Does the push for mass vaccination point toward a staged bioterror event?
By Jon Rappoport
We've seen the signs. I've been highlighting them. The
infamous childhood mandatory vaccination law in California. Other states
that are considering similar bills. The lunatic push in Australia to
outlaw medical exemptions from vaccination. The all-out campaign in the
press, in various countries, to stigmatize people who defect from
official "truth" about the safety and efficacy of vaccines.
On a larger stage, over the past 20 years, we've seen the
promotion of fake "pandemics" demanding universal vaccination to ward
off "millions of deaths": SARS, West Nile, Swine Flu, smallpox, etc. All
duds.
Now we have the boggling case of the University of
Massachusetts, where two supposed instances of meningitis have triggered
an immediate campaign to vaccinate all 20,000 students against
meningococcal B meningitis.
It's clear that the logistics of carrying out such an
extensive program have been in place for some time. The University just
needed an occasion for a test launch of the system. Now they have it.
Yet USA Today reports: "Sarah Van Orman, a physician and
executive director of University Health Services at UW-Madison,
said...the new [meningitis] B vaccine...may not be as effective as the
routinely given vaccine against the four other major bacteria strains."
"In a study of 499 Princeton University students who received
the new B vaccine during an outbreak there, up to a third did not show a
good immune response eight weeks after the second dose, Van Orman
said."
"Some research suggests the vaccine also may provide immunity only for six to 12 months, she said."
But it's full steam ahead for the U of Massachusetts. Other
colleges have long been making preparations. For example, the University
of Rochester, according to its Newscenter (September 19, 2014): "On
Thursday, Oct. 30, University Health Service (UHS) staff will attempt to
vaccinate 5,000 students, faculty and staff against this year's flu
virus [in one day]. The effort will doubly serve as a test of emergency
preparedness to practice delivering mass quantities of vaccine or drug
in response to an urgent public health concern. The effort is being
coordinated by UHS, RC/MERT (University of Rochester River Campus
Medical Emergency Response Team), University Environmental Health &
Safety and the Monroe County Office of Emergency Preparedness...'We will
have to give about 600 vaccinations an hour to meet our goal,' said
Ralph Manchester, MD, vice provost and UHS director."
Understand: this was a test of a system, an emergency system. That was the primary goal of the operation.
Piece by piece, in the US---and undoubtedly in other
countries---the groundwork is being laid for huge networks that can, at a
moment's notice, go live and mass-vaccinate extraordinary numbers of
people.
And they would do exactly that---upon the announcement of a "new deadly pandemic that threatens the population."
How would the "pandemic" occur---or rather, how could it be staged?
Obviously, the vaccine itself could be a carrier, since all
sorts of new toxins could be covertly inserted, in addition to the more
familiar toxic substances already present in vaccines.
But beyond that?
Here is backgrounder I wrote on the subject: How to Stage a Bioterror Event:
The germ is the cover story for chemical destruction.
In general, the primary fact is: no matter what kind of germ
you're talking about or where it came from, releasing it intentionally
does not guarantee predictable results. Far from it.
For instance, people whose immune systems are at different levels of strength are going to react differently.
The perpetrators may find that far less than 1% of people exposed get sick.
Therefore: use a chemical and claim it is a germ.
In other words, there is no germ attack. It's called a germ
attack, but that's a lie. The perps bring in researchers to the affected
area, who go on to claim they have isolated a germ that is the cause of
death and illness. It's a sham. What really happened was the spread of a
toxic chemical that can't be detected, unless you're looking for it.
The chemical has severe, deadly, and predictable effects for a
week or two. Then it disperses and loses potency and the "epidemic" is
done.
In some town, a fairly isolated community, the word goes out
that people are suddenly falling ill and dying. The CDC and the Army are
called in to cordon off the area and quarantine all citizens. A
peremptory announcement is made, early on, that this is a biowar attack.
Major media are allowed outside the periphery. Network news
anchors set up on-location and do their wall to wall broadcasts "from
the scene."
The entire nation, the entire world is riveted on the event, 24/7.
People inside the cordon fall ill and die. Reports emerge from the town:
The networks state that "heroic doctors are taking samples of
blood and the blood is being analyzed to find the germ that is causing
the epidemic." The DoD confirms over and over that this is, indeed, a
biowar attack.
Human interest stories pile up. This family lost three
members, that family lost everybody. Tragedy, horror, and the desired
empathic response from "the world community."
It's a soap opera, except real people are dying.
The medical cartel promotes fear of the germ.
All controlling entities get to obtain their piece of the terrorist pie.
Finally, the doctors announce they have isolated the germ
causing death, and researchers are rushing to develop a vaccine (which
they produce in record time).
Everyone everywhere must be vaccinated, now. No choice. Do it or be quarantined or jailed.
---Mass vaccination clinics emerge from the shadows, all over
the nation. They are ready to go. The system is in place. Everyone must
get the vaccine now.
In this declared martial law situation, the doctors are the
heroes. The doctors and the Army. And the government, and even the
media.
Then, after a few weeks, when the potency of the secret chemical has dispersed, it's over.
When you think about it, this scenario is a rough
approximation of what happens every day, all over the world, in doctors'
offices. The doctors are prescribing chemicals (drugs) whose effects
are far more dangerous than germs that may (or may not) be causing
patients to be ill.
In other words, a chem-war attack is being leveled at people all over the world all the time.
See Dr. Barbara Starfield (Johns Hopkins School of Public
Health), July 26, 2000, Journal of the American Medical Association, "Is
US health really the best in the world." 106,000 people in America are
killed every year by FDA-approved medical drugs. That's a million people
per decade.
In the wake of a staged "biowar" terror attack, new laws are
enacted. The State clamps down harder on basic freedoms. The right to
travel is curtailed. Criticizing the authorities is viewed as highly
illegal. Freedom of assembly is limited.
"Citizens must cooperate. We're all in this together."
A new federal law mandating the CDC schedule of vaccines for
every child and adult---no exceptions permitted---is rushed through the
Congress and signed by the President.
It's all based on a lie...in the same way that the disease
theory of the medical cartel is based on a lie: the strength of an
individual's immune system is the basic determinant of health or
illness, not germs considered in a vacuum.
There are people who are determined to inflate the dangers of
germs. They trumpet every "new" germ as the end of humankind on the
planet. They especially sound the alarm when researchers claim a germ
may have mutated or jumped from animals to humans.
"This is it! We're done for!"
However, if you check into actual confirmed cases of death
from recent so-called epidemics, such as West Nile, SARS, bird flu
(H5N1), Swine Flu (H1N1), and MERS, the numbers of deaths are incredibly
low.
If political criminals, behind the scenes, wanted to stage a
confined "biowar" event, they would choose a chemical, not a germ, and
they would leverage such an event to curtail freedom.
Understand: researchers behind sealed doors in labs can
claim, with unassailable ease, that they've found a germ that causes an
outbreak. Almost no one challenges such an assertion.
This was the case, for example, with the vaunted SARS
epidemic (a dud), in 2003, when 10 World Health Organization (WHO) labs,
walled off from view, in communication with each other via closed
circuit, announced they'd isolated a coronavirus as the culprit.
Later, in Canada, a WHO microbiologist, Frank Plummer,
wandered off the reservation and told reporters he was puzzled by the
fact that fewer and fewer SARS patients "had the coronavirus." This was
tantamount to confessing that the whole research effort had been a
failure and a sham---but after a day or so of coverage, the press fell
silent.
SARS was a nonsensical farce. Diagnosed patients had ordinary
seasonal flu or a collection of familiar symptoms that could result
from many different causes.
But the propaganda effort was a stunning success. Populations
were frightened. The need for vaccines, in the public mind, was
exacerbated.
Exacerbated; and prepared, for the "next one."
...Until eventually---a chemical attack would be called a germ attack.
A staged reality.
No comments:
Post a Comment