|
Massive flu outbreak? Here's the larger story the media won't touch. The lies, the hoax, the scandal. |
|
(To read about Jon's mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)
|
|
Massive flu outbreak? Here's the real story the media won't touch. The lies, the hoax, the scandal.
I covered part of the scandal the other day, but here I'll give you much more.
In case you haven't been following the uproar over the flu outbreak, you've missed the fact that...
Health authorities admit this year's flu vaccine is only 10% effective.
But of course, they urge you to take the vaccine anyway.
Why is this year's vaccine ineffective? Because it's made
using chicken eggs, and researchers have discovered that the flu
virus---which is placed in the vaccine---mutates in chicken eggs.
Therefore, by the time a person takes the flu shot, he's not
being protected against this year's seasonal flu virus. He's being
protected against a mutated virus that isn't causing the flu this year.
This is the conventional explanation. If you think it's the whole story, I have condos for sale on the moon.
You see, vaccines have been made using chicken eggs---not just this year---but for the past 70 years.
Oops.
That would mean the flu vaccine has been ineffective for decades.
Healthline.com: "The majority of flu vaccines are grown in chicken eggs, a method of vaccine development that's been used for 70 years."
But wait. There's more. Much more. I'll break it down into several scandals.
SCANDAL ONE (I covered this the other day): Dr. Peter Doshi,
writing in the online BMJ (British Medical Journal), reveals a
monstrosity.
As Doshi states, every year, hundreds of thousands of
respiratory samples are taken from flu patients in the US and tested in
labs. Here is the kicker: only a small percentage of these samples show
the presence of a flu virus.
This means: most of the people in America who are diagnosed by doctors with the flu have no flu virus in their bodies.
So they don't have the flu.
Therefore, even if you assume the flu vaccine is useful and
safe, it couldn't possibly prevent all those "flu cases" that aren't flu
cases.
The vaccine couldn't possibly work.
The vaccine isn't designed to prevent fake flu, unless pigs can fly.
Here's the exact quote from Peter Doshi's BMJ review,
"Influenza: marketing vaccines by marketing disease" (BMJ 2013;
346:f3037):
"...even the ideal influenza vaccine, matched perfectly to
circulating strains of wild influenza and capable of stopping all
influenza viruses, can only deal with a small part of the 'flu' problem
because most 'flu' appears to have nothing to do with influenza. Every
year, hundreds of thousands of respiratory specimens are tested across
the US. Of those tested, on average 16% are found to be influenza
positive."
"...It's no wonder so many people feel that 'flu shots' don't work: for most flus, they can't."
Because most diagnosed cases of the flu aren't the flu.
So even if you're a true believer in mainstream vaccine
theory, you're on the short end of the stick here. They're conning your
socks off.
The basic flu symptoms---cough, fever, chills, sore throat,
muscle aches, weakness---can be caused by a variety of factors that have
nothing to do with a flu virus.
SCANDAL TWO: In December of 2005, the British Medical Journal
(online) published another shocking Peter Doshi report, which created
tremors through the halls of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC),
where "the experts" used to tell the press that 36,000 people in the US
die every year from the flu.
Here is a quote from Doshi's report, "Are US flu death figures more PR than science?" (BMJ 2005; 331:1412):
"[According to CDC statistics], 'influenza and pneumonia'
took 62,034 lives in 2001---61,777 of which were attributable to
pneumonia and 257 to flu, and in only 18 cases was the flu virus
positively identified."
Boom.
You see, the CDC has created one overall category that
combines both flu and pneumonia deaths. Why do they do this? Because
they disingenuously assume that the pneumonia deaths are complications
stemming from the flu.
This is an absurd assumption. Pneumonia has a number of causes.
But even worse, in all the flu and pneumonia deaths, only 18 revealed the presence of an influenza virus.
Therefore, the CDC could not say, with assurance, that more
than 18 people died of influenza in 2001. Not 36,000 deaths. 18 deaths.
Doshi continued his assessment of published CDC flu-death
statistics: "Between 1979 and 2001, [CDC] data show an average of 1348
[flu] deaths per year (range 257 to 3006)." These figures refer to flu
separated out from pneumonia.
This death toll is obviously far lower than the old parroted 36,000 figure.
However, when you add the sensible condition that lab tests
have to actually find the flu virus in patients, the numbers of flu
deaths plummet even further.
In other words, it's all promotion and hype.
"Well, uh, we used to say that 36,000 people die from the flu
every year in the US. But actually, all we can prove is about 20
deaths. However, we can't admit that, because if we did, we'd be
exposing our gigantic psyop. The whole campaign to scare people into
getting a flu shot would have about the same effect as warning people to
carry iron umbrellas, in case toasters fall out of upper-story
windows...and, by the way, we'd be put in prison for fraud."
SCANDAL THREE: The so-called Swine Flu pandemic of 2009. This one is a real eye-opener. The CDC was caught with its pants down.
Swine Flu was hyped to the sky by the CDC. The Agency was calling for all Americans to take the Swine Flu vaccine. Remember?
The problem was, the CDC was concealing a very dirty secret.
At the time, star CBS investigative reporter, Sharyl
Attkisson, was working on the Swine Flu story. She discovered that the
CDC had secretly stopped counting cases of the illness---while, of
course, continuing to warn Americans about its unchecked spread.
Understand that the CDC's main job is counting cases and reporting the numbers.
What was the Agency up to?
Here is an excerpt from my 2014 interview with Sharyl Attkisson:
Rappoport: In 2009, you spearheaded coverage of the so-called
Swine Flu pandemic. You discovered that, in the summer of 2009, the
Centers for Disease Control, ignoring their federal mandate, [secretly]
stopped counting Swine Flu cases in America. Yet they continued to stir
up fear about the "pandemic," without having any real measure of its
impact. Wasn't that another investigation of yours that was shut down?
Wasn't there more to find out?
Attkisson: The implications of the story were even worse than
that. We discovered through our FOI efforts that before the CDC
mysteriously stopped counting Swine Flu cases, they had learned that
almost none of the cases they had counted as Swine Flu was, in fact,
Swine Flu or any sort of flu at all! The interest in the story from one
[CBS] executive was very enthusiastic. He said it was "the most original
story" he'd seen on the whole Swine Flu epidemic. But others pushed to
stop it [after it was published on the CBS News website] and, in the
end, no [CBS television news] broadcast wanted to touch it. We aired
numerous stories pumping up the idea of an epidemic, but not the one
that would shed original, new light on all the hype. It was fair,
accurate, legally approved and a heck of a story. With the CDC keeping
the true Swine Flu stats secret, it meant that many in the public took
and gave their children an experimental vaccine that may not have been
necessary.
---end of interview excerpt---
I'll add a few details. It was routine for doctors all over
America to send blood samples from patients they'd diagnosed with Swine
Flu, or the "most likely" Swine Flu patients, to labs for testing. And
overwhelmingly, those samples were coming back with the result: not
Swine Flu, not any kind of flu.
That was the big secret. That's what the CDC was hiding.
That's why they stopped reporting Swine Flu case numbers. That's what
Attkisson had discovered. That's why she was shut down.
But it gets even worse.
Because about three weeks after Attkisson's findings were
published on the CBS News website, the CDC, obviously in a panic,
decided to double down. If one lie is exposed, tell an even bigger one. A
much bigger one.
Here, from a November 12, 2009, WebMD article is the CDC's
response: "Shockingly, 14 million to 34 million U.S. residents - the
CDC's best guess is 22 million - came down with H1N1 swine flu by Oct.
17 [2009]." ("22 million cases of Swine Flu in US," by Daniel J.
DeNoon).
Are your eyeballs popping? They should be.
In the summer of 2009, the CDC secretly stops counting Swine
Flu cases in America, because the overwhelming percentage of lab tests
from likely Swine Flu patients shows no sign of Swine Flu or any other
kind of flu.
There is no Swine Flu epidemic.
Then, the CDC estimates there are 22 MILLION cases of Swine Flu in the US.
So now...when health officials begin waving red flags and
raising alarms about a current viral flu outbreak, it would be more than
reasonable to demand they answer questions about their past lies and
deceptions.
Unless you just want to take them at their word.
If so, good luck.
|
 |
|
|
Use this link to order Jon's Matrix Collections.
|
|
|
Jon Rappoport
The
author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM
THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US
Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a
consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the
expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he
has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles
on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin
Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and
Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics,
health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world.
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment