THE FREEMEN
Dear Brethren,
IS "DIARY OF ANNE FRANK" A FRAUD?
Lies
being taught;
Anne Frank was victim of Holocaust who was a brave
girl and kept a diary of her
ordeal during Holocaust which narrates horrors of
Holocaust.
Now
the truth;
Textbook History has myths that live a longer and richer life than truth. A New York Court awarded $50,000 to an American novelist Meyer Levin, to be paid By Otto Frank the father of Anne Frank as an honorarium for Levin's novel "Diary of a Young Girl" also known as "Diary of Anne Frank". Mr. Otto Frank, had promised to pay to a Jewish novelist Meyer Levin not less than $50,000 because he had used the literary creation of author Levin in toto, and represented it to his publisher and the public as his late daughter’s original work.
Otto Frank later decided on
a Broadway production of the same novel but did not pay Meyer Levin for use of
his novel for Broadway production whcih was against the terms of contract.
hence Meyer Levin sued Otto Frank for his writings, and the New York Court Jury
awarded Meyer Levin $50,000, for his 'intellectual work'.
The Jury awarded $ 50,000 dollars as
compensation to be paid by Otto Frank father of Anne Frank to Jew novelist
Meyer Levin who wrote Diary of Anne Frank. That award was later set
aside by the trial justice, Hon. Samuel C. Coleman, on the ground that the
damages had not been proved in the manner required by law as it was not based upon
"legal" evidence of loss. The reason was that if Writer Meyer levin
had written the said novel under his own name and sold it as it was a fiction,
then it would not have sold so many copies. Because Otto Frank father of Anne
frank gave this fictional novel name of his dead daughter and projected to
gullible public as “real” story of Anne Frank that so many copies were sold and
windfall profits were made. However in further appeal against the order of
Judge Coleman, by Jewish novelist Meyer Levin matter was compromised out of
court between the parties.
Jewish writer Meyer Levin had
approached the Court for his claim for damages on account of writing the “Diary
of Anne Frank”, He had also won his case from the Jury, He would not have
withdrawn his Appeal had he not been paid out of court by Otto Frank, to avoid
media publicity. So Otto Frank did pay Jewish writer Meyer Levin $ 50,000
dollars or thereabout for writing ‘Diary of Anne Frank’.
Complete details of the case are
available in case titled Meyer Levin Vs Otto Frank, File number 2241-1956 in the
New York County Clerk’s office.
In 1980, Otto Frank sued two Germans, Ernst Romer and Edgar Geiss, for distributing literature denouncing the diary as a forgery. The trial produced a study by official German state forensic bureau, the Bundes Kriminal Amt [BKA] forensically examined the manuscript, which at that point in time consisted of three hardbound notebooks and 324 loose pages bound in a fourth notebook, with special forensic equipment. In the end, BKA clearly determined that none of the diary handwriting matched known examples of Anne's handwriting. The bureau determined that everything in the diary was written by the same person. The person that wrote the diaries had used a ballpoint pen throughout. Unfortunately for Herr Frank, the ballpoint pen was not available until October 1945 whereas Anne was known to have died of typhus in 1944.
In 1980, Otto Frank sued two Germans, Ernst Romer and Edgar Geiss, for distributing literature denouncing the diary as a forgery. The trial produced a study by official German state forensic bureau, the Bundes Kriminal Amt [BKA] forensically examined the manuscript, which at that point in time consisted of three hardbound notebooks and 324 loose pages bound in a fourth notebook, with special forensic equipment. In the end, BKA clearly determined that none of the diary handwriting matched known examples of Anne's handwriting. The bureau determined that everything in the diary was written by the same person. The person that wrote the diaries had used a ballpoint pen throughout. Unfortunately for Herr Frank, the ballpoint pen was not available until October 1945 whereas Anne was known to have died of typhus in 1944.
The German magazine, Der Spiegel,
published an account of this report stating that;-
(a) some editing postdated 1951;
(b) Experts had held that all the
writing in the journal was by the same hand; and thus –
(c) the entire diary was a postwar
fake.
The diary of Anne frank is written in Ball point pen. Ball point pen was invented by László Bíró, in 1938. In 1940 the Bíró brothers and a friend, Juan Jorge Meyne, moved to Argentina and on June 10 filed for its patent. It was first made available in USA on 29 October 1945 at New York's Gimbles Department store when more tha 5000 pens were entire stock of ball point pens was sold at then cost of $ 12.50 each. Children were never allowed to use Ball point pen till several years later as it destroyed their hand writing.
http://www.ideafinder.com/history/inventions/ballpen.htm
The diary of Anne frank is written in Ball point pen. Ball point pen was invented by László Bíró, in 1938. In 1940 the Bíró brothers and a friend, Juan Jorge Meyne, moved to Argentina and on June 10 filed for its patent. It was first made available in USA on 29 October 1945 at New York's Gimbles Department store when more tha 5000 pens were entire stock of ball point pens was sold at then cost of $ 12.50 each. Children were never allowed to use Ball point pen till several years later as it destroyed their hand writing.
http://www.ideafinder.com/history/inventions/ballpen.htm
Millions of humans world wide were fed
a fiction by Jew Otto Frank for the sake of money is nothing new. In any case
it was not the fault of Anne Frank. She had not done anything wrong. She had
not even written any diary.
Sources;-
Note by author;-
What everybody believes in, is that
Jewish Writer Meyer Levin had impersonated Anne frank, the extent of
impersonation is in doubt whether it was ‘X’ % or ‘Y’%. To my mind if
impersonation is accepted then whether it is in part or in whole is immaterial.
Even those who believe that Anne Frank wrote part of diary also believe that her father tore off part of her diary which was
favorable to Nazi regime and unfavorable to her own family particularly
unfavorable to her own father Otto Frank. So whether it is a case of half truth
or full lies, the diary has to be denounced as fake.
Secondly If Meyer Levin had not written
the first part someone who was “paid well” might have, receipt properly taken
and no cause for a court case !!!
Thirdly where is the case for profits,
such instances come dime a dozen in:-
a) All 70 +
Countries attacked and enslaved for world domination British where every
household suffered similar fate in the hands of their British masters.
b) Treatment of
slaves in America or treatment of US native inhabitants by European immigrants
or Jews who are ruling US today.
c) Treatment of
slaves by Europeans. The bible mentions that the Jews went into slavery.
Deuteronomy 28:68 and they had yokes of iron put around their necks.
Deuteronomy 28:48
d) Every place
which has suffered slavery has worst diaries, except that in those countries
slaves do not own the media.
Lastly in some countries denial of
holocaust / or Anne frank diary is illegal. In some cities particularly in
Amsterdam such diaries have been used to generate massive tourism and made a
source of revenue. Such cities / countries or their “courts of law” will
jealously defend the diary and will prosecute to the extent of bankruptcy
anyone and everyone who publicly denies the diary as a fraud. However such
prosecution has nothing to do with upholding the truth but more to protect the
revenue illegally earned over last fifty five years. A case in hand is that of
David Irwing. Another is Julian Assange, who has been persecuted for publishing
truth in Wikileaks. Nobody has challenged the truth in Wikileaks yet Julian
Assange has been persecuted to the extent of bankruptcy.
Freedom can mean freedom of expression
or freedom to sway the masses by the money power of political donations, or
having your own chosen one as a puppet President 'who' then decides on judges
most of whom dance to moneyers behind their appointments.
kaps
Posted by
kapel de at 12:00 AM
Labels: HISTORY
Posted by Baldwin Templeton at 11:35 AM
No comments:
Post a Comment