It's Time to Drop the Jew Taboo
Charles Bausman • January 15, 2018 1. Introduction
Most
people know about, but few are willing to condemn, the strict taboo in
the media, of criticizing Jews as a group, using that term. One cannot
even criticize a small subsection of Jews, a miniscule percentage of the
Jewish population, even when they richly deserve it.
Obviously,
this is a ridiculous way to run a publication whose object is to get to
the truth, so I am writing this to explain why, from now on, the pages
of Russia Insider will be open to articles
which fairly and honestly address the influence of Jewish elites,
including pointing out when it is malevolent, which it often is, and try
to understand it and explain it, with malice towards none.
I
have become convinced that unless we break this taboo, nothing will
improve in the human catastrophe unfolding in geopolitics. Millions have
died over the past 30 years, and if we want it to stop, and to avoid a
cataclysm which seems to approach inexorably, we have to have the
freedom to criticize those responsible. It is very clear to me, as it is
to many others, that much of the guilt for this comes from Jewish
pressure groups, particularly in the media.
I
can see as an editor, that much of what is written about geopolitics in
the ‘public square’, admirable thought it may be in other respects,
makes itself irrelevant by tiptoeing around this crucial issue.
I
am a newcomer to the media world, unexpectedly thrust three years ago
into the role of owner, publisher and editor of this fairly widely read
publication. We get about 10 million visits per month across all of our
platforms from a sophisticated audience, and we are widely followed by
so- called ‘influencers’. We’ve made a big mark in a short time, and we
did it by saying what others were not willing to say. Many subjects
which we were the first to speak about on a major platform have now
entered the mainstream.
Russia Insider
is a grassroots phenomenon, and sometimes resembles a political
movement as much as it does a publication. We exist solely because of
small donations from readers. We get no funding from major donors, not
to mention governments, foundations, or other organized groups. It is
all private individuals. Our single largest donation over the past year
was $5000, and the median gift is $30. We raised about $80,000 last
year. This gives us the freedom to pretty much say what we want,
something that can be said of very few publications, even in the
alternative media space, most of whom are beholden to large donors.
I
see everyday how one can influence the public agenda by addressing or
ignoring certain topics. One really can make a difference, and I have
tried to have a positive impact, as I understand it. It has been a
remarkable education in the power of the media, even of our relatively
small Russia Insider.
But
this taboo is the great exception. It really is quite extraordinary, to
realize that you can publish about just about anything, except that.
As I said, just about everyone knows about the taboo, and I did too in
my previous career in business, but it is another thing altogether to enforce it, which I felt, until recently, compelled to do, and to have your nose rubbed in it every day when trying to make sense of world events.
2. The euphemisms
Some
try to skirt the taboo with euphemisms. A veritable cottage industry
has emerged inventing ever new ones, indeed, this is the new trend in
the alt-media. We hear a lot about ‘Zionists’, ‘elites’, ‘global
elites’, ‘globalists’, ‘neocons’, ‘liberal interventionists’, ‘the war
party’, ‘the Israel lobby’, ‘the deep state’, ‘bankers’, ‘new world
order’ (I never understood what that is actually), ‘Bilderbergers’ –
sounds like a nice man from a central-European fairytale. My friend the
Saker goes with ‘Anglozionists’.
But none of these terms work, do they? They all obscure the issue, actually enhancing the taboo’s inherent deceit.
Zionists?
Really? I’ve never heard anyone describe themselves this way, or even
other people describe them – ‘Have you meet Max?, he’s an enthusiastic
Zionist!’ I’ve never seen it mentioned as an interest in a social media
profile (perhaps Facebook should include it as an Emoticon). Maybe
Rachel Maddow IS a Zionist, what do I know, although as far as I
understand, Zionism was a political movement that lost its urgency once
the state of Israel was well on its merry way. Elites? Well, no, I would
reckon many Jews are elites, but more Jews are not, and more elites are
non- Jews, so no, that doesn’t work. Well, you get the idea. These are
attempts to slip past the ever-zealous censor, and they serve to
maintain the confusion and deception.
No,
the only trait that these people have in common, is their Jewish
heritage. Some are liberals, some are conservatives. Some are religious,
some are not. Some are mixed Jewish heritage, some are not. Some care
about Israel, some do not. Some support Israel others criticize her.
They are politicians, journalists, academics, comedians, actors, or,
businessmen. Some stem from Western Europe, others from Eastern Europe,
and others from the Middle East.
3. Hostility to Putin’s Russia is largely a Jewish phenomenon
Russia Insider‘s
mission is to explain and describe Russia and her role in the world. As
soon as you begin to drill into how other nations relate to Russia, and
Russian history, it becomes obvious that the unreasonable hostility
towards Putin’s Russia, particularly coming from the US and the UK, is
very much a Jewish phenomenon, and has been for centuries.
And yes, ‘Jewish’ is the only term that accurately describes it, and not one of the many euphemisms we frequently see used.
The
most vitriolic and obsessive Russia-bashing journalists in the media
are mostly Jewish. The publications which push these writers most
energetically are ALL Jewish-owned, and as a publisher, I know very
well, that is where the buck stops.
On
the policy side, the neo-conservative movement, Russia’s harshest foe,
was conceived of, is led by, and consists mostly of, Jews. And their
trouble-making extends far beyond Russia – they are responsible for
America’s disastrous debacle in the Middle East over the last 20 years –
where their crimes have been stymied by precisely one country – Russia.
The psychotically anti-Russian recent UN ambassadors, Nikki Haley and
Samantha Power, were put there by the Israel lobby, and given an
independent brief, in other words, they answer not to their presidents,
rather to their Jewish sponsors.
In
Congress the biggest Russia-Gate tub-thumpers are noticeably Jewish –
Schiff, Schumer, Blumenthal, Franken (although not as overwhelmingly as
in the media). The Israel lobby routinely enforces legislation hostile
to Russia. Bill Browder with his Magnitsky Sanctions – is Jewish.
4. The media
But
let’s talk about the media – for this is where the real power lies. All
other levers and branches of government pale in comparison when it
comes to real political influence.
The two leading newspapers of the land, the New York Times and The Washington Post,
both very Jewish in ownership, editors, and staff, have been waging an
all-out jihad against Putin’s Russia, and are guilty of the most
grotesque dishonesty, slander and journalistic malpractice –
exhaustively catalogued by one of the most authoritative and admired
veteran journalists in America, Robert Parry, winner of the Polk award
among other accolades. You can see an archive of his extraordinary work
criticizing these two publications, particularly in relation to Russia, here.
PBS,
with its lily-white image as purveyor of Masterpiece Theater and other
highbrow offerings, is wholly dependent on donations from wealthy Jews.
Like some Gentile starlet submitting to Harvey Weinstein, that station
has allowed itself to be used, churning out a relentless stream of the
most ridiculous anti-Putin propaganda that would be funny if it wasn’t
so effective among the gray-haired, non-flyover denizens of America, and
their deep pocketbooks. CNN, a deeply Jewish company, has been pushing
Russiagate like a religion, to the point to where their brand has
suffered severe damage.
Rachel
Maddow, the nation’s most popular and influential liberal political
show host is Jewish. She has gone so overboard demonizing Russia and
pushing Russiagate that she has become a figure of fun. On the print
side, the list is the same – the ones shrieking the loudest are mostly
Jews, and disproportionately female – and there is an important lesson
there too – Masha Gessen, Anne Applebaum, and Julia loffe, to name a
few.
The
refrain from the male chorus is no less strident. David Remnick, David
Frum, Bill Kristol, Charles Krauthammer. Even comedy news hates Russia –
John Oliver, Jon Stewart (previously), Bill Maher, all Jews, go to
great efforts to convince Americans that Putin’s Russia is, quite
literally, – and this term is frequently used – ‘Hitlerian.’
Jewish-owned high brow magazines have been leading the charge against Putin – the Newhouse’s New Yorker, the NY Review of Books (the management of this venerable magazine is obsessed with the subject). The New Republic, Newsweek, The Atlantic, and the Rothschild-owned Economist pump out story after story full of what can only be called lies, in a massive campaign to demonize Russia and Putin.
Timothy Snyder, the Yale historian, and Michael Weiss, the neocon firebrand whose website, The Interpreter, is funded by the exiled Jewish oligarch Mikhail Khodorkovsky, are two more prominent figures in this phenomenon.
The Economist
deserves special mention with Ed Lucas leading the charge (he is the
great nephew of Charles Portal, a Jewish air marshal in Britain who was a
relentless proponent of fire-bombing German civilians and is thought to
be behind the burning of Dresden). Equally vitriolic are the writings
of Ben Judah and his father, Tim.
But to draw attention to all this, or to investigate whether there is something about their Jewishness
that makes them so hostile to Russia, is simply, verboten. Inevitably,
when I point out this overwhelming ethnic imbalance, people say, well
what about the many critics of the hostility to Russia who are Jewish? –
the eminently admirable Glenn Greenwald is a prominent example, and
there are many others. The answer is, that the exception to a trend
doesn’t disprove it, and can often serve to mask it.
5. A de facto violation of free speech
The
truth is, that in a nation which frantically pats itself on the
shoulder for enshrining ‘free speech’ in its national credo, and
ceaselessly lectures others on the subject with pompous sanctimony,
speech is not de facto free on this crucial and world-threatening
subject, a remarkable, and dangerous, state of affairs. I will not be
clapped into prison for publishing this article, but the taboo works
like a charm to keep the topic out of public discussion. Who needs
repressive laws when you can con people into censoring themselves? In
Germany, the dominant power in Europe, and in other European countries, I
could be locked up for it – another shocking thought, for this son of
Germany.
The
Jewish dominance of the Russia-bashing phenomenon is far more extensive
than I can convey in a couple of short paragraphs, and I urge someone
to do this in a more systematic way. I will be happy to publish it.
6. Shutting down an honest examination of Russian history
One
of the most spectacular aspects of the taboo is how it whitewashes one
of the most extraordinary events in the history of mankind, the Russian
revolution.
Many
White Russians fleeing the revolution believed that it was mostly a
Jewish coup d’etat, financed by wealthy bankers in New York and London
who were sworn enemies of Christian Tsarism. Indeed there is strong
evidence to suggest that this is true. This view argues that the terror
visited on Russia during the civil war and its aftermath, continuing
well into the Stalin years, for he could not really control it either,
was a Jewish one. Cursory evidence also suggests that this is so, if
only because so much of the Bolshevik leadership was Jewish, in
particular, Trotsky, but also many other vicious personalities,
especially in the secret police which so terrorized the Russian people.
Henry
Ford was heavily influenced by this view, which he heard from Russian
emigres, augmenting his anti-semitism, and it has been well-documented
by liberal mainstream historians that the German National Socialist
movement became radically more anti-semitic in reaction to this
interpretation, which they adopted, strongly influenced by an influx of
White Russians finding refuge in Europe. But one doesn’t hear a whisper
about all this in mainstream historical articles, even to debunk it,
presumably because someone might have their ‘feelings’ hurt.
This
all reverberates to this day. The virulent and entrenched anti-semitism
in today’s Ukraine is a direct heir of this White Russian view. This is
because the Nazis had long-standing subversive programs implemented by
their White Russian allies inside Ukraine and the Baltics, which were
heavily German in ethnicity. The famines of the 30s increased the
sentiment. When Hitler invaded this work paid off magnificently, and
Western Ukraine enthusiastically welcomed him and fought with his
armies, as did many in the Baltics. After the war, German intelligence,
in return for clemency, traded this network to the CIA, which continued
the program to destabilize the USSR, and these programs, representing
significant financial and institutional support continued right through
the cold war, and into the present day.
What
happened in 2014 in the Ukraine had a 100 year provenance, and is
inextricably linked to alleged Jewish culpability for the revolution.
But for all the gallons of ink spilt about the events of 2014, this
crucial background is left laregly undiscussed, even in the alternative
media (I of all people, can attest to this).
Such is the reach and devastating effect of this taboo.
The
enormity of the omission is mind-boggling. The suffering of the Russian
people in the decades after the revolution was extraordinary – and here
there is little agreement – modern revisionists insist that the
revolution and its aftermath claimed perhaps 2 million victims, others
say it reached into the 10s of millions. And it is not just the number
of people, but the way it was carried out – families ripped apart,
fathers hauled off in the middle of the night, churches blown up,
priests tortured and subjected to ritual murder, phony confessions
beaten out of innocents, summary executions without trial, an enforced
culture of snitching, millions sent to slave labor camps – a nation was
held in terror for decades, traumatized to this day. If there is even
the slightest suspicion that this was in essence, a Jewish pogrom
against ethnic Russians, surely it deserves some public examination.
But no, it seems people think observing the taboo is more important.
We try on Russia Insider
to give exposure to this view of events, which I believe deserves a
hearing – I am not enough of an expert to say whether it is correct –
but so effective is the taboo, that there is little of quality
available. There is a very substantial body of work available about this
in Russian, most of it written since the fall of Communism, – in
contrast to the West, this is a widely discussed view inside Russia – so
the heavy lifting has been done – it just needs to be rendered into
English.
7. The best alt-media journalists are neutered
One
of the things we do at RI is to scan the alternative media for what we
think are the best articles about Russia, and republish them with a link
to the original. We also keep an eye on what we think are the most
dishonest articles – and critique them, and it is this comprehensive
surveying of the writers and the publications that gives me such a
strong understanding of the Jewishness of the hostility. The casual
reader’s awareness of it may be anecdotal – I can assure you, it is more
pronounced than people realize. When you read, catalog, analyze, track,
and critique this river of thought 8 hours a day it becomes starkly
obvious.
I
am routinely and happily amazed by the fantastic writing about Russia,
left, right, and center, in the alternative media, which comes from a
most impressive cast of characters, the bulk of it about geopolitics.
The intellectual heft and scholarship is extraordinary. Borrowing from
this brilliance, we put out a deeper and more thorough analysis of
things Russia-related than news organizations with 20 times our budget.
Some
of these men are true heroes, speaking truth to power, fighting back
against a system gone horribly wrong, brave, selfless, often sacrificing
career and financial well-being – but there is one line they won’t
cross.
8. Much of what is written about Russian relations and history becomes meaningless and deceptive
Sadly,
a lot of what they write, is, meaningless, and almost amounts to
professional malpractice, because the Jewish push for confrontation with
Russia is, by far, the most significant factor. Excluding it from a
discussion of geopolitics is ignoring the elephant, not in the corner,
rather the one dancing a Mazurka in the middle of the room. We should
not forget that willful omission is a species of lying, and is
recognized as such in a court of law, and this case is no different.
The
omission is misleading, and sows endless confusion, for it compels
writers to place blame where it does not really belong – the list of
culprits is endless: ‘Democrats’, Liberals’, sometimes it is ‘America
did this’, or ‘Americans did that’, or it is Trump, or Obama, or
Hillary, or Rex Tillerson, or John McCain, or ‘the Military Industrial
Complex, the Deep State, the Intelligence Community, and on and on. Yes,
these individuals are complicit, (except ‘America’, it is a ridiculous
notion that we 350 million souls collectively agree on anything) but it
is not their spineless treachery that is of prime importance, rather the
powerful Jews in American politics and media who so easily compel them
to dance to their tune.
9. A lesson in relevance from the Alt-Right
The
Alt-Right is helpful in understanding Russia, because it has
intellectual heft, and produces a lot of good writing about Russia and
Russian relations, much of which is spot-on. We follow the Alt-Right
media and republish the occasional article, and they are invariably very
popular on Russia Insider – largely, I think,
because they are offering a fresh point of view, and talking about
vitally important issues others refuse to address.
The
Alt-Right is a youth movement. Its leaders are mostly in their 30s, and
the rank and file, which is large indeed, running, by some estimates,
into the 10s of millions globally, seems to mostly range from mid- teens
to mid 20s. Much of the Alt-Right has completely discarded this taboo
and revels in flouting it, indeed, trampling on it, as is the wont of
young people regarding the more tedious and preposterous conventions of
every era.
It
is axiomatic, I think, that one way youth benefits society, is that
they question what the old men are saying, – shake things up a bit, make
them examine their assumptions. It is no coincidence that in the Emperor With No Clothes children’s story, it is a child who points out the obvious, what the adults are so desperately pretending not to see, because it will impair their material well-being.
Pointing
out the pernicious effects of the influence of certain Jewish elites on
many aspects of American and European society and politics, as the
Alt-Right does, greatly assists in understanding how politics really
work.
If you doubt this, then I highly recommend that you listen to a couple of episodes of the most popular Alt-Right podcasts, like Fash the Nation, or Richard Spencer’s Alt-Right Politics, easily accessible by smartphone. The Fash the Nation
hosts are two Beltway policy wonks who sound like they are in their
late 20s or early 30s, who spend a couple hours each week talking
politics. In their analysis, when relevant, and not over-stating it,
they point out when Jewish interests are at play, when politicians,
journalists, lobbyists, publishers, publications, foundations, or their
main funders, allies, spouses, and backers, are Jewish. The gang at Alt-Right Politics
does the same. It becomes very clear what is intuitively obvious – that
blotting out any mention of this hampers any serious discussion.
(For Fash the Nation, I recommend episodes with Marcus Halberstram, like this one, and for Alt Right Politics, the year-in-review episode was a good one. The Fash the Nation
hosts use obscenity on their show, which unfortunately detracts from
their credibility, but don’t be put off by it, put it up to youthful
ignorance – they are worth listening to.)
By
blowing up this taboo, the Alt-Right is making itself relevant, and
those who cling to it, irrelevant. A taboo only works if it is
universally observed – if a sizable number of people begin ignoring it,
everyone else begins to look increasingly ridiculous. Liberals spend an
inordinate amount of time wringing their hands about the Alt-Right. By
refusing to openly and fairly discuss Jewish influence, they are handing
them a powerful competitive advantage.
The
Alt-Right is doing society a service by addressing an issue that
urgently needs sunlight, and by providing an eco-system of websites and
podcasts where authors can be published and critiqued, and points argued
back and forth. Much of the discussion of Jewish influence in the
Alt-Right is very scholarly, fair and balanced, i.e. the work of Kevin MacDonald or Michael Hoffman.
I
believe the Alt-Right will continue to gain traction, simply because
they intelligently discuss two sacred cows – the Jewish Question, and,
closely linked to it, racial equality in terms of abilities, and the
desirability of mixed-race societies. As long as they are addressing
these two crucial issues, and no one else is, they will grow.
10. Malice towards none
Another
pernicious effect of taboos is that they can lead to angry outbursts.
When problems are not addressed, they tend to fester and worsen, until
they become intolerable, and then there is sometimes a sudden and
violent reaction. You can see this dynamic in the public discussion of
the malevolent influence of Jewish elites. Some people, when they
finally perceive its reach and harm, having been mislead by people they
admired and trusted, lash out in anger – a common reaction when you find
out you’ve been deceived about something vitally important. This, I
believe, is another reason to be rid of this taboo as soon as possible –
it has a way of making things worse.
Obviously,
this discussion should be done without any hatred or anger to Jews as a
whole. The Jews who are causing the trouble – the ones at the pinnacles
of political and media power, are a small group indeed. Anyone who has
grown up with and knows Jews well, as I have, knows that they are like
people everywhere – basically decent, and this has been my overwhelming
personal experience. It is their elite institutions that for some reason
are clearly malevolent, and this demands public examination, not the
least by Jews themselves.
What
I am calling for is criticizing the elites who have given their nation a
very bad name, and figuring out why this pattern repeats itself
throughout history.
11. The problem extends to all areas of public life
The
ongoing sex scandals which grace our front pages seem to provide an
exclamation point to the phenomenon. Across the board, from Hollywood to
entertainment to media to Washington, the poor sods being called out by
the screeching harpy mob tend towards a certain ethnicity, not to
mention the leading men in the spectacle. For all the talk and blather
and belly button contemplation that the drama is evoking, no one,
outside the Alt-Right, mentions this obvious fact, for it would be
impolite.
The
problem seems to arise when Jews get into positions of influence, i.e.,
when they join the dreaded ‘elites’. Then, for some reason, regardless
of their political sympathies or other particulars, they get up to no
good – and something goes seriously wrong. Maybe the powerful Jewish
institutions – the media, the banks, the movie studios, the music
industry, etc, are in the hands of degenerates who demand bad behavior
as the price of admission, and then enforce it. I really don’t know, but
obviously the question begs for examination, as the evidence does
suggest that much of human enterprise dominated and shaped by Jews is a
bottomless pit of trouble with a peculiar penchant for mendacity and
cynicism, hostility to Christianity and Christian values, and in
geopolitics, a clear bloodlust.
Hollywood
and TV dramas? A completely Jewish-dominated industry, and a soulless
spiral of depravity and cynicism, which only worsens with each passing
year. Financial markets? – ditto – just watch the movies The Big Short or The Wolf of Wall Street
for a particularly vivid illustration. Pop music and the rap nightmare?
– ditto. The state of Israel and its treatment of the Palestinians? –
more of the same. American foreign policy? – an unmitigated disaster
which has murdered millions and squandered trillions over the last 30
years.
And
I think ‘murder’ is the right word here -I think if you would ask the
relatives of the 2 or so million Iraqis, Libyans, Syrians, Yemenis, East
Ukrainians, or Serbs who died in the wars instigated by the largely
Jewish- dictated US foreign policy over the past couple of decades, that
they would back me up on that.
In
each of these cases, one sees a tendency towards dishonesty. Indeed the
whole ‘Fake News’ phenomenon, is fundamentally Jewish. It is the
Jewish-owned American and European media which churn out an astonishing
quantity of what can only be called lies.
12. We need serious scholarship and analysis
Yes,
1900 years after the exasperated Romans scattered the Hebrew tribes to
the four winds, the ‘JQ’ is still a huge, messy, unsolved problem, and
in our age, it is reaching yet another crisis. I can only speak with any
expertise on a subject I know a lot about. Western foreign policy
towards Russia, and Russian history, and the Jewish influence there is
nothing short of an extinction-level threat to the entire planet. I am
sure experts in Middle Eastern politics would confirm something similar.
All
this needs scholarship and serious inquiry, to finally get to the
bottom of this ongoing tragedy, a tragedy for both Jew and Gentile
alike. Some writers have made important inroads, like Kevin MacDonald,
but much more needs to be done to understand the problem.
One serious writer, Michael Hoffman, in his book Judaism’s Strange Gods,
argues the problem is with modern Judaism, which has changed radically
from the religion of the Old Testament, effectively hijacked by various
Jewish sects such as the New Testament era Pharisees who inspire
misanthropic behavior among elites. I really can’t say, but it is
precisely this kind of inquiry which is needed to figure out, as our
president likes to say ‘what the hell is going on’.
13. Low expectations from the existing alt-media
I
know that many writers and editors in the alt-media, and the alt-lite,
privately agree with what I have written here, but we should not expect
many of them to break the taboo anytime soon. The reason is that they
mostly barely hang on financially, and often work for tiny wages, and
any such change in editorial policy would knock out a certain part of
their funding, (not to mention some of their better authors) making
their financial situation untenable. Some are beholden to foundations or
governments who would pull support. The needed intellectual work is
going to be done on the few platforms whose support base will tolerate
it – and this will mostly be on the Alt-Right, or publications that can
buck the tide, like Russia Insider.
14. A call for articles and support
I
met strong resistance to the ideas expressed here from colleagues,
staff and columnists who contribute to RI. I’ve discussed it at length
with many of them. Some of the best writers on the site, and some of the
most articulate critics of America’s inane policy towards Russia, are
Jewish. Some agree with me privately, but say that to do so publicly
would so damage their careers that they cannot. Some do not agree.
Russia Insider
depends heavily on reader contributions, and I suppose this will
curtail donations from some, so if you agree with this article, then now
would be a good time to click on the donate button.
Discussion of the Jewish problem (and ‘problem’ is the right word here) is obviously not going to be the focus of Russia Insider
– we try to be primarily about Russia, but I am willing to give space
to this issue, and not just as it relates to Russia. I invite all
writers, including from the Alt-Right, to get in touch with me directly
at charles@russia-insider.com with article ideas, proposals, or anything else, and yes, we will publish articles which use (((echoes))).
It
is my great regret that we are not in a position to pay authors for
articles. If anyone reading this is in a position to help provide
funding to pay writers on this important subject, that would be helpful,
because it immediately raises the quality and depth of the writing. If
you are interested, please get in touch with me directly.
At
the end of the day, I don’t care whether other people agree with me on
this or not, whether I lose or gain authors or donations, traffic or
influence, or whether the big tech platforms try to hush us up (they are
already actively doing so). I started this site in the Fall of 2014 to
call out a terrible crime, a whopping lie being told, by the media, most
vociferously by Jews in very influential Jewish-owned publications,
(Andrew Kramer and the editorial board of the New York Times being the
prime example) about the conflict in the Ukraine. I didn’t see it as a
Jewish problem then – I just knew it wasn’t true. I knew relatively
little about Jewish influence at the time. But after three years of
immersing myself in political analysis and media criticism, it is as
plain as day that this is the case.
Russia Insider earned respect by doing our best to tell the truth, and calling out flagrant dishonesty in the media.
We’re not about to stop now.
(Republished from Russia Insider by permission of author or representative)
No comments:
Post a Comment