Two Huge Vaccine Scandals That The Press Is Completely Ignoring
Editorial by World Mercury Project Guest Contributor Jon Rappoport
Some lies are so big, many people can’t
accept the fact that they’re lies. Their minds are boggled. “No,” they
say, “that couldn’t be.” But yes, that could be, and is.
Two giant vaccine scandals are in progress at the moment.
The mainstream press is mentioning them,
here and there, but without any intent to raise alarms, dig in,
investigate, and get down to the core of the problem.
So I’ll get to the core.
The first scandal revolves
around the flu vaccine for the current year. The CDC and other
“experts” have admitted the vaccine has a very low effectiveness rate.
Why is it a dud?
Because the vaccine is produced using chicken eggs,
and in that medium, the flu virus—which is intentionally placed in the
eggs—mutates. Therefore, it isn’t the same virus which is causing flu
this year. Therefore, no protection against the flu.
FiercePharma reports:
“Based on data from Australia, which already had its flu season,
scientists warn that this season’s flu shot might be only 10% effective.
And the reason for such a low level of protection might lie in the
method by which the majority of flu vaccines are made: in eggs.”
Ten percent effectiveness. Now that’s
ridiculous. And it’s assuming you accept the whole model of how vaccines
work—that they actually do protect (safely) against disease, rather
than, at best, repressing the visible symptoms of the disease.
Amidst their spotty coverage of this
scandal, here is what the press is failing to mention: the problem with
the flu vaccine isn’t just a 2017-2018 flaw.
It would be the same problem ever since chicken eggs have been used to manufacture the vaccine.
Are you ready?
Healthline.com: “The majority of flu vaccines are grown in chicken eggs, a method of vaccine development that’s been used for 70 years.”
Hello? Anyone home?
Seventy years. The same problem.
The same “low effectiveness” problem.
That’s a page-one story with a giant
headline. That’s the lead item on the nightly news. That’s a pounding
investigative series about the lunatic promotion of a massively ineffective—but universally promoted—vaccine going back decades and decades.
But it isn’t a giant headline. It isn’t an investigation. It’s a here-today-gone-tomorrow piece. That’s all.
…Dengvaxia can cause more serious infections in those who previously hadn’t had exposure to the virus.
The second scandal keeps
unfolding in the Philippines, where drug giant Sanofi’s Dengvaxia,
given to prevent Dengue Fever, is facing enormous pushback from
government officials, who stopped the national vaccination campaign,
after thousands of children already received the shot.
The issue? Safety.
FiercePharma:
“The Philippines stopped vaccinations shortly after the company warned
that Dengvaxia can cause more serious infections in those who previously
hadn’t had exposure to the virus. The country also kicked off a probe
and plans legal action, according to health secretary Francisco Duque.”
Did you get that? The company (Sanofi) itself warned that vaccine might not be safe.
FiercePharma: “…the [Philippine]
Department of Health didn’t heed warnings from an advisory group of
doctors and pharmacologists, who concluded early last year that the
vaccine’s safety and efficacy were unproven.”
My, my.
But let’s dig even deeper. Sanofi is
saying the vaccine might be dangerous for those who haven’t been exposed
to the Dengue virus before getting the shot. What on Earth does that
mean?
It means a child who had naturally come
in contact with the virus would have developed his own antibodies to it.
And later, those antibodies would protect him against the Dengue virus
IN THE VACCINE. Otherwise, the virus in the vaccine could give him a
case of Dengue or cause some other form of damage.
This is saying, “If a child is ALREADY
immune to Dengue Fever, because his immune system has successfully dealt
with the virus, then the vaccine won’t damage him.”
And THAT is saying, “If the child has
naturally developed an immunity to Dengue, then the vaccine, WHICH HE
DOESN’T NEED, won’t harm him.”
Of course, the press isn’t getting the
picture. If any reporters are seeing the light, they’re keeping their
mouths shut. The scandal is too big and too crazy.
Between the lines, a vaccine company is admitting their vaccine is only safe for children who don’t need it.
A tree just fell in the forest. Who heard it?
No comments:
Post a Comment