Sunday, May 13, 2018
992-997 You See, Bob......
By Anna Von Reitz
You see, Bob, to adopt your own chauvinistic and condescending tone --- you make the mistake of thinking that you know what you don't know, and interpreting legal documents without knowing the legal meaning of words and terms.
You see, Bob, to adopt your own chauvinistic and condescending tone --- you make the mistake of thinking that you know what you don't know, and interpreting legal documents without knowing the legal meaning of words and terms.
I know this is so the same way that
judges always know when someone is ignorant of legal jargon and comes to
their courtroom all stuffed up on what they THINK they know --- and
don't. Those are the same people who are surprised to learn that they
have no "constitutional rights" while claiming to be US Citizens or
"citizens of the United States".
You make all the mistakes that
patriots typically make and all the same (wrong) assumptions, too. And
the really cloying part of this, is that you look down your nose at the
patriots while encouraging and displaying the same kind of ignorance
yourself. I find that very suspicious, Bob. Is it deliberate?
I have already proven to anyone's
satisfaction that you know nothing about what "citizenship" is or what
kinds of "citizenship" there are.
I have already demonstrated that
although you claim to be a "US citizen" of some kind, you don't have the
least little bit of an idea what that political status obligates you to
be and to do. You don't know and can't tell me, but you are a big
enough Blowhard to try to bluff it out and pretend that you know "stuff"
and I don't.
So let's put it to test, Bob. I
already gave you a long list of words that you should know the legal
meanings of, presented in pairs:
"Citizen" and "National"
"Law Enforcement" and "Peacekeeping"
"Domestic" and "Non-domestic"
"Resident" and "Landlord"
"Usufruct" and "Holder in Due Course".
"Alien" and "Inhabitant"
"Within" and "Without"
"Including" and "Excepting"
"Judge" and "Justice"
"Postmaster" and "Post Master"
"of" and "for"
"United States" and "United States of America"
"Territorial" and "National"
"Declaration" and "Constitution"
"Title" and "Covenant"
"Patent" and "Deed"
"Warrant" and "Writ"
So let's see you demonstrate even a
passing knowledge of what the legal definitions of these words are for
starters, before you pretend to have knowledge that you: (a) don't have
or (b) have, but choose not to reveal to others.
Somehow you think that you can just
"shine me on" and make me kow-tow to your ignorance and name-calling and
condescending language.
You might as well give up with that train of thought right now. I've faced off the Pope.. I am not going to bow to you.
----------------------------
See this article and over 900 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.
One well placed shot is all it takes to stop crime.
CONCEALED CARRY VICTORY
This soon to be banned 10 second video is PRICELESS
A man pulls a gun on a group of women
and tries to steal something. One of the women pulls a gun out of her
purse and pops him good. He's still moving but probably a goner. INSTANT
STREET JUSTICE, and absolute proof an armed population is a good thing.
This is why we need the Second Amendment.... Bravo to this woman
My Comment on the T-ROH Warrant
By Anna Von Reitz
Okay, first of all, let’s make sure
that everyone knows what a warrant and a court are. Then we will look at
T-ROH’s jurisdiction or lack thereof with respect to me and others
named by these madmen.
warrant. 1) n. an order (writ) of a
court which directs a law enforcement officer (usually a sheriff) to
arrest and bring a person before the judge, such as a person who is
charged with a crime, convicted of a crime but failed to appear for
sentencing, owes a fine or is in contempt of court.
Legal Definition of “court”:
Court: n. A court is a tribunal,
often as a government institution, with the authority to adjudicate
legal disputes between parties and carry out the administration of
justice in civil, criminal, and administrative matters in accordance
with the rule of law. ... The place where a court sits is known as a
venue.
Lawful Definition of “court”:
Court: n. any tribunal within a
judicial system. Under English common law and in some states it was a
court which heard only lawsuits in which damages were sought, as
distinguished from a court of equity which could grant special remedies.
Quote my friend, Mark Emery, Founder of The Lighthouse Law Club:
Learn about 'lawful' courts and how
to hold your own court. Court is not a 'place' it's an assembly of
qualified jurors convened in any location by the plaintiff and the
defendant under the security of the Sheriff. https://vimeo.com/248990751
In fact and in truth, a court is the
assemblage of people creating the court. It is not a building or place
(that’s merely the venue). And as you can see above, a court may be
engaged in settling “legal” disputes or “lawful” disputes.
As a result, a warrant may be a “writ” issued by a lawful court, or it may be an “order” issued by a legal court.
And in any case, in order for a
warrant to have any validity, the “person” – either the Natural Person
addressed by a lawful court, or the legal fiction PERSON addressed by a
legal court---has to be in the jurisdiction of that court.
As I do not subscribe to T-ROH and
am not a citizen of T-ROH and long ago severed any association with
T-ROH whatsoever (I checked out their spiel along with RuSA and all the
other wannabe organizations and found them wanting for the reasons
already discussed.) nothing that they say or do has any jurisdiction
related to me.
In fact, their “warrant” has as much
authority as a similar “warrant” issued by the Ladies’ Sewing Circle
and Terrorist Society of Columbus, Ohio. The Campus Police at Georgia
State have more actual authority than T-ROH.
So am I worried? Of course, I am
worried. These people are nutcases, dangerously unbalanced and
irrational and out ramming around South America, presumably acting as a
nutcase magnet for similarly inclined persons. That is something to
worry about for sure and has been reported to Homeland Security.
All that said ---
This recent fashion for private
organizations issuing “Warrants” for “Arrest” of other people was
started by Kevin Annett and his International Tribunal for Crimes of
Church and State, which as usual, Copycat Livingway has adopted as
something he thinks he can do, too.
If anyone acts on such “Warrants”
and kidnaps people who belong to other countries and other jurisdictions
of the law, they are likely to: (a) be fired upon and (b) be prosecuted
as criminals.
We have extradition treaties with some other countries that allow for prisoner exchanges and settlement of criminal charges in foreign jurisdictions, but not with T-ROH, which with any luck will simply fade away as another ill-conceived foreign organization built on sand.
----------------------------
See this article and over 900 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.
There's Pikers, and Then.... There's Bob Hurt
By Anna Von Reitz
Imagine this situation:
You have spent decades of your life
studying public documents that are available to everyone to read. You
look around and realize that nobody knows what those documents actually
say -- so you bring forward the facts to help educate people who are
suffering and "being destroyed" as Amos says, for lack of knowledge.
And certain people start calling you
a "liar" and a "fake" and God-only-knows-what-else, even though they
haven't bothered to read it all themselves. They just "know" what they
think they know. And then they demand that you "prove it" to them
because they are too lazy to read the documents and prove it to
themselves.
Let's recap --- they haven't read
the documents. You have. They won't believe you when you tell them what
the documents say. Then they still refuse to read the documents for
themselves and demand that you "prove" to them what the documents
say....
Hello?
That reminds me of the time my Best
Friend Forever said she'd offer me five bucks to go pee for her because
she was afraid to walk out to the latrine at summer camp in the middle
of the night.
There are some things that other
people can't do "for" you. Proving what a document that you refuse to
read for yourself says --- is one of those.
I wish there were some way that I
could attach a USB cable from my ear to your ears and just download
everything I know. The world would quickly become a much safer and
saner and more law-abiding place.
Everyone would know how the
governments are supposed to be structured and how they are supposed to
be funded and would know where the problems lie --- and so, would
correct the Mess without any big debate.
But until people stop reacting like
little babies and going "Waah! Wahh! That can't be so! You must be
lying to me! Waah! Wahh! Prove it to me! Waaaah!" -- and start
reading and thinking as adults who are responsible for reading and
researching and knowing the facts for themselves -- there is no USB
cable.
You have to either believe me and
take my word for what it says, or you have to read it yourself and
determine what it says. Those are the two options that Nature gave us.
All those that want "proof" need to man up and prove it to themselves,
especially as I and others have already done the heavy lifting and told
everyone where to look.
----------------------------
See this article and over 900 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.
Mothers Day
By Anna Von Reitz
It's Mother's Day. Who cares if it was a Hallmark Holiday?
The truth is that it is a
celebrating of all the acts--- great and small -- that we all make every
day of every year, to take care of and nurture others and to take care
of the Earth and otherwise pay our dues.
I am very proud this day of my most
recalcitrant child, my Step-Daughter, Brenda, who --- having almost
nothing to spare --- nonetheless spent all that she had to save her cat
companion, Sassy, an elderly feline who is her only companion.
Some people would say, well, the cat
has had a good run.....put her down. Don't trouble yourself. Dying is
inevitable. Let it be.
But in the face of this reality, Brenda chose life. And life is worth choosing.
I am content. Despite everything,
all the many ills and problems, all the disasters, all the wrong
choices, all the things that weren't right --- in the end, this is
right.
If all parents could look back and
say--- "My child chose what is good, what matters most!" -- then this
would be a better world.
And not just life for an elderly, cat, but life for all.
The Belle Cher family motto is "Loyale au Mort" --- "Loyal unto Death". And so they are. God bless them all.
I am proud and pleased with all my
children, of every race, kind, and creed, who choose life and love. I
truly don't care what you look like, how rich or poor you are, what kind
of pedigree you have or don't have.
What I care about is that you love.
I will simply note this Mother's
Day, that my Brother-in-Law came through his by-pass surgery and that we
look forward to his return to his family and his well-tended garden in
Minnesota.
He has been a pillar of strength,
endlessly hard-working, honest, generous and kind for all us and for his
community since November 1939. He came into the world in the worst of
times and we pray that he can be here to celebrate far better times to
come.
----------------------------
See this article and over 900 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.
Shills, Shillings, and the King's Shillings
By Anna Von Reitz
Ever wonder where the slang use of
the word "Shill" came from, as in, "He's a shill." --meaning that
someone was acting in a dishonest capacity?
A couple hundred years ago,
disguised King's Officers haunted the pubs of England, Ireland and
Scotland. They would offer to buy rounds as people still sometimes do,
only they would slip coins -- British Shillings -- into the bottom of
the tankards. And when the victims got to the bottom of the glass they
would find "the King's Shilling".
Immediately, they would be clapped in irons by waiting Marines and press-ganged into the King's Navy using this excuse.
Well, obviously, this is insane,
dishonest, and pseudo-legal chicanery. The acceptance of what was
advertised as free beer does not logically add up to a pledge to serve
without pay in the King's Navy for a period of years. Nonetheless, this
is what this horrendous government did to its own people.
And despite worldwide sanctions
against slavery and involuntary servitude and the outlawing of
press-ganging, they are still doing it and they aren't even content with
preying upon their own people. Oh, no, they had to export it
worldwide.
In America, they have conscripted
our doctors using a false licensing process and forced them to act as
"shills" -- just like the purveyors of "free beer". They are forced to
register "berths" in the King's Merchant Marine Service and "Social
Security Accounts" for each new American baby born -- giving rise to the
thoroughly false legal presumption that they are "volunteering" to be
and act in the capacity of British Subjects.
The same sneaky, dishonest,
fraudulent claims have been made against Aussies and Canadians, Germans
and Japanese -- people all around the world have suffered from the
criminality. You've been press-ganged, and nothing substantive has
changed except that they don't offer as much as a shilling in return.
Please address your comments to:
British Embassy
3100 Massachusetts Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20008
Secretary General
United Nations Headquarters
New York, NY 10017
and, last, but not least ---
The above link is the Interpol address to report crime, especially international crime.
What we wish to report is
essentially Human Trafficking on paper, designed to create an
opportunity for unlawful conversion of assets and falsification of
public records so as to deprive people of their natural political status
and national affiliations-- which is a war crime under both the Hague
and Geneva Conventions, and results in involuntary public servitude
under color of law and process of undisclosed adhesion contracts.
This has been going on for 150 years
right under their noses. So we would all like an explanation of this
circumstance and some accountability for the deplorable incompetence
that the politicians, police, military, and members of the Bar
Associations have displayed.
And if they start making any
"shifty" noises, smile and inform them that you are discharging your
duty to report and combat crime by bringing it to the attention of the
proper authorities.
Thank you, very much, etc., etc., etc....
----------------------------
See this article and over 900 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.
Final Reply to Larry Becraft
By Anna Von Reitz
I understand that Larry Becraft has been calling me a "Fake" Judge again, and his pal, Bob Hurt, too.
Here is my Final Reply:
If I am a "fake" Judge, Larry, your butt is on the line for not prosecuting me.
Put up or shut up, Larry.
Otherwise, continuing to slander and defame me and accuse me of
committing a crime without pursuing prosecution will be ample grounds to
charge you both civilly and criminally. And since you are claiming to
be a Territorial United States Citizen, you have no recourse to say you
are merely expressing your "opinion" and exercising your First Amendment
rights---- because you have none.
This game can be played from both sides.
No comments:
Post a Comment