Explosive: a review of fake medical tests
By Jon Rappoport
Over the years, during my investigations of deep fraud, I've
uncovered very popular medical diagnostic tests that are wrong-headed,
misleading, and fallacious.
Acceptance of this shocking truth would disrupt the "disease business" like a threshing machine moving through a wheat field.
Claims of diseases, based on tests, would be routinely turned back stamped UNPROVEN and FAKE.
ONE: Antibody test. This is given to detect the presence of a
specific germ in a human. Prior to 1985, a positive test was generally
taken as a sign of good health: the patient's immune system detected the
germ and defeated it.
However, after 1985, public health agencies and doctors
reversed field. They arbitrarily claimed a positive test showed the
person was ill or was going to become ill. No true science backed up
this claim.
BOTTOM LINE: The truth is, a positive antibody test says
nothing about whether a person is ill, will get ill, or is healthy. The
true indicator is the strength of the entire immune system, not just the
antibodies---and the overall strength of the immune system is NOT
measured by an antibody test. THERE IS NO MEDICAL TEST THAT MEASURES THE
OVERALL CONDITION OF A PERSON'S IMMUNE SYSTEM.
TWO: The PCR test. The Polymerase Chain Reaction tests for
the presence of virus in a patient. The test takes a tiny sample, which
technicians assume is a genetic piece of a virus far too small to
observe, and amplifies it many times, so it can be identified. But in
order to cause disease in a human, a huge quantity of virus (easily
observed without the PCR) needs to be present. Therefore, a PCR
test-result indicates nothing about disease---except that medical
personnel couldn't find enough virus in a person, to begin with, to
assume the person was ill or would become ill.
THREE: All tests resulting in a diagnosis of any of the 300
officially certified mental disorders. Why? Because there are no
definitive tests. No blood or saliva or urine tests. No genetic assays.
No brain scans. All so-called mental disorders are diagnosed on the
basis of consulting menus of behaviors. This is pseudoscience. It's on
the level of diagnosing cancer in a patient on the basis of an
interview.
FOUR: All tests designed to assess the effectiveness of
vaccines. The only marker is: does the vaccine produce antibodies in a
human. But as I stated above, antibodies are only one aspect of the
immune system. They aren't the whole picture. A weak immune system's
antibodies are useless.
FIVE: Unsupported claims from public health officials. No
tests at all, or hidden test results. For example, at the height of the
so-called Swine Flu epidemic, in the fall of 2009, the CDC secretly
stopped counting cases in America. Why? Because the overwhelming
percentage of samples taken from the most likely Swine Flu patients,
sent to labs, were coming back with no trace of Swine Flu or any other
kind of flu. In other words, the epidemic was a dud and a hoax. Based on
this vacuum of evidence, the CDC went on to estimate that, in America,
there were 22 MILLION cases of Swine Flu.
This gigantic scandal doesn't just apply to Swine Flu. It applies to any kind of flu.
Dr. Peter Doshi, writing in the online BMJ (British Medical Journal), reveals a monstrosity.
As Doshi states, every year, hundreds of thousands of
respiratory samples are taken from flu patients in the US and tested in
labs. Here is the kicker: only a small percentage of these samples show
the presence of a flu virus.
This means: most of the people in America who are diagnosed
by doctors with the flu have no flu virus in their bodies. So they don't
have the flu.
Therefore, even if you assume the flu vaccine is useful and
safe, it couldn't possibly prevent all those "flu cases" that aren't flu
cases.
The vaccine couldn't possibly work.
The vaccine isn't designed to prevent fake flu, unless pigs can fly.
Here's the exact quote from Peter Doshi's BMJ review, "Influenza: marketing vaccines by marketing disease" (BMJ 2013; 346:f3037):
"...even the ideal influenza vaccine, matched perfectly to
circulating strains of wild influenza and capable of stopping all
influenza viruses, can only deal with a small part of the 'flu' problem
because most 'flu' appears to have nothing to do with influenza. Every
year, hundreds of thousands of respiratory specimens are tested across
the US. Of those tested, on average 16% are found to be influenza
positive."
"...It's no wonder so many people feel that 'flu shots' don't work: for most flus, they can't."
Because most diagnosed cases of the flu aren't the flu.
So even if you're a true believer in mainstream vaccine
theory, you're on the short end of the stick here. They're conning your
socks off.
The basic flu symptoms---cough, fever, chills, sore throat,
muscle aches, weakness---can be caused by a variety of factors that have
nothing to do with a flu virus.
---But don't worry, be happy. Keep your mouth shut and obey all doctors' orders.
No comments:
Post a Comment