Monday, January 15, 2018
Steve De'ak: The 9/11 Crash Test to Settle the "No Planes in New York" Controversy
Dear 9/11 Truth Movement,
I
don’t know about the rest of you, but I don’t want to be doing this
truth movement thing
forever; I’m tired of endlessly arguing 9/11; eventually I’d like to solve this caper and get on with my life. I’m also tired of endless war and I believe the best way to stop the wars is by exposing the lies that started them. So to kill two birds with one stone, I began the 9/11 Crash Test project which you can find at 911crashtest.org and to help explain it I released a you-tube video entitled Tired of War Without End. For those who haven’t heard about it, the project proposal is to use one of the many online fundraising sites to raise funds for the project, while simultaneously raising awareness about 9/11 in the mainstream. The plan is to take a wing-section from a scrapped 767, strap it to a rocket sled and at 550 MPH, slam it into some steel boxes built to the specifications of the exterior columns of the world trade center, filming the results with high-speed cameras and producing a video documentary of the project to release online. I won’t beat around the bush; this endeavor looks the no-planes issue straight in the eye.
Have
you ever wondered why after sixteen years there is so much discord and
still no consensus within the Truth Movement? How can so many obviously
smart people have so many disparate hypotheses, and why do the big,
well-funded truth groups treat the no-planes hypotheses with such
disdain? I’m sure we’ve all seen the same evidence, yet when I examined
it I arrived at a completely different conclusion than most everyone
else. I know people can lie and television can be faked, but as far as
I’m concerned there’s no way a plane can slice a steel skyscraper like a
hot knife through butter, and I believe the 9/11 Crash Test project
will prove it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dBBaDchDnOI
But
I’m not asking for you to embrace my version of 9/11, that’s not what
the project is about; it’s about the test and nothing else, regardless
what any of us believe, or think the results will be or will imply.
Whether or not the crash test ever occurs, the project has already been a
success by reaching people who otherwise would never have considered
9/11 to be anything other than the official story. By simply asking the
question, “What would happen if we crashed a jet-wing into some steel
boxes?” the wheels start turning.
I
was able to change the opinion of even the most staunch, Fox-watching,
gun-toting conservative skeptic by simply explaining the crash test
project and then showing him the Mythbuster’s Myth Revolution video
where they cut a car in half with a heavily braced steel “snowplow.”
For ten years, this friend of mine would laugh at me as I went through
my phases of 9/11 enlightenment, but when I showed him the Crash Test
concept, he became very quiet. After three times watching them cut the
car in half, he finally said, “Oh, that wing would just explode against
the steel.” Three days later he
called to ask how I am able to deal with being lied-to like that, and I
said, “You’ve seen how I deal with it.” And we both laughed. Right
there is one example of a brief skirmish with the mainstream and my
friend is now fully on board with the project and has offered his
expertise with steel fabrication to boot. The point is, the no-planes
conclusion is not so crazy, in fact for the media-driven lifestyle of
today with everyone pretty savvy to technology it is one of the simplest
concepts for the mainstream citizen to grasp, although the implications
can be staggering.
Face
it, for the no-planes conclusion to be correct the leaders of the
world’s media, academia, military and government had to be involved,
meaning our leaders have been feeding us a lie, but you know what they
say; if you make the lie big enough and repeat it often enough people
will believe it, that’s the nature of the big lie. Unfortunately most
of us still trust people in positions of authority; we believe they
would never do such a thing, a conviction I notice is easy to exploit by
propagandists. We tend to believe authority by virtue of their
authority and nothing else. Apparently power only corrupts elsewhere. I
assume it is for this reason the 9/11 Crash Test project has been given
the cold shoulder by most of the Truth Movement establishment; because
it stands the best chance of proving the no-planes hypothesis, which
let’s be honest, would be the death-knell for that part of the truth
movement that has spent the last dozen or so years collecting money and
demanding someone, somewhere conduct a new investigation.
So
with that in mind, listen to some of the responses I have received from
one of the more well-known truth groups, the Architects and Engineers
for 9/11 Truth:
“here’s the problem (we don’t) feel there is a need to resolve the issues between us and the no planers you’ll never get cooperation from (us) on this, the no planers make it easy for the mainstream to ignore us“
Most
of the people I have met in the truth movement share these sentiments,
but the thing is, I know I’m not a dis-information agent, and I’m pretty
sure I’m not stupid, but I doubt the big truth groups aren’t already
part of the mainstream that they claim to be trying to reach. If the
no-planes conclusion is correct, then it would make sense that the
propaganda arm of the military would be working overtime to discredit
it, which to me makes suspect all the truther groups that refuse to
consider it. So here we are back at square one, with the infighting and
finger-pointing of a seemingly dysfunctional truth movement busily
undermining itself while the years pass by.
To break this cycle and to force the issue
both in the mainstream and within the truth movement, I suggest
conducting the 9/11 Crash Test project. If the movement really cares
about the truth, it would consider changing tactics after spending
sixteen years petitioning the most likely suspects for an
investigation. If the movement is correct about the no-planers, and
they sincerely want a unified front without the “fringe element,” then
they can use the crash test as a way to get rid of the no-planes
contingent that prevents them from being taken seriously. If the wing
slices the steel, the no-planers will be discredited but if the wing is
shattered by the steel someone has some explaining to do, but either way
the truth will be known which is presumably the goal of a truth
movement. It’s a win-win for everyone except for the perpetrators.
The
strength of this project is in its asking for a citizen’s
investigation, one that would use the scientific method to prove or
disprove a hypothesis. Yes, based on Newtonian physics, I state it is
impossible for the wing to cut the steel, but I could be wrong which
would only vindicate the government as well as the anti-no-planes truth
movement. The Truth Movement would be able to demonstrate solidarity
and a commitment to the truth, not to mention the ability to apply the
scientific method to solve problems which is a standard to which every
9/11 hypothesis should be held.
So
at the very least this project should end contention within the truth
movement by settling the no-planes argument once and for all, something
which can only benefit the cause of truth whichever way the rocket-sled
slices. So why are the popular truth-groups so reluctant to endorse
it? I think it’s because they know what the results will be, making
this as much a test of mettle as it is a test of metals – that by
simply asking the question “what would happen if…” it puts everyone on
the spot.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ALPZqq3tW3U
The
military has already shown interest; shortly after I first petitioned
New Mexico tech for a price estimate, I began to get hits from the
Army’s sprawling Yuma Arizona testing center. 10 minutes later I
was getting hits from Baghdad. I didn’t sleep well that night. The
project lays-bare the unhealthy relationship between the military and
universities; it embarrasses the military-industrial-
And then there’s the media that saturated
our senses with fabrications, overwhelming us with that horrible,
decade-long propaganda barrage that was so essential to the long term
success of the 9/11 operation. There’s a special place in hell for
them; and if and when this documentary is released their efforts in
bringing hell to the Middle East will be exposed.
One
component of the media is the Internet without which we wouldn’t have
all the popular 9/11 Truth movement groups. Seems to me it’s not an
accident so many forums include 9/11 as just another “conspiracy” to
tuck beside such topics as Alien invasions and Bigfoot. As cynical as I
have become over the years, I am still surprised and chagrined at how
much the 9/11 Crash Test has angered so many people I had naively hoped
would become allies.
The
test will prove whether or not U.S. Government and world leaders are
caught red-handed in a colossal cookie-jar of lies, and it will prove
what anyone honestly examining the evidence already knows; no, in the
real world jets cannot burrow into the ground, or bore through concrete
buildings, or disappear into steel skyscrapers. NATO and the “coalition
of the willing” have been invading the Muslim world while the rest of
the world looked the other way, which if anything is evidence of
collusion on a global scale. But even if everything about 9/11 occurred
as they say it did, the invasions, looting and occupying of whole
nations as retribution for the actions of 19 individuals who were
already dead anyway is barbaric and unacceptable behavior for a
civilized people. Since our leaders appear devoid of moral fortitude
and incapable of policing themselves, it’s up to we citizens to stop
them.
It was Abraham Lincoln who said a house
divided cannot stand and I believe that for the 9/11 Truth Movement to
make any progress over the next 16 years, we need to sort out our
differences and work together. If you are dedicated to reaching the
truth, whatever that may be this project is a rocket-powered shortcut to
getting there and I could sure use your help in making it happen.
Please join me at 911crashtest.org.
Sincerely,
Steve De’ak
References:
See all comments (https://truthermusical.
Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
https://truthermusical. |
No comments:
Post a Comment