experts can be accessed via Benghazi @ Phi Beta Iota.
[43]Bin
Laden died in 2001, inclusive of a published obituary. The CIA rolled
out multiple Bin Ladens over time, seeking to keep the Global War on
Terrorism (GWOT) alive as a budget-building exercise. The final Bin
Laden was a patsy offered up by the Pakistani military to Leon Panetta
as a theatrical exercise to assure the re-election of President Barack
Obama. US Special Forces personnel died to help re-elect Barack Obama. Cf. Robert Steele, “Bin Laden Show 00: Taliban Offer Pre-9/11 and Post-9/11, US Rejection,” Phi Beta Iota Public Intelligence Blog, 10 May 2012. The latter comment has been confirmed by a Pakistani military officer speaking to a trusted journalist.
[44]The
Boston Bombing was the first city-wide FEMA exercise to test the
ability of the police to lock down an entire city and do warrantless
door-to-door searches for alleged terrorists. The internal FEMA briefing
is a matter of public record. Cf. Aaron Dykes, “Homeland Security Admits Boston Drill Eerily Similar to Marathon Bombing,”TruthStreamMedia,
11 June 2013. The use of crisis actors, including the double amputee
who managed to not bleed at all while being ceremoniously run for many
minutes before all the cameras, is now a standard feature of most false
flag operations. Cf. Boston Bombing @ Phi Beta Iota and Crisis Actor @ Phi Beta Iota.
[45]David
Petraeus was fired because John Brennan wanted his job and had the
power to force the issue. While Petraeus was nominally indiscreet with
his biographer and lover, then Reserve Major Paula Broadwell (since
retired with a promotion to Lieutenant Colonel rescinded) had Top
Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information (TS/SCI) clearances, and both
the affair and the sharing of classified information were known prior
to the nomination and confirmation of Petraeus as Director of the CIA.
His firing was a hit job, plain and simple, to accommodate John
Brennan’s ambition. Clapper knew this and chose not to protect Petraeus,
a confirmed Director who merited every possible consideration once
confirmed. Clapper appears to have accommodated Brennan in a political
assassination.
[46]It
is clearly established that the Gulf of Tonkin incident never happened
as was claimed to justify the start of the war on Viet-Nam. It is now
known that the war on Viet-Nam was planned by the military-industrial
complex to use up our existing military stocks so we would have to buy
it all over again. The CIA desk officer for Viet-Nam knew that Ho Chi
Minh was a nationalist not a communist, and that Viet-Nam hates China
and would never be a Chinese domino. It bears mention that President
Lyndon Baines Johnson was a traitor through and through – in addition to
his approving and covering up the assassination of President John F.
Kennedy, and taking us to war against Viet-Nam on the basis of lies, he
also provided the North Vietnamese with a complete list of air targets
one day in advance via the Swiss Embassy – day after day after day –
such that they could relocate their air defenses and shoot down more of
our aviators flying into harm’s way not knowing their targets were known
to the nominal enemy in advance.Cf. Gulf of Tonkin @ Phi Beta Iota.
[47]Hillary Clinton is in my view, based on all the open source evidence I have seen, easily indictable in four major areas. Cf. Robert Steele, “Certified Letter to James Comey – Pedophilia, Electoral Fraud, Treason, Charity Fraud – UPDATE 5,” Phi Beta Iota Public Intelligence Blog, 5 November 2016.
[48]Clapper’s
final chapter blames instability on everyone else, seemingly oblivious
to the fact that is the USA that has been responsible for virtual
colonialism as a proxy of the British Empire, for unilateral militarism,
and for predatory capitalism. His final chapter is divorced from
reality. Cf. Robert Steele, “Rigging
Elections – and Worse! The Americans Rigged Our Election, Bribed Our
Government, Stole Our Gold, Killed Our Men, Raped Our Women, and
Poisoned our Air, Water, and Earth – and You Want to Blame Something on
the Russians?” American Herald Tribune,
10 March 2018; for an understanding of all of the preconditions of
revolution that exist in the USA today because of the Deep State and
Shadow Government, see Robert Steele, “Graphic: Preconditions of Revolution in the USA Today,” Phi Beta Iota Public Intelligence Blog, 16 August 2011.
[49]Supra Notes 31-33. Clapper overstates both the ethics of the US IC, and the efficacy of the US IC. Supra Note
23: All one needs to understand about his failure as DNI can be found
in (General) Tony Zinni’s indictment of the US IC: it provided 4% “at
best” of what one single combatant commander needed (to which I would
add, and nothing for everyone else). See also Robert Steele, “Intelligence for the President–AND Everyone Else,” CounterPunch, March 1, 2009 and Robert Steele, “On Defense Intelligence: Seven Strikes,” CounterPunch, July 2, 2014.
[50]Supra Note
4. Together with Clapper’s lies about the Russians hacking the
election, this stands out as the lie that is most directly refuted by
evidence published since the book was written by Clapper’s ghost-writer
and published, presumably with Clapper’s approval of its content in
detail. Cf. Mary Fanning and Alan Jones, “Whistleblower Tapes: Trump Wiretapped “A Zillion Times” By ‘The Hammer,’ Brennan’s and Clapper’s Secret Computer System,” The American Report, 17 March 2017; Yoda, “Deep Throat II “Fat Boy” aka “Cambridge Zero” Stefan Halper Outed as FBI’s “Penetration” of Trump Campaign UPDATE 2 Gone Missing,” Phi Beta Iota Public Intelligence Blog, 21 May 2018; Norie Huddle, “Daniel Lazare on RussiaGate — Trump Right, Media Wrong, FBI/DOJ Criminal (To Which We Would Add, DNI and D/CIA Also Criminal),” Phi Beta Iota Public Intelligence Blog, 24 May 2018; Owl, “Not One But SEVEN to TEN Spies Against Trump from Corrupt DOJ/FBI,” Phi Beta Iota Public Intelligence Blog, 25 May 2018; and Mongoose, “Obama
White House Coordinated the John Brennan False Flag Attack on Trump
Campaign — British Were Totally Complicit in This Act of Treason,” Phi Beta Iota Public Intelligence Blog, 3 June 2018.
[51]This
is just absolute crap. Rule 1 in Washington is “lie to the President if
you can get away with it,” and this is what the US IC does every single
day, to include pretending that its clandestine operations are
producing unique unilateral secret human intelligence when in fact the
CIA is totally reliant on hand-outs from counterpart foreign
intelligence organizations that lie to CIA with impunity while CIA is
too incompetent to be able to sort the lies from the truth. Cf. Morton Halperin, Bureaucratic Politics and Foreign Policy (Brookings, 1974); a summary review isfree online; and Robert Steele, “Foreign Liaison and Intelligence Reform: Still in Denial,” International Journal of Intelligence and Counterintelligence,
20/1 167-174, Fall 2007. NSA is also severely vulnerable to deception,
for one example applicable to both Libya and Syria, see Mongoose, “How Israel Fakes Out NSA with Signal Rocks that Simulate Syrian Army Transmissions About Sarin Gas UPDATE 2 NSA Incompetence,” Phi Beta Iota Public Intelligence Blog, 14 April 2017.
[52]Supra Note
4. On pages 97-100 Clapper presents as fact a series of lies about
Iraq’s alleged Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) and recounts his role
in supporting the lies told by then Secretary of State Colin Powell to
the United Nations (UN), lies that Powell’s assistant, retired Colonel
Larry Wilkerson, has amply documented (not only that they were lies but
that Powell suspected the were lies). Cf. Charles Lewis, 935 Lies: The Future of Truth and the Decline of America’s Moral Integrity (PublicAffairs, 2014), a summary review is free online; and Sheldon Rampton and John Stauber, Weapons of Mass Deception: The Uses of Propaganda in Bush's War on Iraq (TarcherPerigee, 2003), a summary review is free online.
[53]Clapper
omits mention of the role of the US and Saudi Arabia in the creation of
ISIS/ISIL, the role of the CIA – with Hillary Clinton’s direct approval
– in training and equipping ISIS/ISIL. He exaggerates ISIS/ISIL
accomplishments (other than a few towns the so-called caliphate
consisted of largely unoccupied desert), neglects to mention the
Barcelona Agreements and related bribes to European leaders to allow
unlimited Muslim migration into Europe, furthers the narrative of San
Bernardino – a false flag event with two dead patsies – as an ISIS/ISIL
strike, and seems unwilling to acknowledge that Russia was effective
against ISIS/ISIL for the right reasons, while we were ineffective for
the wrong reasons – the Saudi bribed Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama to
obtain US approval for Saudi atrocities against Somalia, Syria, and
Yemen, with substantial funding from the US taxpayer to boot. It is with
real dismay that I see Clapper, on page 257, explicitly in denial about
the fact that it was the US and the Obama Administration, and its
indictable Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and before her Secretary
of State John Kerry, and a series of CIA directors among whom John
Brennan is the most deserving of deep investigation (followed by George
Tenet) who destabilized the world or were complicit in the destabilizing
of the world – and the processing of Afghan opium by Pakistani military
allies. I put this book down simply appalled that the authors would
have the temerity to call our President a liar when in fact it is the
leadership of the US intelligence community that is in the business of
lying to presidents, to Congress, and to the public, without regard to
their oaths of office or the public interest. The literature on ISIS as a
US/Saudi creation with broad engagement by Zionist Israel, is broad and
deep. Here are just a few of the many sources that contradict Clapper’s
facile assertions on this topic: Nafeez Ahmed, “How the West Created the Islamic State (ISIS) — Jordan Hosts the Command Center — Chalabi and NeoCons Ride Again…,” Phi Beta Iota Public Intelligence Blog, 14 September 2014; Berto Jongman, “CIA Contractor – We Fabricated ISIS,” Phi Beta Iota Public Intelligence Blog, 17 February 2015; Wesley Clark: “ISIS Funded by Our Closest Allies,” Phi Beta Iota Public Intelligence Blog, 2 March 2015; Mike Flynn, “US Helped Create ISIS,” Phi Beta Iota Public Intelligence Blog, 11 August 2015; Wayne Madsen, “More Evidence ISIS is a US Creature,” Phi Beta Iota Public Intelligence Blog, 28 May 2016; Berto Jongman, “CIA Case Officer on ISIS & Terrorism as Fraudulent Stories Designed to Foster War for Profit,” Phi Beta Iota Public Intelligence Blog, 2 August 2016; Chuck Spinney, “Andrew
Cockburn on US Complicity in Saudi Genocide Across Yemen (Let’s Add to
Saudi Funding of Clinton-CIA Creation of ISIS to Take Down Syria for
Saudi Pipeline…),” Phi Beta Iota Public Intelligence Blog, 13 August 2016; Mongoose, “Who Started ISIS? USA?,” Phi Beta Iota Public Intelligence Blog, 27 August 2016; Wayne Madsen, “Yes, The USA Created ISIS…Along With….,” Phi Beta Iota Public Intelligence Blog, 10 September 2016; Berto Jongman, “Hillary Clinton Proven Traitor — the Killer Email Showing She Helped Create ISIS in Partnership with Saudi Arabia and Qatar,” Phi Beta Iota Public Intelligence Blog, 13 October 2016; Berto Jongman, “Julian Assange – CIA (and Saudi Arabia) Created Islam Terrorism,” Phi Beta Iota Public Intelligence Blog, 1 December 2016; Owl, “Merkel Plans War with Russia — Enabling ISIS, Creating Army, Who Assassinated NATO’s Head Auditor?” Phi Beta Iota Public Intelligence Blog, 26 December 2016; Tyler Durden, “Erdogan Says He Has ‘Confirmed Evidence’ the US Supports ISIS,” ZeroHedge, 28 December 2016; Tyler Durden, “Journalist Interrogated, Fired for Story Linking CIA to ‘Diplomatic’ Flights to Arm Syrian Rebels,” Russia Insider, 29 August 2017; Steve W., “IDF-Linked Think Tank Admits Israel, ISIS are Allies in Confronting Iran in Syria,” Galactic Connection, 2 December 2017; Brian Castner, “Exclusive: Tracing ISIS’ Weapons Supply Chain – Back to the US,” WIRED, 12 December 2017.
[54]Not
only did Colin Powell succeed in getting North Korea to agree to all US
terms only to have Dick Cheney derail that agreement by adding more
onerous terms, but it has been long established by Ambassador Robert L.
Gallucci, among others, that North Korea has always had denuclearization
on the table. Today we have the reality that the US IC and DoD are
still denying: North Korea has agreed to unification and
denuclearization continent on US demilitarization of South Korea. All
parties have agreed. The Zionists and the US military-industrial complex
are frantically trying to derail this epic peace agreement. Cf. Colin Powell, My American Journey (Ballentine, 2003), a summary review is free online; Editors, “Agreement on meaning of denuclearization is win for Trump: Gallucci,”Yonhap News Agency, 5 June 2018; Robert Steele, “Is
Zionism Over? From Korea to Syria to the Latest #GoogleGestapo Purge,
President Donald Trump’s Divorce from Zionism Appears Increasingly
Possible,” American Herald Tribune, March 4, 2018; Robert Steele, “Koreas Unite, Denuclearize: Middle East Next – after a Global Financial Re-Set – Ideas for Iran,” Russian International Affairs Council, May 2, 2018.
[55]Cf. NSA Spying Congress @ Phi Beta Iota.
The FBI pioneered spying on US citizens with COINTELPRO at the same
time that the CIA (as well as NASA) have pioneered mind-control
experiments with their in-house Nazis. Cf.Mind Control @ Phi Beta Iota and two books in particular: Cathy O’Brien and Mark Phillips, TRANCE: Formation of America (Reality Marketing, 2005); a summary review is free online; and Glen Yeadon and John Hawkins, The Nazi Hydra in America: Suppressed History of a Century (Progressive Press, 2008); a summary review is free online.
Over time both CIA and NSA have advanced spying on Congress toward the
end of blackmailing Members to protect budgets and avoid accountability.
The Mossad, not the Russians, are the top foreign threat and the top
blackmailer of Congress using pedophilia entrapments such as have been
devised by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, both arguably Mossad
officers funded by a Zionist billionaire to subvert the US Government.
The latter two are not in jail because their pedophilia entrapment
operations appear to have been coordinated with and are now protected by
the CIA and the FBI. Cf. Epstein @ Phi Beta Iota and Pedophilia @ Phi Beta Iota.
[56]The
entire book is a hit job on our legitimately elected president, and
conveys the same narrative as that of Mike Hayden’s book, The Assault on Intelligence: American National Security in an Age of Lies (Penguin, 2018), a summary review of which has been published as Robert Steele, “The Assault on Intelligence: American National Security in an Age of Lies – Book Review,” American Herald Tribune, June 5, 2018. To her credit, Hayden’s earlier book, Playing to the Edge: American Intelligence in the Age of Terror (Penguin, 2017), was quickly challenged by Vice Chairman Dianne Feinstein, “Factual Errors and Other Problems in ‘Playing to the Edge: American Intelligence in the Age of Terror,’ by Michael V. Hayden,”
Staff Summary, March 2016, 38 pp. For my own impressions of the
President based on reviewing three books (never mind all the great stuff
he is doing on the economic, legal, peace, and trade fronts) see Robert
Steele, “Book Reviews and Commentary: Unhinged — Donald Trump, His Family, His Appointees, and Everyone Else by Robert David Steele,” San Francisco Review of Books, January 13, 2018. See also the Trump Revolution Series, both free online and at Amazon Kindle, and my vision for the future of the Trump presidency, Robert Steele, “Trump 2.0: Build the Base, Go Long (25 Years),” Phi Beta Iota Public Intelligence Blog, 12 March 2018.
[57]Supra Note
38. The DNC refused to allow the FBI to actually examine its computers.
The lies about Russian hacking started with a third party and have
never been documented, at the same time that Julian Assange and
Ambassador Craig Murray have stated most emphatically that they received
all their leaks from an insider (probably Seth Rich). Clapper appears
to be in absolute and persistent betrayal of multiple oaths of office on
this one.
[58]Supra Note 38.
[59]On
page 238 he asserts that the Syrians used chemical weapons – later he
mentions Sarin gas specifically. This is simply not true but as with the
false IC reports on Iraq having WMD – part of the 935 lies documented
by Charles Lewis in TruthOut and later a book (Supra Note
4) that were used to justify that five trillion dollar war for the
banks and the profit of the military-industrial complex – Clapper was
the leading figure in communicating this lie to the President about a
false flag attack that was later repeated a second time. In both cases
it was the rebels faking a Sarin gas attack, no Sarin gas was used, and
the US IC was probably complicit in the Zionist-inspired propaganda
narrative, with former D/CIA John Brennan appearing to have played a
major role in orchestrating instances. Robert Steele, “War in the Middle East [in February 2018]… A strategic survey of possibilities, winners, losers… (Trump Revolution 19),” Phi Beta Iota Public Intelligence Blog, 19 November 2017; Robert Steele, “False Flag Attack: Ex-CIA Officer Unravels Idlib Chemical Incident,” Sputnik News, 21 April 2017; Robert Steele, “The
Syrian Missile Attack — Theatrics & House Cleaning? False Flag
Attack Organized by McCain, Brennan, McMaster, Funded by Saudi Arabia
and Israel? (Trump Revolution 10),” Phi Beta Iota Public Intelligence Blog, 11 April 2017; Adam Larson, “Analysis of evidence contradicts allegations on Syrian gas attacks,” The Indicter, April 2017; Robert Parry, “NYT Retreats on 2013 Syria – Sarin Claims,” ConsortiumNews.com, 6 April 2017; Alex Newman, “Was Chemical Attack in Syria a ‘false Flag’ to Trigger U.S. War?” The New American, 7 April 2017; Robert Parry, “Trump’s ‘Wag the Dog’ Moment,”ConsortiumNews.com, 7 April 2017; Editors, “America Illegally Bombs Syria Under False Pretexts. Links for Critical Thinking,” In Gaza and Beyond, 7 April 2017; Jan Oberg, “TFF Live: US bombing Syria – How could they be so sure?” Transnational Foundation, 7 April 2017; Matt Agorist, “Top Journalist Says Hillary Approved Sending Sarin to Rebels Used to Frame Assad, Start Syrian War,” The Free Thought Project, 2 May 2016; Owl, “Syrian False-Flag Gas Attacks Evidence Crucifies Saudi Arabia,” Phi Beta Iota Public Intelligence Blog, 28 August 2013. In passing, note these two stories: Tyler Durden, “Caught on Camera: Israel Targets Civilians With A Chemical Weapon Drone,”ZeroHedge, 24 March 2018; and Mongoose, “How Israel Fakes Out NSA with Signal Rocks that Simulate Syrian Army Transmissions About Sarin Gas UPDATE 2 NSA Incompetence,” Phi Beta Iota Public Intelligence Blog, 14 April 2017.
[60]Peter Schweizer, Friendly Spies: How America’s Allies Are Using Economic Espionage to Steal Our Secrets(Atlantic Monthly, 1993). A summary review is free online .The
reality is that the Russians (and everyone else) monitored, penetrated,
and stole information while also managing overt media influence
campaigns, but they did not “hack” (change the outcome) of the election.
The power of Zionist Israel in the USA is both legal and covert. It has
since the 1940’s enjoyed a protected status from the US IC (for
example, James Angleton covered for Israel and made its theft and
smuggling of nuclear materials from the USA possible, something
President Kennedy was seeking to stop), but has excelled at bribery and
blackmail as well as very focused campaigns to convert US evangelicals
into Christian Zionists, and to “own” most Members of Congress and many
members of state legislatures and city councils. Cf. James Petras, The Power of Israel in the United States (Clarity Press, 2006), a summary review is free online; Paul Findley, They Dare to Speak Out: People and Institutions Confront Israel's Lobby (Chicago Review Press, 2003), a summary review is free online; see also John J. Mearsheimer and Stephen M. Walt, The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy (Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, 2008).
[61]Cf. various posts and links accessible via Epstein # Phi Beta Iota.
[62]Cf. various posts and links accessible via Awan @ Phi Beta Iota.
The Zionists realized in the 1980’s that penetrating US communications
and computing was going to be a critical element in their continuing to
subvert the US economy, US government, and US society. Cf. Martin Dillon and Gordon Thomas, Robert Maxwell, Israel’s Superspy: The Life and Murder of a Media Mogul (Carroll & Graf, 2002). A summary review is free online.
I believe that today the communications and computers of the White
House, Congress, the NSA, and the Department of Homeland Security, as
well as law enforcement jurisdictions at the state and local level, are
completely compromised by Zionist software and hardware penetrations.
[63]My various articles, including several on the Zionist threat, are easily found online; I single out three here: Robert Steele, “Eradicating Zionism with Truth – A Plan for Peace and Prosperity for All,” American Herald Tribune, May 6, 2018.Robert Steele, “Zionism in America – Steven Strikes & Counting…,” Veterans Today, 14 December 2017; Robert Steele, “How
The Deep State Controls Social Media and Digitally Assassinates
Critics: #GoogleGestapo – Censorship & Crowd-Stalking Made Easy,” American Herald Tribune, November 7, 2017. On Zionism, pedophilia, and Hollywood see Robert Steele, “Zion in Shiksa-Land – Harvey Weinstein First Major Jewish Pedophilia Domino in the USA (Trump Revolution 16),” Phi Beta Iota Public Intelligence Blog, 20 October 2017, also available as anAmazon Kindle.
I believe that a second Trump term will see the denuclearization of
Israel as well as Iran and Saudi Arabia and force the Anti-Defamation
League (ADL) and the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) to
register as agents of a foreign power and lose their non-profit status.
In my view, the health and wealth of America the Beautiful will be
vastly improved if we can sharply reduce both the size of the federal
government and the new norm of pervasive secrecy, while eradicating the
Zionist threat. On secrecy see this superb summary: Amy Baker Benjamin, “The Many Faces of Secrecy,” William & Mary Policy Review, 8.2, 2017 and see also the many references accessible via Secrecy @ Phi Beta Iota.
[64]Supra note 63. See also #GoogleGestapo @ Phi Beta Iota and Deep State @ Phi Beta Iota.
[65]I
asked various professionals to critically examine this review in draft.
Several improvements were made. The most compelling explicatory
commentary on how the US IC went so wrong – apart from budget-building –
was received from a retired Chief Warrant Officer (U. S. Army) who is a
world class clandestine HUMINT specialist with experience across
multiple wars from Viet-Nam to Afghanistan:
He
is part of the overall problem that has befuddled the intelligence
community since Vietnam....during that period the clearance level of
most intel folks was no higher than collateral (secret). If you worked
in three areas, clandestine HUMINT (not what HUMINT is normally thought
of, but rather deep penetration), Imagery, and SIGINT, you had a much
higher level (SCI) in order to protect sources and methods. For the
Army, we had 06's coming out of Vietnam who found they did not have
access to these highly restricted sources and felt they were being
cheated (although most didn't understand what any of these disciplines
actually did or the value of the information they provided). These guys
put together a push to bring into "mainstream" intelligence these three
areas and in doing so accomplished exactly what always happens when
combining different groups.....things always slide to the lowest level,
i.e. we became emasculated in our ability to perform). Regular guys felt
they could do just as well as the highly trained folks who were
actually doing the work. This was furthered by guys like Hayden,
Clapper, etcetera so they could march their way to flag level. None were
able to explain the value of these disciplines nor understand the
actual work required. This destroyed the value of these (then)
ultra-sensitive and occasionally spectacularly useful collection
disciplines and began to reduce their integrity. Enter the idea of
OSINT, they were about to shown to be emperors without clothes if OSINT
was able to show its value. Their argument that ALL intelligence folks
needed to have TS/SCI level access would be found to be built on a house
of cards. None of them could allow that to happen. OSINT would have
been the foundational and transformational player had the “leadership”
not become over infatuated with clearance levels (evident by the fact
that none of them can explain what that really means and why it should
apply to everything) and demanding access to ALL sources and methods.
The integrity of most senior level officers (04 and above) is seriously
lacking.......so, yes, Clapper is a liar, and he is not alone.... Just
some random thoughts and rumbling....
No comments:
Post a Comment